0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
770 $

The Privatization of Nuclear War. What Is More Dangerous? A Mini-Nuke or COVID-19?

Support SouthFront

The Privatization of Nuclear War. What Is More Dangerous? A Mini-Nuke or COVID-19?

Illustrative Image

Written by Prof Michel Chossudovsky. Originally published on Global Research

“Meeting with Congress, Zelensky Asks for More Weapons and a No-Fly Zone” according to the New York Times.

A No Fly Zone is tantamount to a World War III scenario.

Who writes and/or determines the content of  Zelensky’s speeches?

Zelensky addressed President Joe Biden in a carefully scripted text:

“You are the leader of your great nation. I wish you to be the leader of the world. Being the leader of the world means to be the leader of peace.”

Zelensky is a political proxy, an obedient lackey. Visibly his speeches had been carefully crafted on behalf of his U.S. sponsors, i.e. Powerful factions within the “Deep State” in support of America’s defense giants.

The Military Industrial Complex has made billions since the Russian invasion. Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Northrop, BAE et al. have seen their shares go fly high, amidst a slump in market values following the Russia invasion on February 24th (for more details see Asia Times).

The Privatization of Nuclear War. What Is More Dangerous? A Mini-Nuke or COVID-19?

Source: Asia Times

Largest Military Budget in US History  

In the immediate wake of Russia’s invasion, the US Congress approved (on behalf of defense contractors, private mercenary companies, et al.),  the “largest ever defense spending bill” in US history, “while U.S. allies in Europe pledged to dramatically ramp up their defense spending to counter the Russian threat, measures that will bring lucrative new contracts to the arms industry” (The Hill, emphasis added).

Did the defense giants have foreknowledge of the Russian attack?

A month prior to the invasion: “top western arms companies were briefing investors about a likely boost to their profits”. Gregory J Hayes, the chief executive of US defense giant Raytheon, stated on a January 25:”

“Raytheon and Lockheed Martin — are openly telling their investors that tensions between the countries are good for business.”

Let us be under no illusions: A World War III scenario involving the use of nuclear weapons directed against Russia and China as well as against several non-nuclear states has been on the drawing board of the Pentagon for more than 20 years.

And America’s major defense contractors which produce the nukes are increasingly involved in strategic decisions pertaining to their use as well as the formulation of US nuclear military doctrine. There is a powerful faction within the Deep State which considers that a nuclear is “winnable”. And winnable WWIII scenarios and simulations (most of them classified) are routinely contemplated.

The Privatization of Nuclear War. What Is More Dangerous? A Mini-Nuke or COVID-19?

Click to see full-size image

Post 9/11 Nuclear Doctrine: “The Cold War Goes Hot” under G.W.B.

A  dangerous shift in US nuclear doctrine occurred in 2001 under the Bush administration.

In early 2002, the text of George W. Bush’s Nuclear Posture Review had already been leaked, several months prior to the release of the  September 2002 National Security Strategy (NSS) which defined, “Preemption” as: “the anticipatory use of force in the face of an imminent attack”. 

The Doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) of the Cold War Era was scrapped and replaced with the Doctrine of Preemptive Nuclear War (PNW), namely the “peacemaking use” of nuclear weapons as a means of “self-defense” against both nuclear and non-nuclear weapons states.

One thing was replaced by its opposite. MAD is real, PNW is fake. There is no such thing as “a peace-making use” of nuclear weapons.

Secret Meeting on Hiroshima Day 2003. Setting the Stage for “The Privatization  of Nuclear War”

A year later, on August 6, 2003, on Hiroshima Day, a secret meeting was held behind closed doors at Strategic Command Headquarters at the Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska.

“Senior executives from the nuclear industry and the military industrial complex were in attendance. This mingling of defense contractors, scientists and policy-makers was not intended to commemorate Hiroshima. The meeting was intended to set the stage for the development of a new generation of “smaller”, “safer” and “more usable” nuclear weapons, to be used in the “in-theater nuclear wars” of the 21st Century.” (Michel Chossudovsky, August 2011)

This meeting was instrumental in setting the stage for the privatization of nuclear war leading up to Obama’s $1.2 trillion dollar nuclear weapons program, which is now slated to increase to $2 trillion by 2030.

