0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
895 $
11 DAYS LEFT UNTIL THE END OF SEPTEMBER

The Taliban Take Kabul

Support SouthFront

The Taliban Take Kabul

Taliban members FILE IMAGE: Parwiz/Reuters

Written by Dr. Binoy Kampmark

It unfolded as a story of fleeing.  The Afghan president Ashraf Ghani, taking flight to Tajikistan, giving little clue of his intentions to colleagues.  The fleeing of the infamous Abdul Rashid Dostum, a warlord assured to to fight another day. The fleeing of tens of thousands of residents out of the city of Kabul, long seen as beyond the reach of insurgents.  The fleeing of Coalition embassy personnel, aided by freshly deployed troops from the United States and the UK sent into Afghanistan as a matter of urgency. The Taliban had taken Kabul.

In departing and leaving stranded colleagues to their fate, the bookish Ghani, preferring pen to gun, had time to leave a message on Facebook.  One could never accuse the man of having wells of courage. He reflected on either facing armed Taliban fighters or leaving his beloved country.  In order to avoid immolating Kabul, which “would have been a big human disaster”, he chose a hasty exit.

Only a few days prior, on August 11, Ghani had flown to Mazar-i-Sharif, in the company of the blood lusty Uzbek Dostum, supposedly to hold the fort against the Taliban with another warlord, the ethnic Tajik Atta Muhammad Noor.  Noor had pledged in June to mobilise the citizenry of Balkh province to fight the Taliban.  “God forbid, the fall of Balkh,” he declared at the time, “means the fall of the north and the fall of the north means the fall of Afghanistan.”

This was not a move greeted with universal joy.  Habib-ur-Rahman of the leadership council of the political and paramilitary group Hizb-e-Islami saw a bit of self-aggrandizing at work, hardly remarkable for a warlord keen to oversee his bit of real estate.  “The mobilisation of the people by politicians under the pretext of supporting security forces – with the use of public uprising forces – fuels the war from one side and from the other it affects Afghanistan’s stance in foreign policy.”

The shoring up mission led by Ghani would do little to conceal the historical differences between Noor and Dostum.  The former had done battle with Dostum’s troops during the latter’s time as a regional commander in the ailing Soviet-backed Afghan government.  Dostum’s defection from the government (one spots the common theme) in 1992 to form the Junbish-e-Milli party presented Noor with a chance to join forces.  But the Tajik left Dostum in 1993 citing irreconcilable ideological differences.  With the initial defeat of the Taliban, Noor triumphed in several military encounters with the frustrated Uzbek, seizing the Balkh province in its entirety.

The accord reached between the parties on this occasion certainly did not involve agreeing to fight the Taliban.  Both had come to the conclusion that scurrying to Uzbekistan was a sounder proposition.  Noor subsequently justified the measure by claiming enigmatically that, “They had orchestrated the plot to trap Marshal Dostum and myself too, but they didn’t succeed.”  Ghani would soon follow.

Members of Ghani’s imploding government have not taken kindly to the flight of their leader.  “Curse Ghani and his gang,” wrote acting defence minister, Bismillah Khan Mohammadi.  “They tied our hands from behind and sold the country.”

The head of the High Council for National Reconciliation Abdullah Abdullah also released a video withering in announcing that, “The former president of Afghanistan” had “left the country in this difficult situation.”  God, he suggested, “should hold him accountable.”  Abdullah, along with former President Harmid Karzai and Hizb-e-Islami leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, are currently in negotiations with the Taliban over the formal transfer of power.

The US and UK have deployed personnel in a hurried panic.  Over the weekend, President Joe Biden, in announcing the deployment of 5,000 troops, told the press that they would ensure “we can have an orderly and safe drawdown of US personnel and other allied personnel, and an orderly and safe evacuation of Afghans who helped our troops during our mission and those at special risk from the Taliban advance.”  Another thousand have also been added to the complement.

There was much embarrassment in all of this.  The US and its allies made the fundamental error that training, money and expertise would somehow miraculously guarantee the stability, continuity and reliability of a ramshackle regime.  Biden, in coming up with his own phraseology, had stated that a Taliban victory was “not inevitable”.  In July, we were given a nugget of Bidenese that, while he had little trust for the Taliban, he did “trust the capacity of the Afghan military, who is better trained, better equipped, and more re- – more competent in terms of conducting war.”

As the Taliban was securing the capital, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken parried evident parallels with the US withdrawal from Vietnam in 1975.  “This is manifestly not Saigon,” he said with little conviction.

