0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
1,600 $

“Pan-Democrats” Win At “Free and Fair” Hong Kong Elections

Support SouthFront

"Pan-Democrats" Win At "Free and Fair" Hong Kong Elections

Click to see full-size image

On November 24th, Hong Kong citizens went to the voting booths for the city’s local elections. The city’s pro-Beijing party lost heavily in the election, with the “pro-Democracy” candidates winning 90% of the city’s 452 district council seats.

Chief Executive Carrie Lam admitted that the local elections revealed that the people of Hong Kong were genuinely unhappy with the government, and with herself specifically.

“I did confess that this particular election has clearly reflected that many voters wanted to express their opinions and views to the government, to myself,” she said.

“The views and opinions expressed … are quite diverse. There are people who want to express the view that they could no longer tolerate the violence on the streets. There are of course people who felt that the government has not handled competently the legislative exercise and its aftermath.”

She further said that the Hong Kong government would heavily reflect on the results and would continue to serve the people and that she would “improve governance.”

Carrie Lam said that Beijing was not holding her accountable for the election defeat and that she still had China’s support. She said that Beijing played no role in the elections.

“Everyone values the results for sure, but the process is also important,” she said. “If we held an election that contravened the principle of rule of law and fairness, that would have caused much more harm to Hong Kong. I am glad to see the whole election process being held in an orderly manner.”

Asked if she would address the protesters’ five demands, including the setting up of a commission of inquiry to look into police use of force, Lam said she had already addressed those issues.

“We have stressed that anyone should not resort to violence for any demands, as violence could not solve anything,” she said. “From the polling results, we can also see many voters hoping to demonstrate their dissatisfaction against violence with their votes.”

The voter turnout was 71.2% and the day went largely without incident. The previous highest voter turnout was 47.1% in 2015, so this set a record. Out of the 7.40 million people in the region, 4.13 million registered to vote.

The District Councils have little power in the Hong Kong government, but they allegedly show the general attitude of the public, without the need to destroy public property and resort to violence.

Western media immediately jumped on the band wagon saying that this was showing of Beijing losing grip of the city and people finally choosing democracy.

CNN noted on the eve of the election, “offers the first objective test of how people in the city feel about the protests and the government.”

The National Interest in typical strong anti-Beijing manner reported that pro-Beijing candidates were “annihilated” at the elections.

At the same time, the elections are an actual victory of the Hong Kong government and Beijing – they’ve proven to the “international community” that democratic and fair elections were held, despite the constant accusations of tyranny and repression.

All MSM coincidentally fails to “notice” that fact.

Rioters have crossed every red line, with throwing petrol bombs, setting businesses and even people on fire, simply for being pro-Beijing. In response, the pro-Beijing Hong Kong Government organized fair and democratic elections in which people were allowed to peacefully express their attitude.

At the same time, it could be argued that many were afraid of expressing their pro-Beijing views. However, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said that these elections meant very little in the broader perspective and that Hong Kong is China, regardless of the outcome.

“Our position is crystal clear. The central government firmly supports the Chief Executive Carrie Lam in leading the Hong Kong government, supports the police in enforcing law and restoring order, and supports the judicial organs in punishing violent criminals.,” said Geng Shuang, Foreign Ministry spokesperson said.

“Hong Kong is China’s Hong Kong,” Geng said.

Geng repeated claims by Foreign Minister Wang Yi earlier in Tokyo, claiming that Hong Kong matters were China’s domestic affairs. Wang told reporters in Tokyo: “Any attempts to undermine the stability and prosperity of Hong Kong will end in failure.”

He underlined Beijing’s commitment to enforcing the “one country, two systems” framework.

Chinese media reported that social unrest played a role in the election process and seriously disrupted it. China Daily said the poll was “skewed by intimidation” and “dirty tricks”.

The outlet said “violent intimidation tactics were intended to reduce the exposure and visibility of pro-establishment candidates”.

“External forces that have helped stoke the months-long anti-government campaign in the special administrative region also contributed greatly to damaging the election chances of pro-establishment candidates,” it said.

Xinhua also reported that the elections “fell victim to rioters.”

“Campaigns of some patriotic candidates were seriously disrupted, and their offices were trashed and set ablaze,” the outlet reported. “One candidate was injured in an attack. Harassment on patriotic candidates occurred on the voting day.”

Finally, it should be noted that most of the seats were won, but the election was not a landslide victory as MSM would suggest it was. The “pro-democracy” candidates won 90% of the seats, but with 60% of the vote, so it wasn’t as “landslide” as presented. The threat of violence more than likely played a role in what people voted for.

Furthermore, the vote wasn’t won by a single “pro-democratic” party, but rather by several which are showing little coordination with each other.

Chung Kim-wah, assistant professor at Hong Kong Polytechnic University, which was a siege-like standoff for upwards of a week between rioters and Hong Kong police. Upwards of 4,000 petrol bombs were discovered on campus.

“It’s noteworthy that pro-Beijing camp still won [up to] 40% of the [total number of] votes, thanks partly to their years-long experience in community work and strong connections in local districts,” Chun Kim-wah said. “The pan-democrats still face an uphill battle next year.”

He, furthermore, said that the vote did show people’s discontent with the current leadership.

This, however, presents an opportunity for the Hong Kong government and Beijing to adjust its strategy, ahead of the September 2020 Legislative Council elections.


Support SouthFront


Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

If the results of the vote are honest then there is no problem, this shows that the Chinese Government is honest and does not interfere in the voting. But how can you be sure of the results of this vote when you have seen clear evidence that anyone who supports Beijing will be burned alive in Hong Kong?


Anyone who supports Beijing will be burned alive? I think it’s a gross exaggeration. If you see 2-3 opposition leaders in Russia being assassinated that would mean in Russia any opposition leader will be assassinated?


i warthed videos where Chinese mainland people came to Hong Kong, stood against Hong Kong and had no idea why they were protesting! All these main landers could say was “Hong Kong i china, that cannot leave China”!
When they were told that Hong Kong DOESNT want independence but just no extradition bill and the other 4 demands (which were already agreed to buy China) they didnt understand!
They were asked “which of the 5 Hong Kong demands dont u like”?
These mainland Chinese had no idea what the 5 demands were, yet they were hating on Hong Kong!

i am telling u now this election was free and fare! if this site is telling u otherwise than its a lie!
Everyone KNOWS that Hong Kong wants to keep its rights! We all know about what happens in China to those who speak out against the CCP!

You are all exposing your bias when u assume Hong Kong is doing the wrong thing!

Aaron Driver

Nobody wins elections at 90 percent, this looks like another cia operation… The results must have been tampered with with a 71.2% turnout way up from previous electoral turnouts. It’s got me thinking something is up.


Quote from the article:

“It’s noteworthy that pro-Beijing camp still won [up to] 40% of the [total number of] votes…”


At the same time, it could be argued that many were afraid of expressing their pro-Beijing views.

LOL poor winnie the pooh lovers were afraid to vote.



the pro-Beijing Hong Kong Government organized fair and democratic elections

Contradicts the title:


Quotes here are used to bash the sense of democracy, freedom and fairness. I think this contradiction come from an arch-known type of ideology:

“War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Ignorance is strength.”

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x