Diplomacy is scrapped in favor of Big Money. The privatization of both conventional and nuclear war is the driving force behind the crisis in Ukraine, coupled with the influx of foreign mercenaries recruited by private companies (on contract to the Pentagon and NATO).

While Biden is officially against the use of nukes on a first strike basis, the lobby groups acting on behalf of the defence giants are calling the shots.

Nuclear War Is “Good for Business”, But It Requires a “Human Face” and a “Peace-Making Mandate”

The Defense Giants are pushing the preemptive nuclear war doctrine with Russia, allegedly as a means of self-defence and national security for America and its allies. And the media applauds. Public acceptance of WMDs is predicated on a public relations campaign which posits that mini-nukes as humanitarian bombs.

The “peacemaking use” of nuclear weapons, missiles and fighter jets is being used as a marketing strategy on behalf of  Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Northrupp Grumman, BAE, et al

The Privatization of Nuclear War. What Is More Dangerous? A Mini-Nuke or COVID-19?

Click to see full-size

The latest state of the art B61-12 mini-nuke, the  “more usable” “low yield” nuclear weapons is a portrayed as a “humanitarian bomb” “harmless to civilians” because the explosion is underground.

The B61-12 “peace making bomb” has a maximum yield of 50 kilotons which is more than three times that of a Hiroshima bomb (15 kilotons) which resulted in excess of 100,000 deaths in matter of minutes.

Humanitarian Preemptive Nukes are part of a dangerous ideology as well as a marketing strategy on behalf of the defense giants. The unspoken reality of a nuclear war is “Mutual Assured Destruction” (MAD) and the End of Humanity as we know it.

Mini Nukes Versus SARS-CoV2

The corporate media is complicit. Lies through omission. There is no informative “fear campaign” on something which is real.

The REAL dangers of nuclear war which threatens the future of humanity do not make the headlines. 

In contrast, a 24/7 fear campaign spearheaded by the media in the course of the last two years has focussed on the deadly impact of COVID-19, which according to the WHO is similar to seasonal influence.

The Privatization of Nuclear War. What Is More Dangerous? A Mini-Nuke or COVID-19?

Illustrative Image

Inventing Fear: “Why Is the Virus Such a Threat”

V- the Virus is portrayed as a “Terrorist”

A sensationalist (scary?) BBC report portrays the SARS-CoV2 as a “Weapon of Mass Destruction”.

“Why is the Virus such a Threat”, because it is a “hit and run killer” with “brilliant evolutionary tactic”:

“Master of Deception. In the early stages of an infection the virus is able to deceive the body. …

It [the virus] behaves like a ‘hit and run’ killer

The amount of virus in our body begins to peak the day before we begin to get sick. …

This is a really brilliant evolutionary tactic – you don’t go to bed, you go out and have a good time,” says Prof Lehner.

So the virus is like a dangerous driver fleeing the scene – the virus has moved on to the next victim long before we either recover or die. 

In stark terms, “the virus doesn’t care” if you die, says [Cambridge] Prof Lehner, “this is a hit and run virus”.  ….

It does peculiar and unexpected things to the body (BBC, James Gallagher, October 22, 2020, emphasis added)


Support SouthFront


Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

C19 is a hoax. The was no pandemic. Enough with espousing WHO/WEF(GAVI) bullshit.


yes strange. the analysts debunking all the wests lies, hypocrisy etc are believing the very ppl when they talk about “viruses” and “pandemics”. FEAR! i cannot believe the geopolitic commentators still believe all this. they know they always lie…


“analysts debunking all the wests lies, hypocrisy etc”


Russia and China went along with it. They too have overhyped seasonal flu every year and especially under the covid plandemic – The first stage of the Global Reset. The Russia-Ukraine War is the second stage to cause inflation.

Last edited 4 months ago by HansGunther

Oh, idiot…


Something is making people sick. Just because they don’t isolate it, and show it to the world, does not mean the bio-weapon does not exist. Even greats like Dr. Luc Montagnier ( who died after speaking out against “vaccinations”) said it is lab created.

