Saudi-led Coalition Warplanes Bomb Houthi Positions In al-Hudaydah. More Than 100 Houthi Fighters Killed

Donate

Saudi-led Coalition Warplanes Bomb Houthi Positions In al-Hudaydah. More Than 100 Houthi Fighters Killed

Illustrative image

On June 3, warplanes of the Saudi-led coalition carried out a series of airstrikes on the Houthis’ positions in the districts of Hays and al-Tuhayat and several other areas along the western Yemeni coast, according to the Emirates News Agency (WAM). The artillery of the coalition reportedly shelled several positions of the Houthis in the same areas.

The WAM said that the Saudi-led coalition airstrikes and shelling killed more than 100 fighters and commanders of the Houthis. The news agency also claimed that the coalition’s proxies had captured 21 Houthi fighters during clashes in the western governorate of al-Hudaydah.

In a related development, the UAE-based al-Arabiya TV reported that Saudi-led coalition warplanes had targeted a meeting of senior military commanders of the Houthis in the coastal city al-Hudaydah on June 3. Yemeni sources claimed that Abdul-Khalik al-Houthi, the brother of Houthis leader Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, was killed in the coalition airstrike. However, these claims are yet to be confirmed.

This heavy bombardment indicates that the Saudi-led coalition is planning to launch a new attack on al-Hudaydah very soon.

Donate

SouthFront

Do you like this content? Consider helping us!

  • David Bedford

    Q: Why do they call camels ships of the desert?

    A: Because they are full of Arab se(a)men.

    • HardHawk

      I think you confuse the arabs, not that I defend them, I could care less with the germans and their sex animal clubs.

  • World_Eye

    This will not go unpunished now the houthis will start expanding their border attacks, and soon you will see to many dead coalitions fucks. I just can’t understand these coalition forces, like 10 countries go to exterminate the houthis and to add the puppet government on place. Same as in Serbia 1999, 15 countries of NATO in coalition bombed Serbia in which the monster was the US who called all the shots, this and that, and others just agreed on it, and play along, same here, the lead players is Saudi Wahhabi Arabia, and all these small puppet countries and the east african counties like Sudan, WTF Sudan has to go in some screwed coalition with Saudi Wahhabi Arabia why, they know that with that they will just get their soldiers dead and dead. The last time the US send their own troops in battle was Iraq 2003 and so on, and they were fighting against insurgents with AK’s in their hands and some RPGs, and the US call that success, a lot of US dogs died in that counter-terror war, since then, the US learn one simple thing, we will never send our troops to fight instead we will pay proxy armies who have something to benefit from that war win win for both sides, and that’s why they send 500 soldiers or 1000 or 5000 amongst so many proxies, like in Syria North with the Kurds, and South with the so called FSA in Al-Tanf. Is someone dies it will be the proxies that will die.In Iraq when the ”WAR” started in 2003 the americans were so scared and they were dying on big scaled, why because they were fighting triebes and they were paying cash money to shia or sunnis to fight against each other, before they were starting to pull out, and they left Iraq in fucking chaos, but just imagine from the other side, sophisticated army with tanks,artillery,jets, anti air systems, lets say as the Russians how much will the americans would have suffer casualties just imagine that. And as for these saudies they are long dead but they don’t realize that yet. The houthis fight for their land, and that’s why they will never be conquered.

    • Rob

      Saudi Wahabis are not so good to target Houthis. Definitely the pilots of these jets could be from US and Israel to commit genocide in Yemen and make Yemen the US colony.

      Children are precious gifts of God and these US and Israel butchering them.

  • James

    Very sad news. About time some of those Houthi missiles got through.

