Who Forced Russia To Intervene In Syria?

Donate

Who Forced Russia To Intervene In Syria?

Written by Valentin Vasilescu; Originally appeared at Algora Blog

Translated by Alice Decker

Attempting to deduce the reasons behind Russia’s involvement in the conflict in Syria, we run into a number of unknowns. First, why were Russian planes in Syria that could have been equipped with 8–24 missiles or bombs furnished with only two bombs or missiles, all of them “smart” (KAB-250 S/LG, KAB-500 L/Kr, KAB-KAB-1500 L, 1500 K, Kh-29 L/T, Kh-25 T), guided by laser beam, GPS and TV/IR? These weapons are accurate to within 2–5 m. It is also unknown why the Russian fighter-bombers were sometimes kept in the air for an hour until the last Syrian civilian was removed from the target area. Don’t forget that the American B-52 bombers carpet bombed Vietnam, burying combatants along with the inhabited localities around them, and the US A-1 Skyrider, F-100, F-105, F-4, F-8, a-4, a-6, a-26 and B-57 planes dumped thousands of loads of napalm on Vietnamese villages. The procedure used by the Russians in Syria is one that is only used by an air force defending its own territory.

Who Forced Russia To Intervene In Syria?

It’s also unclear why Russia decided to intervene only in October 2015, almost four years after the war began in Syria, when 75% of the territory of the nation had been occupied by Islamist rebels. In February 2014, the coup d’état took place in Ukraine, supported by the West and dubbed “Euromaidan,” followed by Crimea’s accession to Russia by referendum in March 2014 and the outbreak of the civil war in eastern Ukraine. The US, the EU and nations loyal to the United States instituted an economic embargo against Russia. In September 2014, during the summit in Wales, NATO decided to develop new defensive capabilities on the border with Russia. This took the form of relocating Brigade 3 tanks from the American 4th Division, to the Baltic countries and Poland (87 Abrams M1A1 tanks, 20 self-propelled M109A6 Paladin howitzers, and 136 M2 Bradley infantry fighting machines). To this is added the 10th Aviation Brigade (50 UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters, 10 heavy transport CH-47 Chinook helicopters and 24 AH-64 Apache attack helicopters).

In the Gulf War, the Americans formulated a new seek-and-destroy algorithm to penetrate into the strategic depth of the enemy’s defenses. After American aviation secured aerial superiority, American fighter-bombers shifted to neutralizing, with high precision, Iraqi armored vehicles along the fortified lines for counterattack and the armored vehicles along the counteroffensive lines, using the second tier and the reserve of large tactical-operative units. Simultaneously with this, the attack helicopters of the American Army and Marine Corps succeeded, together with the batteries of 155mm caliber Paladin M109A6 self-propelled howitzers, in neutralizing brigade artillery groups, divisions, and formations of the first echelon of the Iraqi army.

Who Forced Russia To Intervene In Syria?

The precise location of Iraqi targets was obtained via the American Army’s complex reconnaissance program based on — in addition to satellite data — four levels of ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance & Reconnaissance), collecting and processing data in order to formulate a complete picture of the theater of operations on the ground. The first, strategic, level consisted of the RQ-4 A/B Global Hawk long-range unmanned surveillance aircraft and later the RQ-170 Sentinel, as well as the U-2, E-8C, and RC manned surveillance planes. The second level of ISR was represented by the RQ-7 Shadow, RQ-5 Hunter, MQ-1 Predator, and MQ-9 Reaper unmanned medium- and short-range surveillance planes. The third level of ISR consisted of manned prop planes, like the Cessna Caravan 208B, C-23A Sherpa, C-12R Horned Owl and the C-12 MARSS-II King Air. The fourth level was made up of a fleet of helicopters from the 12 aviation brigades of the US Army (OH-58D Kiowa Warriors and AH-64 Apaches).

Who Forced Russia To Intervene In Syria?

Through the combined action of the American seek-and-destroy             systems, the Iraqi combat structure was disrupted, creating large corridors permitting the penetration of mechanized or tanks units. To pierce deep within the defenses and surround the flanks, they used not so much the M1A2 Abrams tank, M2 Bradley infantry fighting vehicle, or AAV-7A1 marine infantry fighting vehicle — all slow-moving tracked vehicles — but rather gave preference to LAV-25 Stryker motorized units equipped with armored personnel carriers (which can reach a speed of 100km on the highway) made up into Stryker brigades.

Who Forced Russia To Intervene In Syria?

The model Stryker Brigade has 135 Stryker armored personnel carriers and three infantry battalions (3 companies), a reconnaissance squadron (3 companies) with 33 Stryker armored personnel carriers and 12 HMMWV, an artillery division (3 batteries of towed howitzers, 155 mm caliber) and a battalion of special operations troops. Starting in 2012, the Russian army converted 7–10 motorized brigades in accordance with the American Stryker model, based on BTR-80 and BTR-82A amphibious armored personnel carriers. Over the next 2–3 years, the BTR-80/82A will be replaced with new the VPK-7829 Boomerang.

Who Forced Russia To Intervene In Syria?