IN fact the secrecy is good, every new version (really new like “omicron”) can be passed off as “evolution”.

Scientism is a cult

“Something is making people sick.”

Yes, because nobody -ever- got sick before 2019, and especially not from a seasonal affliction called “influenza.” No sir.

70-80k deaths per season in America. So, the “COVID” was actually less deadly than a normal flu season.

But hey, marketing is effective.

CDC still has no reference material for this “COVID-19” virus that supposedly afflicted so many. Which means, there cannot be a “vaccine.” Can’t have a “vaccine” without a pathogen to base it off of.

And interestingly enough, the same “usual suspects” (to include the fraud Luc Montagnier) were involved in the whole “HIV” hoax. Another “virus” that to this day has never been isolated, and for which no tests existed (the Western Blot and ELISA were both similar to the scam PCR test- they were non-specific, and never designed to be used clinically).

Fausti (whose name means “Grim Reaper” in Sicilian), Montagnier, and Robert Gallo are all mass murdering psychopaths.

Want some good evidence? Watch “House of Numbers.”

Also, check out https://www.virusmyth.com/aids/

It seems the “conspiracy theorists” were correct all along.

Last edited 4 months ago by Scientism is a cult

scientism is a dead disgraced philosophical position only found in primitive nations like USA

Scientism is a cult


While it is true that Puerto Rico, Guam, Northern Marianas Islands, and the US Virgin Islands (the “States” making up the “USA”) are full of Scientism cult members, anywhere that pushed the “COVID” hoax is, by definition, guilty of practicing it.

So, not sure where you are going with your assertion.


That was always the purpose of “Scientism” — a “scientific” dictatorship.

Authoritative Quotes Confirming the Global Insurrectionist Movement

Pt. 1 https://youtu.be/Odnp4tvKjBk Pt. 2 https://youtu.be/0jZudUNEL7I Pt. 3 https://youtu.be/jG9KS3sA208 Pt. 4 https://youtu.be/2v1QM0sw73g

Last edited 4 months ago by HansGunther

Agreed! I know hundreds of people in R/L and not one of them has ever had COVID. The “pandemic” was a cover for the destruction of millions of small/medium sized businesses around the world.

The entire “alternative” media is controlled opposition…including South Front.

Fort Detrick

No it’s not. Virus is real. Human made (probably) or not, but it’s real. So enough with espousing Flat Earth bullshit.

Scientism is a cult

It is interesting to observe the “poisoned well” logical fallacy in-play.

Associating things that are shown to likely be true (such as the fact that COVID was and has never been isolated using gold-standard epidemiological methods) with “flat earth” lunacy is a perfect example.

So, just to clear the air, the Earth is spherical.

Which can be ascertained by observing fluid particles (the Earth functions as a semi-fluid on a macro scale) in a microgravity environment.

Spherical. Not lenticular (flat). Capice?

And please provide a link to verified reference material (isolated virus particles). Because as of today, the CDC still does not have them.

Scientism is a cult

Well what do you know, they are both hoaxes:





Literally the simplest “weapon” ever created, and none have ever been use in combat? Even when it would have been an “ideal use scenario” (Chicom offensive across the Yalu in winter of 1950)?! Wake up. The 20th century was fake and gay. Everything was a lie.

And just in case you were not able to see how fake and basic the lie of “nukes” has been, let’s look at “El Gordo” himself. The “Fat Man” device.

Allegedly based off of the “implosion” method, which uses -mechanical- means to compress metal (which, last time I checked, is still impossible), let’s assume for a second, it -is- possible to compress metal down to double density using mechanical (chemical explosive) methods.

“Nuclear detonation” allegedly occurs when fissile material reaches “critical mass” in an instant (and again, for the sake of argument, ignoring the lack of a moderator to slow fast neutrons enough to initiate a chain reaction).

Where did the extra mass come from in “El Gordo?”

Because otherwise, it is the same trick question one asks first graders: “what has more mass, a pound of feathers, or a pound of lead?”

Or, for the sake of this matter, which has more mass, “standard density” Plutonium or “double density” Plutonium?

