0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
100 $
DECEMBER 2021

In Video: Turkey Test-Fires Indigenous Long-Range Air-Defense Missile

Support SouthFront

In Video: Turkey Test-Fires Indigenous Long-Range Air-Defense Missile

Screen grab from the test video which was released by ROKETSAN.

Turkey had successfully test-fired the long-range indigenous air-defense missile “Siper,” Ismail Demir, head of Turkey’s Defense Industries Presidency announced via Twitter on November 6.

Demir said that different tests on the new missile will continue. The missile is planned to enter the Turkish military’s inventory in 2023.

“Turkey will continue to produce new weapons and will have up to six different air-defense systems,” the Anadolu Agency quoted Demir as saying.

Siper, which will reportedly have a range of over 150 kilometers, is being developed by defense giants ASELSAN, ROKETSAN and the Scientific and Technological Research Council.

Turkish sources claims that the new air-defense system will rival the Russian-made S-400 long-range air-defense system. It’s worth noting that four S-400 systems are currently in service with the Air Defense Command of the Turkish Air Force.

Turkey has been working to develop its indigenous air-defense capabilities for quite some time. Several locally-made air-defense systems are expected to enter service with the Turkish military in the upcoming few years.

MORE ON THIS TOPIC:

Support SouthFront

SouthFront

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
98 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lone Ranger

It needs a booster lol.
S-200 says helo from 1965…

farbat

yes i saw the booster aswell its kind of pathetic its because they cant even in their dreams copy s400 rocket engine so they went for something much much less capable meanwhile russia produces unique hypersonics and other sort of missiles like nuclear propelled iran produces gel propellant buried missiles the likes nobody else uses so its also unique and turkey meanwhile is uniquely incompetent XD

Last edited 27 days ago by farbat
The Objective

Watch the video of Iran’s air defense missile tests and compare it to this video of Turkey’s air defense test. The first thing you’ll not is that the Turkish missile is faster even from launch time while Iran’s Bavar 373 missile takes some time to pick up speed. Secondly, the combustion is more complete in this Turkish missile due to the flame color than Iran’s yellow flames. This missile surpasses Iran’s Bavar 373 missiles by all standards. It’s noteworthy that Iran STILL CANNOT produce air-to-air missiles, while Turkey has produced many such missiles – like the Bozdogan. Turkey is more advanced in missile technology than Iran. They just don’t publicize every single test like the Mullahs do. And some sensitive missile tests are done by Pakistan on behalf of Turkey.

Russia on the other hand deploys their most advanced fighter planes in Syria, thinking the Turkish air defenses are vulnerable to long range air strikes. Let this be a lesson.

Ismail Demir made a deceptive announcement that Turkey’s long-range anti-aircraft system will be ready in 4 – 5 years. You cocksuckers on SouthFront did not expect this sudden development until at least 2025. Now you play your usual game of belittling a weapon system even before your imperialist soldiers face these weapons in actual combat. Insha Allah, just like the TB2, this missile will be a game changer and countries will rush to buy it. You idiots say TB2 is low-quality, yet the Kremlin is always bitter about Turkey selling them to Ukraine. Why? If these drones are not capable, who does their deployment suddenly deter the Donbas terrorists?

Turkey is going to start testing the badass surface to surface missiles from 2023. Then you’ll know just how powerful the country is. Iran thinks it’s the father of Missile tech in the Middle East? The Mullahs are about to wake up to a shocking reality.

Don’t forget that Turkey has the S-400. So if they say it compares to this system, then your Russian pilots better take that claim seriously.

The profile picture here is enforced by SouthFront. That’s not me from Africa.

Turk Destroyer

Your S-400 command post/radars most likely have a built in shut off switch that works via some sort of super HF radio link. This makes them inoperable. If not, they will be destroyed by anti-radiation missiles Kh-31P (120km) or Kh-58U (250km).

Do you remember how Egyptian Mig-29’s destroyed an entire Turkish Mim-23 battery at Mitiga airbase? And a Koral EW system? stronk turkish KORAL Completely failed against outdated mig29s from the late 70’s haha

Last edited 27 days ago by Turk Destroyer
The Objective

Can you name the “indigenous” Turkish anti-air craft system that was protecting Mitiga airport? it wasn’t even the Hisar A (Turkey’s short-range air defense system), because Hisar A just completed its acceptance test last month. There’s also the Hisar O which is currently undergoing acceptance test.

