0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
1,162 $
AUGUST 2020

String Of ISIS Attacks Continues In Syrian Desert

Donate

DEAR FRIENDS. IF YOU LIKE THIS TYPE OF CONTENT, SUPPORT SOUTHFRONT WORK:

PayPal: southfront@list.ru, http://southfront.org/donate/ or via: https://www.patreon.com/southfront, BTC: 3Gbs4rjcVUtQd8p3CiFUCxPLZwRqurezRZ, BCH ABC: qpf2cphc5dkuclkqur7lhj2yuqq9pk3hmukle77vhq, ETH: 0x9f4cda013e354b8fc285bf4b9a60460cee7f7ea9

Since the start of the week, the Syrian Army has repelled several ISIS attacks on its positions in the desert in central Syria.

The most recent attack took place in eastern Homs early on July 2 and became the largest one so far. Clashes lasted for several hours and Syrian troops even called for support from the Russian Aerospace Forces. Pro-opposition media claim that up to 10 soldiers were killed on injured in the encounter, but this is yet to be confirmed.

In response to this attack, the Syrian Air Force and the Russian Aerospace Forces carried out a series of raids against detected positions of the terrorist group on the western bank of the Euphrates and near the US-controlled al-Tanf zone on July 2 and July 3.

According to Syrian sources, hundreds of ISIS members still hide in the desert using underground tunnels and mobile groups of fighters equipped with all that is needed to operate independently. Over the past months, the Syrian military has made several attempts to track and eliminate these units. However, it has achieved only a partial success.

On July 2, forces of Turkey’s Syrian National Army shelled a positon of the Syrian Army west of the Turkish-occupied town of Tell Abyad triggering local clashes. The most intense fighting erupted near the village of Abdi. According to pro-government sources, at least one Syrian soldier was injured and a few Turkish proxies were killed.

Turkish-backed forces continue regular ceasefire violations despite the recent military buildup undertaken by the Syrian Army near the contact line in northeastern Syria. Most likely, Turkish proxies feel a kind of impunity thanks to the direct protection of the Turkish Armed Forces. This behavior instigates military tensions in the region.

Meanwhile, Syrian forces blocked a US military convoy at the al-Dardara bridge on the road between Tel Tamr and Abu Rasin in the northern countryside of Hasaka. After a short verbal confrontation, the US convoy withdrew from the area. Recently, such incidents between Syrian and US forces in Hasakah province became something common. Apparently, the Damascus government boosted its efforts to limit the freedom of operations of the US-led coalition there.

The situation stabilized in the militant-held part of Greater Idlib. After almost a week of clashes and competing accusations by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham and the Fa Ithbatu coalition (both groups linked with al-Qaeda), the sides reached a ceasefire deal. Hayat Tahrir al-Sham once again demonstrated that it is the most influential and militarily capable group in the opposition-held area.

Donate

SouthFront

Do you like this content? Consider helping us!

  • Jens Holm

    It woukld be nice if we knew if ISIS are adding or a eroded down.

  • FlorianGeyer

    The ISIS hit and run tactics seem to mimic those if the British SAS.

    I wonder why :)

    • Cromwell

      The SAS invented this sort of warfare,but they were a real army,ISIS hiding in the desert?fighters need logistics they can’t exist on their own and airforce recon can locate those bastards.

      • FlorianGeyer

        Yes, and it means that logistics and intelligence are provided by a well oiled group of professionals, I think.

        The original members of the SAS were all military misfits and ruffians, even the officers. Such people are ideal for special forces roles.

        • Jens Holm

          There we go again. You repeat what completly wrong.

          Qaida as well as ISIS already was guerilla very good for seek and hide.

          So its about upgrades. The same goes for YPG. YPG already was experts or relative good in guerilla warfare by PKK.

          You dont have to THINK about it. Most of that is well descriebed and public on internet.

          The same goes for the help they got in Iraq making old Saddams help them with taken advanced weapons.

          The original members of SAS wasnt misfits at all. It was a new very needed kind of sources besides the old incompetent english establishmen based on titles.

          The Brittish was like Yiu fx can see in Zulu with many stupid Leaders, stupid rules incl. the fellow demanding for writings for ammo.

          Furthermore – as fx descriebed by Montgommery as well as Eisenhower and Patton – the solduers were not trained well and coordinated, they had lack of good food, lack of facilities in the fiels as well as they needed more rest after figtings, so they next tiem could fight hard again.

          Weapon use was same thing. They should have better and anough weapons.

          It was an all over upgrade and partly experiental against the modern German and Japanese warfare.

    • Jens Holm

      Tactics like that are very old.

      Sure ISIS are upgraded by someone and inspired by Qaida.

  • AlexanderAmproz

    Until when do this Israel Criminal false flag will be tolerated by Russia
    and the discredited UN ? ? ?
    =======================================================
    https://www.globalresearch.ca/isis-is-a-us-israeli-creation-top-ten-indications/5518627

    ISIS Is a US-Israeli Creation. Top Ten “Indications”

    By Makia Freeman

    Global Research, December 28, 2019

    The Freedom Articles 5 April 2016

    Region: Middle East & North Africa, USA

    Theme: Intelligence, Terrorism

    Relevant article first posted on GR in April 2016.

    ISIS is a US-Israeli creation, a fact as clear as the sky is blue. It’s a truth as black and white as the colors on their flag. For many alternative news readers, this may be patently obvious, but this article is written for the large majority of people in the world who still have no idea who is really behind the rise of ISIS. No matter which name they go by – ISIS, ISIL, IS or Daesh – the group has been deliberately engineered by the US and Israel to achieve certain geopolitical goals. They are a religious, fundamentalist, Sunni terrorist organization created to terrorize and overthrow certain secular or Shiite Arab nations such as Syria and Iraq, but they are not just “Islamic”. They may be Muslims, and they may be advocating an Islamic State, but they are very much working towards the goals of Zionism.

    It’s amazing how many people still struggle to get that point. We have been inundated with propaganda surrounding the fraudulent war on terror, notably terms such as Islamic terrorism and radical Islam, but more accurate phrases would be Zio-Islamic terrorism and radical Zio-Islam. Secret military agencies such as the CIA and the Mossad pull the strings. Here is a list of the top 10 ‘indications’ that ISIS is a US-Israeli creation.

