0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
1,360 $
JUNE 2021

NATO Bombed You To Protect You: Stoltenberg Explains 1999 Bombings During Visit To Serbia

Support SouthFront

NATO Bombed You To Protect You: Stoltenberg Explains 1999 Bombings During Visit To Serbia

Belgrade. IMAGE: Wikipedi

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg says that people having “poor” memories of NATO’s 1999 bombing of Yugoslavia are wrong because the military bloc did this to protect civilians and save lives.

“I stressed that we did this to protect civilians and to stop the Milosevic regime,” Stoltenberg stated during a meeting with the students of Belgrade University.

The NATO secretary stated further that the bloc supports a “dialogue” between Serbia and its breakaway region [now a self-proclaimed state] of Kosovo. According to him, Belgrade has to “look into the future” for furher cooperation between the two sides.

The attitude showed by Stoltenberg is a common example how the US-NATO propaganda works. Any actions, incluindg illegal military interventions, false flag provocations and mass civilian casualties, are being explained by the need to “defend democracy”, “protect civilians” and “save lives”.

Support SouthFront


Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Do Stoltenberg believe everybody is Cretin enough to swallow UK/US/NATO lies ?

Promitheas Apollonious

obviously it does.


He must have been smoking some happy weed b4 he gave the talk


Soltenberg father was already a Gladio member,
unsurprisingly Olof Palm Assassination enquiries never ended
and Stoltenberg son became a Norway War Minister…


I had to say, you are very knowledgeable about him. I usually just simply categorise these kinds of ppl as the ones deserved to be in hell for eternity


On the site voltairnet.org
you have plenty excellent informations the MSM will not give


Just another money power pig puppet…

AM Hants

I was just looking up his history. Together with his mother, Karin Stoltenberg (née Heiberg; 1931–2012), was a geneticist who served as state secretary in multiple governments during the 1980s being heHis mother, Karin Stoltenberg (née Heiberg; 1931–2012), was a geneticist who served as state secretary in multiple governments during the 1980svily involved in Genetics.

Funny how so many involved in genetics, went onto have children/grandchildren who are now in positions of power.

Dr Josef Mengele – how his work lives on.

Planned Parenthood – founded for genocide/ethnic cleansing, of the black community.
Heather Ann Nauert – US State Department – She was also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Grandfather, Robert W. Nauert, founded in 1926. Pioneer Life, an insurance company. Wasn’t the grandfather linked to the genetics movement? She is the daughter of Peter Nauert, an insurance manager, but her mother’s name is unknown. She has three siblings Justin, Jonathan, and Joseph. Nauert experienced her childhood in Wisconsin. She is American by nationality, but her ethnicity is unknown. Further, there is not much information regarding her childhood life.?… https://marriedbiography.com/heather-nauert-biography/

Operation Paperclip – where are the ‘kinder fuehrer’?


Adolf Hitler was selected, financed and put on power by the British “Empire”
who invented Nazism and Zionism on purpose to Colonized Middle-East
and weaken Europe to make London stronger…

Anglo-American Money Owners Organized World War II

AM Hants

Didn’t he provide Merkel’s mother with a sperm sample? I am seriously interested in finding out, just how many, who have found their way into positions of power, in Government funded institutions, came via some eugenics programme.

Thanks for the Voltaire links, I do like his articles.


The height of the modern eugenics movement came in the late 19th and early 20th century.
The XVI Century “Humanist” Erasmus “De Moria” book
has to be read, it’s considered among the Best book ever written.
Its a small Great Book easy to read and understand
and had great influences until today, much more than the
rubbish eugenics.
Hitler Aide de Camp was General Bloch,
when a Nazi told him he was Jew,
he answer “I decide who is Jew or not”
The Wehrmacht had more than 1’000 High rank Jew Officers.
I do believe the Germans Culture never been as Racist as
the US Culture was after WW2 and still today.

I am used to live in a small city with a wide majority of foreigners
from 195 Countries, never notice any racism, Social or religious
discriminations, it’s not compatible and unthinkable with a Laic/Humanist Culture where Rousseau and Voltaire
were used to live… Never observed it the last 60 Years,
just a friendly curiosity, Culture and social Diversity is wealth
for progress and enlightenment….

AM Hants

Thanks for recommending: The XVI Century “Humanist” Erasmus “De Moria” book

‘…I am used to live in a small city with a wide majority of foreigners
from 195 Countries, never notice any racism, Social or religious
discriminations, it’s not compatible and unthinkable with a Laic/Humanist Culture where Rousseau and Voltaire were used to live… Never observed it the last 60 Years,
just a friendly curiosity…’ -thI am used to live in a small city with a wide majority of foreigners
from 195 Countries, never notice any racism, Social or religious
discriminations, it’s not compatible and unthinkable with a Laic/Humanist Culture where Rousseau and Voltaire were used to live… Nice, how it should be. Where the community comes first, for everybody.

Brother Ma

Who says Breivik was a Gladio apart from himself? Could it not be the rantings of a madman?
I do believe in Gladio and in the Deep State but i like evidence aa well. Anything more you can tell us about that?


Gladio in Europe is an old story
Google for P2 in Italy, and P26 in Switzerland.

I put Gladio in the Voltairenet search windows and got
with 51 articles in English, have a look…

Brother Ma

Thank you friend.


Why on earth would you say that. Happy weed doesn’t make anyone stupid, or ignorant, or money hungry.

Clearly he is high on greed , envy, and power.

Save your prejudicial ignorance for those stupid enough to eat it.


Its called sarcasm


no, it is called prejudice.

No different than saying a truth teller wears a tinfoil hat, for understanding the science behind what happened on 911.

Nothing sarcastic, about it.

“Sarcasm is “a sharp, bitter, or cutting expression or remark; a bitter gibe or taunt”. Sarcasm may employ ambivalence, although sarcasm is not necessarily ironic. Most noticeable in spoken word, sarcasm is mainly distinguished by the inflection with which it is spoken and is largely context-dependent”

Dušan Mirić

I suppose (at least some of) Hitler’s aides also believe his crimes are the right thing, yet, I don’t believe Stoltenberg. If he is a honest man he would never join the most dangerous terrorist mob in the world.

AM Hants

Stoltenberg, I do wonder if his relatives were either close to the Bolsheviks, or the National Socialist (German) Worker’s Party? Like so many who find themselves rising up the ladder, either in Nato, or in Government funded institutions.

The ex-Prime Minister, on non-nuclear Norway, from 2000 to 2001 and from 2005 to 2013.

Stoltenberg, whose name is derived from Stoltenberg in northern Germany. The family is believed to have emigrated to Norway in the 17th century. His father, Thorvald Stoltenberg (1931–2018), was a prominent Labour party politician who served as ambassador, as defence minister and as foreign minister.

His mother, Karin Stoltenberg (née Heiberg; 1931–2012), was a geneticist who served as state secretary in multiple governments during the 1980s.

Marianne Heiberg, married to former Foreign Minister Johan Jørgen Holst, was his maternal aunt. Jens lived in Serbia from 1960 to 1963 while his father was Ambassador to Yugoslavia.

Stoltenberg’s first steps into politics came in his early teens, when he was influenced by his sister Camilla, who at the time was a member of the then Marxist–Leninist group Red Youth.

1985 to 1989 – Stoltenberg was a journalist for Arbeiderbladet.
1989 to 1990 – leader of the Workers’ Youth League.
Executive Officer for Statistics Norway, Norway’s central institution for producing official statistics.
1990 and 1992, he was leader of the Oslo chapter of the Labour Party.

Up to 1990, he had regular contacts with a Soviet diplomat. He ended this relationship after being informed by the Norwegian Police Security Service his contact was a KGB agent, warning him of further contact. Stoltenberg’s code name within the KGB was “Steklov… Wiki

Funny, how so many of those who have a problem with Russia, cut their teeth on the old ideology of the Bolsheviks and National Socialist (German) Worker’s Party. With links to the Khazar and Ashkenazi Nomadic Turkic Tribes, who adopted Christianity, Islam and Judaism, and learnt to speak Hebrew.


the Bolsheviks were Jews, Eisenhower too…

GERMAN HOLOCAUST GERMAN GENOCIDE: 9-15 Million Germans Killed 1945 – 1953 Post WW2 “The Morgenthau Plan” EISENHOWER’S DEATH CAMPS “A Forgotten Genocide” – True Democracy Party


History is written by the winners

“vae victis” (Bad luck to the looser)
said Brennus to the Romans when in front Roma in 390 BC

NB: What is true or not about WW2, I have no idea,
but the winner had the biggest Bombs,
did more massacres and Destructions, that why he won.
Logically it’s the Evilest the winner and not the looser.
My trust to Hollywood and MSM is extremely limited,
even if Orson Wells or Alec Guinness and al are very good…

WW2 History still has to be written !

AM Hants

Must admit, I never took much notice of WWII, just, the Sunday afternoon films. It was back in 2014, that I took notice. The Russian Victory Parade. Finding out they lost 13 million, out of the 27 million, the Soviet Union lost. The UK lost 450,000 or somewhere near that figure, yet, nothing was ever mentioned about the sacrifices of the Soviet Union, together with the outcome would have been different, if the Russians had not sent the Germans back to Berlin. It was then I realised, each nation has their own story to tell. Together with, why nobody objects to Hiroshima and Negasaki being taken out, at the end of the war, when Japan was ready to surrender. It seems so strange, that only one sector of society complains, when so many nations suffered similar horrors, one way or another.



Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Fictions and Facts

by JOHN LAFORGE FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

About the US atomic destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, popular accounts still stick to the false but “greatest generation” story that, “Without [them], more Japanese would have died in a US assault on the islands, as would have tens of thousands of Americans,” as Mike Hashimoto wrote in the Dallas Morning News in 2016.

The New York Times reported that year, “Many historians believe the bombings [of] Hiroshima and then Nagasaki, which together took the lives of more than 200,000 people, saved lives on balance, since an invasion of the islands would have led to far greater bloodshed.” Many historians, perhaps; but not that many.

On the contrary the chief historian of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, J. Samuel Walker, wrote in the journal Diplomatic History in 1990, “The consensus among scholars is that the bomb was not needed to avoid an invasion of Japan and to end the war within a relatively short time. It is clear that alternatives to the bomb existed and that Truman and his advisers knew it.”

Historian Martin Sherwin has debunked the tale of the “good” atom bombs, citing in his 2003 book A World Destroyed “a ‘considerable body’ of new evidence that suggested the bomb may have cost, rather than saved, American lives. That is, if the US had not been so determined to complete, test, and finally use the bomb, it might have arranged the Japanese surrender weeks earlier, preventing much bloodshed on Okinawa.”
The 20 Century had 203 Millions victims,
only 6 Millions Jews and 200 Thousands US GI are important…

What about the 197 Millions others ?

One life = One life, isn’t it ! ! !


Estimated Totals for the Entire 20th Century

AM Hants

I read somewhere that it was a Truman ‘willy waving’ competition, to show Stalin how far the US had come with the atomic bomb.

February 4–11, 1945 – Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill meet in Yalta, Crimea, Russia to discuss the future of Germany, Eastern Europe and the United Nations.

Franklin D. Roosevelt on April 12, 1945 died.