On the issue of Koral EW system, it was designed to be a standalone system against fight jets. EW is only a small part of air defense warfare. There must be radars, missiles, and even fighter jets to shoot down airplanes that EW is unable to tackle.
Koral certainly is better than anything Russia produced since these Turkish EW systems can deal with the TB2 while Russia’s cannot. Another pointer is that Idlib rebels have shot down or downed more Russian drones in the past few months than the Bayraktars lost during battles in Syria, N-K, and Libya. Don’t be in a hurry. You’ll soon see Turkish anti-aircraft systems in real combat – most likely in Libya.

Garga

How “objective” of you to compare Orlan, a <$100k low altitude (1000-1500m) recon drone with a $5,000,000 medium altitude (5500-8000m) combat one.
Again with "soon"… OK, we'll wait…… yawn….

Are you from Africa? Is that you in the avatar?

Icarus Tanović

That’s some idf punk.

HB_norica

“The first thing you’ll not is that the Turkish missile is faster even from launch time while Iran’s Bavar 373 missile takes some time to pick up speed. Secondly, the combustion is more complete in this Turkish missile due to the flame color than Iran’s yellow flames.”

First the measure of an air defence missile is how well it can destroy a target and at what range NOT the colour of it’s exhaust.

Second videos can be sped up or slowed down and the human eye cannot tell the difference. Better video editing does not make for a superior air defence system.

“Russia on the other hand deploys their most advanced fighter planes in Syria, thinking the Turkish air defenses are vulnerable to long range air strikes”

the Russian 4-SU-35’s and and a couple of SU-34’s … the vast majority of aircraft the Russians have deployed are 1979’s vintage sU-24’s and SU-25’s … both ground attack aircraft that can only be used with complete air superiority. What kind of “long range air strike” do you envision using the six aircraft at Russia’s disposal?

HB_norica

“You idiots say TB2 is low-quality, yet the Kremlin is always bitter about Turkey selling them to Ukraine. Why? ”

They aren’t low quality … it’s just that drones flown remotely by line of sight or sat link are of limited use to countries with EW capabilities. Donbass rebels don’t have EW however so they are going to be a very effective weapon against them.

The danger for all of us is that Russia is on record as saying they will come to the defence of the Donbas rebels if they are attacked by the Ukrainians.

If you want to arm the Ukrainians and start a war with Russia give them advanced weapons. If you want to see the situation in Ukraine hold back on the weapons and force the Ukraine back to the negotiating table.

“If these drones are not capable, who does their deployment suddenly deter the Donbas terrorists?”

They are very capable against countries without EW or modern air defences. Remember in 2011 when the Iranians hacked and took over control of that top secret RQ-170 drone in 2011. They didn’t even see the stealth drone on radar … all they saw was a sat link and they took over control of the drone and landed it. They did the same thing a couple of years ago in Iraq with US predator drones.

Russia routinely knock down drones using EW in Syria. Turkish TB-2 were reported to have had great success against the SAA in Syria last year however what wasn’t so widely reported is that the Turks were using the same drones for surveillance missions as per agreements with the SAA. Then one day the drones showed up armed … once the Russians caught wind of it the TB-2’s were shut out of Syrian airspace.

The Objective

j

The Objective

just

The Objective

I like your friendly explanation of things. While I agree with most of what you said, I think you overestimate Russia’s anti-drone capabilities. Your statement doesn’t hold true in all circumstances when you said: “Then one day the drones showed up armed … once the Russians caught wind of it the TB-2’s were shut out of Syrian airspace.”
How then do you explain N-K and Libya?

Secondly, you said: “Russia routinely knock down drones using EW in Syria. Turkish TB-2 were reported to have had great success against the SAA in Syria last year however what wasn’t so widely reported is that the Turks were using the same drones for surveillance missions as per agreements with the SAA”

Yes, Russia did down dozens of drones in Syria, but those weren’t TB2s. Those were drones by rebels. I think those rebel drone attacks weren’t actually meant to harm Russians but to probe for weaknesses in their air defense systems.

