0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
2,355 $
3 DAYS LEFT UNTIL THE END OF OCTOBER

Robot Wars Incoming? U.S. Testing MQ-9B SeaGuardian Anti-Submarine UAV

Support SouthFront

Robot Wars Incoming? U.S. Testing MQ-9B SeaGuardian Anti-Submarine UAV

Click to see full-size image

The US Navy is testing a new submarine hunter drone off the California coast.

The anti-submarine MQ-9B SeaGuardian drone manufactured by General Atomics Aeronautical Systems will be sent to “hunt” for Russian submarines.

Back in November, an MQ-9A Block V Reaper dropped 10 sonobuoys to track a simulated submarine target on a U.S. Navy Pacific test range, in what the contractor says is the first time an aerial drone has deployed a self-contained anti-submarine warfare system.

The test was part of the development of the MQ-9B SeaGuardian drone, which is part of a research and development project in conjunction with the Navy’s Naval Air Systems Command.

If this concept can be made to work effectively, it reportedly has the potential to significantly lower the cost of submarine hunting and free up larger, more expensive manned sub-hunting platforms such as the P-8A Poseidon.

It can also potentially act as a command-and-control platform.

Robot Wars Incoming? U.S. Testing MQ-9B SeaGuardian Anti-Submarine UAV

Click to see full-size image

The Reaper managed to acquire and track an expendable anti-submarine warfare training target for three hours using the General Dynamics UYS-505 acoustic processing software.

According to a General Atomics readout of the test, the MQ-9B SeaGuardian will have four wing stations available to carry up to four sonobuoy dispenser system pods, packing up to 40 ‘A’ size or 80 ‘G’ size sonobuoys.

“This demonstration is a first for airborne ASW. The successful completion of this testing paves the way for future development of more Anti-Submarine Warfare capabilities from our MQ-9s,” said General Atomics Aeronautical Systems President David Alexander in a statement. “We look forward to continuing collaboration with the U.S. Navy as they explore innovative options for distributed maritime operations in the undersea domain.”

This form of “aerial anti-submarine warfare” promises to be a cheaper way to deal with the issue.

“What it does is it allows now the P-8 doesn’t have to be the only thing that delivers the sonobuoys,” said Bryan Clark, a retired submarine officer and senior fellow at Hudson Institute. “So the P-8 can start to step back to be more of a [command and control] platform, it doesn’t have to service all sonobuoy fields.

“Right now what has happened is a P-8 goes out, drops all the sonobuoys and hangs around burning flight hours while it monitors the sonobuoy field. And of course, you’ve got to have multiple P-8s to be able to cover the area. Whereas with this idea, you could have MQ-9s doing the deploying and the servicing of the sonobuoy field at a much lower flight hour cost.”

MORE ON THE TOPIC:

Support SouthFront

SouthFront

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jesus

Russian SSBNs can fire their nuclear weapons from or close to their bases.

Servet Köseoğlu

So???Delivering sonouboy from Uav is not a big deal but it will be definitely cost-effective especially for blue -green water countries.

farbat

americans are show offs and they are totally incompetent

farbat

america just loves to make propaganda about its military industry and therefore they come up with nonsense everytime they feel pressure and i dont say that this isnt effective yet still its kind of absurd to claim that it would be groundbreaking

johnny rotten

You know what? as a countermeasure they could put buoys that blast heavy metal at full blast, imagine how crazy they would go.

farbat

if this were some bombs with supercavitating technology to hit the target from the air than i would be impressed because it would be terrifying for subs and because it would be hard to create an airfoil while the bomb is spashing into the water

farbat

can it be that the american engineering is that terrible?

farbat

america has a big enough science base so i dont believe that americas problem is science atleast its still not the case but i slowly but surely come to the believe that america is very very bad at engineering and here the f35 and f22 come to mind the f22 is even such a mess that it cant really fly without being put out of service afterwards and the f35 cant fly supersonic speed without being put out of service and it is worse than most training fighters in so many aspects

8
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x