    ISIS is a US-Israeli Creation: Indication #1: ISIS Foreknowledge via Leaked DIA Doc

    The DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) is 1 of 16 US military intelligence agencies. According to a leaked document obtained by Judicial Watch, the DIA wrote on August 12, 2012 that:

    “there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist Principality in eastern Syria (Hasaka and Der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime …”

    This was written before ISIS came on to the world stage. Clearly ISIS was no random uprising, but rather a carefully groomed and orchestrated controlled opposition group.

    The “supporting powers to the opposition” referred to are Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the GCC nations such as Qatar, who are in turn being supported by the US-UK-Israeli axis in their struggle to overthrow Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad. As I outlined in this article Syrian Ground War About to Begin? WW3 Inches Closer, the US is backing the Sunni nations while Russia, China and Iran are backing the Shia nations, so there is the definite potential for this to erupt into World War 3. Below are screenshots of the actual DIA document:

    ISIS-US-Israeli-creation-1

    ISIS-US-Israeli-creation-2

    ISIS is a US-Israeli Creation: Indication #2: ISIS Never Attacks Israel

    It is more than highly strange and suspicious that ISIS never attacks Israel – it is another indication that ISIS is controlled by Israel. If ISIS were a genuine and independent uprising that was not covertly orchestrated by the US and Israel, why would they not try to attack the Zionist regime, which has attacked almost of all of its Muslim neighbors ever since its inception in 1948? Israel has attacked Egypt, Syria and Lebanon, and of course has decimated Palestine. It has systemically tried to divide and conquer its Arab neighbors. It continually complains of Islamic terrorism. Yet, when ISIS comes on the scene as the bloody and barbaric king of Islamic terrorism, it finds no fault with Israel and sees no reason to target a regime which has perpetrated massive injustice against Muslims? This stretches credibility to a snapping point.

    ISIS and Israel don’t attack each other – they help each other. Israel was treating ISIS soldiers and other anti-Assad rebels in its hospitals! Mortal enemies or best of friends?

    ISIS US Israeli creation toyota akbar

    ISIS US-Israeli creation toyota

    ISIS is a US-Israeli Creation: Indication #3: Toyota Trucks

    Why Russia is Serious about Fighting Terrorism and the US Isn’t. America Protects Al Qaeda and ISIS

    Where did ISIS get an entire fleet of matching Toyota pick-up trucks? Why do so many of its photo shots feature a fleet of matching Toyotas – matching in both model and color? As this Information Clearing House article humorously states:

    “The official story is ISIS stole them from the “Good Terrorists” (Al Nusra), who were originally given their cool wheels by the US government. Which would seem to beg a couple of enquiries. Not least of which is – why are the US giving any terrorists matching fleets of luxury SUVs? And for that matter, how many fleets are we talking about?

    So, exactly how many trucks did the US supply? Where are ISIS currently garaging this impressive collection? And why do they all have to be Toyotas? Is it a terrorist thing, or simply a US Govt preference? Do Toyota mind the brand-association? Or the fact that so many of the ISIS drive-by photo-ops look like perverted car ads?”

    Some of these trucks were actually used vehicles that got sent from the US and Canada over to Syria. This Texan plumber discovered to his horror that his old truck was being used in the war, replete with his business name still on the door!

    ISIS is a US-Israeli Creation: Indication #4: ISIS’ First Class Social Media Skills

    The issue of the Toyotas leads us to the next question about ISIS. Who’s handling their publicity? How have they managed to get so many photos of Toyota truck drive bys? How have they managed to master Western social media so well to spread their message, propaganda and threats? How have they managed to produce slick videos depicting (fake) beheadings? How does a barbaric group of killers, who speak a language very different to English, who espouse fundamentalist, religious ideals (such as Sharia law), and often criticize all things Western, manage to develop such excellent social media skills?

    ISIS is a US-Israeli Creation: Indication #5: Israeli Group SITE First to Release ISIS Footage

    Another key giveaway that ISIS is a US-Israeli creation is that the Israeli group SITE (Search for International Terrorist Entities) are often the first to find and publicly release the video (as their co-founder Rita Katz has let slip on occasion). SITE was involved in the slew of fake green screen ISIS beheadings of 2014. Speaking of fake beheadhings, why did this fictional Turkish TV drama show a beheading just like that of ISIS?

    ISIS is a US-Israeli Creation: Indication #6: ISIS Leader Baghdadi a Mossad Agent

    Although this indication is hard to confirm, there were reports apparently originating from Edward Snowden that the leader of ISIS (Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi) was actually an Israeli Mossad agent by the name of Simon Elliot or Elliot Shimon: [GR Editor’s note: this source and quotation are yet to be fully verified, including the source originating from Eduard Snowden]

    “Simon Elliot (Elliot Shimon) aka Al-Baghdadi was born of two Jewish parents and is a Mossad agent. We offer below three translations that want to assert that the Caliph Al-Baghdadi is a full Mossad agent and that he was born Jewish father and mother:

    The real name of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is “Simon Elliott.” The so-called “Elliot” was recruited by the Israeli Mossad and was trained in espionage and psychological warfare against Arab and Islamic societies. This information was attributed to Edward Snowden …”

    Bashar Assad, President of Syria. The US has been actively plotting strategies to destabilize and overthrow his government.

    ISIS is a US-Israeli Creation: Indication #7: Leaked Cables Showing US Plotting Syrian Overthrow

    Julian Assange of Wikileaks did a great job in capturing information about what was happening in Syria years before the “Arab springs” and current war started in 2011. He reveals how William Roebuck, then chargé d’affaires at the US embassy in Damascus, was plotting to destablize the Syrian government. The following quotes from Roebuck’s cables to Washington show how he was outlining the vulnerabilities of Assad:

    “– Vulnerability:

    — THE ALLIANCE WITH TEHRAN: Bashar is walking a fine line in his increasingly strong relations with Iran, seeking necessary support while not completely alienating Syria,s moderate Sunni Arab neighbors by being perceived as aiding Persian and fundamentalist Shia interests. Bashar’s decision to not attend the Talabani ) Ahmadinejad summit in Tehran following FM Moallem,s trip to Iraq can be seen as a manifestation of Bashar’s sensitivity to the Arab optic on his Iranian alliance.

