0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
3,048 $

‘Operation Cyclone – Ukraine Edition’ The Real Plan?

Support SouthFront

‘Operation Cyclone - Ukraine Edition’ The Real Plan?

By Gavin O’Reilly 

For almost three months, the Western mainstream media, in a move not dissimilar to its previous assertions that Saddam Hussein had the capability to launch WMDs within 45 minutes, or that Iran was building a nuclear bomb, has repeatedly claimed that Russia is planning an ‘imminent’ invasion of its Western neighbour Ukraine – under the rule of the successive US-EU friendly governments of Petro Poroshenko and Volodymyr Zelensky since the 2014 Euromaidan, a CIA and MI6-orchestrated regime change operation launched in response to then-Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych’s November 2013 decision to suspend an EU trade deal in favour of pursuing closer ties with the Russian Federation.

With the ongoing collapse of the global COVID-19 media narrative following the highly coincidental timing of last month’s World Economic Forum Davos Agenda virtual event, a hypothetical Russian invasion of Ukraine has now taken centre stage amongst corporate media outlets with a track record of promoting war and regime change in countries refusing to kowtow to the demands of the US-NATO hegemony, a media narrative which has seen thousands of US and British troops being deployed to Eastern Europe as a result – a highly provocative action and one, that should even a minor miscalculation occur amidst the current tensions, could easily escalate into a full-blown military conflict between East and West.

Recent comments by current Ukrainian President Zelensky however, in which he poured cold water over the idea of a Russian invasion of Ukraine, as well as the recent supply of over 90 tonnes of weaponry to Kiev by the United States amidst the current tensions, and US President Joe Biden stating himself that Washington would not engage militarily with Russia, would suggest that although the possibility of the current crisis inadvertently spiralling into a global conflict between Russia and NATO remains, that that is not the current intention of the West – rather a plan seemingly exists to provoke Russia into intervening in the eastern Donbass region of Ukraine to protect the predominantly ethnic Russian inhabitants of the breakaway Republics of Donetsk and Luhansk, before drawing Moscow into a wider guerrilla conflict in the rest of Ukraine, the second largest country in Europe, with the intentions of tying Russia down for the foreseeable future in an Iraq-style military quagmire, a tactic with previous historical usage against the Kremlin.

In 1978, at the height of the Cold War, both East and West were locked in a battle to prevent their opposing ideologies of Socialism and Free Market Capitalism taking hold in their respective spheres of influence – with previously Western-friendly Afghanistan having come under control of the pro-Soviet PDPA (People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan) following that year’s Saur Revolution, a plan was quickly hatched by the White House and Downing Street to destabilise the newly-established Left-wing state.

From 1979 until 1989, the CIA’s Operation Cyclone would see the arming, funding and training of Islamist militants known as the Mujahideen, including none other than Osama Bin Laden and others adhering to the ultraconservative Saudi Arabia-backed Wahhabi ideology, in neighbouring Pakistan, before sending them on to wage war on the ‘atheist Communists’ of Afghanistan and their Soviet allies – with Moscow having intervened at the outset of the conflict following an official request for assistance from Kabul.

This decade long intervention by Moscow however, would ultimately fail to shore up their client state, the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan, with Kabul’s Socialist government lasting a mere three years following the Soviet withdrawal before a civil war would see it replaced by the religious fundamentalist Islamic State of Afghanistan in 1992 – a government which would itself be overthrown by the Taliban four years later.

The ten-year long Soviet effort is also widely seen as a contributing factor to the Bloc’s subsequent breakup in 1991 – indeed, Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Adviser to then-US President Jimmy Carter when Operation Cyclone was launched in 1979 and instrumental in its implementation, would later recount in a 1998 interview about how drawing the USSR into a Vietnam-style quagmire in order to drain its resources was a motivating factor – and with Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu recently outlining a plot to stage a Syria-style false flag chemical attack in eastern Ukraine, as well as media reports of the CIA training Ukrainian guerrilla fighters, drawing Russia into a costly military conflict is seemingly a motivating factor of the regime change lobby yet again.



Support SouthFront


Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Peter Jennings

I too believe that the US and its nato poodles want to tie Russia’s hands by embroiling them in regional conflicts. Initially with Ukrainians, armed and trained by the US and nato. They have been trying for quite a while now. Mainly through the southern countries, which hasn’t worked out.

China is next on the menu if not already. The US and its nato poodles need a war in which to bury their recent and past crimes against humanity.


Good article. I have two minor quibbles. 1. The Soviets did a good job of “shoring up” Kabul’s Socialist government. It lasted longer than Gorbachev. It only collapsed when Yelsen cut off arms supplies years. 2. Afghanistan didn’t play a role in the collapse of the Eastern bloc. I didn’t even figure in the collapse of the Soviet Union. It wasn’t anything like Vietnam. The US lost 3000 helicopters the Soviets 300.


Agree. Afghanistan is the most overrated war ever, yet CIA and Western media likes to brag how it was decisive in dissolution of USSR. In reality Americans and their vassals lost at least 3-4x more soldiers in Vietnam (plus significantly more material losses). Russia lost 2-3 times as many troops in Borodino 200 years ago in a single day battle than in entire war in Afghanistan! (not to mention Stalingrad or Kursk). It wasn’t particularly expensive either, Soviets never deployed large force there. It’s only importance was extensive use by Reaganite propaganda, but also by Gorbachev’s traitorous clique to undermine USSR from within.

Last edited 1 year ago by Viktor
Corrupt Shithole of Ukropisstan

U.S. lost 5500+helos and 2200+ jets, not counting South Vietnamese losses. NV lost around 200Migs and a a few dozen SAM launchers.

Chris Gr

Iran also supported the mujahideen and even secularist countries like Turkey and Egypt supported them back then.

Bigg Chungus

Iran also helped the USA overthrow them in 2001 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_uprising_in_Herat). Yet Iran, Turkey, and Egypt are not at all relevant to this specific article, except for smoothbrained readers like you who need every situation and every country to fit either entirely on one or the other side of the lines in your coloring book. “Whatabout …” is not an argument, nor is it even a valuable comment.

Last edited 1 year ago by Bigg Chungus
Chris Gr

But now Iran supports Taliban again.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x