  • AlexanderAmproz

    It was scheduled since long,
    MBS is just the CIA/MOSSAD puppet for the tragic continuity
    of one of the worst ever Colonial “Roadmap”
    ——————————————————
    http://www.voltairenet.ORG/article197477.html

    DIVERGENT INTERPRETATIONS IN THE ANTI-IMPERIALIST CAMP – PART 1

    The anti-imperialist camp: splintered in thought

    by Thierry Meyssan

    In 2011 when his country was subject to a jihadist siege, President Bashar el-Assad’s reaction was against the norm: rather than strengthening the powers of his security services, he cut them back. Six years on, his country is in the process of emerging victorious, in the most important war since Vietnam. This same type of aggression is unfolding in Latin America. Yet here, it is sparking off a far more classic response. In this article, Thierry Meyssan distinguishes the analysis and strategy of President Assad on the one hand and Maduro and Morales on the other. His aim is not to place these leaders in competition, but rather to call upon each of them to remove themselves from political catechisms and to pay due attention to the lessons learnt from the most recent wars.

    In May 2017, Thierry Meyssan appeared on Russia Today and explained where the South American elites were going wrong in their fight against US imperialism. He insisted that there has been a sea-change in the way the US now wages armed conflicts and we now need to radically rethink how we should defend our homeland.

    The operation to destabilize Venezuela continues. The first phase: violent gangs demonstrating against the government killed passers by, as if citizenship created no bonds between them. The second phase: the major food suppliers organized food shortages in the supermarkets. Then some members of the forces attacked several ministers, called for a rebellion and now have retreated into hiding.

    Of course the international press never ceases to hold the “regime” responsible for the deaths of demonstrators. Yet it is a fact that a number of videos testify that these demonstrators were deliberately assassinated by demonstrators themselves. No regard is paid to this and on the basis of this false information, the press then proceeds to qualify Nicolas Maduro as a “dictator” just as it did six years ago with respect to Muammar Gaddafi and Bashar el-Assad.

    The United States has used the Organization of American States (the OAS) as an arm against President Maduro just like it once used the Arab League against President al-Assad. Caracas, not expecting to be excluded from the Organization, denounced this method and left of its own accord.

    Maduro’s government has however two failures on its balance sheet: the vast majority of its voters did not go to the polling stations for the legislative elections of 2015, allowing the opposition to sweep a majority in Parliament. it was caught out by the crisis of food products, even though the same thing had been organized in the past in Chile against Allende and in Venezuela against Chávez. It required several weeks to put in place new circuits to provide food.

    In all likelihood, the conflict that begins in Venezuela will not be held back by its borders. It will ooze out, embracing the entire North West of the South American continent and the Caribbean.

    An additional step has been taken with military preparations against Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador following Mexico, Colombia and British Guyana. The team responsible for co-ordinating these measures is from the former Office of Global Democracy Strategy. This was a unit established by President Bill Clinton, then continued by Vice President Dick Cheney and his daughter Liz. Mike Pompeo, the current director of the CIA, has confirmed that this unit exists. This has led to rumours in the press, followed up by President Trump, of a US military option.

    To save his country, President Maduro’s team has refused to follow the example of President al-Assad. Maduro’s team thinks that there is no real comparison between what is happening in Venezuela and Syria. The United States, the principal capitalist power, would set off to Venezuela to steal its oil, according to a plan that has been repeatedly played out in the past on three continents. This point of view was given further weight by a speech that Evo Morales, Bolivia’s President, recently delivered.

    Let us recall that in 2003 and 2011, President Saddam Hussein, the Guide Muammar Gaddafi and a number of President Assad’s advisors reasoned similarly. They thought that the US would attack the following states in succession: Afghanistan and Iraq, then Tunisia, Egypt and Libya and Syria. And why? For the sole reason of bringing about the collapse of regimes that were resisting its imperialism and controlling hydrocarbon resources in an expanded Middle East. A number of anti-imperialist authors cling to this analysis today. So for example, they use it to try to explain the war against Syria by reference to the interruption of the Qatari gas pipeline project.

    Now, this line of thinking is turning out to be false. The US is not looking to reverse progressive governments (Libya and Syria), nor to steal the region’s oil and gas. Its intent is to decimate States, to send people of these countries back to a pre-historic time where “man did not love his neighbour as God loved him but would pounce like a wolf upon his neighbour” [Translator’s note: the literal translation of the French original is: “man was a wolf for man”].

