0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
100 $
JUNE 2023

The “China Threat” and the Solomon Islands

Support SouthFront

The “China Threat” and the Solomon Islands

Illustrative Image

Written by Dr. Binoy Kampmark

Rarely has the Solomon Islands had as much attention as this. Despite being in caretaker mode as it battles the federal election, the government of Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison still had room to politicise its anti-China twitch.  The person given the task of doing so was the Minister for International Development and the Pacific, Senator Zed Seselja.

In a quick visit to Honiara to have discussions with Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare, Seselja stated that Australia remained dedicated to supporting the security needs of the Solomon Islands, and would do so “swiftly, transparently and with full respect for its sovereignty”.  The Pacific country remained a friend, part of the “Pacific family”.

While not specifically condemning the waywardness of the Sogavare government in forging closer ties with Beijing, Seselja explicitly mentions that discussions included “the proposed Solomon Islands-China security agreement.”  Using the familiar talking point of pushing regional familial ties, the Minister insisted that “the Pacific family will always meet the security needs of our region.”  In a tone suggesting both plea and clenched fist, Seselja went on to claim that Solomon Islands had been “respectfully” asked to reject the pact and “consult the Pacific family in the spirit of regional openness and transparency, consistent with our region’s security frameworks.”

The origins of this badgering stem from the Sino-Solomon Islands draft security agreement published online by an adviser to the disgruntled Malaita Provincial Government of Premier Derek Suidani.  That, in of itself, was telling of local domestic tussles, given Suidani’s opposition to increasing influence from Beijing and his own tilt towards Taiwan.

According to Article 1 of the draft, the Solomon Islands may request China to “send police, police military personnel and other law enforcement and armed forces” for reasons of maintaining social order, protecting lives and property, providing humanitarian assistance, carrying out disaster response, or “providing assistance on other tasks agreed upon by the Parties”.

With the consent of Honiara, China may also “make ship visits to, carry out logistical replenishment in, and have stopover and transition in Solomon Islands”.  Chinese personnel may also be used in protecting Chinese personnel and projects on the islands.

Amongst Australia’s talking heads and hacks was a sense of horror.  Greg Sheridan, writing for The Australian, saw parallels with Japan’s aims during the Second World War “to isolate Australia from the US by occupying Pacific territories, specifically Guadalcanal in what is now the Solomons.” The same paper described the deal as “a nightmare in paradise.”

Canberra and Washington are also concerned by what is seen as a lack of candour on the part of Beijing, a tad rich coming from powers that mischievously formed the AUKUS pact in conditions of total secrecy.  Article 5 expressly notes that “neither party shall disclose the cooperation information to a third party” without written consent of the other party, which has been taken to mean that citizens of the Solomon Islands are not to know the content of the agreement.  That would put them in a similar position to Australians who have an incomplete picture on the role played by US military installations such as Pine Gap, or the broader expectations of AUKUS.

The extent Sogavare and his ministers are being badgered by Australian dignitaries is notable.  Their message: We acknowledge your independence as long as it is exercised in our national (read US) interest.  This was the theme of the visit earlier this month from Paul Symon, chief of the Australian Secret Intelligence Service, and Andrew Shearer, Director-General of the Office of National Intelligence.

According to a note from Sogavare’s office, the visitors discussed “Australia’s core security concerns” about a potential Chinese military presence in the country.  Both Symon and Shearer were told that Honiara’s “security concerns are domestically focused and complements [the] current bilateral Agreement with Australia and the regional security architecture.”

This view is unlikely to have swayed officials tone deaf to local concerns.  The Biden administration, playing tag team to Australia’s efforts, has given Kurt Campbell, the US National Security Council Coordinator for the Indo-Pacific, the task of changing Sogavare’s mind.  He promises to visit the Pacific state along with Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Daniel Kritenbrink, later this month.