Now, the scene was one of grave, turbaned and bearded men, armed to the teeth, overseeing the desk which Ghani previously occupied in the presidential palace.  They had survived and outwitted an army better armed and supposedly better trained. They had survived airstrikes launched from within the country and from bases in the Persian Gulf and Central Asia, via heavy bombers and lethal drones.  They had survived the forces of the US, NATO and rival militias.

They now find themselves in control of an entity they wish to be recognised as the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.  History has come in its full violent circle.  A group of insurgents dismissed as fundamentalist mountain savages who would be vanquished before the modernising incentives of the West have shown up, as previous Afghan fighters have, the futility and sheer folly of meddling in their country’s affairs.

Dr. Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge.  He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne.  Email: bkampmark@gmail.com

MORE ON THE TOPIC:

Support SouthFront

SouthFront

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ragheadthefiendlyterrorist

To be frank I was impressed by Abdullah Abdullah, whom I had thought could be relied on to be among the first to run away. Karzai’s a bit of a different matter, the man is a born survivor and has spent the last seven years networking in the Afghan political scene. He definitely has had contacts with the Taliban and got assurances of safety and more likely than not some kind of role in the new regime. Abdullah Abdullah, though, could have legitimately anticipated violent retribution owing to his role in the 1990s to the 2001 invasion. Like him or not, and I don’t, the man has guts.

Last edited 1 month ago by Ragheadthefiendlyterrorist
Merciful Taliban

Can somebody tell me why the Taliban have decided to be merciful to the fleeing enemy (and the traitors) of Afghanistan – the same enemy 9and traitors) who have caused the death of several million Afghans and set the countery back 50 years in development and infrastructure?

Can somebody tell me why the Taliban are allowing 1000’s of American and British troops to fly back into Kabul and attempt to create a new “Green Zone” at Kabul airport?

Can somebody tell me why the Taliban is not following centuries old military doctrine of pursuing and destroying a routed enemy so as not to give them an opportunity to regroup and counter attack?

Can somebody tell me why the Taliban is not viewing the concentration of enemy forces at the airport as a target rich environment – an opportunity to dispose of the rotten fish trapped in a barrel?

Can somebody tell me who / what is holding the Taliban back from a once in a war military opportunity to absolutely massacre a routed enemy? The whole lot of them must be vulnerable to indirect mortar, rpg, and grad missile barage (and add in a few plane on the ground and bunker hits from a few captured TOW to add to the mix)

Can somebody tell me why the Taliban appear to have left escape roads unblocked and the runway intact when RPG units and IEDs (plus suicide truckers) could shut the whole area down

Can someone tell me why the Taliban have not nutralised at the very least the fuel and ammo for the British and American attack helicopters being used for crowd control – if not the helicopters themselves when running civillians off the airfields.

One thing I dont need anyone to tell me is that you can bet your life that if the situation were reveresed and the Taliban were concentrated and in disaray at the airport the Americans and British would bomb the absolute hell out of them, likely through “spooky” c130 gunships and B52 carpet bombing – in addition to cruise missile strikes. They would not care a dot about civilian casualties – they would put down the massive loss of life to fleeing civillians to “Collateral Damage” – as they have for the last 20 years in countless cowardly attacks.

The US and British troops, and the media, should be praising the Taliban at this point for thier mercy by not destroying the lot of them – as they would be allowed and justified to do under the rules of war as established over millenia.

The US and British should be counting thier blessing that they are being allowed to flee. I very much doubt the US and British would have been so merciful had the shoe been on the other foot.

Jim Allen

There’s those that can tell you these things, and more. It’s just that none of them care to talk to some stupid that is incapable of seeing the obvious that’s before him/her, and beating you about the head, and shoulder’s, while asking incessant nonsensical questions the answer’s can’t be missed, avoided, mistaken, and at this point ignored. If only you’d shut up, switch in your head.

Dave

Bookish men are great fighters, as the US had to learn in Vietnam, having lost to a history teacher.
Ghani’s decision was right and a patriotic one. Why waste more Afghani blood for the US empire?
Apparently, nobody in the higher US echelons reads. Perhaps they should. Yes, the pen is mightier than the sword; meaning, all the US might couldn’t conquer Taliban, meaning students.

Alberto Bohon.

Ahmad Shah Massoud’s son, Ahmad Massoud calls for the fight against the Taliban from the Panshir region of Afghanistan, I hope their futile resistance will be failed and destroyed. let the Taliban’s enemies fall to the ground all of them.

Jim Allen

That’s nice, now STFU.

6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x