    Has toppling the Saddam Hussein regime and the regime of Gaddafi brought peace back to these states? No! Wars have continued even though “government of occupation” has been set up in Iraq, then a government composed of other governments in the region including those who collaborated with the imperialists opposed to national independence. Wars are still being waged. This surely evidences that Washington and London had no intention of toppling these regimes nor defending democracy. These were transparent covers for their true intentions which were to eliminate the people in these states. It is a basic observation that rocks our understanding of contemporary imperialism.

    This strategy, radically new, was taught by Thomas P. M. Barnett following 11-September 2001. It was publicly revealed and exposed in March 2003 – that is, just before the war against Iraq— in an article in Esquire, then in the eponym book, The Pentagon’s New Map. However, such a strategy appears so cruel in design, that no one imagined it could be implemented.

    Imperialism seeks to divide the world in two. One part will be a stable area which profits from the system while in the other part a terrifying chaos will reign. This other will be a zone, where all thought of resisting has been wiped it; where every thought is fixated on surviving; an area where the multinationals can extract raw materials which they need without any duty to account to anyone.

    According to this map, taken from one of Thomas P. M. Barnett’s power point slides, presented at a conference held at the Pentagon in 2003, every state in the pink zone must be destroyed. This project has nothing to with the struggle between classes at the national level nor with exploiting natural resources. Once they are done with the expanded Middle East, the US strategists are preparing to reduce the North West of Latin America to ruins.

    Since the eighteenth century and the British Civil War, Western development has been triggered by its attempt to do all it can to avoid chaos. Thomas Hobbes taught us to support the thinking of the State rather than risk experiencing this torment for another time. The notion of chaos only returned to us with Leo Strauss, after the Second World War. This philosopher, who has personally trained a number of personalities within the Pentagon, intended to build a new form of power by plunging part of the world into hell.

    Jihadism inflicted onto an expanded Middle East has shown us what is chaos.

    While President Assad reacted as anticipated to the events of Deraa (March – April 2011), by sending his army to quell the jihadists of the Mosque al-Omari, he was the first to understand what was happening. Far from increasing the powers of the forces to maintain order to repress the aggression sourced from abroad, he equipped his people with the means to defend their homeland.

    First: he lifted the state of emergency, dissolved the special courts, freed the Internet communications and forbid the armed forces to use their arms if to do so would endanger the lives of innocent civilians.

    When Assad took these decisions he was clearly not going with the flow. And these decisions were ladened with consequences. For example, at the time of the attack of a military convoy at Banias, soldiers held off using their weapons in self-defence; they preferred to be mutilated by the bombs of their attackers and occasionally die, rather than to fire, risking injuring inhabitants that were looking at them being massacred without intervening.

    Like many at this time, I thought that the President was too weak and his troops too loyal; that Syria was going to go down. However six years on, Bashar el-Assad and the Syrian armed forces met the challenge. While at the beginning the soldiers have struggled alone against foreign aggression, gradually, every citizen came on board, to defend the country.

    Those who were not able to or who did not want to resist, went into exile. It is clearly the case that the Syrian people have greatly suffered. That said, Syria is the only State in the entire world, since the Vietnam War, to have resisted until imperialism tires itself out and surrenders.

    Second: faced with this invasion of a multitude of jihadists, from Muslim populations all over the world – Morocco to China, President Assad took the decision to abandon part of his territory to save his people.

    The Syrian Arab Army confined itself to the “useful Syria”, that is, to the cities. It abandoned the countryside and the deserts to the attackers. Damascus kept supervising, uninterruptedly, the provision of food to every region under its control. Contrary to an idea accepted by the West as common knowledge, the only areas where there is famine are those areas under Jihadi control and in the cities that it has besieged; the “ foreign rebels” (forgive this oxymoron), supplied by “humanitarian” associations, use the distribution of food packages as a means of making starving populations submit to them.