The mass did not change, even if you buy the hilariously bad physics that supposedly got you “double density.”

People are easily bamboozled.

Last edited 4 months ago by Scientism is a cult
Scaldling Cold

You realize we harness nuclear fission to generate electricity right? We know stars release tremendous amounts of energy via fusion, or do you think stars are a hoax too? Knowing the amount of energy released by fission and fusion, why do you think it can’t be weaponized if we already use it to generate energy to heat water and spin a turbine?

Read up on Chernobyl sometime; the amount of energy released at the very end when the reactor boiled away its water was quite amazing.

Scientism is a cult

Yes. Nuclear fission is one of the most (if not -the- most) efficient form of energy generation currently available.

Thanks to the moron Jimmuh Carter, the efficiency of the energy generation was nerfed back in 1978 with the cancellation of “fast breeder” technology, which would have allowed for a complete “burn” of the fuel, instead of the current 5% burn.

The so-called “spent fuel” is only 5% “spent.” The spent fuel pools were originally a stopgap until the breeder technology could be perfected.

Nuclear energy and power generation is not a matter for debate. And it is hilarious that you are suggesting I “read up” on Chernobyl. Truly a belly laugh inducer.

To get back to the original thrust of the matter, let’s clarify the configuration space of the discussion:

Nuclear fission (and fusion) are not in question. What is clearly and demonstrably a hoax is the notion that “fast, uncontrolled” fission or fusion can cause an “explosion.”

I will continue the discussion below.

Scientism is a cult

To continue, let’s examine some facts (there are more, but this hits the salient points):

First off, to initiate (and sustain) a nuclear reaction, the fissile material requires a “moderator.” Without this moderator, a reaction cannot occur, because the neutrons released by the radioisotope are moving too fast to have any chance of striking a nucleus. This is unavoidable.

There were no “moderators” in any of the “explosive nuke” designs.

Next, a “nuclear explosion,” if feasible, would exhibit characteristics completely unlike a conventional explosion. Ergo, we would observe, in the alleged “tests,” characteristics dissimilar from, say -108 long tons of TNT- (such as was used at “Trinity” for the “test shot.”) There would be no orange or red flames, indicating a very low temperature hydrocarbon combustive explosion.

There would be no “smoke,” as there would be nothing combusting. And if you say “the atmosphere” was combusting, producing “smoke,” then the conversation is over, and you can go back to remedial elementary school basic science.

A reminder that “pyrocumulus” clouds (mushroom clouds) are only seen in two scenarios: ground explosions and forest fires or other large conflagrations. A ground detonation of that alleged magnitude would have left substantial craters at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, not to mention evidence of a blast wave (trees and fragile structures were left standing meters from alleged “ground zero,” more like “ground nothing.”)

A reminder that metal is incompressible. And that a pound of plutonium has the same amount of mass as…a pound of plutonium. Rendering “El Gordo” (the so-called “Fat Man” implosion device inoperable).

A reminder that both Hiroshima and Nagasaki were already firebombed and 50-70% destroyed prior to August 1945.

A reminder that a flight of 29 B-29 bombers were diverted from Imabari (a target classified as 100% destroyed as of April 1945) to Hiroshima on August 6th 1945.

A reminder that in spite of the “no fly” zone over Hiroshima on August 6th, a photo recon B-29 inadvertently overflew it less than half an hour after the “Enola Queer” allegedly dropped “Little Boy.” The photos showed a standard incendiary attack had taken place. Certainly no “fungus cloud.”

A reminder that Hiroshima was up and functioning a week after being “nuked,” that the Japanese had to be told that they had been “nuked” (because these were just such powerful weapons), and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki are the healthiest cities in Japan, with -zero detectable radioisotopes in either the trees or soil- (quite the feat, considering the “bomb residue” would have a half life of over 200 million years).

Occam’s Razor says that neither Hiroshima or Nagasaki were “nuked,” and that “explosive nuclear detonation” is quite impossible.

People have made the error of equating nuclear and standard chemical phenomena. I term it the “Campfire/gunpowder fallacy.”

