0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
895 $
6 DAYS LEFT UNTIL THE END OF SEPTEMBER

In Videos: At Least 11 Killed In Indian-Pakistani Exchange Of Strikes In Disputed Kashmir Region

Support SouthFront

In Videos: At Least 11 Killed In Indian-Pakistani Exchange Of Strikes In Disputed Kashmir Region

Click to see the full-size image

At least 11 people were killed and 30 others were injured in a recent exchange of strikes between Pakistan and India in the disputed Kashmir region.

The Pakistani Armed Forces and government blamed India for initiating clashes by firing rockets and mortar shells that killed 5 Pakistani civilians and wounded 27 others on November 12 and 13. The Pakistani side described the attack as ‘unprovoked incident of cease-fire violations’ and said that Pakistani troops responded by targeting the Indian posts.

The Indian military said three of its soldiers were killed and three others were wounded. Three Indian civilians were also killed by Pakistani shelling. The Indian side says that it acted in response to Pakistani shelling and actions of Pakistani sabotage groups.

The situation in the area remains tense but there are no indications of any offenisve preparations by any side.

MORE ON THE TOPIC:

Support SouthFront

SouthFront

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
43 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kenny Jones ™

I like how the South_front community only cares conflicts involving Russia..
I mean these are two nuclear powers where tensions are escalating to war, but 0 comments here..

occupybacon

comment image

Roham Pasha

luckily the indo-pak community hasnt discovered this site yet

SnowCatzor

I know right, they make the toxic trash talk here look polite in comparison.

Frank

Luckily and Frankly, my dear no ones gives a damn about teeming South Asia.

Vox Populi

The world views the Indian-subcontinent as an impoverished and strange cesspool of bizarre religions and practices and no one is really interested in their spats. If China was involved then it becomes top news, but Indians and Pakistanis who are same people killing each other over some rocks is not really newsworthy. Even a nuclear war confined to South Asia and assisting in global population control would not rate too high in the western media.

Jihadi Colin

A nuclear war in the Indian subcontinent would cause radioactive fallout, depending on the season and the wind direction, from India to Iran, Afghanistan and Iraq (summer) or Pakistan to Bangladesh and China (winter) so plenty of people would be bloody well affected by it and talking about it.

Jihadi Colin

Proud Hindu and I have discovered this site long ago.

John Wallace

These border disputes have been going on ever since they partitioned the countries when Trump was a boy running around in shorts. Russia has supported India and China Pakistan ever since . Each blame the other for starting it and who knows which did. As long as it doesn’t escalate like 1965 which lasted four or five months with NO winner., or several times since all of which are very short wars. I haven’t heard either side using nukes so perhaps MAD works .

Vox Populi

They will just bob their heads and talk a lot ….comment image

Jihadi Colin

Personally, I just saw this article. And no there will not be any way because the gibbering globetrotting genocidal Gujarati gangster government of Narendrabhai Damodardasbhai Modi is owned by corporate interests, specifically Mukeshbhai Dhirubhai Ambani and Gautambhai Shantilalbhai Adani, whose income stream would be damaged by a war. So there won’t be one though Modi will keep creating propaganda “victories” on his tame media for his Bhakts (worshippers).

Indian1

Then why is your Bajwa sweating profusely and his legs shivering?

Jihadi Colin

My Bajwa? Who’s that?

Indian1

Pakistani army chief qamer Bajwa

Indian1

Just Google ‘pak army chief general Bajwa sweating profusely and his legs shivering’ and you will find who Bajwa is and how much brave Pak army is!

Jihadi Colin

What does that have to do with me? You said “my Bajwa”. As far as I know the name of the army chief of this country (not including the gibbering globetrotting genocidal Gujarati gangster’s out of turn promoted human shield supporting sexist blowhard Rawat) is Manoj Naravane. Maybe you Modifellating Bhaktonazis have better knowledge though.

Indian1

Your views regarding Rawat, Manoj narvane and prime minister Modi are hallucinating fantasies of your drug addict prime minister imran Khan

Jihadi Colin

Actually, the gibbering globetrotting genocidal Gujarati gangster is the prime minister of this country, not Imran Khan. I think you should update your knowledge.

Jihadi Colin

Also, are you really claiming that

1. Manoj Naravane isn’t the chief of army staff of India?
2. That Rawat didn’t support using human shields in Kashmir?
3. That Rawat wasn’t promoted above the heads of two more senior generals by the Modi regime?

I can prove every single one of those claims, so better be careful how you answer, Modifellating Bhaktonazi.