    — Possible action:

    — PLAY ON SUNNI FEARS OF IRANIAN INFLUENCE: There are fears in Syria that the Iranians are active in both Shia proselytizing and conversion of, mostly poor, Sunnis. Though often exaggerated, such fears reflect an element of the Sunni community in Syria that is increasingly upset by and focused on the spread of Iranian influence in their country through activities ranging from mosque construction to business. Both the local Egyptian and Saudi missions here, (as well as prominent Syrian Sunni religious leaders), are giving increasing attention to the matter and we should coordinate more closely with their governments on ways to better publicize and focus regional attention on the issue.”

    ISIS is a US-Israeli Creation: Indication #8: Russia Bombs ISIS, US Protects ISIS

    Before Russia militarily entered Syria, the US claims it was “attacking” ISIS, yet Russia was able to do in a few months what the US has been unable to do for years. Why? Is the US military that incompetent, or this is further proof that the US has been funding and supporting ISIS all this time? At one point there were even reports that US soldiers were told not to fire on ISIS targets, even if they had a clear view of them, as this Free Beacon article reports:

    “U.S. military pilots who have returned from the fight against the Islamic State in Iraq are confirming that they were blocked from dropping 75 percent of their ordnance on terror targets because they could not get clearance to launch a strike, according to a leading member of Congress.”

    Why did US State Department spokesman Mark Toner struggle to celebrate the fact that ISIS had lost Palmyra recently?

    ISIS is a US-Israeli Creation: Indication #9: ISIS Always the Excuse for Further Intervention

    Finally, consider this: why is ISIS always the perfect excuse for further military intervention in Syria? Given the history of foreign meddling in Syria, particularly by the US and Israel in the last 70 years, isn’t it rather convenient that the specter of ISIS is the justification offered for proposed no-fly zones, air strikes and ground troops? How would the US and Israel conquer the Middle East without their pet Frankenstein ISIS?

    Share this article with those who haven’t yet awoken to the truth about ISIS. Many have already seen through the propaganda. Once enough of us do, the usefulness of this ridiculous, dangerous and vaudevillian terrorist group will expire – and maybe a critical mass of people will pull back the curtain and, for once, get a glimpse of the true puppetmasters.

    Concluding Note

    ISIS is a US-Israeli Creation: Indication #10: ISIS is an Acronym for Mossad. [The Israeli Secret Intelligence Service. Interesting Coincidence]

    ISIS itself is an acronym, not just for Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, but for Israeli Secret Intelligence Service! This is another way to describe the Mossad, the shady Zionist spy agency whose motto is “by way of deception, thou shalt do war”. In this video (below), the 2 authors being interviewed (Dan Raviv and Yossi Melman) admit that the acronym ISIS = Mossad.

    Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative news / independent media site The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com (FaceBook here), writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the worldwide conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance.

    Minor Editing by Global Research

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/isis-is-a-us-israeli-creation-top-ten-indications/5518627

    • Icarus Tanović

      Everythinh is on its place, but one cardinal mistake ia presented that leada people astray. Those ISIL, Al Nusra, etc. are not Muslims, nor do they have anything Islamic. It is called pseudo-Islam, a Wahhabism.

      • Jens Holm

        You are 100% wrong. You can find same kind of extremists in other religions as well.

        • Astar Roth

          No, you are wrong, that guy is very right. Wahhabism is pseudo islam and doesn’t have anything to do with it. It is Mi6 creation…

          • Jens Holm

            Mi6. You are barking mad. Wahabisme was made long time before Mi6.

          • Astar Roth

            No you are Zionistic dog and you barking mad.

          • Jens Holm

            Muhammed Ibn Abd al-Wahab was born in 1704

          • Astar Roth

            The guy never existed the way Zionist Hasbarats like you portrays him.
            Everyone knows about Memories of Mr. Hempher, and Saud alliance with Zionists.

    • Willing Conscience (The Truths

      That’s not accurate enough to explain anything, Obama and Hillary did have a hand in creating Isis to do what this article says they wanted to do, and yes Israel did play a big part in it as well, but the Muslim brotherhood are the real creators of Isis, and of Al Qaeda, and the Taliban, and the Mujahadeen.
      And you’re ignoring the fact that after Trump was elected everything changed, he’s been trying to designate the Muslim brotherhood as a terrorist organization ever since he was elected, and back in june 2018 both the US and Israel changed the mantra of “Assad has to be removed”, to “Assad can remain in power”.
      And Trumps Kurdish SDF forces have been clamping down on Isis harder than the Iranians have been in Deir ez Zor have [SF published many articles telling us readers that], and Trumps been killing heaps of Isis fighters and pro Turkish terrorists in Idlib for the last 12 months or more, so you’re still making Trump pay for the sins of his predecessor, even though he’s trying to get rid of them all now, and he’s been saying Assad can remain in power, he also tried to pull US forces out of Syria 3 times.
      The real reasons there’s still war in Syria is Russia keeps pandering to Turkey, and because Iran wants to threaten Israel, that’s the real reason the Syrian war hasn’t ended yet, but even more importantly, Assad’s too unforgiving and unwilling to compromise, his moral resolve won’t let him, which I both admire and condemn him for, sadly that means the Syrian people are now suffering when they don’t have to, a good man preserves his morals but the Syrian people suffer as a consequence.
      The US has said twice now that they want to go back to the position Syria was in before the war started, and they’re more than willing to allow the Russian full retention of all their existing assets there, so why are there still problems, only Iran and Turkey can answer/solve that.

      • AlexanderAmproz

        Muslim Brotherhood was funded
        by the MI6 in 1928 it is Londonistan
        Iran has none problems with Iranian Sephardi Jews.
        Nazism and Zionism is a London invention to manipulate
        Khazars on a Israel Colonial Theocratic Levant disturbance
        purposes to control Oil for the 7 sisters to racket the World
        detrimental the Levant Populations with Colonial Pilfering !

