0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
100 $

Why The Battle for Aleppo Is So Long and So Important

Support SouthFront


PayPal: southfront@internet.ru

Donation alerts: https://donationalerts.com/r/southfront

Gumroad: https://gumroad.com/southfront

Or via: http://southfront.org/donate/ or via: https://www.patreon.com/southfront,

BTC: 3Gbs4rjcVUtQd8p3CiFUCxPLZwRqurezRZ,

BCH ABC: qpf2cphc5dkuclkqur7lhj2yuqq9pk3hmukle77vhq,

ETH: 0x9f4cda013e354b8fc285bf4b9a60460cee7f7ea9

Siege of Petersburg during the American Civil War lasted for 9 months. Siege of Tobruk during World War 2 lasted for 8 months. The defense of Leningrad during World War 2 lasted 900 days. Tripoli in 2011 was taken in 8 days. The battle for Aleppo has raged since 2012 and so far neither side of conflict has a decisive advantage.

Aleppo is not the capital of Syria, but its population in 2012 was 2.1 million, more than in Damascus. It is a major industrial center, with a pre-war concentration of electrical, chemical, textile and pharmaceutical industries. Aleppo was responsible for 60% of export revenues to the national budget. The city is also home to are military schools such as the Al-Assad Academy, as well as weapons depots.

It should be noted that the opposition initiallywas not powerful in the western neighborhoods of the city. On the other hand, the eastern neighborhoods were populated mostly by recent immigrants from the countryside, the poor and the conservative-minded Muslims. At the same time, Western districts are hereditary residence of the residents, as well as the Christian minority.

The battle for Aleppo is regarded as crucial by all parties to the conflict. The opposition plans in case of victory in Aleppo to create a base for conducting further hostilities along the north-western border with Turkey. In turn, the SAA’s task is to prevent these developments, as well as the Turkish intervention “to stabilize own borders” that would follow.

So why has the battle continued for so long? There are several explanations.

The first is the city’s dense urban and industrial environment. Wars of the 20th century have shown that the most difficult type of warfare is urban. Every house or building can be transformed into a fortress with firing ports for heavy weapons.

Cellars are already equipped with shelter from the bombs and shells. They can also be used as a place for rest and recreation. In addition, the cellar is an ideal storage of weapons, ammunition, food and fuel. Even destroyed houses serve as cover for movement of troops and equipment.

Minarets, bell towers, smokestacks are ideal for snipers and spotters for artillery and aviation. Underground communications are actively used by all parties to hide their forces and for their sudden appearance behind the front lines.  Dense urban and industrial development creates difficulties in the destruction of buildings and structures in that it requires large stocks of ammunition and a large number of artillery pieces, or car bombs in order to launch surprise attacks. Armored vehicles are relegated to the role of fire support for the advancing infantry and cannot exploit their superior mobility or even protection.

Urban warfare creates command and control problems due to the proximity of friendly and hostile forces, and the impossibility of maintaining clear front line. The danger of friendly fire is high. Urban warfare consists of sudden, fleeting clashes, placing soldiers constant psychological stress. Urban environments also impede concentrations of troops, made intelligence and command activities gathering more difficult, and hinders radio communications.Without a doubt, in the city is much more preferable to keep the defense than to attack.

2. Motivation of the parties. Aleppo has been turned into a fortress, with besiegers (SAA) and the besieged (the armed opposition). The SAA has been bled by the four years of war and needs resupply and replenishment. Many of its allies, such as the Kurdish militias, IRGC, or Iraqi volunteers, come from the outside of the city which limits their effectiveness. There is constant media pressure against the SAA which is described as a collection of war criminals. Many of young males who would have been subject to mobilization have fled the city and became refugees. The militants also suffered heavy losses, and have been cut off from the rest of the world, but they enjoy international propaganda support. And they have no incentive to surrender, due to the atrocities they have committed. Therefore one can expect bitter fighting during the forthcoming assault.

