0 $
2,350 $
4,700 $
861 $
COLLECTED IN SEPTEMBER

Permanent War: Congress Forbids NATO Withdrawal

Donate

The Ron Paul Institute: The Democrat-controlled House followed the Senate yesterday in passing legislation forbidding the president from withdrawing from NATO and affirming undying US support for the outdated Cold War alliance. Is NATO really about defense? Or is it a jobs program for the military industrial complex?

Donate

SouthFront

Do you like this content? Consider helping us!

  • Harold Smith

    Congress can’t actually “forbid” withdrawal from NATO; all they can do is try to provide political cover for orange clown’s calculated betrayals; it’s just more good cop/bad cop political theater for the benefit of those people who demand to be “fooled.”

  • verner

    the most amazing thing is why the various european states maintain their costly membership in the not so glorious organization nato; its value is more than doubtful since its primary purpose is to support the political ends of washington dc/white house at costs that most members would like to be without. the old order where the moronic states paid the better part of the costs was reasonable since the other members agreed to be at the beck and call of the destitute states whatever the situation or whether or not it was useful for the member. but once that the destitute states require members to pay up to the limit, there is every reason for each member to scrutinize the purpose of any engagement and say no if the engagement mostly serves the destitute states of america of A or some other ulterior motive, like israel, a country which in every respect is the enemy of mankind and thus must be discontinued!

    • RusskiiTroll54

      Why? cause they are zionist vassals

      • Ronald

        Why ? they bought the FEAR .

        • verner

          perfectly spelled out for literate bums – read and engage grey matter if available

      • verner

        can’t read can you illiterate bum

        • RusskiiTroll54

          the one not understanding here is you, cunt

    • Tommy Jensen

      Because they are integrated.
      US has 25% of the worlds GDP. Europe benefit a major part of its turnover from US.
      US employ 50% of the worlds military and lead NATO. Europe benefit from sub-supply and jobs.
      If you pull out of NATO as EU country, you are exposed and lose the benefits from being a lapdog behind US enormous MIC, its bloodsucking and robberies on other nations.

    • Barba_Papa

      NATO is a get US military protection for free club. Even with the current shakedowns by the Orange One to spend more on defense (read: BUY MORE US MILITARY HARDWARE!) its still cheaper then becoming responsible for your military defense. There’s no way that European countries could afford gender sensitivity trainings and other fun stuff if they had to actually create their own armies again. That’s companies merge and countries sign cooperation agreements. To save money.

    • Sinbad2

      Are you familiar with the term press gang?

      If a country was to even mention that it might leave NATO, its economy would suffer, the politician who spoke of it would be found corrupt, or his children would have an unfortunate accident.
      The Americans are evil to the core, they have no moral values and are extremely vindictive.

      • Sinbad2

        As an example do you remember Dominique Strauss-Kahn?

        He mentioned in passing, that the Euro would make a good reserve currency.
        Within days he was accused of rape and jailed.

    • Min Khin Kyaw

      Safer to stay inside nato than not. Once nato has invited a country to join, it rather join. Some other countries want to join nato – Ukraine for example. For some reasons, nato has not accepted them yet.

      • verner

        accept a bankrupt country that is hellbent to start a war against nato’s worst nightmare – won’t happen.

        • Min Khin Kyaw

          If not with Russia directly, the war could go ahead. But war with Russia would be very bad for Ukraine because it could break into pieces and lead to total separation from Russian Ukrainians. Possibly, Russians are well prepared how to do that. Russians have fought NATO indirectly. They won both times. Not sure where they lost. But it’s possible to say they lost when a friendly country becomes an enemy by joining NATO or EU. Somehow Russia survives both physical war and economic war. Now it’s in S America – Venezuela.

  • Rob

    In 2019 FUKUS will be further cucked. On Syria now the US adminstration completely divided.

  • Spit

    The Americans will leave NATO
    The American Patriots who will eventually and Naturally rise into position of power of the US government will Understand that the country will fall Unless they replace NATO with something better, something that benefits the people of America or.
    Or NATO will take America with it if it falls.
    The percieved enemy (China/Russia) will evolve and NATO will die because it will not evolve.

    I Spit fire.

    • Brian Michael Bo Pedersen

      I dont think that US would ever leave NATO, leaving NATO means they have to come up with new excuses for all those bases and weapons in Europe.

      • Spit

        Dont worry, This is Checkmate. There is no need to exact insults.
        The people will live and the True enemy will not.

        • Sinbad2

          You do realize that the true enemy of all mankind is the USA?

  • RichardD

    NATO is being sidelined in importance by events in Syria. The primary conflict of good verses evil that will determine the future of our planet and civilization is occurring in the skies over Israel, Lebanon and the eastern Mediterranean. Right now the Russians are cowering in fear of the Jews, who are Russia’s and humanity’s primary enemies, and have been for a long time.

    Though with the slow down in Jew war crime treaty violation airstrikes since the IL-20 shoot down. It looks like the Russians are finally starting to take the Jew threat seriously. And are working to stop the Yinon plan. I hope that they’re putting the nuclear weapons capability in place for use against Israel to insure escalation dominance over the Jew menace to humanity. I also hope that it doesn’t have to be used. But it should be ready to thoroughly destroy the IDF and government of Israel quickly and efficiently if it does have to be used.

    How many innocent people the criminally insane Masada Jews are planning to fratricide and genocide, I don’t know. But the capabilities to quickly destroy the IDF should be in place and ready for use if the Jews do go that route.

    • verner

      the Caspian Sea is a perfect firing ground for a full frontal attack on israel and it is entirely out of reach for the israelis, the iron dome would be the iron doom, what more can the world ask for! and then the ground troops from syria, hezbollah, iraq and iran can come in and clean up and kick the
      stragglers into the med. what’s not to like?

      • RichardD

        Properly equipped and supported, the Syrians are capable of doing it themselves. Which would be the better option.

        • verner

          nope but with the help from hezbollah and some from iran and israel will be toast and russia aiming their nukes on tel aviv in case netanyahu goes for a nuclear option.

          • Sinbad2

            Israel is a nothing, apart from its nukes, which it can only be delivered by plane.
            The only reason Israel is a threat is they own a gorilla called USA.

          • RichardD

            What are Hezbollah and Iran going to do that Syria can’t do with BM-30s, S-300/400s and Kalibr cruise missiles supported by Russian satcom, ECM & EW systems? 3M-54 Kalibr cruise missile launchers:
            https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/ba/Club-K001.jpg/300px-Club-K001.jpg

      • RichardD

        The goal is to stop the IAF attacks, get the US to withdraw from Syria, and win the Syrian war. Not invade Israel and start a war with the Jews.