17 July to 2 August 1945, The Potsdam Conference : (Berlin Conference of the Three Heads of Government of the USSR, USA, and UK.) The participants were the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States, represented by Communist Party General Secretary Joseph Stalin, Prime Ministers Winston Churchill (who lost the election) and Prime Minister Clement Attlee. President Truman, who took over from the late President Roosevelt. Ironic timing, the death of Roosevelt and who replaced him.

President Harry Truman made the fateful decision to drop a massive atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. On August 6, 1945. “Little Boy,” flattened the city, killing at least 70,000 people that day and tens of thousands more from radiation poisoning.

On August 9, 1945 – The United States dropped another atomic bomb nicknamed “Fat Man,” was dropped on the Japanese city of Nagasaki, killing an estimated 40,000 people immediately and another 20,000 to 40,000 in the months following the explosion. The second run was not delayed in order to give Japan time to surrender but waiting for supplies of plutonium 239.

On August 15, 1945, Japanese Emperor Hirohito announced an unconditional surrender, ending World War II.

2 September 1945 – end of WWII.

comment image

Reinhard Gehlen, working with the Dulles brothers, in the precurser to the CIA. Remember ‘Operation Paperclip – CIA providing safe passage for the Nazi elite, and no doubt what was left of the Bolshevik elite). Richard Gehlen, who had so many connections with the German nuclear engineers and scientists.

“Little Boy” was created using uranium-235, a radioactive isotope of uranium. This uranium-235 atomic bomb, a product of $2 billion of research, had never been tested. Nor had any atomic bomb yet been dropped from a plane. Some scientists and politicians pushed for not warning Japan of the bombing in order to save face in case the bomb malfunctioned…

Unlike other bombing raids, the goal for this raid had not been a military installation but rather an entire city. The atomic bomb that exploded over Hiroshima killed civilian women and children in addition to soldiers. Hiroshima’s population has been estimated at 350,000; approximately 70,000 died immediately from the explosion and another 70,000 died from radiation within five years.


Monte George Jr

There are several obvious motivations for the US atomic attacks on Japan, but a major contributor is rarely discussed. After the allied victory in Europe, large numbers of active duty GI’s were shipped to staging areas in Central America (principally Guatamala) in preparation for the invasion of Japan. Having just survived a bloody war in Europe, these troops were in no mood to go to Japan, and the level of anger among them was astronomical. The MPs in Guatemala City were afraid to show their faces in public for fear of the disgruntled, violence-prone GIs. An invasion of Japan would have risked a massive revolt in the US military. For better or worse, the Atomic Bomb solved that problem.

AM Hants

That is interesting.

R PLobo

Japan only surrendered when they realized that the Soviets were prepared to invade the mainland. The US could care less about American GI’s lives. Japanese leaders understood that the country simply could not withstand a combined Russian and US invasion. The US had a limited number of atomic weapons – regardless city killers are useless against armed forces. Even troop concentrations are difficult to target by tactical nuclear weapons. The Japanese could have defeated the US on the home islands in guerilla warfare but not againsts a Russian invasion. The Japanese had sought to keep the Russians out of the war but failed. The US motivation was two fold – to try to intimidate the Russians and to experiment on an urban population with nuclear weapons.

Monte George Jr

The US motivation was not 2-fold. It was many-fold. Geopolitical decisions of that magnitude are always taken after examining all the angles, and calculating a most-likely vector sum result of each possible action. The bloody loss of life in the battles for a string of tiny Pacific islands is proof that an invasion against the dug-in fanatic population of Japan itself would have been extravagantly costly, with or without the Russians. The Japanese are thought to have been considering a surrender, but NOT an unconditional one. The only way to get an unconditional surrender and avoid this costly invasion, was to convince the Emperor to order his people to surrender. Without the Emperor’s command (or with a dead Emperor) the Japanese people would have fought on to the end.
The Atomic attacks convinced the Emperor to surrender, and allowing him to survive allowed him to direct the people to surrender peacefully. Happy ending for all except the residents of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but that is war; so let’s stop trying to start another one!

R PLobo

Nonsense – Russia was the only reason that the Japanese surrendered. As if the US could care less about their troops or civilian population. Nuclear weapons are totally useless other than as terror weapons. They do not gain any tactical advantage as demonstrated by even the US not employing them after Japan. The US used them out of the gate and only as a ploy to push back Russia – once the Russians had their own atomic weapons it became a mute point.
The tired old trope of the Emperor being swayed by the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is just that. Consider the context of the fire bombing of Tokyo and major Japanese urban areas – nuclear weapons made no difference to the Japanese.


“{As if the US could care less about their troops or civilian population. ”

clearly not. They put toxic fluoride in the water, absent any benefit. IQ killing, apathy causing fluoride, for the win.


bunk. Clearly they did not need to use that bomb, Japan was already willing to surrender.

“but NOT an unconditional one. ”

This is ridiculous and immoral reasoning with which to do mass murder on a city.

All they wanted, was to keep their emperor. . That is the ostensible reason why we murdered 200,000 in one fell swoop. But I agree with many that it was the first weapon of terror to be used on the planet. For purpose. To send a message.

Clearly, the globalists thought it necessary to cement the power of their bully boy, the grand ole USA.


Do Russians will be Great while protecting US/NATO victims ?

It’s becoming the Humanity hopes !

Russia’s Air Defense Deliveries to Syria Are Not Enough for a Full No-Fly Zone


Hiroshima and Nagasaki target was to show who is the strongest
and terrorize the whole World for supremacy.

Pearl Harbor was self inflicted alike 9/11 on purpose
to Dominate Asia for US Colonialism.

I do believe the worst occurred on the North Korea Population.

Alfred McCoy is considered the best Historian for South-East Asia
Noam Chomsky books mostly base on declassified Archives are also excellent…

The USA’s decades long warfare against China

North Korea Punished for Helping to Liberate Africa


North Korea in the Great Nuclear Game

On Voltairenet there is a lot of good informations in the DOSSIER folder,
in the right corner up there is also a Search where you can type what you are looking for

by Manlio Dinucci

AM Hants

Thanks for the links.


We Americans consider ourselves the darling saviors of this planet, while we are willing bitches to the mass murdering and twisted sociopaths who want to own and rule this planet. Makes me sick to be any part of Americana..

Harvey Swinestein

The Soviets won the war against Germany. Without massive Soviet pressure on the Eastern front, the allies would have been defeated . .


not strange at all. Fluoridated with propaganda as media = a mindless herd of swine.

John Whitehot

“the Bolsheviks were Jews”

then it came Stalin, and all your kind has had their dirty hairy hands slapped off Russia.

Brother Ma

Either he is a beast like the rest or a useful Scandinavian idiot. Do not forget, they now dress boys as girls there, allow headchoppers to rape their women and then do not arrest or imprison them because that would be racist. The headchoppers burn down the towns and streets. A beautiful country destroyed in five years by idiots ruling for Americaisrael.


“allow headchoppers”

You talking about the CIA, or the terrorists employed by the US government ?

Brother Ma

Headchopers= jihadi moslems whether employed by Cia or not. Yes , i Do believe almost all are CIA assets.


He doesn’t care, he thinks he is ruling class and the peasants don’t matter.

Dušan Mirić

Well, his words could be explain in several ways. He believes it, he is paid to believe, he doesn;t care what he says until he got paid for or, as prof Miroljub Jevtic said: “He’s de-Christianized.”

Dušan Mirić

I am sorry, I didn’t understand Russian or any slavic languages…


Scandinavia, Germany, Holland and Switzerland majority is Atheist,
it’s the Christian Culture evolution.

Religion are Darwinist too, appear, evolute, and die after few Centuries
when not anymore adapted to the Society needs…

Red Pilled ThoughtCrimes

gonna spend next 30 minutes watching this with a coffee i think. I know very very little about this war. Wasnt informed on iraq war either tbh. Syrian war i only know through SouthFront. wish i could donate more.

Tudor Miron

Are you American?


In the Western World there is a total black out

or monstrous lies and manipulation by the MSM

about any NATO activities.

None “Normal” person will agree with the NATO Horrors
lasting since it exist, April 4 in 1949 !


Yes, all the media people are as guilty as the Governments.
It angers and saddens me how man can be so cruel. Animals kill for food, humans kill for pleasure.



Tudor Miron

Anyway it is nice to see that more and more people starting to look around and think for themselves, refusing to let MSM to think for them.



Red Pilled ThoughtCrimes



Nato country’s have never being attacked, They allways attack others without valuable reason ! And allways based on lies !

Promitheas Apollonious

what goes around comes around give it time.



Kosovo Serbs are white niggers of Europe

In Kosovo, in 1999, NATO orchestrated KLA terrorism to cause a cycle of attacks and repression which was used to justify military intervention under the pretext of protecting the civilian population. Thirteen years down the line, Kosovo has unilaterally declared its independence and inflicts the most outrageous discrimination on its Serb population … under the auspices of NATO.


The new Serbian Warsaw Ghetto in the occupied Serbian land of Kosovo.

Serbs may not have black skin, but they are being treated like white niggers of Europe. Every day. In the media. On the streets in Kosovo. The pogrom and genocide against the Serbs in Kosovo has taken many, many forms. The theft of their land, the destruction of any means of economic survival, the ghettoization of the population inside barbed-wire fences, the destruction of their places of worship, the singling out and murdering of leaders of the community.

“The slow and systematic ethnic cleansing of Serbs and other minorities takes place in Kosovo every day.” – Kristian Kahrs, former NATO press officer in Kosovo. At the celebration of St. Vitus Day, the Serbian national holiday that is traditionally celebrated in Kosovo and Metohija, Serbs had their basic human rights violated. The police prohibited people from entering Kosovo, and those who did manage to enter were forbidden Serbian cultural markings, including Cyrillic script and Christian symbols. Banners and flags were confiscated and shirts were stripped away, thus the pilgrims were forced to attend the religious ceremonies half-naked. Women were not spared either: a young woman had her shirt stripped away because it depicted the White Angel. The police fired live ammunition at unarmed demonstrators, severely wounding three people. Buses that had passed the police checkpoints, including one with children, were met with stones and Molotov cocktails by the crowd, leaving 16 children injured. Women were forced to disrobe in public. Personal possessions were stolen and destroyed. Obviously this entire picture of KFOR, and EULEX, is nothing but a camouflage to cover up the genocidal pogrom against every person and every thing Serbian in Kosovo. Not only are the people hunted down and killed like animals whenever that’s possible. If that’s not possible, they’re assaulted in broad daylight in front of thousands of witnesses to terrorize them. And if that’s not possible, then there’s an anonymous attack on buses and means of transport. And if that’s not possible, then the buildings which they used to inhabit are destroyed. And if that’s not possible, then they’re satisfied destroying their churches and signs of their religion.

Anybody who believes the fairy tale that Kosovo is a multi-ethnic and multi-cultural society certainly has never been there or they’ve gone there on the pay of somebody who’s told them to go there to lie. It’s as simple as that. The minute you enter Kosovo, you know that you are either one of the those who is in charge — that means an Albanian or their international supporters, or you’re one of the hunted, literally hunted, minority ethnic groups. That seems to be the primary objective of the Albanian authorities there — to determine who’s who, to make life as hard as possible for those who aren’t among the Albanian ruling group.

What is being done to the Serbs in Kosovo is without precedent since the time of Adolf Hitler in Europe. Serbs are not allowed to exercise the freedom of speech, they have no access to the media, they are disarmed, their government at least until recently and maybe still is basically under the control of the American occupiers. So all they have left is Gandhi-like tactics of sitting down on the ground either blocking the roads or blocking the squares.