Russian weapons got pretty serious bashing on the MSM. This psychological defeat is impacting Russia’s ability to sell its air defense systems. I don’t think any country contemplated buying new or more Russian air defense systems since 2020. And it could remain so for the next two to three years. My point here is, if Russia did actually shoot down TB2 drones, the pictures will be allover the internet and especially on SouthFront (which follows the war closely). There are only about five pictures of downed TB2 drones for all three theaters of operation (Libya, Syria, N-K). Somebody claimed that most TB2s downed in Syria fell in rebel controlled Idlib. That’s impossible to accept because these drones did most of the damage in areas newly captured by Syrian forces in 2020 and those already controlled by Assad’s forces. If Russia did really stop the TB2 drones, why then did they halt the operation to take Idlib? It doesn’t add up. don’t tell me they didn’t want a war with Turkish forces. Because then they shouldn’t have started offensive in the first place and killing three dozen Turkish forces.

Last edited 27 days ago by The Objective
Chris Gr

Russia didn’t want a war with Turkey this time. This is correct.

BE CLEAR

Ahahah I can see that you are far from subject. Try to search “armed unmanned aerial vehicles” produced by Turkey and look which countries want them, then you may not humiliate yourself with stupid comments XD XD

Icarus Tanović

S-200 says hello from 1954. De facto.

The Objective

From 2023 onward, your Su-35 planes are sitting ducks. That’s a promise.

Turk Destroyer

In your dreams. Hisar-A, Hisar-O, and Mim-23 deployed in Idlib and still unable to shoot down any Russian planes. If you tried, your Siper would be destroyed by a Kh-31P as soon as its radar opens up. You have no idea how easily Russia could destroy Turkey’s military ability in Syria and Turkey using its air squadron and naval assets in Tartus. Combined Kalibr, SEAD would destroy your airbases, runways, and SAM sites. Leaving Turks with zero ability to launch drones or F-16’s, SAA would have their boots on Turkish faces real quick.

The Objective

You talk really big, but realities on the ground say otherwise. You won’t stand a chance in the Mediterranean, and the black sea will not be smooth sailing either. That’s what the 1000 km anti-ship cruise missiles are for. Your ships will sink faster than you realize.

And what would Turkey be doing while you bomb their airbases? Fold their arms and watch your airbase operate in Syria? And who told you that drones need airbases? Pretty much every tarred road can hand drones in Turkey.

You can destroy the airbases. But that’s about all you can do. Because not a single Russian ship or plane would be left intact in the Mediterranean or black sea. And Turkish troops will roll into Damascus. That ends the war.

Turkey has EVERY Russian position marked in Syria. Every move is monitored. Unless you guys dig holes underground and hide like the Iranian missile forces, most of your missile launchers will be taken out within hours of hostilities.

Hisar A just completed the acceptance test last month. Engaging Russian planes in real world is part of the acceptance test. The engineers learn plenty about about your planes and how to deal with them. It reminds me of the time when Syrian rebels were launching drones against Russian outposts in Syria. Now I realize those attacks were not meant to harm Russian forces but to probe for weaknesses in Russian air defense systems. The TB2 combined all the lessons learned in those drone attacks which Russia foiled multiple times. And now even the S-400 cannot deal with the TB2, let alone other more advanced Turkish drones.

Hisar A deployment in Syria is the same procedure. You’ll realize this one day.

Lone Ranger

Lay off the LSD, its bad for you…

Icarus Tanović

I know who you are. You’re dirty muslim brotherhood pig from india living in Chicago, that used to get your self little one room crib in San Francisco, bad tripping that he is a sort of a “turk”.
So, put down the candies and let the little boys go. Muhahahaha. You knowhatimsayin. Punk motherf.

Last edited 27 days ago by Icarus Tanović
Chris Gr

Those that rule Iran are secular and not MB?!

Icarus Tanović

How about those who rules over your asshole, instead?

Lone Ranger

In Disney movies only.

Icarus Tanović

No, you misspelled that, it isn’t SU-35, what you want to say is F-35 actually.

L du Plessis

Rival the S400?? with only 150km range 😂

Lone Ranger

Its probably inferior even to the S-200.

Icarus Tanović

It is inferior to S-125, man! Really.

The Objective

It will mess up you project in Syria very soon.
Finally, a no-fly zone in Idlib is within reach.