Indian1

Your name itself (jihadi) reveals that you are a pakistani. Like all other Pakistanis, you are ashamed of disclosing your nationality. All Pakistanis living in western countries never admit that they are Pakistanis. Instead they lie that they are indians. If you were an Indian citizen our forces and police would have dealt with you appropriately.

Jihadi Colin

You don’t have much of an IQ, do you? Anyone calling himself a “jihadi” is a Pakistani? As for “Jihadi Colin”, he’s a cartoon character created by me, but that’s neither here nor there. You Modifellating Bhaktonazis don’t own this country. We humans – of all religions or none – have as much right to live in it as you, and we have as much right to make our opinions known as you. And remember one thing, your gibbering globetrotting genocidal Gujarati gangster god Narendrabhai Damodardasbhai Modi isn’t immortal. Once he’s finished your Bhakt Jumla Party literally has nobody else to get a vote.

Kenny Jones ™

Anyway, again the only winner in such a conflict would be the West, they benefit from strong states fighting, same with China

Mr T

I stand with PAK army.

Kenny Jones ™

So you’re a Turk

The Objective

He mustn’t be a Turk to support Pakistan. I support Pakistan too, and I’m no Turk.

krokodil

Yes you are.

The Objective

What a laugh. Why should I deny being a Turk if I’m one? Because I fear you or anyone here?
I just agree with the Turkish regime currently, although I don’t buy the idea of attempting to overthrow the dictators and monarchies of the Muslim world. This is not because I agree with their policies, but because overthrowing them will lead to chaos and bloodshed among Muslims, destruction of Muslim cities and the creation of groups outside state control, like we see in Iraq, Libya, Lebanon, Yemen, Syria and others.
I really think the Muslim brotherhood should work with Al-Sisi and the GCC regardless of how evil they view these leaders to be. They should help maintain and strengthen regime stability while encouraging the dictators and kings to make reforms that favor the masses and Islam. If the Muslim brotherhood had gained the trust of these regimes and helped to stabilize them instead of seeking to overthrow them, the dictators and king would have listened to their demands, and even if not all are met, some will be. And that would have saved the live of thousands (like those massacred in Egypt to disperse the sit-ins)

Leif Oskar Zetterstrøm

Today’s religions are old-fashioned and outdated. They simply do not hold up in today’s modern and enlightened world.

Kenny Jones ™

What are you then? Just interested

The Objective

A pro-Sunni activist. I suppose you are one of the supporters of the Mullahs.

Kenny Jones ™

“Yes”

The Objective

Kenny Jones

Porc Halal

“The Objective” claiming he’s not a turk…
comment image

Vox Populi

Pakistan is a failed state with a corrupt army that has hijacked a country and lost every war in its miserable history. It is only Indian incompetence that allowed this festering sore to survive, much like the Arabs and Israelis.

Jihadi Colin

Pakistan won the 1947-48 war, keeping half of Kashmir. It fought India to a standstill in 1965, and lost in the East in 1971 owing basically to the fact that its army there was isolated and impossible to reinforce or supply. It fought India to a standstill in the west in that same war. In the 1999 “war” – actually localised border fighting – it was fighting with one hand tied behind its back, unable to use air power or full military formations because that would acknowledge that its military was involved, while India could apply all its forces. Even so it took Clinton’s intervention to end the fighting. And even then at least one strategic hill remained with Pakistan and is theirs to this day.

Whacko

The China-Turkey-Pakistan alliance is dangerous for India. India and China are almost at war on the Ladakh border.

SnowCatzor

China isn’t allied with Turkey. Erdogan doesn’t like the way China treats the Uigher Turks.

Frank

Frankly, the Chinese are not really enamored with Muslims lately.

Jihadi Colin

The Chinese are up to their necks investing in Pakistan and Iran and Chinese engineers are working in Saudi Barbaria as well. Chinese Ma Muslims are in no way targeted either. The Chinese restrictions on Uighur Wahhabism is to prevent a Chechen style paid for jihadi invasion and nothing to do with any “anti Muslim” programme.

Jihadi Colin

Wrong. There is no China Ottoman alliance. The gibbering globetrotting genocidal Gujarati gangster government of Narendrabhai Damodardasbhai Modi in India is however allying itself with the Imperialist States of Amerikastan.

JIMI JAMES

India have alotta swastika cia/coksukrz whom rather see genocide prosper than both peoples(period)
In the name of democracy mind you:

Proud Hindu

We have given deep pain to paki bastards yesterday ;)Its true we lost some soldiers but the pakis lost a lot of things.

Jihadi Colin

Said who, the gibbering globetrotting genocidal Gujarati gangster government of Narendrabhai Damodardasbhai Modi? This is the same Modi which said we could hang it or burn it alive if demonetisation was a failure?

43
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x