If you remember, this was the Nis Express. Albanian terrorists had placed a remote-controlled I.E.D. that blew up this bus. Nearly 40 wounded, twelve people died including two-year-old Danilo and both his parents — Kosovo, Feb 17, 2001 – Jerusalem, June 20, 2002

THIS is what Bill Clinton, GWB, and Obama wanted in Kosovo. Only up to March 2004, 120 Christian religious objects and cultural monuments were devastated or destroyed. Since June 1999 when the NATO Kosovo Force (KFOR) occupied Kosovo, then an integral part of then-Yugoslavia, Kosovo was technically under a United Nations mandate, UN Security Council Resolution 1244. Under 1244 Kosovo would remain part of Serbia pending a peaceful resolution of its status. That UN Resolution was blatantly ignored by the US, German and other EU parties in 2008. Immediately after the bombing of Serbia in 1999 the Pentagon seized a 1000 acre large parcel of land in Kosovo at Uresevic near the border to Macedonia, and awarded a contract to Halliburton when Dick Cheney was CEO there, to build one of the largest US overseas military bases in the world, Camp Bondsteel, with more than 7000 troops today.

Orahovac is a city in southern part of Serbia, Kosovo and Metohija which is inhabited with some 25,000 Albanians. There is also small enclave of approx. 400 Serbian and Roma souls. They’re constantly protected by KFOR troops. In the 21’st century those people are living in ghetto which comprises of 300 meters in 2-3 streets where they are allowed to move relatively freely. Their spirit is truly something worth of admiration.

Hashim Thaci, Prime Minister of Kosovo and head of the Democratic Party of Kosovo, is the former leader of the terrorist organization which the US and NATO trained and called the Kosovo Liberation Army, KLA, or in Albanian, UCK. A draft report by the Council of Europe says Kosovo Prime Minister Hashim Thaci was the head of a “mafia-like” network that dealt weapons, drugs and human organs. The report, “Inhuman treatment of people and illicit trafficking of human organs in Kosovo” identifies the province’s recently re-elected “prime minister” Hashim Thaçi as the boss of a “mafia-like” Albanian group specialized in smuggling weapons, drugs, people, and human organs all over Europe. The report reveals that Thaçi’s closest aides were taking Serbs across the border into Albania after the war, murdering them, and selling their organs on the black market. In addition, the report accuses Thaçi of having exerted “violent control” over the heroin trade for a decade. The U.S. and German-installed leadership of Kosovo finds itself under siege after the Council of Europe voted to endorse a report charging senior members of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) of controlling a brisk trade in human organs, sex slaves and narcotics.

Kosovo and Albania are major heroin transit routes into Europe. According to a 2008 US State Department annual report on international narcotics traffic, several key drug trafficking routes pass through the Balkans. Kosovo is mentioned as a key point for the transfer of heroin from Turkey and Afghanistan to Western Europe. Those drugs flow under the watchful eye of the Thaci government.


The Balkan Chronicles

Dušan Mirić

Alexander, Kosovo tragedy has it prelude in Croatia as well as in Bosnia and Herzegovina too


NATO main worry is to hide the true for European
who will never agree with US/UK/Israel Abuses
in Europe, Afghanistan, and Middle-East !


In his defense, Stoltenberg could be too gullible.

If some1 say he /she sho*t him in the a** save him from his pimple on his bot**m, he would take it as an act of saving too…


He is just the same kind of War Criminal alike Bush’s, Rumsfeld, Cheney,
Blair, Cameron, Sarkosy, Hollande, Fabius and al !

Guillotine for all of them would be too fair,
and I am agains Death Penalty, but what to do with such Monsters ?

Adolph Hitler was a chore Child in comparison !


What you do to these people is what America does, lock them up and torture them on a regular basis.
Killing them is letting them off lightly.



Seventy years of harassing political establishment and people of Europe

by Andrey Fomin

Contrary to appearances, the decision of the United States to investigate a possible Russian aid to anti-European parties is not intended to protect Europeans from foreign interference. This is quite the opposite. For 70 years, Washington controls the West European politics prohibiting all forms of genuine democracy.



According to a “sensational” article by The Telegraph, the US director of National Intelligence was recently instructed by Congress to “conduct a major review into Russian clandestine funding of European parties over the last decade.” [1] This disclosure —a classic “controlled leak”— is intended to warn disobedient yet popular political entities across Europe to scale back their ambitions to rebalance the roles and weight of their nation states within the European Union. Hungary’s Jobbik, Greece’s Golden Dawn, Italy’s Lega Nord, and France’s Front National are explicitly included in the US “warning list,” while other unnamed “parties” in Austria, the Czech Republic, and the Netherlands are being advised that they are “under a US security probe.” Even the new British Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, is suspected of flirting with the Russians. So, according to the sponsor of The Telegraph’s story, any European politician who dares to question NATO’s eastward expansion, the policy of anti-Russian sanctions, or the current European stance on the Ukrainian conflict is essentially a witting or unwitting tool of “Russia’s hybrid warfare.”

Well, that would be funny if it weren’t so dangerous. In fact, any impartial observer would pose some simple questions: Why the hell do US intelligence agencies care about challenges to Europe’s internal security? Aren’t they the same agents who finance, recruit, and control countless political organizations, individuals, and media outlets on the European continent? Why are they so brazenly revealing their dominion over Europe?

A politically correct challenger would argue that the United States saved Europe from the “Communist threat” after the end of WWII, facilitated its speedy economic recovery, and is still safeguarding the continent under its nuclear umbrella. Perhaps. But a review of the historical background should not begin with the Marshall Plan. First of all, that was launched in April 1948. Since the Nazis capitulated in May 1945, a misinformed reader might deduce that the United States had been drafting a massive investment program for Europe for as long as three years, and … he would be wrong. At the Second “Octagon” Quebec Conference in September 1944, President Roosevelt and US Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau Jr. submitted to the British PM Winston Churchill their Post-Surrender Program for Germany [2]. That strictly confidential document envisaged the partition and complete deindustrialization of the German state. According to the plan, Germany was to be divided into two independent states. Its epicenters of mining and industry, including the Saar Protectorate, the Ruhr Valley, and Upper Silesia were to be internationalized or annexed by France and Poland. Following are a few excerpts:

• The [US] military forces upon entry into [German] industrial areas shall destroy all plants and equipment which cannot be removed immediately.

• No longer than 6 months after the cessation of hostilities, all industrial plants and equipment not destroyed by military action shall either be completely dismantled and removed from the area or completely destroyed.

• All people within the area should be made to understand that this area will not again be allowed to become an industrial area. Accordingly, all people and their families within the area having special skills or technical training should be encouraged to migrate permanently from the area and should be as widely dispersed as possible.

• All German radio stations and newspapers, magazines, weeklies, etc. shall be discontinued until adequate controls are established and an appropriate program formulated.

That was the original postwar recovery program for Germany, known as the Morgenthau Plan. The notorious Joint Chiefs of Staff Directive 1067 (JCS 1067) addressed to the Commander-in-Chief of U.S. Occupation Forces in Germany, which was officially issued in April 1945, was fully in line with that document [3].

Partition of Germany according to Morgenthau Plan, 1944

The Morgenthau Plan very quickly proved to be a strategic mistake. The United States underestimated the ideological and cultural impact the Soviets would have on European societies. Left to their own judgment, American strategists failed to understand the attraction that a socialist system held for the majority of the population of the liberated nations. A vast spectrum of pro-socialist and pro-communist politicians began winning democratic elections and gaining political influence not only in Eastern Europe, but also in Greece, Italy, France, and other European states (Palmiro Togliatti and Maurice Thorez are just a few who could be named here). Thus Washington came to understand that its forced de-industrialization of Europe could result in Soviet-style reindustrialization and eventual Russian dominance of the continent… Therefore the US had to promptly replace the Morgenthau Plan with one named after Secretary of State George Marshall… Over the course of four years it provided Europe with $12 billion USD in credits, donations, leases, etc., for the purpose of buying … American machinery and other goods. Although the plan undoubtedly revived the economies of Europe, its biggest positive effect was on … the US economy itself! Simultaneously a wave of political repression was launched throughout Europe, most notably in Germany.

The media has largely forgotten about a Soviet initiative, proposed in 1950, to withdraw from the GDR and to reunify a neutral, non-aligned, demilitarized Germany within one year of the conclusion of a peace treaty. As a matter of fact, the resolution adopted at the Prague meeting of the foreign ministers of the Soviet Bloc on Oct. 21, 1950 proposed the establishment of an all-German Constituent Council, with equal representation from East and West Germany to prepare for the formation of an “all-German, sovereign, democratic, and peace-loving provisional government.” Needless to say, the US government and West German administration in Bonn strongly opposed the initiative [4]. While a plebiscite on the issue “Are you against the remilitarization of Germany and in favor of the conclusion of a Peace Treaty in 1951?” was announced in both halves of the divided state, that referendum was held and officially acknowledged only in East Germany (with 96% voting “yes”).vtek The authorities in US-controlled West Germany failed to respond in a truly democratic manner. They refused to recognize the preliminary results of the referendum that had been held since February 1951 (of the 6.2 million federal citizens who had taken part by June 1951, 94.4% also voted “yes”) [5] and introduced the draconian cautious Criminal Law Amendment Act (the 1951 Blitzgesetz) on July 11. According to that legislation, anyone guilty of importing prohibited literature, criticizing the government, or having unreported contacts with representatives of the GDR, etc. was to be prosecuted for “state treason,” which was punishable by 5 to 15 years in prison. Consequently, between 1951 and 1968, 200,000 charges were brought against 500,000 members of the Communist Party and other left-wing groups in Germany under this law. Ten thousand people were sent to prison, and most of those who were “cleared” of charges never resumed their political activities. Additional legal amendments in 1953 actually abolished the right to freely hold gatherings and demonstrations, and in 1956 the Communist Party of Germany was banned.

More details can be found in Daniel Burkholz’s 2012 documentary “Verboten – Verfolgt – Vergessen” (Forbidden-Followed-Forgotten. Half a Million Public Enemies), which is surprisingly unavailable on YouTube.

The political repression that occurred in Germany from the 1950s to the 1980s, compared to similar events in other European countries during the same period, is a very taboo topic. Operation Gladio in Italy, the crimes of the regime of the Black Colonels in Greece, and the controversial assassinations of realistic European politicians who openly advocated for historical compromise with the Soviet bloc – such as Italian PM Aldo Moro (1978) and Swedish PM Olof Palme (1986) – all received far more media attention. The revelations made by a former correspondent for the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Udo Ulfkotte, in his book Gekaufte Journalisten (“Purchased Journalists”) about the mechanism of media control in Germany (remember the Morgenthau Plan?) represent only the tip of the iceberg.

The almost complete lack of reaction seen in Berlin after Edward Snowden’s disclosure of the blanket electronic espionage routinely conducted against German leaders by the NSA means that in reality, Germany has acknowledged its loss of sovereignty over its own country and thus has nothing to lose.

So, after taking all these facts into account and rereading the article in The Telegraph, are you still so sure that the United States is truly the guardian of Europe’s sovereignty? Is it not more likely that by using the alleged “Russian threat” to control and harass the political establishment and civil society in Europe, Washington is making headway toward a simple and primitive goal – that of merely keeping its sheep within the fold?

