0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
2,074 $
9 DAYS LEFT TO ALLOCATE SOUTHFRONT'S MONTHLY BUDGET

US Navy’s Shipbuilding Procurement Plan 2019-2024

Donate

US Navy's Shipbuilding Procurement Plan 2019-2024

Click to see the full-size image

SSBN 826 Columbia Class Submarine – the newest strategic nuclear submarines of the US Navy, designed to replace the submarines of the “Ohio” class with “Trident” system. It is armed with 16 ballistic missiles Trident II D5LE.

These submarines will be a keystone of the naval component of the US nuclear fist. A total of SSBN 826s were planned to procure.

The final cost of the research and development work will be about $42 billion. The building of the first submarine will cost about $6.2 billion. The following submarines will cost about $4.9 billion each. A total cost of these submarines’ operational life-time is expected to be about $347 billion.

The operational life of one submarine – 42 years. It is planned that every submarine will be able to carry out 124 patrols during this period. The SSBN 826 power unit will be able to work without additional nuclear fuel during the entire operation life of the submarine. This is a notable distinction from Ohio-class submarines, which need a time- and fund-consuming refueling of the nuclear reactor in the middle of the operational life.

The US is not hurrying up to build Columbia-class submarines. The main reason is the sufficiency of the existing Ohio-class submarines, which are now the core of the strategic offensive nuclear forces of the US. The high cost of development and building of new submarines also should be taken into account. This will probably lead to some decrease of the strategic underwater fleet of the US by 2030s. All 12 Columbia-class submarines will likely be built by 2042.

CVN 78 USS Gerald R. Ford – is the lead ship of her class of United States Navy aircraft carriers. She is entering the fleet replacing the decommissioned USS Enterprise (CVN-65). As of 2019, she is the world’s largest aircraft carrier, and the largest warship ever constructed in terms of displacement.

The research and development cost of the project is $4.7 billion. The CVN 78 building cost is $12.8 billion. The expected CVN 80 will likely cost $13.87 billion. Therefore, the total cost of 3 Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carriers will be about $38 billion. At the same time, the operational costs for this class are lower than for Nimitz-class aircraft carriers. This factor of operations of Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carriers will allow saving about $5 billion a 50-year period. Additionally, the improved construction of the aircraft carrier allows to conduct warfare in a more efficient way and involve less personnel.

The timely update and development of the carrier fleet allows the United States and further to remain the undisputed blue-water leader and effectively support its overseas military operations.

SSN 774 Virginia Class Submarine – is a class of nuclear-powered fast attack submarines (hull classification symbol SSN) in service with the United States Navy. The Virginia-class attack submarine is the U.S. Navy’s newest undersea warfare platform and incorporates the latest in stealth, intelligence gathering and weapons systems technology. The Virginia-class attack submarine was designed to be less expensive and better optimized for post-Cold War submarine missions than the Seawolf-class design. The Virginiaclass design is slightly larger than the Los Angeles-class design, but incorporates newer technologies.

Average cost of manufacturing is about $2.7 billion per unit and about $3.2 billion per unit with VPM (Virginia Payload Module). The Block V submarines built from 2019 onward will have an additional Virginia Payload Module (VPM), 84-foot-long, mid-body section equipped with four large-diameter, vertical launch tubes for storing and launching additional Tomahawk missiles or other payloads. The Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two Virginia-class boats requested for procurement in FY2019 at $6,502.3 million. The second of these two boats is to be the first Virginia-class boat built with the Virginia Payload Module (VPM).

The Navy’s force-level goal, released in December 2016, is to achieve and maintain a 355-ship fleet, including 66 SSNs. Under the Navy’s FY2019 30-year shipbuilding plan, a 66-boat SSN force would be achieved in FY2048. CRS (Congressional Research Service) and CBO (Congressional Budget Office) estimated in 2017 that adding even more SSNs to the earlier years of the 30-year shipbuilding plan could accelerate the attainment of a 66-boat force to as early as 2037.

Such a significant number of planned Virginia Class Submarines reflects the White House confrontational vision of current international relations. The United States seeks to provide overwhelming superiority over the fleets of all potential adversaries.

DDG-51 Arleigh Burke Class of guided missile destroyers – is the United States Navy’s first class of destroyer built around the Aegis Combat System and the SPY-1D multifunction passive electronically scanned array radar. These warships were designed as multimission destroyers, able to fulfill the strategic land strike role with Tomahawk missiles; antiaircraft warfare (AAW) role with powerful Aegis radar and surface-to-air missiles; antisubmarine warfare (ASW), with towed sonar array, anti-submarine rockets, and ASW helicopter; and antisurface warfare (ASuW) with Harpoon missile launcher.

The 13 DDG-51s planned for procurement in FY2018-FY2022 are to be procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract that Congress approved as part of its action on the Navy’s FY2018 budget. DDG-51s procured in FY2017 and subsequent years are being built to a new design (the Flight III DDG-51 design), which incorporates a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or SPY-6 radar.

The Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2019 at $5,292.7 million, or an average of $1,764.2 million each.

Arleigh Burke Class of guided missile destroyers are generally recognized as one of the best classes of destroyers with guided missiles or even the best one around the globe.

Today the US Navy has a goal to achieve and maintain a Navy of 355 ships, including 104 LSCs (large surface combatants, including both cruisers and destroyers). The DDG-51 program is, in terms of number of hulls, one of the largest Navy shipbuilding programs since World War II. By now, a total of 66 DDG-51s were in service. As of July 2018, a total of 82 DDG-51s were planned to procure.

The reasons of a wide-scale procurement of DDG-51s are same to ones concerning Virginia Class submarines and reflect the shifting in the international security environment to a new situation featuring renewed great power competition.

Donate

SouthFront

Do you like this content? Consider helping us!

  • Jesus

    All these new projected platforms are tenantively going to use Tomahawk, Harpoon and Standard missiles. These platforms become rather useless if their weapons lack capacity to engage peer forces effectively.

    • Justin

      i think they will be future proof and made to be “launch capable” of weapons they have on the drawing board! The US cant be that dumb!

      • Jesus

        US has not produced any capable weapon system in over 3 decades. Their F (teen) series fighters were designed in the early 70’s. US is very anemic in ground based, antiship and surface to air rocketry, because they enjoyed air superiority and neglected everything else. Just like their economy and their ability to produce a wide range of products.

        • Justin

          Perhaps youre right, perhaps not!
          But allow me to play ‘devil’s advocate”!
          They produced the F-117 in the early 1970’s but didnt show it to the world until 1990!
          We cant possibly know what they have when the very nature of the military industry is to be secret!

          Example, we didnt know what Russia had until Putin announced it last year! Which of course was like a warning shot!

          So i cant just take ur word for it simply because u researched and found nothing! There hasnt been a war they have been in that required them to show what they had especially when fighting rag tag armies!

          So Jesus, honestly i dont think ur comment holds water!
          Dont get upset by my reply please its just that i dont think u are being completely honest with yourself or with me!

          • Jesus

            The facts define truth, US has not produced a successful weapon system in over three decades. Weapons they have produced are white elephants and financial black holes. You are not being honest to the facts.

          • Justin

            You dont know what u dont know!

  • Dick Von Dast’Ard

    A military looking for a justification.
    Trying still to create one.

  • Real Anti-Racist Action
  • Joe Kerr

    Looks like the new Zumwalt class of destroyers has been canned, after the first one broke down in the Panama Canal on its maiden trip and had to be towed back to port (a blessing in disguise, as its instability in heavy seas would see it capsize anyway).