In Syria, the Russian Su-25, Su-24, and Su-34 fighter-bombers and those of the Syrian air force created breaches in the rebel battle formations, striking their ammunition and fuel reserves and mobile combat equipment (such as tanks and towable artillery pieces), and also their armored fortifications. Russian Mi-24V and Mi-28N attack helicopters eliminated from the rebels’ defense arsenal Toyota pick-up trucks armed with machine guns, rocket launchers and portable anti-tank rockets (from the counter-offensive arrays) and vehicles loaded with explosives for suicide attacks. Through these breaches they brought in Russian BTR-82A armored personnel carriers, considered to be highly advanced given their great maneuverability in unobstructed terrain, and their fire power from turret-mounted 30mm cannons. For their protection, along with the BTR-82As there were some Russian T-90A tanks equipped with the Shtora active defense system which renders useless the American TOW-2 anti-tank missiles. And it can’t be ruled out that Russia will also send Syria its new types of armored vehicles (the T-14 Armata tank, the T-15 and Kurganets-25 IFVS), which are in the test phase now — the most advanced tanks as of today.

Who Forced Russia To Intervene In Syria?

In Syria, the Russian army has created a strong component of C4I reconnaissance (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence and Interoperability) for its search-and-strike system. The collection and processing of data has been stratified on many levels, just as it is in the US Army. These levels comprise, in addition to satellite data, Il-20M1 and Tu-214R manned reconnaissance planes (which can carry out missions lasting 12 hours or more), Zala, Yakovlev Pchela-1T and Orlan-10 short-range unmanned planes (UAVs), Dozor 600 long-range unmanned flights, and also Mi-35 and Ka-52 reconnaissance and attack helicopters.

Who Forced Russia To Intervene In Syria?

Since the anti-Islamic State coalition led by the US (which includes NATO and the Arab Gulf States) had aircraft operating in the airspace of northern, central and eastern Syria, according to statements by General Philip Breedlove, the former NATO commander in Europe, the Russian air and land forces created an exclusion zone (A2 / AD bubble) in western Syria, barring NATO forces. Within the exclusion zone, Russia implemented a set of security measures by which it secured primacy in the radio-electronic war (Electronic warfare – EW) against the land, air and space reconnaissance systems of the anti-Islamic State coalition.

The area became opaque to the Coalition’s reconnaissance due to the Russian Krasukha-4 equipment, which jams radar surveillance from American spy satellites of the Lacrosse / Onyx families, ground based radars, AWACS and other airborne radar systems like the E-8C, RC135, Sentinel R1, and those mounted on unmanned planes such as the RQ-4 Global Hawk, MQ-1 Predator, and the MQ-9 Reaper. The Russian planes were equipped with SAP-518/ SPS-171 and L-175B Hibini jamming pods, while the Mi-8AMTSh helicopters were outfitted with Richag-AV jamming systems. Other jamming equipment that Russia has sent to Syria can disrupt and cancel flight commands, from a distance, to drones executing reconnaissance in the airspace of western Syria, or it can generate countermeasures, in the visible spectrum, infrared or laser, against the Americans’ electro-optical aerial or cosmic surveillance (imagery intelligence, IMINT). Inside the zone of exclusion in Syria, Russia has also deployed Su-30 SM and Su-35 intercept jets along with S-400 long range anti-aircraft missiles.

Thus, the deployment of the Russian air and land forces in Syria was also a consequence of the Obama Administration’s measures with regard to Russia, especially the increased NATO aggression close to Russia’s borders. It has not only served to support Bashar Al Assad’s regime but has spurred Russia’s military preparation with a view to repelling the eventual NATO invasion of Russia desired by the Obama Administration. But it also served to test certain essential components of the new strategic search and strike system of the Russian army. This system had not been tested until now, under field conditions, in combat. The system that was copied from the American one has been adapted to the specific needs of the Russian army, and that is to defend Russia in the event of a NATO invasion.

Donate

SouthFront

Do you like this content? Consider helping us!

  • Agha zahid Ali

    Three reason given why Russia jump.

  • LeseMajeste

    Russia knows the path to war on the Motherland goes from Syria, to Iran to Russia. And the blood-thirsty neoCONS aren’t done yet, they’ll still commit more mayhem in their attempt to knock off Assad.

  • murtazabhai008@gmail.com

    Putin is a hero. Russia is defeating terrorism while America supports terrorism by helping Saudis. Wahabis are the worst human on earth. World’s largest terrorism are funded by Saudi Kuwait and all wahabi dominated countries. But unfortunately America supports this wahabi dominated countries.

    • Arthur Smith

      >Putin is a hero.
      He WAS a hero, did some very courageous stuff in his first 2 terms, but he was weak even then, and now challenges are much more grave. The fact he is still holding power shows that there is a terrible lack of competent people in our government, he just can’t pass responsibility to fresh team. You don’t need to be a hero to uphold your duty as an ally, just a decent statesman.

      >Wahabis are the worst human on earth
      Dude, they aren’t even the worst of muslim sects. Go educate yourself a little about Ismailits, more widely known as Hashishins/The Assasins. Wahabis are just fanatics common in all the cultures, but given a half-assed ideology.

