India To Finalize S-400 Deal With Russia Despite US Pressure: Indian Defense Minister

Donate

India To Finalize S-400 Deal With Russia Despite US Pressure: Indian Defense Minister

Sputnik / Mihail Mokrushin

India will finalize the deal for almost $5.7 bn acquisition of five advanced S-400 Triumf air defence missiles from Russia. This was confirmed to the India Times by Defense Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in New Delhi on July 13th.

The S-400 missile systems, which can detect, track and destroy hostile strategic bombers, stealth fighters, spy planes, missiles and drones at a range of up to 400 km and an altitude of 30 km.

India has just reached the final phase and there has been an outcry because such a purchase is prohibited under the recent US law called CAATSA (Countering America’s Adversaries through Sanctions Act) which deters countries from purchasing Russian weapons. However, it is arguable if it should be applied to this situation, since the, Indian Times reports has been in the works since 2015, long before the US law was entered into force.

The Diplomat reports that Indian Defense Minister has stated “With Russia, we have had a continuous relationship of defense procurement of seven decades. We told the U.S. Congress delegation which met me in Delhi that this it is U.S. legislation and not a UN law. We have had this relationship, an enduring relationship with the Russians and are going ahead with buying the S-400.” Earlier this year, in May, Indian Times and the Diplomat reported that India and Russia have finalized the price and are now in the last stages and the deal shall not be hindered by US legislation.

There will be a dialogue between the Indian Defense Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj and their American counterparts – Jim Mattis and Mike Pompeo. This will happen in early September. Since the deal has begun prior to CAATSA, both Mattis and Pompeo have argued in defense of countries such as India who has new military projects with Russia worth $12 bn, as well as an operational need to maintain the huge inventory of Russian-origin weapon systems in its armed forces.

The Diplomat reports that in 2016, the Obama administrations declared India as a “major defense partner”, thus giving it access to sensitive US military technology, however India is not an ally, it is a strategic partner in the region.

The meeting between Defense and Foreign Ministers will also include discussions regarding bilateral military pacts such as COMCASA (Communications, Compatibility and Security Agreement) and BECA (Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement for Geo-Spatial Cooperation) which the US has tried to put forward for 15 years, reports the Indian Times.

Turkey, in a similar situation is about to finalize buying S-400 missiles and the US tried to pressure them in the same way. General Tod Wolters, the NATO Allied Air Commander, commented in front of Reuters that the news of this purchase was worrying, however he was trying to hold strong ties with Turkey. The US is attempting to block any sale of F-35 fighter jets to Turkey, because of worries that the S-400 system could receive vital information in the F-35 technology.

David Deptula, a retired Air Force general and industry consultant, commented in front of Reuters – “The Turks have to make a choice. They’re either going to be part of NATO or they’re going to move into the Russian camp in terms of defense.”

However, General Wolters is positive that the security threat that the integration of a S-400 in a NATO defense posed is yet to be determined, however it has not hindered communication with the Turkish military as a NATO ally. However Turkey is adamant that if there are sanctions against its decision to complete the deal with Russia, there will be a retaliation against the US.

India and Turkey show that it will not be hindered by US pressure, despite being its strategic partner, and in the case of Turkey ally, they also works towards their own interest in making deals with Russia, showing that they pursue their own interests above all.

Donate

SouthFront

Do you like this content? Consider helping us!

  • Raptar Driver

    “We told the U.S. Congress delegation which met me in Delhi that this it is U.S. legislation and not a UN law.”

    Very correct and good for the Indians. The U.S. seems to think that their laws are everyone’s. If this is not a cause for concern for the entire planet (including Americans) then there are no concerns whatsoever.

  • Jesus

    Go India and buy the best antiaircraft defenses in the world.
    US is counter offering an anti ballistic system that is expensive and unreliable.

  • Bob

    India has long been heavily equipped with Soviet legacy and Russian weapons systems – these make up the majority of their armor, heavy artillery and AA/SAM defense systems – and likewise Soviet legacy and Russian warplanes dominate their air wing inventory. This is not news to anyone, hence the US position is deeply irrational and needlessly confrontational – attempting to forcibly pressure India from engaging with their long standing hardware supplier and the logical source for further upgraded and related systems.

    • John Whitehot

      it must be said that although in the army they have been using mostly soviet systems, since the start of the cold war they tried to differentiate the sources of their equipment, and also to keep their own defense industries healthy by developing and deploying national devices.
      During the latest 60 years India employed an array of weapons systems from different countries with different philosophies – this makes them a highly sought customer for weapons manufacturers.

      I always wondered how would they cope in the case of a prolonged high intensity conflict, as it would become rather difficult for them to keep up supply and replacement lines for all their equipment, especially if air and sea lanes would be contested.

      nonetheless they probably chose to perfect a national doctrine based on flexibility, in order of not becoming too dependent on a single country for defense.

      the percentage of the amount of a given system inside their national pool probably shows how much they expect to face a military crisis with said country.