Andrey Fomin


[1] «Russia accused of clandestine funding of European parties as US conducts major review of Vladimir Putin’s strategy. Exclusive: UK warns of “new Cold War” as Kremlin seeks to divide and rule in Europe», Peter Foster & Matthew Holehouse, The Telegraph, January 16, 2016.

[2] “Suggested Post-Surrender Program for Germany”, F. D. Roosevelt, September 1944.

[3] “Directive to the Commander in Chief of the U.S. Occupation Forces (JCS 1067)” (April 1945)

[4] “Notes for Eastern Element’s Briefing of General Mathewson”, February 15, 1951. Published in Foreign Relations of the United States 1951, Volume III, Part 2, European Security and the German Question (Document 341).

[5] “Flusslandschaft 1951. Frieden”, Protest in München.



Poor Turk

Yet, majority of Serbians hate Russia and love the west.


So True Love

Dr. Pro. Liv.

Not true at all.

Dr. Pro. Liv.

Not true.
You are liar.

Poor Turk

Triggered? Name one media group in serbia that reports in favour of Russia. And most of the people here are moving to western countries.


I doubt you are even a Turk, just another Chuck Chunder working for America, spreading hate.

Dr. Pro. Liv.

Your argument is rubbish just like your 1st comment.
ALL “media” in Serbia is directly controlled by the West either directly or indirectly.
(Serb government is also controlled by the West)
Opinion of the Serb population is often radically different from the pro-Western PROPAGANDA that is written-spoken in all Serb “media”.
Because of bad economic situation people go to West for work true… But that tradition of working in Western Europe is 60-70 years old already …It exists ever since 1960’s in Yugoslavia to the present day.
And has nothing to do with Serbs “liking” or
“not liking” the West . It is simple fight for survival .
You should know all that being “Turk” since Turks have same story going to West (Germany) for work and not because they are “liking” the West…

Tudor Miron

Are you Serbian to clame on their behalf?

Dr. Pro. Liv.

The only “link” to Serbs is his hate for Serbia and Serbs (and Russia probably)

Dušan Mirić

Probably just another hater just for hate. I never made such inquiry, but as much as I know from my friends and neighbors nobody hate Russians or Russia. Perhaps dislike certain individuals like Yeltsin…Also, I heard that newspaper Danas (Today) is anti-Russian, but I don’t think so, just healthy skeptical

Tudor Miron

Thanks for clarification. Regarding Yeltsin – this traitor deserves the worst.

Dušan Mirić

You’re welcome


Do you are a shameless Circus Clown hire by NATO ?

John Whitehot

so turkey exists in the dimension where you live.

nice to know.

Raptar Driver

Wrong, you are trolling.



History Of Staged Terrorism Exposed In German Mainstream Media


Bologna Central Station bombing in 1980

The conservative german Süddeutsche Zeitung on April 4 published an remarkable article within a series on the occasion of the 60th anniversary of NATO. Excerpts and summary here:

Underground Troops In Nato Countries – Guerilla For The State by Jonathan Stock

It was a secret of many Nato member countries. Underground armies were existing to fight in the case of a Soviet invasion in guerrilla fashion. The trails lead back into the 1950s – NATO is still blocking the facts.

The article goes in great detail into the history of Gladio, its connections with former german SS troops and plans to blow up bridges and other strategic infrastructures in case of an soviet invasion after WW2. The story the “Stay behind Army” was blown open in 1952 when members of the underground groups informed police and the scandal first made the news. This lead to a politcal uproar when it is revealed that a list of numerous well known german personalities exited who were planned to have been killed in case of an emergency situation. The list included communists as well as social democrats and the state interior minister of the german state of Hessen. Several people were arrested when the list was discovered. German chancellor Adenauer claimed to have not known anything about the activities at the time. The US High Commissioner Walter Donnelly claimed the group was about to be dissolved in the same month when the arrests occurred. The Süddeutsche Zeitung article then reports that after a ruling of the german constitutional court the arrested members were released in the same month.

In October of 1952 Prime Minister of the german state of Hessen made the case public in state parliament . After that even the New York Times and the german newsmagazin Der Spiegel reported about the case and for the first time the public got informed about the existence of the “Stay Behind Army” of NATO

The article then reports about former Italian Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti who in 1990 during investigations about alleged Mafia and crime connections chose to reveal the existence of the italian “Stay-behind-Organisation” named “Gladio“.

This lead to a offical report of the german government in December 1990 that said: “The units that where set up by allied secret services on german territory until 1955 for means of securing intelligence and trafficking of personal have been transfered into the custody of german intelligence services as of 1956.” The report also stated that the organisation was not dissolved as promised in 1952 and that 104 people still were active at the time of the report.

The article in Sueddeutsche Zeitung goes than in great detail into explaining the findings of the swiss university professor Daniele Ganser. The paper writes about the 11 countries in which Gladio was active according to Ganser and then quotes him: “The groups intervened massively in the interior affairs of some of the countries – at least in Belgium, Greece, Turkey, France and Italy, for example with the bombing of the central railway station in Bologna in 1980.” and “It can not be accepted, that tax money is being used to kill ordinary citizens.”

Nato’s Secret Armies: Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe, by Daniele Ganser


Original source: http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/


Tommy Jensen

Now ISIS is the new sleeper cells in Europe for Nato.


Exactly, NATO, Gladio, CIA, MI6, DGSE, Mossad, AL Qaida, ISIS, Daesh and al
are different branches of one of the UK/US Deep Power Same Gang dancing together !

AM Hants

There is also ‘Operation Beluga; running with ‘Operation Gladio’, which is to blame Russia for everything.

OpEdNews Op Eds 3/27/2016 at 15:24:04
Operation Beluga: A US-UK Plot to Discredit Putin and Destabilize the Russian Federation
By William Dunkerley … https://www.opednews.com/populum/page.php?f=Operation-Beluga-A-US-UK-by-William-Dunkerley-Antiterrorism-Database_France_Litvinenko_Putin-160327-385.html

AM Hants

BBC Timewatch 1992 : Operation Gladio 1 – The Ring Masters VF… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sl1EOWhgHhw

Gladio, Nato’s Dagger at the Heart of Europe: The Pentagon-Nazi-Mafia Terror Axis… Richard Cottrell… https://www.amazon.com/Gladio-Natos-Dagger-Heart-Europe/dp/1615776885



9/11, the JFK Assassination, and the Oklahoma City Bombing as a Strategy of Tension

by Peter Dale Scott

Scholar and former diplomat Peter Dale Scott compares the events of September 11, the JFK assassination and the Oklahoma City bombing. He exposes the existence and continuity of a “deep state” behind the facade.



Introduction: Structural Deep Events and the Strategy of Tension in Italy

From an American standpoint, it is easy to see clearly how Italian history was systematically destabilized in the second half of the 20th century, by a series of what I call structural deep events. I have defined these as “events, like the JFK assassination, the Watergate break-in, or 9/11, which violate the … social structure, have a major impact on … society, repeatedly involve law-breaking or violence, and in many cases proceed from an unknown dark force.” [1]

Piazza Fontana bombing

Bologna bombing

The examples in Italy, well known to Italians, include the Piazza Fontana bombing of 1969, the Piazza della Loggia bombing of 1974, and the Bologna railway bombing of 1980. These bombings, in which over one hundred civilians were killed and many more wounded, were attributed at the time to marginal left-wing elements of society. However, thanks chiefly to a series of investigations and judicial proceedings, it is now clearly established that the bombings were the work of right-wing elements in collusion with Italian military intelligence, as part of an on-going “strategy of tension” to discredit the Italian left, encourage support for a corrupt status quo, and perhaps move beyond democracy altogether. [2] As one of the conspirators, Vincenzo Vinciguerra, later stated, “The December 1969 explosion was supposed to be the detonator which would have convinced the political and military authorities to declare a state of emergency.” [3]

Vinciguerra also revealed that he and others had also been members of a paramilitary “stay-behind” network originally organized at the end of World War II by the CIA and NATO as “Operation Gladio.”

In 1984, questioned by judges about the 1980 Bologna station bombing, Vinciguerra said: “With the massacre of Peteano, and with all those that have followed, the knowledge should by now be clear that there existed a real live structure, occult and hidden, with the capacity of giving a strategic direction to the outrages…[it] lies within the state itself…There exists in Italy a secret force parallel to the armed forces, composed of civilians and military men, in an anti-Soviet capacity that is, to organise a resistance on Italian soil against a Russian army…A secret organisation, a super-organisation with a network of communications, arms and explosives, and men trained to use them…A super-organisation which, lacking a Soviet military invasion which might not happen, took up the task, on Nato’s behalf, of preventing a slip to the left in the political balance of the country. This they did, with the assistance of the official secret services and the political and military forces. [4]

Gladio connections to sustained false-flag violence, again involving NATO and the CIA, were subsequently revealed in other countries, notably Belgium and Turkey. [5]

The original purpose of Gladio was to consolidate resistance in the event of a Soviet takeover. But many of the senior Italians involved in the bombings implicated the CIA and NATO in them as well:

General Vito Miceli, the Italian head of military intelligence, after his arrest in 1974 on a charge of conspiring to overthrow the government, testified “that the incriminated organization, … was formed under a secret agreement with the United States and within the framework of NATO.” Former Italian defense minister Paulo Taviani told Magistrate Casson during a 1990 investigation “that during his time in office (1955-58), the Italian secret services were bossed and financed by ‘the boys in Via Veneto’—i.e. the CIA agents in the U.S. Embassy in the heart of Rome.” In 2000 “an Italian secret service general [Giandelio Maletti] said . . . that the CIA gave its tacit approval to a series of bombings in Italy in the 1970s to sow instability and keep communists from taking power. . . . ‘The CIA wanted, through the birth of an extreme nationalism and the contribution of the far right, particularly Ordine Nuovo, to stop (Italy) sliding to the left,’ he said.” [6]

Daniele Ganser, in his important book Nato’s Secret Armies, has endorsed a Spanish report that in 1990 NATO Secretary General Manfred Wörner (a German politician and diplomat) secretly confirmed that NATO’s headquarters, SHAPE, was indeed responsible:

The Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE), directing organ of NATO’s military apparatus, coordinated the actions of Gladio, according to the revelations of Gladio Secretary-General Manfred Wörner during a reunion with the NATO ambassadors of the 16 allied nations. [7]

Extrapolating from such testimony, Ola Tunander has compared the strategy of tension in Italy, with its false-flag bombing attacks, to “what the Turkish military elite might describe as the correction of the course of democracy by the ‘deep state’ [a Turkish term].” [8]

Strategy of Tension

But I believe it would be too simplistic an analysis to blame the Italian strategy of tension exclusively on Vinciguerra’s “super-organisation which… took up the task [of false-flag bombings], on Nato’s behalf.” There appear to have been other directing forces besides NATO and those elements Vinciguerra was aware of through Italian military intelligence (the SID, later SISMI). It is important to recall that the Italian trials of those convicted for the 1980 Bologna bombing implicated not only Vinciguerra, SISMI, and Gladio, but also elements of the Italian mafia (the Banda della Magliana) and the Italian Masonic Lodge Propaganda-Due (P-2), with links to criminal bankers and the Vatican. [9]

In short, if we suggest that something like the Turkish deep state was involved in the Italian strategy of tension, this does not suggest a solution to the Italian mystery, so much as a zone, or interlocking network, for further research.