Lone Ranger

Keep dreaming Shlomo.
You lost that war a long time ago

The Objective

We lost? Which means Russia won, right? Can you tell me Russia’s mission in Syria and whether they accomplished it?
Idlib is the second Afghanistan.

Last edited 27 days ago by The Objective
Lone Ranger

Idlib is not Afghanistan.
SAA, Russia, Iran won you lost.
Most of Syria is under SAA control.
Isisraeli chair farce is firing duds now.
Totally ineffective.
Iraq is under Iranian control.
Afghanistan lost, is under Iranian, Pakistani, Chinese control.
Greater Israel Project lost.
New Khazaria project lost.
Turkey is moving away from NATO.
Meanwhile Israel managed to compromise everything the U.S. has in its inventory and guess what, its useless even again older Russian export air defense systems.
Turkey tried to take Idlib, it didn’t go too well for them the last time.
This time it will be a disaster for them if they try.
Meanwhile the majority of the Israeli population is being genocided by Pfizer and mossad.
Slow clap…

Robert

lone ranger is mentioning failed states as success stories in an international journal, what a fool……..the real game is at its infant stage , Afghanistan will never have a functioning government, so is Iraq and Syrian, Iran is on the way. this nations will be split into smaller ethnic states, their citizens are disillusioned and are just about to explode, this includes lebanon and turkey. take note, Russia and Americans are on the same page on this.

Icarus Tanović

Are you ready for rumble, because Iran gots you by bumble? Iran gots nukes. Proof? They’d be pretty much leveled till now.

Chris Gr

Yes you are correct. But nobody needs to break apart.

The Objective

You are funny. I seem to think you consider me an Israeli supporter.
Anyway, I’ll tell you what Russia’s mission is in Syria: Reinstate Assad’s dictatorship over all of Syria and eliminate any threat to the regime.
So far, that goal has not been achieved. If Turkish and American forces leave Syria, Russia still has Iran-backed militias to deal with. They number more than a hundred thousand and seldom join in the fight against Idlib rebels. their focus is maintaining the link from Iran all the way to Lebanon. And they’ll try to maintain this link even at the cost of a military clash with Russian-backed SAA.

Chris Gr

That’s right, Russia is alone in Syria.

Icarus Tanović

Is that all you got? Oy vey, Zionist.

Turk Destroyer

Unlikely. Siper will have an advanced aesa radar. S-200 would be a beast of a missile with a brand new aesa radar as well. But more expensive, outdated missile design that’s why succeeded with S-400 or s300pm2.

farbat

its not even a rival to s200 as lone ranger says in fact the s200 have probably better rocket technology than anything turkey can produce so its maybe similar to generation 1 anti aircraft missiles from the usa the booster points to it being the case

Last edited 27 days ago by farbat
The Objective

You are just one big idiot. Where do you even get these cracked ideas from?
Iran is not in Turkey’s league when it comes to weapons tech. Get used to that and you’ll feel less pain about it. You dumbs went for nuclear technology which invited sanctions that slowed down your technological development. Erdogan on the other hand suspended nuclear technology and focused on other important technologies for civilian and military use. Now Turkey is mature and has a deep tech talent pool from where foreign companies can draw. While Iran’s economy is rapidly contracting, Turkey’s economy grew 9% in 2021. That’s a huge progress for Turkey. And this comes at a time that African markets are still putting in place the necessary paper work and logistics to further boost Turkish exports.

You’ll see weapons that are scarier —— soon. very soon. I can’t wait for 2023 when most of the secret weapons will be tested in the open for the first time. Erdogan gave the order for a 2500 km missile since 2012. My guess is, Turkish engineers already exceed this range, and with great accuracy just like the TB2.

Last edited 27 days ago by The Objective
Garga

:))

I love it when you promise to kick our collective behinds and no-fly zone over Syria “soon, very soon…”. !
We and Syrians just have to wait a few years, right?

PS. Hoo boy, you’re one busy bee! You officially surpassed Jens.

Last edited 27 days ago by Garga
Chris Gr

Bro!

Garga

Yo!

Last edited 27 days ago by Garga
Chris Gr

What will Iran do next?

Garga

About what?

Icarus Tanović

About winter vacations?

Chris Gr

About real politik.