3. Numeral balance. Neither side as a clear advantage in terms of the quantity of troops and equipment, when it is generally recognized the attacker needs a 3-fold superiority in order to guarantee success. Moreover, the advancing forces also have to hold liberated territory, prevent enemy break-outs, and clear the city of mines and booby-traps, all the while avoiding heavy casualties that would undermine SAA’s manpower even more.

4. The recent gains of the Syrian army and its allies in the area inspired supporters of the Syrian government that wait the further advances of the pro-government forces in eastern Aleppo and the city’s southwestern countryside. In turn, the militants are regrouping for further attempts to break the blockade of militant-controlled areas of the city.

One should not expect a peaceful resolution to the battle since the opposition has no desire to give in. Likewise there is no progress on the diplomatic front, and UN Security Council peace initiatives are deadlocked.

Support SouthFront


Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Divesh Kumar

I saw a rat at 4:24 with broken leg operating a heavy gun………. Who motivates these rats so much that they are ready to plunge into certain death like this?


Samething that motivates them to blow themselves up. Brainwashed and blind faith in leaders who exploit the vulnerables in every part of the World.

Gabriel Hollows

They also know that there will be no mercy for them because of the atrocities they have committed. They fight desperately to escape justice.

Brad Isherwood

The Muslim Brotherhood history…it’s evolvement with Nazi Germany during WW 2.
MI6 manage the MB after WW 2. …Ayman AL Zawahiri was with the MB who
Assassinated Anwar Sadat of Egypt.
MB is passed onto CIA…as Takfiri appear in Chechnya wars and Balkans.

Assads Father had to deal with MB……this toxic has continued in Syria with it
At knives vs Baathist.
Erdogan is using the MB movement in Turkey to consolidate his twisted Caliphate.
Egypt was duped by Arab Spring and the Facebook morons who sent Egypts youth and other dupes into the streets to tumble Mubarak. ..with MB ending up in the driver seat.
Egypts military realized they must coup the MB to get Egypt back on track.

With Jews you loose….and with Muslim Brotherhood. …..you loose.

Turkey will regret giving the MB room to mind screw the nation.


It looks like just a bunch of justification to the errors that the syrian generals have done (tactic) to take totally Aleppo. Really, it is difficult to understand this long delay time (having the support from russian, iranian, and hezbolas), and the superior weapons they have (night vission staff). I do not know what, but something is missing with the syrian tactica.

Gabriel Hollows

What this doesn’t explain is why the militants seem to gain twice or thrice the amont of land when they make their offensives. It makes no sense that the SAA are only ones affected by the problems in the video.


Its because traitor Lavrov with his suspicious cease fires stop the advance every time S A A mars against terrorists.Rebels after every cease fire ,rearm and counterattack.Russia with that policy will defeat like Afghanistan.

Mark Rothschild

Can anyone answer the following questions?

If urban areas are so inherently easy to defend and difficult to seize then why was the German army unable to hold and defend urban centers in Russia as they gradually fell back westward after their defeat at Stalingrad?

Another question. Why was the German army able to seize (almost) all of Stalingrad right up to the Volga shoreline if urban centers are inherently hard to seize and easy to defend?

Any comparison between Stalingrad and Aleppo would help clarify these questions.

Marumiyu Moriame

attrition, germans could not support their losses russians outnumbered them and the winter in russia is harsh. napoleon also learned this lesson and hitler strategically should have never invaded russia. it was a grave mistake that eventually lead to his end. the weapons changed but the lesson was the same.

Karai Puku

Right. Russia is too big to be occupied, and it’s a nuclear power. There is absolutely no danger of Russia being occupied, or even attacked.
Russia can breath freely. It only has to guard itself against entanglement into wars that cannot be controlled, like August 1914. or Afghanistan.
In Syria Russian air force is defending Europe against extremists that are armed by NATO.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x