Has a Strategy of Tension Been Exercised in America?

Gladio connections to sustained false-flag violence, again involving NATO and the CIA, were subsequently established in other countries, notably Belgium and Turkey. [10] I wish to propose that America, as well as Europe, has also suffered from a similar series of false-flag structural deep events, including bombings, that have, in conformity with the same strategy of tension, systematically moved America into its current condition, a state of emergency.

Nato headquarters

Among the false flag structural deep events I wish to consider today are

The John F. Kennedy assassination of 1963, or 11/22, which led to the CIA’s Operation Chaos against the anti-Vietnam War movement. (11/22 was clearly a deep event: many documents in the area of Lee Harvey Oswald’s relations to CIA operations are still being withheld, despite statutory and court orders to release them. [11]

The Robert Kennedy assassination of 1968, followed immediately by emergency legislation which led to state-sponsored violence at the 1968 Democratic Party Convention.

The 1993 first World Trade Center bombing and the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, which led to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.

9/11 and the subsequent false flag anthrax attacks of 2001, which led to the imposition of Continuity of Government (COG) measures, the Patriot Act, and the proclamation, on September 14, 2001, of a State of Emergency which remains in effect. (In September 2012 it was once again renewed for another year). [12]

These structural deep events have had a common and cumulative result: the erosion of public or constitutional power, and its progressive replacement by unconstrained repressive force. I have argued elsewhere that

1) as in Italy, all of these events were blamed on marginal left-wing elements, but in fact involved elements inside America’s covert intelligence agencies, along with their shadowy underworld connections.

2) some of these structural deep events bore a relationship to the ongoing secret planning – known in the Pentagon as the Doomsday Project – for Continuity of Government (or COG) in an emergency, which entailed its own secret communications network, and arrangements for what (in the Oliver North Hearings) was called “suspension of the American Constitution.”

3) in every case, the official response to the deep event was a set of new repressive measures, usually in the form of legislation.

4) cumulatively, these events suggest the on-going presence in America of what I have called a “dark force” or “deep state,” analogous to what Vinciguerra described in Italy as a “secret force…occult and hidden, with the capacity of giving a strategic direction to the [successive] outrages.” [13]

The Oklahoma City Bombing (4/19) and 9/11

Recently I viewed for a film, “A Noble Lie,” about the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. [14] This gave me a chance, for the first time, to test these hypotheses against the case of Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995, or what I shall call 4/19. More than I could have anticipated, 4/19 fit into and strengthened this analysis.

Oklahoma City Bombing

The film “A Noble Lie,” itself points to some striking similarities between the events of 1995 and of 2001. The most obvious is the alleged destruction of a steel-reinforced building by external forces (a truck bomb in the case of the Murrah Building in 1995, flying debris in the case of Building Seven in 2001). Experts in both cases have asserted that the buildings in fact could only have been brought down by cutting charges placed directly against the sustaining columns inside the building. Here for example is a report to Congress from General Benton K. Partin, a retired U.S. Air Force Brigadier General and expert on non-nuclear weapons devices:

When I first saw the pictures of the truck-bomb’s asymmetrical damage to the Federal Building, my immediate reaction was that the pattern of damage would have been technically impossible without supplementing demolition charges at some of the reinforcing concrete column bases…. For a simplistic blast truck-bomb, of the size and composition reported, to be able to reach out on the order of 60 feet and collapse a reinforced column base the size of column A-7 is beyond credulity. [15]

There is now a broad and growing consensus among architects, engineers, and other experts, that the three buildings which collapsed on 9/11 in the World Trade Center were also most probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges. [16]

Another important similarity was the legal consequence of most of these events: the response to Oklahoma City was the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, while the response to 9/11 was the first implementation of COG and the passage (after a false flag anthrax attack) of the Patriot Act. “A Noble Lie” focuses on the domestic consequences of the Antiterrorism Act, and indeed it did, like the Patriot Act after it, provide for significant restrictions on the right of habeas corpus as the courts had interpreted it. In other words, both acts provided pretexts for implementation of the proposals for warrantless detention that had been a central focus of COG planning in the 1980s with Oliver North. This fit into a larger ongoing pattern of the progressive restriction of our constitutional rights by unrestrained coercive power — a pattern that I will trace back to the assassination of John F. Kennedy in 1963.

But there were important foreign consequences of the 1996 Antiterrorism Act as well, in particular Section 328, which amended the Foreign Assistance Act to bolster

assistance in the form of arms and ammunition to certain specific countries, for the purpose of fighting terrorism. [17] This in turn led in 1997 to the creation of secret “Eyes Only” liaison agreement between the CIA’s Counter-Terrorism Center (CTC) and Saudi Arabia, followed by a subsequent CIA agreement in 1999 with Uzbekistan (i.e. two of the most secretive and repressive regimes in the world today). [18]

I have argued that these secret liaison agreements – with Saudi Arabia and Uzbekistan – may have provided the cover for secret CIA withholding of information before 9/11 about the designated 9/11 culprits al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar. [19] Thus, if my analysis of the CIA’s withholding in 2000-2001 is accurate, then 4/19 in 1995 did not just exhibit similarities to 9/11: it was a significant part of the build-up which allowed this withholding to occur, and also 9/11 itself.

Increases in Repressive Power After Deep Events

That 4/19 in 1995 had repressive legal consequences links it both to 9/11 in 2001 and also to 11/22 in 1963, after which the Warren Commission used the JFK assassination to increase CIA surveillance of Americans. As I wrote in Deep Politics, this was the result of

the Warren Commission’s controversial recommendations that the Secret Service’s domestic surveillance responsibilities be increased (WR 25-26). Somewhat illogically, the Warren Report concluded both that Oswald acted alone (WR 22), . . . and also that the Secret Service, FBI, CIA, should coordinate more closely the surveillance of organized groups (WR 463). In particular, it recommended that the Secret Service acquire a computerized data bank compatible with that already developed by the CIA. [20]

In the ensuing Vietnam War this involvement of the CIA in domestic surveillance led to the CIA’s Operation Chaos, an investigation of the antiwar movement in which the CIA, despite its Charter’s restrictions on domestic spying,

amassed thousands of files on Americans, indexed hundreds of thousands of Americans into its computer records, and disseminated thousands of reports about Americans to the FBI and other government offices. Some of the information concerned the domestic activity of those Americans. [21]

The pattern of increased repression would repeat itself four years later in 1968 after the assassination of Martin Luther King, in response to which two US Army brigades were (until 1971) stationed on permanent standby in the United States, as part of Operation GARDEN PLOT to deal with domestic unrest. [22]

The pattern was repeated again with

the assassination of Robert Kennedy. In the twenty-four hours between Bobby’s shooting and his death, Congress hurriedly passed a statute— drafted well in advance (like the Tonkin Gulf Resolution of 1964 and the Patriot Act of 2001) — that still further augmented the secret powers given to the Secret Service in the name of protecting presidential candidates. [23]

This was not a trivial or benign change: from this swiftly considered act, passed under Johnson, flowed some of the worst excesses of the Nixon presidency. [24] The change also contributed to the chaos and violence at the Chicago Democratic Convention of 1968. Army intelligence surveillance agents, seconded to the Secret Service, were present both inside and outside the convention hall. Some of them equipped the so-called “Legion of Justice thugs whom the Chicago Red Squad turned loose on local anti-war groups.” [25]

Other Similarities between Dallas in 1963 and Oklahoma City in 1995

The repressive consequences after 11/22 in 1963, and after 4/19 in 1995, are linked to other shared features between the two events. Almost immediately after 11/22 there were reports from both inside and outside government, suggesting that Oswald had killed the president as part of an international Communist conspiracy.

In Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, I called these “Phase-One” reports, part of

a two-fold process. Phase One put forward the phantom of an international plot, linking Oswald to the USSR, to Cuba, or to both countries together. This phantom was used to invoke the danger of a possible nuclear confrontation, which induced Chief Justice Earl Warren and other political notables to accept Phase Two, the equally false (but less dangerous) hypothesis that Oswald killed the President all by himself. …. [T]he Phase-One story… was first promoted and then defused by the CIA. Michael Beschloss has revealed that, at 9:20 AM on the morning of November 23, CIA Director John McCone briefed the new President. In Beschloss’ words: “The CIA had information on foreign connections to the alleged assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, which suggested to LBJ that Kennedy may have been murdered by an international conspiracy.” [26]

To this day both Phase-One and Phase-Two stories have dominated the treatment of 11/22 in the governing media, to the virtual exclusion of non-establishment analyses treating 11/22 as a deep event.

Many have forgotten that there was a Phase One-Phase Two process with respect to 4/19 as well. Both immediately and thereafter there were a number of reports linking McVeigh and Nichols to Iraqis and other Middle Easterners, including Ramzi Yousef, the fugitive bomber in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing (which also used an ammonium nitrate (ANFO) bomb in a Ryder rental truck.) [27] Both Clinton and his Counterterrorism Coordinator, Richard Clarke, have confirmed that some of these stories were discussed at a meeting of the Counterterrorism Security Group on the day of 4/19. [28] Both men also claim to have dismissed them in favor of a low-grade Phase Two local conspiracy led by the two designated culprits: Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols. But reports of Middle Eastern involvement, sometimes attributed to sources inside government, continued to appear in the governing media, including CBS, NBC, and the New York Times. [29]

First World Trade Center bombing of 1993

Meanwhile, signs of a local Iraqi conspiracy were industriously pursued by an Oklahoma City NBC reporter, Jayna Davis, and collected in her book The Third Terrorist. Her Phase-One evidence was centered on an all-points-bulletin initial search, quickly suppressed, for an unnamed John Doe #2. Her research was subsequently endorsed in a Congressional Report by Republican Congressman Dana Rohrabacher. [30]

Moreover Richard Clarke has written that the Oklahoma City bombing was followed by a spate of new internal Presidential Decision Directives or PDDs (in addition to the Antiterrorism Act), which were drafted by himself. One of these addressed a security problem in response to the Oklahoma City bombing, and another conferred new counterterrorism powers on himself, including his new title as National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection, and Counter-terrorism. Two (PDD 62 and especially PDD 67) dealt with what he calls a more “robust system of command and control” for “our Continuity of Government program,” which in his words “had been allowed to fall apart when the threat of a Soviet nuclear attack had gone away.” [31]

These words recall Tim Weiner’s report of April 1994 in the New York Times that in the post-Soviet Clinton era, “the Doomsday Project, as it was known” was scheduled to be scaled way back, because “the nuclear tensions” of the Soviet era had faded away. [32] In other words Clinton had planned to scale back the Doomsday Project (which was governed by a secret extra-governmental committee including Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, then both not in government); but Richard Clarke used Oklahoma City to save the Doomsday Project, make it more robust and place it under his own control.

According to author Andrew Cockburn, a new target was found:

Although the exercises continued, still budgeted at over $200 million a year in the Clinton era, the vanished Soviets were now replaced by terrorists. . . . There were other changes, too. In earlier times the specialists selected to run the “shadow government” had been drawn from across the political spectrum, Democrats and Republicans alike. But now, down in the bunkers, Rumsfeld [and Cheney] found [themselves] in politically congenial company, the players’ roster being filled almost exclusively with Republican hawks. “It was one way for these people to stay in touch. They’d meet, do the exercise, but also sit around and castigate the Clinton administration in the most extreme way,” a former Pentagon official with direct knowledge of the phenomenon told me. “You could say this was a secret government-in-waiting.” [33]

Of course the fact that 4/19 was followed by a strengthening of COG does not of itself corroborate my thesis that COG planning has been a significant factor in the planning and execution of America’s structural deep events [34] However there were other recurring features in the picture I have presented of America’s structural deep events, and we do find these in the Oklahoma City story.