The Objective

Yes, if you insist on reinstating Assad, then we’ll surely beat collective asses in Syria. Your ONLY hope should be that Erdogan losses election. The opposition may tolerate a Russian imposed dictatorship in Syria, but Erdogan certainly won’t. Whatever Russia does in Syria, it’s unlikely to take any bold steps before the 2023 Turkish elections (hoping to see Erdogan lose)

Garga

Then I hope Erdogan wins the 2023 “election” again then, because our behinds were to be kicked soon, perhaps as soon as 2023? It’s a pity if he isn’t around then to do it.

We don’t reinstate anybody, Syrians did. Poor thang is so used to election rigging he thinks everybody does it.
But don’t let this little fact gets in the way of kicking our ar$es. By all means, please go for it!

The Objective

You can try taking back Idlib then when Erdogan is still president in Turkey. If you followed the recent resolution passed in the Turkish parliament, you’ll know Erdogan means business. The Turkish parliament extended Turkish operations in Syria by another 2 years and gave Erdogan the RIGHT to invite FOREIGN TROOPS on Turkish soil if and when need be.

Now, who are these possible foreign troops, and why would Erdogan even consider such a move? No country in Syria threatens Turkey like Russia does. Iran will never dream of a full-blown war with Turkey. America also won’t consider such a move. But Putin has proven erratic enough to try arm-twisting Turkey (remember the Feb. 2020 attack).

These foreign forces are most likely the soldiers of Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Qatar, and Somalia, (possibly even Libya). It seems to me Turkey can accept a war with Russia over Idlib. The ball is in Putin’s court. If he tries forcing his way into Idlib, then we know what will likely follow. The recent Turkish military deployments isn’t aimed at a small military like the SAA. It’s aimed at something much bigger.

Although you talk really big, you cannot deny one fact: That Turkey deterred an attack on Idlib for over two years.

I pray that Allah answers your prayer about Erdogan winning. Then I assure you that absent a negotiated settlement, you won’t take Idlib for the next 7 years. And if you try to force your way through, then the Assad regime is gone for good. It seems you forgot the lessons Turkey taught you guys in March 2023. And that was even at a time the Turkish forces least expected an escalation. This time, they won’t be caught off-guard. They are ready and prepared to take on Russian forces should the Russians attack Turkish troops. Don’t ever doubt that.

Garga

Although you talk really big, you cannot deny one fact
No fella, it’s you who talks big, I’m just pulling your leg. ;)

It seems you forgot the lessons Turkey taught you guys in March 2023.
No comment!!!

Seriously, who is the guy in your avatar? What is he doing in your avatar? Why is he in your avatar?

Chris Gr

Almost nobody in the region supports the Turkish invasion of Syria. Egypt, Iraq and Saudi Arabia support Syria and Iran want a peace deal between them.

goingbrokes

Oh man, how many keyboard warriors have we seen over the years? Always someone comes along and starts going on about how this group or that is going to kick the Syrians out of their own country! First it was Nusra, then HTS, the SDF, then the Turks, and israelis were always going to do that next month. Syrians know how to deal with all of them. SAA every day. Others are advised to stay home.

Chris Gr

Erdogan is the most pro-Iranian president that Turkey has ever had!

Icarus Tanović

Just short of Naftali Bennett.

Ahson

yous at our mercy nigglet. Get real or I’ll smack yous guppu face.

farbat

150km is absolute nonsense they are lying its probably at 70km i mean please just look at this rocket and you get my point its not capable to even be fast enough to matter nor can it fly far its kind of a show and nothing else

Last edited 27 days ago by farbat
farbat

the speed of this missile is probably at the speed of 1k or so it looks very pathetic in fact probably karrar drone is faster specially the interceptors

Last edited 27 days ago by farbat
The Objective

What a dumb reason to give. 150 km is enough to handle all Russian planes, including the fucked up Su-57. Your most advanced reliable plane (the Su-35) cannot attack its targets from 150 km away. They must come close about 100 km and that puts them within range of this system. Even America’s F-22 cannot fight effectively from 150 km away. the same thing goes for France’s Rafel. So this range is enough to kick the asses of ALL Russian planes in Syria. the most important thing is that the missiles should be accurate and fast. And you can see from the video (immediately after launch – the last part of the video) that this missile is damn fast. It will surely sent a chill down the spines of Russian pilots in Syria.