        Ashkenazis are Khazar Turco-Mongol invaders becoming
        Bolshevik monster mass murdering 70 Millions innocent
        Russians, and today the Palestinians !
        Nazisme is a US smoke screen invented to hide Bolshevik atrocities and ransom for Pilfering Germany !

        • Jens Holm

          Do You have Lebanse, Syrian, Turkish or Iranian inflation?

          • Willing Conscience (The Truths

            Does it really matter where he comes from, people from the same families have different opinions to each other, so using a person’s cultural or ethnic origins to help assess the validity of their comment is really pointless unless you’re generalizing.

          • Jens Holm

            Well it does if Wahabisme is used as a propaganda against fx the Brittish.

          • Astar Roth

            Oh do you have, you Hasbarat any Zionistic inflation? Your kingdom of evil is crumbling down.
            End of story.

        • Willing Conscience (The Truths

          “Hassan al-Banna founded the Muslim Brotherhood in the city of Ismailia in March 1928 along with six workers of the Suez Canal Company, as a Pan-Islamic, religious, political, and social movement.
          The Muslim Brotherhood’s goal, as stated by its founder al-Banna was to drive out British colonial and other Western influences, reclaim Islam’s manifest destiny—an empire, stretching from Spain to Indonesia.”

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood#:~:text=The%20Muslim%20Brotherhood%20is%20a,and%20Justice%20Party%20in%20Egypt.

          That’s what the wiki has to say about the Muslim Brotherhood [MB] but if you listen to what the Arab League countries who are at war with the Brotherhood have to say, they trace the Brotherhoods origins back nearly 100 years earlier.
          The Muslim Brotherhood’s in control of Turkey now thanks to Erdogan’s AK Party, and they also have excellent relations with Iran too, but the Russians have designated the MB as a terrorist organization and Trump’s been trying to do the same thing too, and Assad keeps saying they’re Syria’s number one enemy, so the MB aren’t popular with either the west or anyone else, and the Arab League Monarchies the least of all.
          The MB want exactly the same sort of political system that the Iranian’s already have in place, a system that places Islam above everything else, above democracy, man made laws, human morals, and beyond any sort of diplomatic compromise with external forces, and Sharia law is their the answer to everything.
          The Muslim brotherhood want Assad removed from power but neither the US or Israel want him removed anymore, both the US and Israel have been saying Assad can remain in power since june 2018, and the Arab league have been saying they want Assad to remain in power since mid 2017, only Erdogan and the MB still keep saying Assad should go.
          It’s no longer a west versus the east war in Syria, that ended back in june 2018, this is now a Muslim brotherhood war, and it’s also conveniently become an excuse for Iran to flex their muscles at Israel, which sadly doesn’t help end hostilities or do anything to help rebuild the country.
          Cheers.

      • AlexanderAmproz

        FAKE WARS AND BIG LIES (2/25)

        https://www.voltairenet.org/article206934.html

        The Muslim Brotherhood as assassins

        by Thierry Meyssan

        We are continuing the publication of Thierry Meyssan’s new book, «Before Our Very Eyes, Fake Wars and Big Lies : From 9/11 to Donald Trump». In this episode, he describes the creation of an Egyptian secret society, the Muslim Brotherhood, and then its re-creation after the Second World War by the British secret services. Finally, the use of the group by MI6 to carry out political assassinations in this ex-Crown colony.

        VOLTAIRE NETWORK | DAMASCUS (SYRIA) | 5 JULY 2019

        عربي DEUTSCH ESPAÑOL FRANÇAIS ITALIANO PORTUGUÊS ROMÂNĂ TÜRKÇE

        This article is an extract from the book Fake wars and big lies. See Contents.

        JPEG – 31 kb

        Hassan el-Banna, founder of the secret society the Muslim Brotherhood. We know little about his family, except that they were watchmakers – a trade reserved for the Jewish community in Egypt.

        The “Arab Spring” as experienced

        by the Muslim Brotherhood

        In 1951, building on the foundations of the old organisation of the same name, the Anglo-Saxon secret services put together a secret political society called the Muslim Brotherhood. At first they used it to assassinate personalities who resisted them, and then, starting in 1979, as mercenaries against the Soviets. At the beginning of the 1990’s, they incorporated the Brotherhood into NATO, and in 2010, attempted to force it into power in the Arab countries. The Muslim Brotherhood and the Sufi Order of the Naqshbandi were financed with at least $80 billion annually by the ruling Saudi family, which made them one of the most powerful armies in the world. All jihadist leaders, including the leaders of Daesh, belong to this military structure.

        The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood

        Four empires disappeared during the First World War – the German Reich, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Tsarist Holy Russian Empire, and the Ottoman Sublime Porte. The victors utterly lacked any sense of reason in the conditions they imposed on the defeated. Thus, in Europe, the Treaty of Versailles determined conditions which were unacceptable and unbearable for Germany, falsely blamed as the sole responsible for the conflict. In the Orient, the carving up of the Ottoman Caliphate was not going well. At the San Remo Conference (1920), in accordance with the secret Sykes-Picot agreements (1916), the United Kingdom was authorised to set up a Jewish homeland in Palestine, while France was allowed to colonise Syria (which included, at the time, what is now Lebanon). However, in what was left of the Ottoman Empire, Mustafa Kemal led a revolt both against the Sultan, who had lost the war, and against the Western powers, who were taking control of his country. At the Sèvres Conference (1920), the Caliphate was chopped into little pieces in order to create a variety of new states, including a Kurdistan. The Turko-Mongol population of the provinces of Thrace and Anatolia rose up and carried Kemal to power. Finally, the Lausanne Conference (1923) traced the frontiers we know today, gave up on the idea of Kurdistan, and organised gigantic population transfers which caused more than half a million deaths.

        But just as in Germany, Adolf Hitler was to contest his country’s lot, so, in the Near East, a man stood up against the new division of the region. An Egyptian schoolteacher founded a movement to re-establish the Caliphate which the Westerners had defeated. This man was Hassan al-Banna, and his organisation was the Muslim Brotherhood (1928).

