On November 27th, Turkey and the UN-assigned Libyan Government of National Accord (GNA) signed a memorandum of understanding for military cooperation. The deal was announced on December 7th, and since then Turkey has repeatedly said that if the GNA asks for military assistance, Ankara would provide it.
On December 19th, the GNA officially voted to accept Turkey’s offer for military support. Now, Turkey needs a Parliament approval for a bill allowing the troops deployment in Libya, where Turkish forces will fight against Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar’s Libyan National Army (LNA).
On the diplomatic front, Turkey has wasted no time, with Recep Tayyip Erdogan going to Tunisia to gather various support from countries in the region. So far, both Tunisia and Algeria have said that they would not take part in the conflict, and urged Turkey to avoid involving itself. At the same time, Turkey and the GNA also increased their propaganda efforts over the conflict setting ground for a Turkish military intervention.
To provide a sense of urgency, the GNA formally requested “air, ground and sea” support from Turkey on December 26th.
“We cannot stay idly when the UN-recognized Libyan government demands our help,” Ankara Deputy Emrullah İşler said. “As Turkey, we will accept the invitation of legitimate Libyan government, with whom we have a history of relations spanning 361 years,” he added.
Erdogan said that it was a matter of time until Turkey could provide the requested support, as mentioned above. Ankara will attempt to use its ground, air and maritime support to further its interests in the east Mediterranean Sea further.
One of the reasons of the Turksih support to the GNA is the agreement on the shared maritime zone reached by the sides. Ankara sees it as an important step to legalize its drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean:
Even before officially announcing that it would take part in the conflict, Turkey has supplied the GNA with weapons, ammunition and equipment. In June 2019, Erdogan confirmed that Ankara was selling weapons to it.
“We have a military cooperation agreement with Libya. We are providing to them if they come up with a request, and if they pay for it. They really had a problem in terms of defense needs, equipment,” Erdogan said, back then.
Around the same time, photographs surfaced of Turkish “Kirpi” armoured vehicles that were delivered to the GNA.
Since late November and early December, these deliveries have appeared to be ramped up. The Turkish military supplies to the GNA is a mix of weapons, ammunition, and other military equipment. Turkey also deployed Bayraktar TB2 unmanned aircraft, which can be configured to carry weapons. They operate from airfieldsin Tripoli and Misrata.
The Libyan National Army shot down and desroyed several another Bayraktar TB2s during the battle for Tripoli.
The deliveries of weapons, ammunition and various equipment could be ramped up even further, how effective this would be for the GNA against the LNA, which is gaining ground remains in question.
The GNA requested three components of asssistance: “air, ground and sea”. In terms of air support, Turkey can deploy more Bayraktar TB2s, which are currently present in the conflict, but even a dozen such drones wouldn’t be enough to change the situation on the ground, keeping in mind the LNA has proven capable of downing them.
Turkey needs to be able to deploy an air group somewhere on the ground and carry out strikes from there. Approximately 90% of Libya is under LNA control, so there is no safe location for a deployment there. So far, Tunisia and Algeria refused to play any direct role in the conflict, while the self-proclamed Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus is still too far away. Egypt has been quite vocal and active in its support of the LNA, so a deployment there is out of the question. Italy doesn’t support the LNA, but it is strictly against a Turkish intervention because the expansion of the Turkish influence threatens its financial interst in the Libyan oil trade. So, it is rather unlikely.
Turkey operates no aircraft carriers. Its TCG Anadolu amphibious assault ship can be configured as a light aircraft carrier, but it isn’t ready yet, work on it is on-going and it is expected to be delivered some time in 2020. Therefore, it remains unclear how Ankara will be able to provide the GNA with an extensive air support without endangering its own aircraft by deploying them close to the combat zone.
In terms of maritime support, Turkey can employ its Navy’s capabilities use its warships to support the GNA. As mentioned, it has no aircraft or helicopter carriers that can be used to project power in the conflict. A deployment of a large naval group in the area is risky, if one takes into account the hostile political environment, with Egypt, Cyprus, the UAE and Greece are strictly opposing any such actions. This deployment also goes against the interests of other NATO allies such as France and Italy.
Additionally, deploying warships near the Libyan coast puts them in jeopardy from modern anti-ship measures, for example, anti-ship missiles that can be launched from the shore. The recent example is Yemen’s Houthis who have repeatedly proven that missiles, can be quite an effective tool to combat even a more technologically advanced enemy. In a worst-case scenario, the Turkish Navy can suffer notable losses, and the risk of this could be too real to tangible to overlook.
Then it comes down to a likely ground operation, possibly via a landing. Turkey has, in its navy, several landing ships, the biggest of which are the two Bayraktar-class amphibious warfare ships, who both stand at 7,254 tons of displacement. In addition, it has the Osman Gazi-class landing ship, at a 3,700-ton displacement. Finally, it has two Sarucabey class landing ships, at a displacement of 2,600 tons. It’s other landing ships, albeit active, are outdated.
With 5 modern landing ships, it is questionable how capable of a landing can be achieved, keeping in mind that the note about the LNA using all means and measures that it has to prevent such a scenario.
In these conditions, the most likely scenario of Turkey’s ground operation is the deployment of a limited number of specialists, the public employment of private military contractors, as well as efforts to redeploy members of its proxt groups from Syria to Libya.
The deployment of rebels from Syria to Libya is already on-going via aircraft arriving in Tripoli. Videos showing Turkish-backed Syrian rebels in Libya already started appearing online:
This could prove somewhat effective to support the GNA existence. However, these reinforcements will be apparently not enough to reverse all the gains that Haftar’s LNA made during the past years.
In terms of the diplomatic environment, Egypt, the UAE, Italy, France, Greece are strongly against Turkey’s operation in Libya and the agenda it appears to be following towards spreading its influence in such a manner. Egypt and France recently discussed the situation in Libya, and a potential coordination of efforts if need arises. The US is unlikely to make any direct steps to stop the Turkish operation, but Washington employs its diplomatic influence to oppose it. Russia assumed a rather neutral stance, apart from reports of the presence of Russian PMCs assisting Haftar’s forces. So, Anakra will unlikely receive a direct support from Moscow.
As the Turkish Parliament moves towards the approval of the military operation in Libya, Ankara appears two have two main options:
- Turkey deploys a limited force that would allow it to keep the GNA existing, but will not be able to turn the tide of the conflict. Taking into account the large-scale Turkish-GNA propaganda campaign in support of the military action in Libya, the too limited action may cause a situation, when Ankara will lose face on the international scene. To put it into perspective, a successful scenario would be given as Syrian President Bashar al-Assad who invited the Russians and the outcome is apparent. And then there would be GNA Chairman Fayez al-Sarraj who invited Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to barely survive against the LNA.
- Turkey moves in to begin a large-scale military operation, with all the risks associated with it. This would likely lead to a very negative response from a number of influential regional players – Egypt, the UAE, Italy, France, Greece, and may lead to a collapse of the existing NATO security infrastructure in this region. However, in the event of success, this will allow Turkey to drastically increase its influence and strengthen its positions in Northern Africa and the Mediterranean Sea
MORE ON THE TOPIC:
- Syrian Mercenaries Loyal To Turkey Spotted In Libya’s Tripoli (Videos)
- Russia-linked Private Military Contractors Were Filmed In Libya (Video)
- Turkey To Deploy Its Syrian Proxies In Libya’s Tripoli – Report