You would have said the same of the TB2 had it not kicked your asses real bad in N-K, Syria, Libya, and soon Algeria.

Turk Destroyer

Lol delusional. Su-35 can track ground targets with radar up to 300km away and attack using anti-radiation missiles from 250km (Kh-58U) or Kh-31P (120km) away without even turning its radar on. Khibiny ECM can passively guide missiles to enemy anti air radars past 200km away.

The Objective

It tracks radar up to 300 km or 3000 km or 30,000 km. the big question is, how effective is its ability to detect those radars? Because if those radars fail in real combat like the Pantsir radars failed, then the Russian pilots are on a suicide mission.

Lone Ranger

You getting delusional.

Lone Ranger

Actually it can.
The Su-35 can engage air targets up to 300km away with air to air (R-77 extended range variant) and ground targets up to 1000km away with cruise missiles(KH-59 and P800- Onyx).
Turkish missile tech is 60s era.
Iran is at 80s era.
Better luck next time…

Lone Ranger

Left out the Kalibr….
Official max range 2500km, unofficially it can hit targets 4000km away.
Compared to its size its the best long range cruise missile in service.
And the Su-30, Su-34 and Su-35 can carry it.
Oy oy…

Last edited 27 days ago by Lone Ranger
The Objective

Let’s say Russia has 1millio kilometer range air-launch missiles deployed in Syria. Are you telling me that Russian forces will fight from beyond 150 km? What about air-support for ground forces? Even if these Russian planes will fight in a permissive airspace, that would be impossible. It appears you are forgetting that Syrian airspace will be hotly contested in the event of a war with Turkey. Russian planes will have to deal with drones, fighter planes, EW systems, and air-defense missiles. Insisting on fighting from 150 km away will be a recipe for defeat.

Lone Ranger

150 km is very short range.
Basically Russia can hit you anywhere anytime, but you cant do the same.
How many cruise missiles does Turkey have and what range do they have, and how many has Russia?
Turkey is outgunned, and has inferior tech.
Even Israel is struggling against Russian air defenses.
And the Russians dont even sweat lol.
Only nukes could defeat Russia in Syria but Israel is at a disantvanage in that case as well, because of its size and location.
So Israel wont dare to risk a nuke attack.
And anything else is luke warm steam at best.
Bye.

Icarus Tanović

No, you ugly punk. We will fight them with long range from 15cm. Aight?

The Objective

I agree that based on the theoretical ranges of these missiles, Russian planes can fight from 150 km away. Now a question for you:
Is it practical to insist on fighting from 150 km away? How can you gain territory or render air-support to ground forces, like when drones are kicking their asses?
Then there is the permissiveness of the airspace. You think the Turkish airforce will just stand idly by and watch you launch missiles from 200 km away?

Finally, I noticed that Russians are even more boastful than Americans these days. Every of their weapons is invincible and must defeat the other person’s weapons. I think this mentality is a recipe for disaster. Your air defense systems have already been humiliated once. We may witness more humiliation if the Donbas situation degrades further. I think it’s a big mistake under-estimating Turkish weapons just because you have BIG paper specs. It seems like Turkey shot down one of Russia’s modern jets in 2015 without even leaving Turkish airspace. What happened to all the long-range radars integrated in those Russian planes?

You may be surprise, but I’m confident a lot of Russian planes will be shot down if they engage the Turkish armed forces in Syria. This is why they have been able to stop an Offensive on Idlib since 2018

Lone Ranger

Russian air defense systems were never humiliated.
The exact opposite.
They prevailed every time when used correctly.
Armenia doesn’t count, those air defense systems were placed on the border and were offline deliberately waiting to be hit.
Armenian leadership is CIA/mossad run, they wanted to play Russia, Azeris and Turkey against each other and failed.
Oy oy…
Israel is running out of options…

Icarus Tanović

Fire them without a paycheck. Better luck next time, baby. Those M60 tanks are for like old timer tank rally world championship provided by armies and FIA.

farbat

pathetic btw turkey has no future so better secure that first before you seek to secure your pathetic delusion of superiority which turkey would be leveled fast in any conflict so why does it delude itself this much

James

the russian air defense missiles from 50 years ago even better than this turkish crap

Icarus Tanović

70 years ago.

farbat

question is can turkey produce proper rocket engines or is it just continuing to larp

Ahson

Iran considers turks as niggers……it’s just how it is. No need to apologize here.