        In principle, the Caliph was the successor of the Prophet, to whom all owe obedience – it was therefore a very coveted title. There had been several great lines of Caliphs in succession – the Omeyyads, the Abbassids, the Fatimids and the Ottomans. The next Caliph would have to be the man who seized the title – and as it happened, this was the “General Guide” of the Brotherhood, who was quite comfortable with the idea of becoming the master of the Muslim world.

        The secret society spread rapidly. Its intention was to work from within the system in order to re-establish Islamic institutions. Applicants had to swear fealty to the founder not only upon the Qu’ran, but also on a sabre or a revolver. The aim of the Brotherhood was exclusively political, even though it expressed itself in religious terms. Hassan al-Banna and his successors never spoke about Islam as a religion, nor did they evoke Muslim spirituality. For them, Islam is no more than a dogma, a submission to God and the exercise of Power. Obviously, the Egyptians who supported the Brotherhood did not see it this way. They followed it because it claimed to follow God.

        For Hassan al-Banna, the legitimacy of a government was not to be measured by its representativeness, the way we evaluate that of Western governments, but by its capacity to defend the “Islamic way of life”, in other words, the way of life of 19th century Ottoman Egypt. The Brotherhood never considered that Islam has a History, and that Muslim ways of life vary considerably according to region and era. Neither did it imagine that the Prophet had revolutionised the Bedouin society in which he lived, or that the way of life described in the Qu’ran is no more than a stage meant for those particular men. For them, the disciplinary rules of the Qu’ran – Sharia – do not correspond to a given situation, but fix inalterable laws upon which Power can rely.

        For the Brotherhood, the fact that the Muslim way of life had often been imposed by the sword justified the use of force. The Brotherhood would never admit that Islam may have been spread by example. This did not prevent al-Banna and his Brothers from standing for election – and losing. If they condemned political parties, it was not because of opposition to the multi-party system, but because by separating religion from politics, they would succumb to corruption.

        The doctrine of the Muslim Brotherhood was the ideology of “political Islam” – “Islamism” – a word which was destined to become all the rage.

        In 1936, Hassan al-Banna wrote to Egyptian Prime Minister Mostafa El-Nahas Pasha. He demanded:

        – legislative reform, and the conformity of all tribunals with Sharia law;

        – recruitment within the armies to create a volunteer force under the banner of jihad;

        – connection between all Muslim countries, and the preparation for the restoration of the Caliphate, in realization of the unity demanded by Islam.

        During the Second World War, the Brotherhood declared itself to be neutral. In reality, it mutated into an Intelligence service for the Reich. But from the point at which the United States entered the war, when the fortune of arms seemed to be changing sides, it played a double game, and sold information about Germany to the British. In this way, the Brotherhood revealed its total absence of principles and pure political opportunism.

        On 24 February 1945, the Brothers tried their luck and assassinated the Egyptian Prime Minister in the middle of a parliamentary session. This was followed by an escalation of violence – a movement of repression against the Brotherhood, and a series of political assassinations, going as far as the murder of the new Prime Minister on 28 December 1948, and in retaliation, the killing of Hassan al-Banna himself, on 12 February 1949. A short time afterwards, a tribunal instituted by martial law condemned most of the Brotherhood to prison sentences, and dissolved their association.

        This secret organisation was in reality no more than a band of assassins who hoped to grab power by masking their ambition behind the Qu’ran. Its story should have ended there. Unfortunately, it did not.

        • AlexanderAmproz

          The Brotherhood reinstated by the Anglo-Saxons,

          https://www.voltairenet.org/article206934.html

          and the separate peace with Israel

          The capacity of the Brotherhood to mobilise people and turn them into assassins obviously intrigued the major Powers.

          JPEG – 29.2 kb

          Despite his denials, Sayyid Qutb was a Freemason. He published an article entitled « Why I became a Freemason », published in the magazine al-Taj al-Masri (the « Crown of Egypt »), on 23 April 1943.

          Two and a half years after its dissolution, a new organisation was formed by the Anglo-Saxons, who re-used the name “Muslim Brotherhood”. Because all its historical leaders were incarcerated, ex-judge Hassan al-Hudaybi was selected as General Guide. Contrary to what is often believed, he represented no historical continuity between the old and the new Brotherhood. It transpired that a unit of the old secret society, the “Secret Section”, had been tasked by Hassan al-Banna with perpetrating attacks for which he denied all responsibility. This organisation within the organisation was so secret that it had not been affected by the dissolution of the Brotherhood, and was now available to his successor. The Guide decided to disown the “Secret Section”, and declared that he wanted to attain his objectives only by peaceful means. It is difficult to establish exactly what happened at that moment between the Anglo-Saxons, who wanted to recreate the old society, and the Guide, who believed he was simply reviving its audience from within the masses. In any case, the “Secret Section” survived, and the authority of the Guide waned in favor of other Brotherhood leaders, triggering a great internecine struggle. The CIA gave Sayyid Qutb a leadership position within the Brotherhood. Qutb, a Freemason [1], was the theoretician of jihad, whom the Guide Hudaybi had condemned, before being forced to come to terms with MI6.

          It is impossible to specify the relations and degrees of hierarchy between these men, on one hand because each foreign branch enjoyed its own autonomy, and on the other, because the secret units within the organisation no longer necessarily answered either to the General Guide, or the local Guide, but sometimes directly to the CIA and MI6.

          During the period following the Second World War, the British attempted to re-organise the world in order to keep it out of Soviet hands. In September 1946, in Zurich, Winston Churchill launched the idea of the United States of Europe. On the same principle, he also launched the Arab League. In both cases, the aim was to unify these regions without Russia. From the beginning of the Cold War, the United States, for their part, created associations tasked with accompanying this movement for their own profit – the American Committee on United Europe and the American Friends of the Middle East [2]. In the Arab world, the CIA organised two coups d’état, first of all in favour of General Hosni Zaim in Damascus (March 1949), then with the Free Officers in Cairo (July 1952). The goal was to support the nationalists who were believed to be hostile to the Communists. It was in this state of mind that Washington sent SS General Otto Skorzeny to Egypt, and Nazi General Fazlollah Zahedi to Iran, accompanied by hundreds of ex-Gestapo officers, with whom they hoped to direct the anti-Communist conflict.