Of these the most prominent is the importance in the official story of designated culprits who were very possibly government informants or double agents. [35] Perhaps the best documented recent example is the US Government’s use and protection of the senior al-Qaeda operative Ali Mohamed as a double agent inside al Qaeda; this protection allowed him to train some of the participants of the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993, and later help organize the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombing in Kenya. [36]

In my 2008 book The War Conspiracy I discussed the possibility that both Lee Harvey Oswald and some of the Arabs designated in 9/11 (Ali Mohamed, al-Hazmi, al-Mihdhar) may in fact have been double agents working with a US Government agency, such as the FBI or Army Intelligence. [37] Others have suggested that at the very least Oswald was an FBI informant; and Lawrence Wright wrote in The New Yorker that, in withholding the names of al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar from the FBI, “The CIA may also have been protecting an overseas operation and was afraid that the F.B.I. would expose it.” [38]

In this context I noted with great interest the contention in “A Noble Lie” that Timothy McVeigh, the prime designated culprit in 4/19, may also have been an informant or double agent working for the U.S. Army. [39] Of course this contention remains unproven, but the film provides some corroborative evidence.


The Oklahoma City Bombing and Operation PATCON

What is certain is that McVeigh, like Oswald, al-Hazmi, and al-Mihdhar, was in a milieu of known informants and or double agents, who were part of an important secret operation. In the case of Oswald and the two Saudis, this suggests reasons for the U.S. Government’s on-going suppression of important facts about them, both before the crimes they are alleged to have committed, and ever since to the present day. [40]

In 2005 John M. Berger, an excellent researcher, discovered that in the 1990s the FBI, in a major counterintelligence operation, codenamed PATCON for “Patriot-conspiracy,” had been investigating McVeigh’s milieu of armed right-wingers — or what Berger called

a wildly diverse collection of racist, ultra-libertarian, right-wing and/or pro-gun activists and extremists who, over the years, have found common cause in their suspicion and fear of the federal government. The undercover agents met some of the most infamous names in the movement, but their work never led to a single arrest. When McVeigh walked through the middle of the investigation in 1993, he went unnoticed. [41]

PATCON was particularly focused on a former asset of Oliver North’s illegal network to supply arms to the Nicaragua Contras: Tom Posey and his paramilitary group Civilian Material Assistance (CMA). In the 1980s, according to Paul de Armond, CMA had begun as “as an adjunct to the Alabama Ku Klux Klan.” [42] Enrolled in the Contra supply effort by first the Defense Intelligence Agency and then Oliver North, CMA’s “volunteer” work in patrolling the Arizona border against incoming aliens persuaded then-Congressman John McCain to serve on its board. [43] But in PATCON’s eyes in the Post-Reagan era, “Posey was a notorious black market arms dealer, suspected of having contraband sources on more than one U.S. military base.” [44]

In both JFK and 9/11 it seems clear to me that the subsequent cover-ups derive from the fact that the respective plots were skillfully designed to piggy-back on authorized covert operations, in such a way as to ensure a subsequent cover-up. Berger’s important essay in Foreign Policy on PATCON does not suggest a connection between McVeigh’s plot and the FBI operation. However he notes deep in the essay that Dennis Mahon, an associate of McVeigh and another important target of PATCON,

would go on to be a well-known figure in white supremacist circles and was convicted in February for the 2004 mail bombing of a state diversity official in Arizona. After his arrest in 2009, Mahon told his cellmate that he was “the number three anonymous person in the Oklahoma City bombing investigation.”

In other words, Mahon identified himself as John Doe #2.

Berger, on his own Website Intelwire, has written that “Mahon has spoken of knowing McVeigh in the past,” and has concluded that, “Based on those comments and other information, it is at least plausible that Mahon was involved in the [Oklahoma City] bombing. [45] Berger’s “other evidence” is the testimony of ATF informant Carol Howe, transmitted first by Jayna Davis and then by Congressman Rohrabacher, that before 4/19 “Mahon talked about targeting federal buildings for bombings. …[and] took three trips [with McVeigh’s contact Andre Strassmeir] to Oklahoma City.” [46]

Mahon has been characterized as a self-aggrandizing loose talker. However, it seems safe to say that we better understand the context of Oklahoma City after considering the new evidence relating to PATCON, a secret FBI operation from 1991 to 1993 then known only to insiders.

JPEG – 33.9 kb

Was Oklahoma City “a Sting Gone Wrong”?

Although PATCON itself was officially terminated in 1993, we learn from its files that there were in fact a number of ongoing informants at Elohim City, Oklahoma very likely including not only Howe but also Strassmeir. [47] The Government’s lack of response to the reports they received of an intended bombing strengthens the hypothesis, voiced in the film “A Noble Lie,” that the 4/19 plot was initially intended as a sting, the lethal result of which represented “a sting gone wrong.”

If so, this would increase the similarity between 4/19 and the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993. According to the official account, this was also a conspiracy penetrated by the FBI, also involving an ANFO bomb on a Ryder rental truck that was also later identified by its vehicle identification number (VIN) on a metal fragment. [48] In the 1993 bombing the New York Times later reported from tapes of interviews of the FBI’s informant with his FBI handler:

Law-enforcement officials were told that terrorists were building a bomb that was eventually used to blow up the World Trade Center, and they planned to thwart the plotters by secretly substituting harmless powder for the explosives, an informer said after the blast.

The informer was to have helped the plotters build the bomb and supply the fake powder, but the plan was called off by an F.B.I. supervisor who had other ideas about how the informer, Emad A. Salem, should be used, the informer said. [49]

This Times story of the 2003 WTC bombing clearly describes a conspiracy that had been effectively penetrated by the FBI, which nonetheless, for whatever reason, reached its lethal conclusion. One such case of a penetrated operation “gone wrong” in 1993 might be attributed to confusion, bureaucratic incompetence, or the problems of determining when sufficient evidence had been gathered to justify arrests. A repeated catastrophe two years later raises the question whether the lethal outcome was not intended.

Together with the example of inaction on the CIA’s prior knowledge of the alleged 9/11 hijackers, the three mass murders strengthen the claim to the International Criminal Court of Judge Ferdinando Imposimato, the Honorary President of Italy’s Supreme Court: that 9/11 was “a repeat of the CIA’s ’strategy of tension’ carried out in Italy” from the 1960s to the 1980s. [50] I appreciate that it will be difficult as well as painful for most Americans to contemplate that America’s own history, like that of Italy a half century ago, could have been systemically manipulated and destabilized by unknown forces. But the more research I do, the more I am convinced that something like Judge Imposimato’s verdict must be considered.

Moreover, if the Italian analogy is applicable to the United States, then the judgment that “9/11 was “a repeat of the CIA’s ’strategy of tension’ carried out in Italy” raises a larger question about all the structural deep events we have considered, especially the bombings of 1993 and 1995. Were these all part of a single sustained strategy of tension? It is too early to tell. But at the very least the WTC bombings of 1993 and 2001 show suggestive signs of common origins – both outside government (the plotters Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and the informant Ali Mohammed) and possibly inside (as indicated by the overlapping, ongoing cover-ups of both). [51]

In contrast, all of the structural deep events I have been discussing are predictably treated by the governing media as the work of marginal outsiders – by a “lone nut” like Oswald, or a “lone wolf” like Timothy McVeigh. The commonalities between these events I have presented suggest a different analysis: that insiders including intelligence officials and other government officers, as well as outsiders, including government agents and double agents, must be held responsible for repeatedly designing plots that, because of their interface with sanctioned intelligence operations, will not be revealed by government.

My own analysis identifies these insiders as part of an on-going milieu, admittedly amorphous and unstructured, linking the secret networks in government to other powerful forces in our society, For want of a better phrase, I have labeled this milieu, reluctantly, as the “deep state.” [52] But as I remarked earlier with respect to Italy, the term “deep state” is not offered as a solution to these unsolved crimes, but as a focus for further research.

An Alternative Analysis of Deep Events: State Crimes Against Democracy

Let me contrast my own analysis with those of two others. The first is the notion of a “secret government” put forward in an important PBS program in 1987 by Bill Moyers. [53] It rightly points to the dangerous rise of covert agencies, and above all the CIA, inside government since the National Security Act of 1947. And it analyzes the crimes of Iran-Contra in particular as an example of secret government escaping from the jurisdiction of the law and other restraints of the Constitution and public state.

In the words of the Moyers show

The Secret Government is an interlocking network of official functionaries, spies, mercenaries, ex-generals, profiteers and superpatriots, who, for a variety of motives, operate outside the legitimate institutions of government.

In other words, the show was pointing to the “Enterprise” used by North and his allies inside and outside the Executive Office Building to implement Iran-Contra and other policies that violated law and/or the directives of Congress. As I have shown elsewhere, North, implementing these policies, availed himself of the emergency antiterrorist network, codenamed Flashboard, that had been put together, at immense cost, by the Doomsday Project. [54] In so doing, he was “piggy-backing:” using the authorized secret network for an illicit, criminal program, outside of the network’s designated purpose.

Such an analysis could be screened on PBS in 1987 because one part of the U.S. government at that time was at war with another – a war which set Casey at odds not only with Congress but even with senior officers in his own agency the CIA. [55] One can locate Moyers’ show as part of a series of insider leaks and governing media exposés of Oliver North’s off-the-books “Enterprise,” which North (and behind him CIA director Casey) had used to violate official policies and laws. [56] In short Moyers’ challenge to Casey’s and North’s “warriors” suited the aims of the traditional CIA (and their usual backers, the “traders” on Wall Street). [57]

Thus we should not be surprised that it had nothing to say about the role of North’s superior, Vice-President Bush, or about the stake of corporate interests in promoting CIA covert operations around the world (such as the much larger 1980s CIA operation in Afghanistan). Above all, it had not a word about North’s Doomsday Project planning to “suspend the U.S. Constitution,” even though this did surface for an instant in the Iran-Contra Hearings. [58] By its silence about the Doomsday Project, the show failed to address the ongoing planning which, I believe, allowed for the fruition of COG plans in 9/11 and the Patriot Act. To sum up, the Moyers attack on the secret government was largely confined to what was already in the public record. It did not venture into deep politics.

More recently the concept of State Crimes Against Democracy, or SCADs, has been proposed by Prof. Lance deHaven-Smith, and endorsed by some of my friends in the 9/11 Truth community, including Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff. By SCADs, Prof. deHaven-Smith means “concerted actions or inactions by government insiders intended to manipulate democratic processes and undermine popular sovereignty.” [59]

One great advantage of the SCAD hypothesis is that, unlike my own work, it has been discussed in academic journals, thus breaking a kind of sound barrier. But I have problems with the term “State Crimes.” On the one hand I would claim that the State, or some segments of the state, is often the victim of deep events, as in 4/19. On the other I see the State as primarily a guarantor of democracy, not simply an enemy of it.