    The Syria people have seen for themselves how the Republic alone assumed the role of feeding them and protecting them. The Muslim Brotherhood and their jihadists played no part.

    Third: In a speech delivered on 12 December 2012, President Assad traced, how he intended to remake political unity in his country. Of special mention, he pointed out the need to draft a new constitution and to submit it to adoption by a qualified majority of his people then to proceed to democratically elect all institutional officials, including of course, the President.

    At that time, the Westerners mocked the claim of President Assad to call elections when the war was at its bloodiest. Today, all diplomats involved in resolving this conflict including the UN, support Assad’s plan.

    While Jihadi commandos were freely roaming the entire country, notably Damascus, and were murdering politicians even invading their homes where their families were, to do so, President Assad has encouraged dialogue with nationals who oppose him. He guaranteed the security of the liberal Hassan el-Nouri and the Marxist Maher el-Hajjar so that they too, might risk presenting themselves at the presidential elections in June 2014. Despite an appeal to boycott issued by the Muslim Brotherhood and Western governments, despite jihadi terror, despite the fact that millions of citizens were exiled abroad, voter turn out (of those present) was 73.42 %.

    In the same way, from the beginning of the war, he created a ministry for National Reconciliation, something never seen before in a country where war is going on. Assad handed the ministry over to Ali Haidar, the President of PSNS, an allied party. He negotiated and concluded thousands of agreements taking into account the amnesty of citizens who had taken arms against the Republic and their integration in the Syrian Arab Army.

    During this war, President Assad has never used force against his own people. This is so, despite the allegations of those who freely accuse him of widespread torture. So, let me be clear: he has never set up mass executions nor mandatory conscriptions. It is always possible for a young man to avoid his military obligations. Administrative procedures allow any male citizen to evade national service if he does not desire to defend his country with weapons in hand. Only the exiled who have not had the occasion to pursue these procedures may find themselves in violation of these laws.

    For six years, President Assad has not stopped on the one hand, making an appeal to his people, asking them to thrust upon him obligations, and on the other hand, trying to feed them and to protect them, as far as he is able. He has always assumed the risk of giving before receiving. That is why today, he has won the confidence of his people, and can count on their active support.

    South American elites are wrong to pursue the fight of the previous decades for a fairer distribution of their wealth. The battle which they must focus is no longer one where the majority of the people and small class of privileged individuals are on opposite sides.

    The choice put to the peoples of the expanded Middle East and to the people of South America is this: aut defendendum vobis patriam est aut morendum vobis est (you must either defend your homeland or die). It is this question that they will have to respond to.

    The facts prove it: the number one priority of imperialism today is no longer plundering natural resources. Imperialism, unscrupulous, dominates the world. Yet now its vision has expanded to wiping out people and to destroying the societies in the regions where it is already exploiting resources.

    In this iron era, the Assad strategy alone allows us to stand tall and free

  • Rafik Chauhan

    if this is true this was not saudi fighter jets they are not capable this all are israeli and US under Saudi flag cowards are always cowards . they cannot fight ground war without Air support. I salute Houthis for thier courage. but its time for Ansharallah to fight back and cut off thier supply and trap them. But i doubt this casulties instead Hotuhi cliam it killed 75 saudi thugs in 2 days. will see soon Al saud will pay

  • HardHawk

    Time for the houthis to pass the war into SA main land and create some chaos to them.

  • yudha bdg

    Great news, keep the good job Saudi. Those shia militants must be out of yemen

    • Amine Mansouri

      All Irani majosi Shia will be eliminated soon from Arab lands inchallah. Respect from Morocco 🇲🇦🇾🇪✌️

      • Ryder

        7acha tkon mghribi wla maslm fhad Ramadan, la 7awla wala 9owata ila billah

        • Amine Mansouri

          wash nta shi3i?