          Unfortunately, Skorzeny schooled the Egyptian police in a tradition of violence. In 1963, he chose the CIA and the Mossad over Nasser. As for Zahedi, he created the SAVAK, the cruelest political police force of the time.

          While Hassan al-Banna had defined the objective – seizing power by manipulating religion – Sayyid Qutb defined the means – jihad. Once the adepts had admitted the supremacy of the Qu’ran, it could be used as a foundation for organising them into an army and sending them into combat. Qutb developed a Manichean theory which distinguished “Islamist” from “evil”. This brainwashing enabled the CIA and MI6 to use adepts to control the nationalist Arab governments, then to destabilise the Muslim regions of the Soviet Union. The Brotherhood became an inexhaustible reservoir of terrorists under the slogan – “Allah is our goal. The Prophet is our leader. The Qu’ran is our law. The jihad is our way. Martyrdom is our vow”.

          Qutb’s ideas were rational, but not reasonable. He applied an ironclad rhetoric of Allah – Prophet – Qu’ran – Jihad – Martyrdom, which left no room for any discussion at any point. He placed the superiority of his logic over human reason.

          JPEG – 28.8 kb

          Reception of a delegation of the secret society by President Eisenhower at the White House (23 September 1953).

          The CIA organised a conference at Princeton University on “The Situation of Muslims in the Soviet Union”. It was the occasion for the United States to receive a delegation of the Muslim Brotherhood led by Sa’id Ramadan, one of the heads of its armed branch. In his report, the CIA officer in charge of the summary noted that Ramadan was not a religious extremist, but rather resembled a fascist – a way of underlining the exclusively political character of the Muslim Brotherhood. The conference ended with a reception at the White House, hosted by President Eisenhower, on 23 September 1953. The alliance between Washington and jihadism was formed.

          JPEG – 27.5 kb

          (From left to right) Hassan el-Banna married his daughter to Saïd Ramadan, which made Ramadan his successor. The couple gave birth to Hani (Director of the Islamic Centre in Geneva) and Tariq Ramadan (who became a full professor with the chair of contemporary Islamic studies at the University of Oxford).

          The CIA, which had resuscitated the Brotherhood to use against the Communists, first of all used it to help nationalists. At that time, the Agency was represented in the Middle East by middle-class anti-Zionists. They were rapidly ousted and replaced by senior civil servants of Anglo-Saxon and Puritan origin, graduates from major universities, all favourable to Israel. Now Washington entered into conflict with the nationalists, and the CIA turned the Brotherhood against them.

          JPEG – 14.2 kb

          Said Ramadan and Abdul Ala Mawdudi hosted a weekly broadcast on Radio Pakistan, a station created by the British MI6.

          Sa’id Ramadan had commanded a few combatants from the Brotherhood during the brief war against Israel in 1948, then helped Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi to create the paramilitary organisation Jamaat-i-Islami in Pakistan. The point was to fabricate an Islamic identity for the Muslim Indians so that they could constitute a new state, Pakistan. Jamaat-i-Islami in fact drew up the Pakistani constitution. Ramadan married the daughter of Hassan al-Banna, and became the head of the armed branch of the new “Muslim Brotherhood”.

          Meanwhile, in Egypt, the Brotherhood had taken part in the coup d’état by General Mohammed Naguib’s Free Officers – Sayyid Qutb was their liaison officer. They were tasked with eliminating one of their leaders, Gamal Abdel Nasser, who had opposed Naguib. Not only did they fail, on 26 October 1954, but Nasser took power, subdued the Brotherhood, and put Naguib under house arrest. Sayyid Qutb would be hanged a few years later.

          Forbidden in Egypt, the Brotherhood fell back to the Wahhabi states (Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the Emirate of Sharjah), and to Europe (Germany, France and the United Kingdom, plus neutral Switzerland). Each time, they were received as Western agents fighting the growing alliance between the Arab nationalists and the Soviet Union. Sa’id Ramadan was issued a Jordanian diplomatic passport, and settled in Geneva in 1958. From there that he directed the destabilisation of the Caucasus and Central Asia (both Pakistan-Afghanistan and the Soviet Fergana Valley). He took control of the Committee for the construction of a mosque in Munich, which enabled him to supervise almost all the Muslims in Western Europe. With the assistance of the American Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Russia (AmComLib), which is to say the CIA, he had at his command Radio Liberty /Radio Free Europe, a radio station financed directly by the US Congress to spread the philosophy of the Brotherhood [3].

          After the Suez Canal crisis and the spectacular about-face of Nasser to join the Soviets, Washington decided to provide unlimited help to the Muslim Brotherhood in the fight against the Arab nationalists. A senior officer of the CIA, Miles Copeland, was charged – in vain – with selecting a personality within the Brotherhood who could play, in the Arab world, a role equivalent to that of Pastor Billy Graham in the United States. It was not until the 1980’s that a preacher of that calibre was found – the Egyptian Yusuf al-Qaradawi.

          In 1961, the Brotherhood established a connection with another secret society, the Order of the Naqshbandis. This was a sort of Muslim Freemasonry which mixed Sufi initiation with politics. One of their Indian theorists, Abu al-Hasan Ali al-Nadwi, published an article in the Brotherhood’s magazine. The Order is ancient, and represented in many countries. In Iraq, the grand master was none other than the future vice-President, Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri. He would support the attempted coup d’état by the Brotherhood in Syria, in 1982, and then the “Return to Faith Campaign” organised by President Saddam Hussein in order to restore an identity to his country after the imposition of the Western no-fly zone.

          In Turkey, the Order would play a more complex role. It would include as its directors both Fethullah Gülen (founder of the Hizmet movement) and President Turgut Özal (1989-1993), as well as Prime Minister Necmettin Erbakan (1996-1997), founder of the Justice Party (1961) and the Millî Görüş movement (1969). In Afghanistan, ex-President Sibghatullah Mojaddedi (1992) was the Order’s grand master. In 19th century Russia, with the help of the Ottoman Empire, the Order had raised up Crimea, Uzbekistan, Chechnya and Daghestan against the Tsar. Until the fall of the USSR, we would hear nothing more of this branch – just as in the Chinese Xinjiang region. The proximity between the Brotherhood and the Naqshbandis is very rarely studied, given the a priori Islamist opposition to mysticism and Sufi orders in general.