I agree that some government insiders play an important role in these events, indeed, I have documented some of these in the preceding pages. But I find it misleading to pin the blame for the crime on the State alone. After all, if a bank insider opens the door to a group of bank robbers, what ensues (even if you choose to call it an “inside job”) is unmistakably a robbery of the bank, not by it.

SCAD analysis is far more useful and sophisticated than I can present it here, and I expect to continue to learn from those who pursue it. But it is not deep political analysis. DeHaven-Smith’s list of SCADs includes “the secret wars in Laos and Cambodia,” two relevant policy decisions (rather than events) that we know came from the Oval Office; although covert at the time, and very arguably illegal, they were when exposed not at all mysterious and thus essentially not very deep.

By positing SCADs as a struggle between the State on the one hand and democracy on the other, I believe this analysis oversimplifies both concepts, and underestimates (as Moyers did not) the internal contradictions within each. Democracy is after all a form of the state in which the people’s freedom and power is constitutionally guaranteed by the state (or what I call the public state). And at least one of deHaven-Smith’s SCADs – the JFK assassination – might more logically be considered a crime against the state, rather than by it.

Phillips and Hoff seem to recognize this difficulty: they drop the JFK assassination from their own list of SCADs. [60] But this artificially segregates the JFK assassination from other deep events, such as the Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy assassinations, which I believe are parts of a common syndrome.

In short I believe in the crucial importance of a distinction that SCAD analysis does not make – between the public state that is ostensibly dedicated to fostering the welfare, rights and upward power of the people, and that residue of unofficial powers inside and outside government, or what I have awkwardly called the deep state, that for a half century has been progressively eroding that upward or persuasive power, and replacing it with unrestricted, unconstitutional power (or violence) of its own.

My final objection to SCAD analysis is practical. If the state is the author of these crimes, then the work of critics must be to mobilize public opinion against the state. This fits the libertarian politics of those who (like Alex Jones and other lovers of the Second Amendment) profoundly distrust the public US state in its entirety, and not just its covert agencies. Prof. DeHaven-Smith’s own analysis implicates not just covert intelligence agencies of the US Government but the government as a whole, and perhaps particularly the courts. (In support of this indictment, he is able to point to the Supreme Court’s unusual action, in 2000, of itself electing George W. Bush as president, by a vote of five to four.)

But a strategy of attacking the state as a whole seems to me an example of defeatist politics. Here again we can be enlightened by the Italian strategy of tension, which is a tale of indiscriminate terror with a happier ending. The terror bombings ended after Bologna in 1980, thanks to a series of vigorous and courageous investigations by first journalists, then parliamentary commissions, and finally the courts (not least the court of Judge Imposimato himself, which investigated the murder of Italian premier Aldo Moro and the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II). The victory of truth over violence did not come easily: journalists, parliamentarians, and at least one judge were themselves killed. And it was clearly a victory against one part of the state, which was achieved through the countervailing forces of other parts.

The Italian example proves that the forces behind a strategy of tension are not invincible. They also suggest that, if the dark forces of the deep state are to be defeated, this will take the combined resources, not just of the people, but of those elements in government that can, eventually, be aroused in search of the truth.

If this essay contributes to this purpose, it will be because others take up the line of inquiry I have indicated. I myself do not claim to understand the inner truth about these structural deep events. But I hope I have successfully indicated some of the directions which future investigations should pursue.

Peter Dale Scott


[1] Peter Dale Scott, “The Doomsday Project and Deep Events: JFK, Watergate, Iran-Contra, and 9/11,” The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, November 21, 2011, .

[2] Daniele Ganser, Nato’s Secret Armies: Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe (New York: Routledge, 2005); Philip Willan, Puppetmasters: The Political Use of Terrorism in Italy (London: Constable, 1991).

[3] Vincenzo Vinciguerra, in “Strage di Piazza Fontana spunta un agente USA,” La Repubblica, February 11, 1998 .

[4] “Secret agents, freemasons, fascists . . . and a top-level campaign of political ’destabilisation,’” The Guardian, December 5, 1990 ; quoted in Daniele Ganser, NATO’s Secret Armies: Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe (London: Frank Cass, 2005), 7.

[5] Ganser, NATO’s Secret Armies, 125-47, 224-44.

[6] Peter Dale Scott, The Road to 9/11 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007), 181. Cf. Ganser, NATO’s Secret Armies, 6.

[7] Ganser, Nato’s Secret Armies, 26; citing El Pais, November 26, 1990.

[8] Tunander, “The War on Terror,” 164.

[9] Cf. Peter Dale Scott, American War Machine (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010), 30: “In February 1989 Italian Special Prosecutor Domenico Sica asserted that responsibility for at least some of the terror bombings during the past decade lay also with the Mafia—that is, what I am referring to as the global drug connection.”

[10] Ganser, NATO’s Secret Armies, 125-47, 224-44.

[11] Scott Shane, “C.I.A. Is Still Cagey About Oswald Mystery,” New York Times, October 16, 2009. For my analysis of deep similarities between 11/22 and 9/11, see Peter Dale Scott, The War Conspiracy: JFK, 9/11, and the Deep Politics of War (Ipswich, MA: The Mary Ferrell Foundation, 2008), 341-96.

[12] See White House, “Message from the President Regarding the Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks,” September 11, 2012 .

[13] For my ambivalent use of the term “deep state,” see Scott, American War Machine, 20-23.

[14] For an introduction to the film, see “A Noble Lie: Oklahoma City 1995 with James Lane and Chris Emery,” Alex Jones Channel, December 16, 2011, .

[15] General Benton K. Partin, letter to members of Congress, May 17, 1995; in David Hoffman, The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics of Terror (Los Angeles: Feral House, 1998) . Another explosives expert, Samuel Cohen, wrote to a Congressman that “It would have been absolutely impossible and against the laws of nature for a truck full of fertilizer and fuel oil… no matter how much was used… to bring the building down” (ibid.). Anders Breivik’s ammonium nitrate car bomb in front of the Norwegian Prime Minister’s office would seem to corroborate Partin and Cohen: Breivik’s bomb shattered windows but caused no structural damage whatever to the building.

[16] “9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out,” a film prepared by AE911Truth, PBS, September 16, 2012 . Cf. Bill Christison (a former senior official of the CIA), “Stop Belittling the Theories About September 11,” Dissident Voice, August 14, 2006 . http://www.dissidentvoice.org: The WTC buildings “were most probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges placed in the buildings.”

[17] Charles Doyle, “Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996: A Summary,” Federation of American Scientists, June 3, 1996 . In a December 2000 memo, Richard Clarke confirmed that this assistance was being supplied “through the CIA’s Counter-terrorism Center (CTC) and State’s Anti-Terrorism Program (ATA)”

[18] Scott, “Launching the U.S. Terror War,” The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus ; citing Anthony Summers and Robbyn Swan, The Eleventh Day (New York: Ballantine Books, c2011), 396.

[19] Scott, “Launching the U.S. Terror War.” This withholding of information is a significant parallel with the CIA’s withholding of significant information about Lee Harvey Oswald from the FBI in 1963, in the weeks just before the 11/22 JFK assassination.

[20] Peter Dale Scott, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, 280; quoted in Scott, “Doomsday Project.”

[21] Church Committee, Report, Book III – Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans, 682.

[22] Nate Jones, “Document Friday: ‘Garden Plot:’ The Army’s Emergency Plan to Restore “Law and Order” to America.” National Security Archive, August 11, 2011 .

[23] Public Law 90-331 (18 U.S.C. 3056); discussion in Peter Dale Scott, Paul L. Hoch, and Russell Stetler, The Assassinations: Dallas and Beyond (New York: Random House, 1976), 443-46; quoted in Scott, “Doomsday Project.”

[24] Army intelligence agents were seconded to the Secret Service, and at this time there was a great increase in their number. The Washington Star later explained that “the big build-up in [Army] information gathering…did not come until after the shooting of the Rev. Martin Luther King” (Washington Star, December 6, 1970; reprinted in Federal Data Banks Hearings, p. 1728); quoted in Scott, “Doomsday Project.”

[25] George O’Toole, The Private Sector (New York: Norton, 1978), 145, quoted in Scott, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, 278-79, also Scott, “Doomsday Project.”

[26] Peter Dale Scott, “Overview: The CIA, the Drug Traffic, and Oswald in Mexico,” History Matters ; citing Michael Beschloss, ed., Taking Charge: The Johnson White House Tapes, 1963-1964 (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1997), 22. “Phase-One” stories, followed by “Phase-Two” media rebuttals, have continued ever since, most recently in 2012 with the publication by former CIA officer Brian Latell of an informant’s claim that Castro had prior knowledge of what would happen in Dallas (Brian Latell, Castro’s Secrets: The CIA and Cuba’s Intelligence Machine [New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012]).

[27] Wall Street Journal, September 5, 2002 ; “Take AIM: Jayna Davis on OKC Third Terrorist,” AIM.org . Cf. Dana Rohrabacher, Chairman, Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee of the House International Relations Committee, “The Oklahoma City Bombing: Was There A Foreign Connection?” Report, December 26, 2006 .

[28] Richard Clarke, Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror (New York: Free Press, 2004), 97-99.

[29] Jim Naureckas , “The Oklahoma City Bombing: The Jihad That Wasn’t,” Extra! (Fair), July/August 1995 .

[30] Jayna Davis, The Third Terrorist: The Middle East Connection to the Oklahoma City Bombing (Nashville TN: Thomas Nelson, 2004); Dana Rohrabacher, Chairman’s Report, Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee of the House International Relations Committee, Oklahoma City Bombing Investigation.

[31] Clarke, Against All Enemies, 167.

[32] Tim Weiner, “Pentagon Book for Doomsday Is to Be Closed,” New York Times, April 17, 1994: quoted in Scott, Road to 9/11, 186.

[33] Andrew Cockburn, Rumsfeld: His Rise, Fall, and Catastrophic Legacy(New York: Scribner, 2007), 88; quoted in Scott, Road to 9/11, 187.

[34] Scott, “The Doomsday Project and Deep Events.”

[35] Over and over the daily news provides instances of new deep events that involve informants. As I write, the headlines report widespread Muslim violence throughout the world, in response to a despicable anti-Muslim film one of whose promoters admitted to be a deliberate provocation (Sheila Musaji, “The Tragic Consequences of Extremism,” The American Muslim, September 14, 2012, ). I was not surprised to read later that one of the men responsible for the film, Nakoula Nakoula, was also a federal informant (“Producer Of Anti-Islam Film Was Fed Snitch,” The Smoking Gun, September 14, 2012 ). As I wrote on my Facebook page, “I don’t think anyone should leap to sweeping conclusions from this revelation that one of the film’s makers, Nakoula Nakoula, was a government informant. But this fact so complicates the background of this allegedly “amateurish” film that I feel justified in my original assumption: that we might be facing here another deep event (as defined in my book American War Machine).”

[36] Scott, Road to 9/11, 151-60.

[37] Scott, War Conspiracy, 355-56, 357-63 (“The Role of Double Agents”); Cf. Scott, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, 247-53, 257-60.

[38] See Anthony Summers, Official and Confidential: The Secret Life of J. Edgar Hoover (New York: PocketBooks, 1994), ch.29, n4; Harrison E. Livingstone, The Radical Right and the Murder of John F. Kennedy (Bloomington, IN: Trafford, 2006), 131 (Oswald); Lawrence Wright, “The Agent,” New Yorker, July 10 and 17, 2006, 68; cf. Wright, Looming Tower, 339-44 (al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar).