          • Ryder

            Ana maslam ma3ndich m3a taifiya ou had lhadra l5awya lkit5la9 lfitna floma lmouslima

  • potcracker2588

    that was the israeli airforce

  • Real Anti-Racist Action

    News Update:
    Israeli jets fly over Hudaydah amid Saudi push to seize city: Houthi chief.
    Leader of Yemen’s Houthi Ansarullah movement Abdul-Malik Badreddin al-Houthi has revealed that Israeli warplanes have been detected flying over the key port city of Hudaydah.

    Houthi said Israeli jets have been seen in Hudaydah’s skies over the past few days amid a push by Saudi mercenaries to seize the city, Arabic-language al-Masirah television network reported.

    “Yemen is actually fighting against a Saudi-Zionist coalition,” he said, referring to a military campaign which Riyadh has been carrying out against Yemen since 2015.

    Several Western countries, the US and the UK in particular, are widely known to be helping Saudi Arabia in the aggression, but this is the first time claims of Israeli complicity have been made.

    Referring to close ties between Israel and terrorist groups in Syria, Houthi noted that the Takfiri elements in Yemen are also the “mercenaries and servants” of Tel Aviv and Washington.

    Israel and Saudi Arabia have no diplomatic relations, but latest reports say the two regimes are working behind the scenes to establish formal contact.

    A senior Israeli nuclear expert revealed recently that Tel Aviv was selling Saudi Arabia information that would allow the kingdom to develop nuclear weapons.

    Ami Dor-On, a senior nuclear commentator with the Israeli military organization iHLS, said the cooperation has been made possible in the wake of widening ties between Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

    Hudyadah situation

    Hudaydah, home to about 400,000 people, is a lifeline for aid to war-torn Yemen. Riyadh claims the Houthis are using the key port for weapons delivery, an allegation rejected by the fighters.

    The city, which lies on Yemen’s western Red Sea coast, has witnessed renewed tensions over the past few days. Saudi-backed forces have closed in on Hudaydah, sparking fears of an all-out assault.

    The UN and humanitarian organizations have warned that a potential Saudi attack on Hudaydah could result in a disaster.

    Jan Egeland, a former UN aid chief who now heads the Norwegian Refugee Council, told Doha-based Al Jazeera broadcaster on Saturday that a Saudi attack would make the situation “much worse.”

    “We must avoid war at all costs in Hudaydah, not only because of the hundreds of thousands of people who would get in the crossfire but also because the port and the lifeline will be destroyed,” he said.

    Egeland further demanded “a ceasefire and peace talks” to resolve the crisis in Yemen.

    “What we asked for is that the United States, the United Kingdom and France who have influence over the Saudi-led coalition – they sell arms, they have close military relations, close diplomatic and intelligence cooperation – guarantee that attacks stop,” he added.

    Earlier this week, the UN voiced grave concerns about the situation around Hudaydah.

    The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) also warned that fighting in Hudaydah would make “an already catastrophic situation even worse.”

    “The ICRC is line with international humanitarian law urges all the parties to the conflict to respect civilian lives by taking every possible measure to protect civilians,” the Geneva-based humanitarian institution said in a statement.

    Yemenis conduct retaliatory attacks

    Separately on Saturday, al-Masirah reported that Yemeni army soldiers and fighters from allied Popular Committees had destroyed seven Saudi armored vehicles in the kingdom’s southern regions of Asir and Najran.

    The Yemeni attacks came in retaliation for the Saudi-led military campaign on the impoverished state.

    Yemeni forces further managed to prevent the advance of Saudi and Sudanese mercenaries in Asir and killed dozens of them, the report said.

    Saudi Arabia and its allies launched a war on Yemen in March 2015 in support of Yemen’s former Riyadh-friendly government and against the Houthis.

    The military campaign has killed and injured over 600,000 civilians, according to the Yemeni Ministry of Human Rights.

    Saudi Arabia has also imposed a blockade on Yemen, which has smothered humanitarian deliveries of food and medicine to the import-dependent state.

    SOURCE:
    http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2018/06/03/563733/Yemen-Israel-Hudaydah-Houthi