          JPEG – 27.8 kb

          The Saudi headquarters of the World Islamic League. In 2015, its budget was superior to that of the Saudi Ministry of Defence. The world’s major buyer of weapons, Saudi Arabia acquired arms which the League distributed to the organisations of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Naqshbandis.

          In 1962, the CIA encouraged Saudi Arabia to create the Muslim World League and finance both the Brotherhood and the Naqshbandi Order to work against the nationalists and the Communists [4]. The organisation was first of all financed by Aramco (Arabian-American Oil Company). Amongst the twenty or so founding members, we note the presence of three Islamist theorists whom we have already mentioned – the Egyptian Sa’id Ramadan, the Pakistani Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi, and the Indian Abu al-Hasan Ali al-Nadwi.

          De facto, Arabia, which suddenly disposed of enormous liquidities thanks to the commerce in oil, became the godfather of the Muslim Brotherhood all over the world. At home, the monarchy entrusted them with the educational system for schools and universities, in a country where almost no one knew how to read or write. The Brotherhood had to adapt to its hosts. Indeed, their allegiance to the King prevented them from swearing loyalty to the General Guide. In any case, they organised around Mohamed Qutb, Sayyid’s brother, in two tendencies – the Saudi Brotherhood on one side, and the “Sururists” (adepts of Sheikh Surur) on the other. The Sururists, who are Saudis, attempted to create a synthesis between the Brotherhood’s political ideology and Wahhabi theology. This cult, of which the royal family are members, lived by an interpretation of Islam which was born of the Bedouin tradition, iconoclast and anti-historic. Until Riyadh came into all its petro-dollars, it made traditional Muslim schools anathema, which, in return, considered it heretical.

          In reality, the politics of the Brotherhood and the Wahhabist religion have nothing in common, although they are compatible – except that the pact linking the Saud family with the Wahhabist preachers cannot exist within the Brotherhood – the idea of a “divine right” monarchy clashes with the Brotherhood’s greed for power. It was therefore agreed that the Sauds would support the Brotherhood everywhere in the world, on the condition that they abstain from entering politics in Arabia.

          The Saudi Wahhabi support for the Brotherhood provoked extra rivalry between Arabia and the two other Wahhabi states – Qatar and the Emirate of Sharjah.

          From 1962 to 1970, the Muslim Brotherhood took part in the civil war in North Yemen, and attempted to re-enlist the monarchy on the side of Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom against the Arab nationalists, Egypt and the USSR – a conflict which foreshadowed what was to happen over the next half-century.

          In 1970, Gamal Abdel Nasser managed to negotiate an agreement between the Palestinian factions and King Hussein of Jordan, which put an end to the “Black September” terrorist group. But on the evening of the Arab League summit which met to ratify the agreement, he died, officially from a heart attack, but was far more probably assassinated. Nasser had three vice-Presidents – one from the left wing who was extremely popular; a centrist, a very public figure; and a conservative at the bidding of the United States and Saudi Arabia – Anwar el-Sadat. Under pressure, the left-wing vice-President declared himself unfit for the function. The centrist vice-President preferred to abandon politics. Sadat was therefore designated as the Nasserian candidate. This drama is played out in many countries – the President chooses a vice-President from among his rivals in order to extend his electoral base, but when he dies, the vice-President replaces him and ruins his heritage.

          Sadat, who had served the Reich during the Second World War, and professed great admiration for the Führer, was an ultra-conservative soldier who served as Sayyid Qutb’s alter-ego, a liaison officer between the Brotherhood and the Free Officers Movement, the group of nationalist authors who instigated the 1952 revolution in Egypt. As soon as Sadat gained power, he freed the Muslim Brothers who had been imprisoned by Nasser. The “faithful President” was the Brotherhood’s ally for anything concerning the Islamisation of society (the “Corrective Revolution”), but its rival when politically profitable for him. This ambiguous relationship was illustrated by the creation of three armed groups, which were not factions within the Brotherhood, but exterior units under its orders – the Islamic Party of Liberation, the Islamic Jihad (under Sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman), and Excommunication and Immigration (the “Takfiri”). All of them claimed to be following the instructions of Sayyid Qutb. Armed by the secret services, the Islamic Jihad launched attacks against the Coptic Christians. Far from mitigating the situation, the “faithful President” accused the Copts of sedition, and imprisoned their Pope and eight of their bishops. Finally, Sadat intervened in the government of the Brotherhood and took a stance in favor of the Islamic Jihad against the General Guide, whom he arrested [5].

          On instructions from US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, Sadat convinced Syria to join with Egypt to attack Israel and restore Palestinian rights. On 6 October 1973, while the Israelis were celebrating Yom Kippur, the two armies took the Hebrew country in a pincer movement. The Egyptian army crossed the Suez Canal, while the Syrian army attacked from the Golan Heights. However, Sadat only partially deployed his anti-aircraft cover, and halted his army 15 kilometres to the East of the Canal – meanwhile, the Israelis attacked the Syrians, who discovered that they were trapped and screamed conspiracy.

          It was only when the Israeli reserve forces had been mobilised, and the Syrian army was surrounded by Israeli troops, that Sadat ordered his army to continue its progression, before halting it once again to negotiate a cease-fire. Observing the Egyptian treason, the Soviets, who had already lost an ally with the death of Nasser, threatened the United States and demanded an immediate cessation of combat.

          JPEG – 25 kb

          Ex-liaison officer with Sayyid Qutb for the « Free Officers » and the Brotherhood, the « believer president », Anouar el-Sadate, was to be proclaimed as the « sixth caliph » by the Egyptian parliament. Here, this admirer of Adolf Hitler is in the Knesset alongside his partners Golda Meïr and Shimon Peres.

          Four years later – still pursuing the CIA plan – President Sadat went to Jerusalem and signed a separate peace treaty with Israel, to the detriment of the Palestinians and of Syria. From then on, the alliance between the Muslim Brotherhood and Israel was sealed. All the Arab peoples decried this treason, and Egypt was excluded from the Arab League, whose headquarters were moved to Algiers.