      >World’s largest terrorism
      Is economical, biological (bio-weapons) and technological. Head-cutters are nothing compared to world elites.

      • jj

        “he just can’t pass responsibility to fresh team”

        Because it seems, strangely, that there is not a good patriotic and strong leader to succeed him. The fact that he, who actually rather mediocre, is the strongest available seems weird.
        But so does the situation in the U.S., where despite the country’s huge population, you get such disappointing candidates and leaders.

        • Arthur Smith

          There are a lot of deserving people, but it just wouldn’t matter if only leadership passed successfully, but not power from one generation of elites to another. Medvedev is not his man and even Putin started to undestand that some time ago. He was a step from cliff, not on stairs.
          You can’t call Putin mediocre, if you are familiar with his unanounced decisions and achievements in first two terms. Yet he kept the old system, so can’t considered savior and stuff.

          • jj

            Can you list, by name, these deserving people? And they have to be willing to be a leader (I mean are these people you mention vying for the position?) besides having the ability/competence and being patriotic and intelligent enough against the NWO.

          • Arthur Smith

            I already said, it isn’t about suitable leaders, but about their teams and wider – institutes backing them. Or are you just interested in less public heavyweights in Russia?

      • jj

        “Is economical, biological (bio-weapons) and technological. Head-cutters are nothing compared to world elites.”

        Yes, but the head-cutters have used poison gas and have recently poisoned the water supply. They cut off the water supply for millions in Damascus.
        The head-cutters (who are tools of the world elites) do use all kinds of illegal and chemical weapons and other tools. Saudis and other western-backed allies drop phosphorous and cluster bombs on civilians.

        So really, the head-cutters are extensions of the elites. They are backed and financed by policies of the elites. The elites have their policies, they get the governments to carry it out, the government uses terrorists (or back state forces and mercenary/contractors, which then delegate the jobs to the terrorists, who’ve they’ve often trained) to destroy a targeted country.
        If they don’t get a puppet government installed, they will destroy the country, or perpetually torment it. If they get a puppet government, it implements the policies of the elites.

        • Arthur Smith

          I deny difference between death by unnecessary starvation, artificial diseases, prohibition of technology and just obvious weapons.
          Post-USSR countries lost millions upon millions in “peace” following our surrender in Cold War. Terrorists terrorize, but we were plunged into total despair. So I don’t want to hear about clueless head-choppers with all their unconventional weaponry being apex of villainy.

          • jj

            The Soviets were fooled by President Ronald Reagan’s “charm offensive” – all the while it was trickery as the U.S./CIA had harmful things long planned for the USSR countries, and Yugoslavia too…and Iraq and so on.
            You speak as if you are from there or Russia (“we were plunged”), but you don’t have a cool Russian name/nick, just a plain western one.

          • Arthur Smith

            Nah, USSR citizens just lost motivation and got corrupted, and as always fish rotted from it’s head. Whatever followed just deepened already present trends.
            Yes, I’m a russian from Moscow’s suburb and Arthur by birth certificate, also christened as Arian.

  • Russell A Wilson

    Russia is helping Syria and Syria is helping Russia test its armed forces. No one has really commented on how small the Russian contingent really is in Syria. Mean while Russia has been able to to fly 3 to 4 times more sorties than the much larger US coalition air force. This means that the US and Nato would need 300 to 400 fighters and bombers for every 100 Russian aircraft just to keep up if hostilities broke out. I also read somewhere that stated Russia,s defense doctrine states that the defense of Russia will not be conducted on Russian soil. Russia is advertising to the US they are not to be messed with. Trouble is the US government and Nato cannot see the writing on the wall

    • Arthur Smith

      >I also read somewhere that stated Russia,s defense doctrine states that
      the defense of Russia will not be conducted on Russian soil

      Not “will be conducted”, but “should not be limited” inside our borders. And if I remember correctly, this stuff was mostly said about Central Asia north from Pakistan and Iran, it was heated at least since XVIII century, when British Empire dominated there. Fortunately, soon it will be chinese turf and they play rough.

      • Ace

        Fortunately?

        • Arthur Smith

          Well, who else is going to make those territories tame and modernized?

          • Ace

            At last they’ll get wifi. :-)

          • Bob

            lol

    • Bob

      Russian military’s airframe design brief has always been to build them robust – they are still designed to be capable of landing on rough surfaces, and emphasis on mechanically reliability, meaning they can be flown really quite hard without quickly degrading their systems and parts.

  • jj

    I think Russia started worrying about its naval bases in Syria if the Syrian government was truly ousted. It noticed the Syrian forces faltering and with the west’s increasing anti-Russian moves and rhetoric, it decided it needed to give Syria a hand.
    However, after initial good success, it seems it started getting involved in dialogue and deals with Israel and U.S. and these deals made it back off and even started tying the hands of the anti-terrorist Syrian forces.
    I worry that info the Syrian army gave Russia has sometimes been given by Russia to the enemy countries in the premature and short-sighted moves to restore “peace” and shaky half-or-total-failing ceasefires.