0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
1,120 $
JUNE 2021

Italy: Banks in trouble

Support SouthFront

Written by Borislav Boev; Originally appeared at Lentata.com; Translated by author for SouthFront

At the end of June 2017 the Italian government decided to save two failed regional banks with a rescue package of 5,2 bln. euros. The assets of the problematic “Banca Popolare di Vicenza” and “Veneto Banca” were taken by “Intesa Sanpaolo”, which is in stable condition. The whole ‘bailout’ however, might cost the Italian taxpayers as high as 17 bln. euros.

Italy: Banks in trouble

The recapitalization of these two banks means that the Italian taxpayers will have to pay the bill, which poses a potential risk not only for the economic climate, but also the political stability in the country. In this particular case, the government support for troubled banks directly contradicts the new European Banking directive for restructuring troubled banks. These new rules are aimed to protect the ordinary taxpayer from paying for bankers’ mistakes – something that has repeatedly happened during past recessions. The European Union itself somewhat violated its own rules after allowing the Italian government to ‘seal off’ the financial hole, opened by “Banca Popolare di Vicenza” and “Veneto Banca”.

The European Union wanted to show that they had learned the lesson from the Great recession, so they decided to rewrite the rules on which the governments are dealing with troubled, problematic banks. Under these new rules, the risk has to be distributed horizontally, instead of the traditional vertical ways. Spreading the risk horizontally essentially means that the cost of the failing banks must be paid by the shareholders and the bondholders, aiming to protect the ordinary citizens who have put their money in the banks. The so called bail-in where the bank saves itself instead of the well-known bail-out, where the government intervenes with a big rescue package at the expense of billions.

However, the case with these two Italian banks didn’t take the bail-in direction. Many of the smaller investors will be saved. And this means Italian taxpayer will have to fill the gap. The government however, has decided not to close the banks in order to avoid unnecessary panic in the already troubled economic climate. But the acquisition of the good assets from “Intesa Sanpaolo” comes with a price: 600 bank offices will be closed and 3,900 employees will be laid off.

Italy’s banking problems are no longer Italian. The country’s economy is 3rd biggest economy in the Eurozone, following Germany and France. Earlier this year, the Italian parliament approved a 20-billion-euro rescue package, aimed at saving failing banks such as “Monte Del Piachi”

The most worried about what’s happening in the Italian financial system is Germany. Berlin’s worries are reasonable: in case of deepening the crisis, combined with slow

recovery of the Italian economy, Germany would have to intervene again. Moreover, the shaky financial situation in Italy is a serious blow to the idea of creating a stable, united and working banking union within the Eurozone.

If Italy fails to stabilize its financial system and get the economy back on its feet, Germany might have to intervene again with rescue packages – a scenario, similar to the Greek one. The German government will try to avoid this. We shouldn’t forget that Italy and Greece are leaders in the Eurozone for most troubled countries in terms of public debt. In 2016, the debt-to-GDP ratio of Italy reached 132%. Moreover, the Italian economy is not recovering from the Great recession as fast as Rome wants. The post-crisis years saw a negative GDP growth of -3%. In 2014, 6 years after the crisis, the Italian economy showed some signs of recovery, but the growth rates are still too sluggish – they hardly reach one percent per year. Slow recovery is one of the reasons why small business still have difficulty in paying their credits.

The consequences of the banking instability in Italy are yet to manifest. Bad credits are of considerable size as they reached 325 billion euros. The accumulation of such great negatives in the banking system suggests that for many years the banks led a policy of unreasonable crediting, combined with bad management and even worse risk management. When these facts combine with the slow rates of economic recovery and political instability, the prognosis is not that good. Despite the facts, things are not that bad either. At least not in the short-term. The markets did not shake after last month’s decision to recapitalize the banks. Their optimism can be contributed to the fact that with this move, the Italian government has taken out the risky banks from the picture. But market’s flat response doesn’t mean that the crisis is resolved. The difficult decisions are yet to come, and they are directly related to the political situation not only in the country, but also in the European Union.

Italy’s banking problems are becoming a major obstacle to the overall concept of creating a single banking union within the Eurozone. What’s happening in the country raises doubts about whether the new banking rules, imposed by EU, will work at all. European leaders need to realize that there is a huge difference between desire and reality, especially in the manner of “integration at any price” policy.

Support SouthFront


Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
El Diablo

Capital-marxism :D We (i’m italian) save banks every weeks, that are free of do debits again and again. When a lot of entreprises do bankrupcy every years because Italian State don’t pay them for the works they have done for the state. Italian state don’t pay you: italian state say that you are failed.

El Diablo

Oh: you have forgotten to say that in the 8th biggest country for GDP in the Earth, 100.000+ people every year go away for search a job.

Анрэс Суарэс

If you understand spanish you can read sections [3.12] to [3.25] and the all Section 5 , of the pdf at http://www.intercambioasincrono.com/ .
There you see a proposal to destroy capitalism while keeping a market economy.

Sean Glennie

A bit of a contradiction, isn’t it?

Sean Glennie

This is the tip of the iceberg of what can happen when occultist lunatics (influenced by the filth propagated by the false prophet and self-proclaimed messiah, Sabbatai Zevi) get into power and construct a secret cabal.

Frankist Jews are about as Jewish as David Koresh was Christian. In other words, both are crazy cults and imposters of the religions they claim to represent. Sabbatai Zevi & Joseph Frank were in essence devil worshippers, while David Koresh is a stereotypical cult leader from the deep south (American redneck).


[Hebrew University of Jerusalem Professor Gershom Scholem called Jacob Frank, “one of the most frightening phenomena in the whole of Jewish history”. Jacob Frank would eventually enter into an alliance formed by Adam Weishaupt and Meyer Amshel Rothschild called the Order of the Illuminati. The objectives of this organization was to undermine the world’s religions and power structures, in an effort to usher in a utopian era of global communism, which they would covertly rule by their hidden hand: the New World Order.

Using secret societies, such as the Freemasons, their agenda has played itself out over the centuries, staying true to the script. The Illuminati handle opposition by a near total control of the world’s media, academic opinion leaders, politicians and financiers. Still considered nothing more than theory to many, more and more people wake up each day to the possibility that this is not just a theory, but a terrifying Satanic conspiracy.]


Анрэс Суарэс

No. It isn’t. May sound weird because so many years listening to the propaganda of “capitalist market vs centralized communism”. Yet stand assured that with my proposal you destroy banks forever while keeping the market economy.

Sean Glennie

Now I understand. Many have criticized central banks for good reasons (including libertarians of the Gustave de Molinari variety), including some people throughout history that are frowned upon.




I would think that many businesses in Europe curse the day when US sanctions were imposed on Russia that have in been a kick up the bum for Russia that has spurred on their self reliance and enterprise after a period of lazy reliance on oil and gas revenues to purchase EU goods and services.

El Diablo

Also simple be in EU is not a good thing for primary italian sector. We have limits in how much everything can produce and we must import the other by other countries. Capital-communism: the worst by the both :D


The Italian Banking sector is over populated with more supply than demand apart from excessive bad loans and have been in trouble for the last few years and many have been bailed out just like the two being reported on in this article.


Sounds like the perfect time to encourage those NGOs to “rescue” “migrants” and bring them to Italy where they can be parasites on Italian taxpayers.

Am I right???!!!!

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x