US lawmakers are also keen to hold the fort against Chinese influence in the Pacific and are excited about the prospects of using Australian soil to do so.  Republican Senator Lindsey Graham sees the garrisoning of Australia with US troops as an answer.  “I see an opening in this part of the world to push back on China in a way that would fundamentally change the fear that you have of a very bad neighbour,” he told Sky News Australia on April 13.

The proposed Honiara-Beijing pact shows how neither Australia, nor the US, can hope to buy Honiara’s unqualified allegiance to its own policies.  It worried Australian Home Affairs Minister Karen Andrews, who responded to the news of the draft by claiming that, “This is our neighbourhood and we are very concerned of any activity that is taking place in the Pacific Islands.”

To date, Solomon Islands has been treated as a failed state, a security risk in need of pacification, and a country distinctly incapable of exercising plenary power.  Australia has adopted an infantilising, charity-based approach, shovelling billions into the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands (RAMSI).  Australian High Commissioner Lachlan Strahan was quick to reassure Sogavare that Canberra would be extending the mission till December 2023, while also providing $AU21.5 million in budget support, a second patrol boat outpost and a national radio network.

None of these ongoing factors have prevented discussions between Honiara and Beijing on security issues. Chinese police officers were sent to the Solomon Islands in February, forming the People’s Republic of China Public Security Bureau’s Solomon  Islands Policing Advisory Group.  Their mission: aiding the local police force in improving their “anti-riot capabilities”.

Local politics, deeply divisive as they are, will have to eventually dictate the extent with which various powers are permitted influence.  Solomon Islands Opposition Leader Matthew Wale is very much against the gravitational pull of China.  Last year, he attempted to convince Australian officials, including the High Commissioner, that the draft was a serious possibility.  With the prospect of further jockeying between Washington, Canberra and Beijing, Honiara promises to be a very interesting place.  Along the way, it might actually prove to its meddlesome sceptics that sovereignty is possible.

Dr. Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge.  He currently lectures at RMIT University.  Email: bkampmark@gmail.com


Support SouthFront


Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ashok Varma

It is just the impotent pip squeak Australian racist war criminal cowardly lapdogs barking Sino-phobia. Even India rejects this nonsense.

jens holm

Your comment is not connected to the article at all.

Elohim Kosher Bar

Yankistani and Europansy puppet governments are in deep doo-doo and need WW3 in order to distract their peasants from the following:

1) Covid death shots are becoming increasingly noticeable. Most will die within the next few years. 2) Intentional financial mismanagement and destruction of their economies by the globalist entities. 3) To distract from Ghislaine Maxwell’s pedophilia trial where ZERO arrest have been made. 4) To distract from the coming destruction of the Petrodollar and loss of global influence.

If their peasantry understood the ramifications of the above, ALL their bribed / blackmailed politicos would be hanging from the nearest trees. After which, the global-homo corporation heads (Committee of 300, Bilderberg Group, CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), Club of Rome, Black Nobility, Banking families, Pilgrim Society, RIIA (Royal Institute of International Affairs), etc.) would also be hanging from trees.

jens holm

Its a dispute about Chinese and Taiwanese emmigrants is a dividing and among the locals killing many of them for good or bad reasons.

By that the Bejing chopstickers has asked for help. That has northing to do with Austrailia. They went there to try to seperate the locals and calm things down so no chinese of any kind were killed

Kampmark and partly China pee in their own crackpipes and blame others for the smell and smoke.

Theproblems are old. Should this have been a state at all? Its about not onl seize but also who actually lives there.

We see the same for Russia. Even now it has no indfrastructure for its own devellopment. They have learned after their collapse. They have not mas a single tool for it.

The solution is to make a good centerstructure – Or accept the unification is a fake. By fake you can make new countries and then unite them, if they choose.

Its exact the same for Solomon as for Russia. There is a critical seize. States or areas should be for people actully living there.


I see a color revolution soon.


It seems strange that the same countries who said that Ukraine has a right to “choose” its allies, or in other words self-determination, do not seem to apply that logic to countries who choose to tilt towards perceived rival states, and there’s plenty of historical examples to back it up with.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x