[39] This is in line with other features he exhibited in conformity with those I had previously pointed to in the designated culprit stereotype. One is the absurd ease and speed with which he was soon arrested for driving without license plates. In 2008 I compared Oswald with the alleged 9/11 hijackers under the heading “Instant Identification of the Culprits” (Scott, War Conspiracy, 347-49). David Hammer, who was on Death Row with McVeigh, has written that McVeigh confided to him at length how in fact he was a federal undercover agent in a sting operation targeting right-wing extremists. See David Paul Hammer, Deadly Secrets: Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City Bombing (B.oomington, IN: AuthorHouse, 2010).

[40] Jefferson Morley and Michael Scott, Our Man in Mexico: Winston Scott and the Hidden History of the CIA (Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Press, 2008) [11/22]; Kevin Fenton, Disconnecting the Dots (Walterville, OR: Trine Day, 2011) [9/11].

[41] J.M. Berger, “Patriot Games: How the FBI spent a decade hunting white supremacists and missed Timothy McVeigh,” Foreign Policy, April 18, 2012 .

[42] “First organized by Tom Posey as part of his Civilian Military Assistance (CMA) organization, the CMA operated as a shadow wing of the Reagan administrations illegal Contra network. Posey and the CMA began as an adjunct to the Alabama Ku Klux Klan. They were first active in smuggling weapons to Central America with the assistance of a Defense Intelligence Agency operation called “Yellow Fruit” and later absorbed into Oliver North’s Contra re-supply operation. Posey was later indicted for violations of the Neutrality Act for his gunrunning activities. North and Reagan administration officials intervened in the trial and the charges were dismissed under the curious grounds that the Neutrality Act only applied during peacetime and the Contra operation was the equivalent of a formal state of war” (Paul de Armond, “Racist Origins of Border Militias”).

[43] “John McCain has worked with white racists before,” Daily Kos, October 12, 2008 . I have not been able to determine whether this is the Tom Posey whom David Koch named to be Treasurer of his Citizens for a Sound Economy. Cf. “Tom-Posey, KKK, Koch Brothers, CSE,” .

[44] Berger, “Patriot Games.”

[45] John Berger, “Witness Mahon Claimed He Was Third Man in Oklahoma City Bombing,” Intelwire, January 10, 2012 .

[46] John Berger, “Witness Mahon Claimed He Was Third Man in Oklahoma City Bombing,” Intelwire, January 10, 2012 http://news.intelwire.com/2012/01/w….

[47] For Strassmeir as an intelligence agent, see e.g. Investigative Report prepared for Oklahoma Representative Charles Key, in Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee, Final Report, 460-62; David Hoffman, The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics of Terror (Venice City, CA: Feral House, 1998), 121-47.

[48] Athan G. Theoharis, The FBI: A Comprehensive Reference Guide (Phoenix, Ariz.: Oryx Press, 1999), 94.

[49] Ralph Blumenthal, “Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast,” New York Times, October 28, 1993 .

[50] “Top Italian Judge Refers 9/11 to International Criminal Court,” Aangirfan, September 11, 2012 .

[51] Scott, Road to 9/11, 151-61. Both before and after 1993, and again before and after 2001, a key role in the cover-up was played by U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald. See Scott, Road to 9/11, 152, 155-59; Peter Lance, Triple Cross (New York: Regan/HarperCollins, 2006), 219-23, 274-79, 298-301, 317-18, 358-64, etc.

[52] Scott, American War Machine, 20-23.

[53] Bill Moyers, The Secret Government, PBS 1987 .

[54] Peter Dale Scott, “Northwards without North,” Social Justice (Summer 1989); revised as “North, Iran-Contra, and the Doomsday Project: The Original Congressional Cover Up of Continuity-of-Government Planning,” Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, February 21, 2011 .

[55] See e.g. Tim Weiner, Legacy of Ashes (New York: Doubleday, 2007), 396-404; Scott and Marshall, Cocaine Politics, 125-64. (Posey),

[56] North’s ventures into illegality eventually involved the mobilization of known drug-traffickers in support of the Contras. One of his more dubious assets was the patriot paramilitary group Civilian Military Assistance of Tom Posey, which eventually became a prime target of PATCON (Berger, “Patriot Games).

[57] For the distinction between traders and warriors or “Prussians,” see Michael Klare, “Beyond the “Vietnam Syndrome” (Washington, D.C.: Institute for Policy Studies, 1981); Peter Dale Scott, “Korea (1950), the Tonkin Gulf Incident, and 9/11: Deep Events in Recent American History,” The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, June 22, 2008 .

[58] A personal note: when I was at a think tank in Washington dealing with Iran-Contra, I was videotaped at length by the two producers of Moyers’ show. One week before the show aired on PBS, they assured me that I would be in it. But in the end, all that remained of me in the show was my forearm, in an unexplained group shot of the think tank sitting around a conference table. At the time my research focused on the activities of Bush and North (including North’s alleged plans for “suspension of the constitution”) that the Committees, like the Moyers program, did not pursue. See Scott, “North, Iran-Contra, and the Doomsday Project.”

[59] Lance deHaven-Smith, “Beyond Conspiracy Theory: Patterns of High Crime in American Government,” American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 796; citing Lance deHaven-Smith, “When political crimes are inside jobs: Detecting state crimes against democracy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 28(3).

[60] Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff, “State Crimes Against Democracy,” Media Freedom International, Mar 2, 2010 .


Serbs should have killed him right there. Than they would have said they were only protecting them self from Stoltenberg regime.

Tudor Miron

To mirror him (Stoltensnake) they should say that it was done for his own protection.

Dušan Mirić

I never got such an idea!!! Perhaps by my name I am Soulful Makepeace :)

Dušan Mirić

Interesting! I never got such idea.


Well, in all fairness, who is going to admit that there were other more nefarious reasons behind going to war? George W. Bush and Tony Blair still maintain that they invaded Iraq for the right reasons and that it worked out for the best. And the job of the NATO secretary-general is to spout whatever PR bullshit his bosses, the NATO countries, want him to say. Occasionally he tries to suggest something that involves more activities for NATO, but then again the dude is a bureaucrat. And all bureaucrats try to get more jobs and roles for their department, because mission creep means more budget and more bureaucrats for them to rule over.


“George W. Bush and Tony Blair still maintain“

hoping the lies become the truth. They got caught lying. We know it, but we are powerless.

leon mc pilibin

Another evil zionist scumbag,,why is this criminal at large,?,Hang the warmongering swine.


How about we hang his masters in America at the same time?
After a fair trial of course, the fear of death is worse than death.

Tudor Miron

NATO strategy – create (fund, arm, train terrorists) unrest than come to “resque”. In order to “protect civilians” and “save lives” start bombing populated areas and kill those same civilians but at much higher scale.


President Reagan started the US attack on Yugoslavia in 1984.
They start by destroying the economy, then they spread stories that you are poor because of Muslims, or Christians, to turn people against each other. Only then do they start bombing.
All those high minded European countries just watched and did nothing.
But Karma is coming, the US intends to do to Europe, what it did to Yugoslavia.

America is evil to the core.


Blaming america, is like blaming the biceps of the guy who beat you up.

money power rules.
“When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes… Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object is gain.” – Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of France, 1815

“Some even believe we [Rockefeller family] are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – One World, if you will.If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it ”
| David Rockefeller |

John Whitehot

for what concerns me, the USA and NATO are just a front for the worst international criminal organization to ever exist in human history.


“Capitalism is the legitimate racket of the ruling class.”( Al Capone)

John Whitehot

al capone may have a point.

unregulated, wild financial capitalism is no different than crime.

why? what’s the goal of any criminal? to make money by any mean.
the same goes with finance


Exactly, ever wondered why Karl Marx, an economist is so vilified?

Because he explained in great detail how capitalism is designed to take money from people who work, and give it to those who don’t. Sort of a reverse Robin Hood, steal from the poor, and give to the rich.

John Whitehot

i don’t fall into the error of considering finance and loansharking the same as capitalism.

there’s people trying to make the enemies of jewish finance appear as communists so to indignate westerners.

they will fail once again.


No I don’t either, but why should an idiot boss earn more than a worker?
Take Donald Trump, a total fool, but he earns more in a day, than most do in a lifetime.


makes me laugh, the capitalism advocates when capitalism no longer exists. And no longer should exist when technology can create goods and services at the cost of free energy.,

Inequality is no longer necessary on this planet.


While finance and loansharking work off of the same principles as capitalism. Profit. Greed, and envy.

Americans still in denial about their beloved capitalism.

Fact is, capitalism has not existed in the USA for 40 years. You are now in a fascist state, AKA end game capitalism, when the big dogs done won.

John Whitehot

financial transactions need to be taxed up to 100%.

zionists must be denied their way to make money without working.

Tudor Miron

That “organization” is very old.


I imagine someone saying “Ah, so glad you bombed me”… -_-

Dušan Mirić

Recently, a US official said something like that for the people of Raqqah in Syria where CENTCOM forces destroyed about 80 percent of all structures


Americans also think Vietnam is an ally?

Alejandro Bonifacio

he is insane, ok “bomb us to save us please mother f*cker”

Igor Dano

serbian police should have arrested him upon arrival.
better cetniks should have shot down the plane upon approach.


Bomb some freedom into them Jens.
What a pathetic creature, I hope he has a long and painful death.

Harvey Swinestein

They bombed Serbia when Russia was weak. The cowards don’t have the courage to attack when a powerful Russia is ready to fight.. . .

Brother Thomas

Serial mass murderers.


America plans to have a war with Russia, and Europe is the battlefield.
It’s amazing how Stoltenberg, who would know the plan, is happy to see his family and country destroyed for a few dollars, and publicity. What sort of creature can do that?


his family wont be there…..

John Whitehot

what a tool stoltemberg is.


A chisel, and I have just the hammer to hit that chisel on the head.

John Whitehot

you could say that as a chisel he isn’t sharp at all though.


If I hammered him into a concrete block, he would end up very blunt.

John Whitehot

he would just throw himself on his knees and cry for forgiveness until you’d be convinced to spare him.. besides, everybody’s got a boss aint it.


No I wouldn’t, but I would probably feel sorry for him, and let him die quick.

John Whitehot


me and my clique don’t shoot slaves and handicapped persons.


He isn’t a slave, he likes running the murder squad(NATO)

John Whitehot

he is a slave to whoever puts money in his pockets, and he runs nothing – like all the other people we see on tv, they are there just to put their face over a given organization.


But he volunteered, he isn’t poor, I’m sure Norway gives ex PM’s a good pension.
And he isn’t a gullible 18 year old thinking he is defending his country. Stoltenberg, like Blair and Cameron get off on the power.


Yes, I was angry last night, such a stupid uncaring man.

John Whitehot

no worry

Dušan Mirić

Recently I heard that gen. Clarke have interests in power company (stollen from Serbian Electric company) and another war monger of that time Madeleine Allbright owns some telecom company. Boris Malagurski pointed out that Britons are ruling Trepca led and silver mines… Anti narcotic police expert said in a tv show, Kosmet is now distribution center for H from Afghanistan and the rest, stealing of land and other properties was left to “small fish”, like it was recently made in Croatian legislative that approve stealing 800.000 parcels of Serb owned land etc.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x