The Objective

Turkey already produced the engines for its long-range missiles, including standoff surface to surface ballistic and cruise missiles. Turkey’s missile technology is far more advanced than Iran’s and Pakistan’s.
This test has taken many of you bastards by surprise, which explains the insane bitterness from the comments. But this is just the beginning. Turkey’s fifth generation fighter is set to be unveiled on March 18 2021. Make sure you watch it on YouTube or TV. Because many badass systems will be tested between January and April 2023.
Just like you idiots would have belittled the TB2, you are also belittling another game-changing missile by ROKETSAN. Much of Turkey’s munitions are developed by Roketsan, and we saw what those missiles did to your Iranian proxies and Russian weaponry. This particular missile will shoot down ALL flying object created by Russia or Iran. That’s a promise. Roketsan doesn’t produce shit. Their weapons are damn accurate and effective most of the time.
Again, wait for the future unmanned fighter jet from Turkey. We’ll probably deploy one before America does. Iran is far behind to even contemplate that technology. Maybe Russia will catch up within a decade, but that’s a long shot considering that Russia still hasn’t deployed a successful drone that can rival the TB2 let alone TB3 or Akinci or Anka S.

the profile picture is being enforced by SF. That’s not me.

Turk Destroyer

47 bayraktar ($6 million each), 2 Anka-S ($80 million each) destroyed in Libya
9 pantsir ($12 million each) destroyed in Libya

4 bayraktar, 2 anka-s destroyed in Syria
3 pantsir

Cost/basis for Libya: $108 million in 90’s era LNA pantsir-s1 destroyed vs $442 million in STRONK drones (winner Pantsir)

Cost/basis for Syria: $36 million in SAA pantsir-s1 destroyed vs $184 million in STRONK turk drones (winner, again Pantsir)

Syria and Libya both show a larger ratio of drones being shot down than SHORAD system destroyed. Turkish financial losses over$626 million (half a billion) haha cry

You talk about “muh game changers” but the real game changer is KAB-1500. and TSK get sent to paradise by the dozens. And there’s nothing TSK or TAF can do :)

Last edited 27 days ago by Turk Destroyer
The Objective

47 TB2 lost in Libya! man, you are really wonderful. Could you post links to any articles that claim anything close to those numbers. Even if they are Russian propaganda outlets, I’d like to see the proofs they present.

Chris Gr

Turkey has fought against Libya (LNA), Syria (SAA) and Armenia only. These armies are some of the weakest in the world.

The Objective

Turkey didn’t fight these armies directly, except in the case of Syria.
the comparison is between the weapons engaged in the fighting — not the countries. Russia weapons mostly failed.

Last edited 27 days ago by The Objective
Chris Gr

They did engage and they had bigger allies especially in the case of Armenia.

TomSawyer

It wont take long and Turkey will have much better missiles as Iran – Iranians are always boasting but in reality, they are far behind technologically

Ahson

the guppu niggers used a Persian name for it? Why didn’t they use a turkish nigger name for it? You do realize we consder turks as niggers? don’t you?

Ahson

Iran considers turks as lower caste asiatic moghal people. In case nobody here noticed, the turks used a Persian name ‘Separ’ to name this missile. Separ in Persian means shield. Motherfucker dalit didn’t have a guppu muzlim name for their missile?

Last edited 27 days ago by Ahson
Chris Gr

Iranians mostly consider Turks as brothers. lol

Ahson

maybe in your camel jockey movie?

Icarus Tanović

I bet in there. He’s a main character, best actor. This is that film I’m talking about:
https://youtu.be/3MmZul0Aj0E

Last edited 27 days ago by Icarus Tanović
Chris Gr

Your mind is fixated on bullshit all the time.

Icarus Tanović

But hurted, huh? That is you playing that punk with camels in the deserts. Greek song, Greek music style, niggah.

Last edited 25 days ago by Icarus Tanović
Turk Destroyer

Lol Turkish retards trying so hard to rival Russia when they can’t even rival Iran. Lira down to 20 USD in another year.

98
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x