They know that a campfire, which is a slow release of energy resulting from combustion, produces energy. So, they assume (not knowing that chemical and nuclear phenomena do not scale in the same fashion) that it should be possible to “quickly release” energy in the same way that dynamite causes an explosion. Unfortunately, this is not possible (at least not as of 2022). Smashing two pieces of metal together will not cause the release of high velocity gas. It would result in melting of the metal, perhaps a “road flare” event.

As Stanley Kubrick tried to reveal in his hilarious documentation of the nuclear hoax “Dr. Strangelove,” stop worrying, and laugh at the “bomb”

Last edited 4 months ago by Scientism is a cult
Scientism is a cult

A few more anecdotes:

The alleged “Trinity” shot left so much radiation that the observers the next day had to take such extreme precautions as…wearing paper booties over their shoes. So much for “deadly radiation.”

The metal tower used to hold the “Trinity device” was still intact at the base. A reminder that the liquidus temperature of glass and steel are for all intents and purposes identical. So much for “turning the desert into a sheet of glass.”

(Side note: the alleged pieces of fused desert sand called “Trinitite” are actually naturally occurring tektites from meteor impacts. Note that there was no “Nagasakite” or “Hiroshimite.”)

A reminder that at Hiroshima, the “flash” was enough to allegedly vaporize humans instantly, but not enough to do the same to nearby saplings. And vaporizing a human body would require far more energy than vaporizing a sapling).

There’s plenty more, but apparently observation and paying attention went away a long time ago.

P.S, the reason Nikola Tesla was likely murdered is that he was easily smart enough to have called bullshit on the whole endeavor. Einstein was a barely functioning idiot, and J. Robert Oppenheimer (hmmm, Oppenheimer, interesting family name…sounds Nazi) was a known grifter and actor, not a scientist.

Wake up, pay attention, and stop worrying about the impossible scenarios.

Scientism is a cult

Interestingly, they are both “COVID” and “Nukes” are a hoax.

Both are “fear drivers” to direct human behavior.

Both wither in the face of actual scientific scrutiny. But when fear is paramount, rational, critical thinking shuts off.

And before the usual trolls show up, the Earth is a sphere. Which can easily be determined by observing the morphology of fluid particles in a microgravity environment. Spherical.

When they are observed forming “lenticular” (flat) shapes, the Flat Earther lunatics can start making noise.

Last edited 4 months ago by Scientism is a cult
Bob - Enough

Correct. https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-2020-worldwide-corona-crisis-destroying-civil-society-engineered-economic-depression-global-coup-detat-and-the-great-reset/5730652


Yet Russia goes along with it and China set the stage for medical tyranny in the name of “stopping covid”.



The “virus” came from fort dietrick in Maryland. They closed it in urgence after 14000 dead dy put on a E-cigaret. But !!!! The sympthoms for “covid 19” are just the same !!! Military games Wuhan, more than 9000 participants from more than 150 countrys. The reason the “virus” get around the world in no time. A “virus” who is active from -40°C till +50°C the year around is a bio wapon !!! One good thing happened, the boomerang smached back in dotard Trump his face. The WHO unther zio domination admitted that they can not 100% exclude man manipulation. They had hoped the world would be neutralised with illness and so attaq it. Wrong bet yankee !!!


You can’t even form a proper sentence. Shut up retard.

sod off

Actually you are too stupid to comprehend more than 2-3 words. Try these: fuck off moron.


stupified arkansas lmao nazi like all amerikants—beside pedophilia—another of your fetishes

Tommy Jensen

When your government says you should take the vaccine, you should just take it and stop being a self-hating Joo. As you are not government, and you have not been on Yale University as they have been doing it!

Last edited 4 months ago by Tommy Jensen

The Wuhan virus was the ‘panic button’ setup between China and US for the original G2 globalization plan. Virus research was part of confidence building between the two countries. It was triggered by Xi when he got panicked by Trump. Once pushed the world enters reset period, the so called the ” Great Reset”.

Tommy Jensen

Follow the money, everything is an investment scam detailed planned for profit.


jens holmo has privatized lgbt social worker that provides him with state paid diapers in his sanitarium for senile retired shoe shine boys

Tiffany Dover


Would love your thoughts, please comment.x