          JPEG – 21.7 kb

          Responsible for the « Secret Wing » of the Muslim Brotherhood, Ayman al-Zawahiri (currently the head of Al-Qaïda) organised the assassination of President Sadate (6 October 1981).

          In 1981, Washington decided to turn the page. The Islamic Jihad was ordered to eliminate Sadat, who had outlived his usefulness. He was assassinated during a military parade, while the Parliament was preparing to proclaim him the “Sixth Caliph”. In the presidential box, seven people were killed and 28 wounded, yet sitting next to the President, his vice-President General Mubarak survived. He was the only person in the box wearing body armour. He succeeded the “faithful President”, and the Arab League could now be repatriated to Cairo.

          https://www.voltairenet.org/article206934.html

        • Willing Conscience (The Truths

          The Arab league Monarchs are the ones that spill the beans on the MB the most, they have more relevant information about the MB than anyone else, and they say all roads lead to Rome [the MB].
          Most of the info in the articles you linked is correct but not all of it, there are some dubious connections that are made that aren’t easily corroborated, and some of it’s just simply innuendo.
          The MB killed Russians in Afghanistan when Osama Bin Laden was the leader of the Mujahideen, and they did that while they were on the US payroll, but now they kill US soldiers in Afghanistan using their own money.
          And the MB also used Isis to kill many of their fellow Muslims in Iraq and Syria too, and that was all done while on US/Israeli/Arab League/EU payrolls too, but those payrolls for Isis stopped back in 2017, and the payrolls for the FSA and others stopped in 2018, now they all just use MB funds to keep themselves going.
          We all know what happened in Egypt and can see how the MB is treated there now, members of their organization are jailed tortured and killed by the current government all the time and no one complains [too loudly] about it, but look at how China treats their own citizens who follow the MB ideological extremism, reports say more than one million Uighurs have been sent to detention centres already, some reports say it’s up to 2 million, and China isn’t a western country by any means, so the MB doesn’t discriminate between east and west, all non believers are the enemy for them, even the Chinese.
          And look at how much trouble the MB caused Russia during the Chechen wars, there were more atrocities carried out by the MB supported Chechen separatists in both Chechnya and Russia than there were in Syria by Isis [not as bad as Iraq though], so everyone’s had a taste of the MB’s Islamic fundamentalism.
          As the Arab League say, “all roads lead to rome”.
          Cheers.

          • AlexanderAmproz

            Al Qaida was also in Kosovo under US request
            for a “Casus Belli” with Yugoslavia …..
            Uighurs in China are US proxy, Rohingyas in Burma,
            Abu Sayyaf/ISIS in the Sulu & Mindanao, South Thailand,
            Indonesia too …..

            What for a folly !

          • Astar Roth

            And Bosnia.

    • Jens Holm

      Minority rapport from You. Its like 6 billion Jews aganst 1 billion muslims.

      Hard times.

      Next time You starve, we will parashute pigs and mexicans to You.

      • Astar Roth

        Save it for your self, dog.

  • cechas vodobenikov

    isis is amerika—poor peasants that murder for money

    • Icarus Tanović

      That’s true, and Wahhabism is major problem.

  • Icarus Tanović

    We have major problem here, the Wahhabism.
    I really now don’t know what to say about that Russia Turkey ceasefire agreement.

    • Mustafa Mehmet

      You don’t make any different anyway

    • Cromwell

      In my view that ceasefire was a big mistake,the SAA were on a roll heading for idlib city,now any battle for that city will cost many more lives,the terrorists and the turks have brought in many more fighters and weapons,but it can and MUST be liberated.

      • Mustafa Mehmet

        Goland first. then idlib and rest go on saa

      • NancyLouis

        Since I started working online from home, I earn € 125 per hours. Amazingly, the only thing he needs is easy typing and internet access. This job is really incredible and gives me a big share of income every day. I’m sure you’ll get the best result.. I started here

        ………………………….➤➤➤➤➤➤➤➤➤➤ http://www.D𝙤u𝘾𝙖𝙨𝙝.𝘾𝙤𝙢Ⓐ

        The word “Ⓐ” not add in the web address

    • Mustafa Mehmet

      go on say something anus chill feel free

  • Assad must stay

    Looks like daesh needs to be wiped out again like in 2017

    • Mustafa Mehmet

      Who’s been stopping you all this time? as usual all talk and no action. assad and his murderer gangs has to go now

      • Cromwell

        STFU you terrorist Ape.

        • Mustafa Mehmet

          up yours and all Cockroaches

      • Astar Roth

        No, Erdogan and his gang of Wahhabi headchoppers had to go.

        • Jens Holm

          Them too.

          • Mustafa Mehmet

            When Erdoğan’a term finish he will go to

        • Mustafa Mehmet

          when molla.. hezbollock.. Russia.. and all mercenary leaves Syria everything will be ok

          • Astar Roth

            When Turkish gang of goaters leave Syria then it will be peace.

      • Jens Holm

        Sure, but there are no replacement.

        • Mustafa Mehmet

          Of course there is. new politicians always around. Once you finished your term you should step aside. most of the Arab countries run by the dictator anyway.. assad replaceable to

          • Jens Holm

            I hope You are right. There are good and bad dictators as well.

            The only ones having any plan for the future are the SDF Kurds, and not many like them even their proposals makes a lot of sense.

    • Jens Holm

      They were never wiped out. They were military defeated as territory by loosing Hajin-Abu Kamal.

      By regrouping well as ISIS guerilla they are let alone too much and mainly by Assads. USA also has its part leaing as they did, because they knew and know Assads and Russians are made weak and cant keep all being bad as military units.

      But the main mistake is ISIS made possible as well as the other oppositions to Assads.

      The fault is Assads only.

  • Rhodium 10

    US base in Al Tanf is the ISIS nest…

    • Astar Roth

      Veeery true…

      • Jens Holm

        Chanel number 5 connected them. Later they were upgraded by a F16.

        • Astar Roth

          What are you talking about? Are you sane?

    • Jens Holm

      And Trump is a clone of Muhammed. Hillary is related to Aysia too. They use same kind of shoes.

  • Paul

    Need to burn the desert ppl