0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
1,095 $

In Latest Privacy Scandal, Facebook Gave Apple, Amazon And Others Unprecedented Access To User Data

Support SouthFront

Originally appeared at ZeroHedge

Facebook has been giving user data to at least 60 major device manufacturers over the last decade – including Apple, Amazon, BlackBerry, Microsoft and Samsung – as part of a data-sharing partnership program which allowed the companies to integrate various features such as messaging and “like” buttons into their products.

In Latest Privacy Scandal, Facebook Gave Apple, Amazon And Others Unprecedented Access To User Data

The data-sharing agreement, reported Sunday evening by the New York Times, allowed manufacturers to access information on relationship status, calendar events, political affiliations and religion, among other things. An Apple spokesman, for example, said that the company relied on private access to Facebook data to allow users to post on the social network without opening the Facebook app, among other things.

In Latest Privacy Scandal, Facebook Gave Apple, Amazon And Others Unprecedented Access To User Data

What’s more, the manufacturers were able to access the data of users’ friends without their explicit consent, despite Facebook declaring they would not let outside companies access user data. The catch? The NYT explains.

Facebook’s view that the device makers are not outsiders lets the partners go even further, The Times found: They can obtain data about a user’s Facebook friends, even those who have denied Facebook permission to share information with any third parties.

In interviews, several former Facebook software engineers and security experts said they were surprised at the ability to override sharing restrictions. –NYT

It’s like having door locks installed, only to find out that the locksmith also gave keys to all of his friends so they can come in and rifle through your stuff without having to ask you for permission,” said Ashkan Soltani, a research and privacy consultant and former chief technologist for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

To test one partner’s access to Facebook’s private data channels, The Times used a reporter’s Facebook account — with about 550 friends — and a 2013 BlackBerry device, monitoring what data the device requested and received. (More recent BlackBerry devices, which run Google’s Android operating system, do not use the same private channels, BlackBerry officials said.)

Immediately after the reporter connected the device to his Facebook account, it requested some of his profile data, including user ID, name, picture, “about” information, location, email and cellphone number. The device then retrieved the reporter’s private messages and the responses to them, along with the name and user ID of each person with whom he was communicating.

The data flowed to a BlackBerry app known as the Hub, which was designed to let BlackBerry users view all of their messages and social media accounts in one place.

The Hub also requested — and received — data that Facebook’s policy appears to prohibit. Since 2015, Facebook has said that apps can request only the names of friends using the same app. But the BlackBerry app had access to all of the reporter’s Facebook friends and, for most of them, returned information such as user ID, birthday, work and education history and whether they were currently online.

The BlackBerry device was also able to retrieve identifying information for nearly 295,000 Facebook users. Most of them were second-degree Facebook friends of the reporter, or friends of friends.

In all, Facebook empowers BlackBerry devices to access more than 50 types of information about users and their friends, The Times found. -NYT

Despite winding down the partnerships in April – including the posting capabilities used by Apple, Facebook has defended the data-sharing agreements, saying they comply with the company’s privacy policies and a 2011 consent decree issued by the FTC. Facebook officials say they don’t know of any cases where user information has been misused.

These partnerships work very differently from the way in which app developers use our platform,” said Ime Archibong, a Facebook vice president. Unlike developers that provide games and services to Facebook users, the device partners can use Facebook data only to provide versions of “the Facebook experience,” the officials said.

“These contracts and partnerships are entirely consistent with Facebook’s F.T.C. consent decree,” said Archibong.

Former FTC official Jessica Rich, however, disagreed with that assessment.

“Under Facebook’s interpretation, the exception swallows the rule,” said Ms. Rich, now employed by the Consumers Union. “They could argue that any sharing of data with third parties is part of the Facebook experience. And this is not at all how the public interpreted their 2014 announcement that they would limit third-party app access to friend data.”

And because Facebook does not consider the device makers to be outsidersthe data sharing partnerships go even furtherThe Times discovered, which is what allows the companies to access user data of a Facebook user’s friends – even if they’ve denied Facebook permission to share information with third parties.

The discovery of the manufacturer data-sharing agreements comes on the heels of a massive data harvesting scandal in which the social media giant allowed third party apps to gather massive quantities of user information for various political and marketing purposes. In March, political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica was revealed to have misused the private information of tens of millions of Facebook users.  The Cambridge Analytica ordeal shed light on the pervasive collection of data which has come under growing scrutiny since the scandal began in March.

The Cambridge Analytica scandal revealed how loosely Facebook had policed the bustling ecosystem of developers building apps on its platform. They ranged from well-known players like Zynga, the maker of the FarmVille game, to smaller ones, like a Cambridge contractor who used a quiz taken by about 300,000 Facebook users to gain access to the profiles of as many as 87 million of their friends.

Apparently Facebook discussed the issue as early as 2012 and simply decided not to change the arrangements, despite the data-sharing agreements being flagged as a privacy issue.

But the device partnerships provoked discussion even within Facebook as early as 2012, according to Sandy Parakilas, who at the time led third-party advertising and privacy compliance for Facebook’s platform.

This was flagged internally as a privacy issue,” said Parakilas, who left Facebook in 2012 and has emerged as a new voice against the company’s data handling policies. “It is shocking that this practice may still continue six years later, and it appears to contradict Facebook’s testimony to Congress that all friend permissions were disabled.

As for the various answers given by the device manufacturers (via The Times):

  • Samsung declined to respond to questions about whether it had any data-sharing partnerships with Facebook. Amazon also declined to respond to questions.
  • Usher Lieberman, a BlackBerry spokesman, said in a statement that the company used Facebook data only to give its own customers access to their Facebook networks and messages. Mr. Lieberman said that the company “did not collect or mine the Facebook data of our customers,” adding that “BlackBerry has always been in the business of protecting, not monetizing, customer data.”
  • Microsoft entered a partnership with Facebook in 2008 that allowed Microsoft-powered devices to do things like add contacts and friends and receive notifications, according to a spokesman. He added that the data was stored locally on the phone and was not synced to Microsoft’s servers.
  • Facebook acknowledged that some partners did store users’ data — including friends’ data — on their own servers. A Facebook official said that regardless of where the data was kept, it was governed by strict agreements between the companies.

In Latest Privacy Scandal, Facebook Gave Apple, Amazon And Others Unprecedented Access To User Data

Support SouthFront


Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alen Crow

comment image


he REALLY looks like an ET…
i am pretty sure, all of our comments here are stored somewhere and shared by those companies as well
~ : ^( ~~~


Zuckenberg is doing money from all the stupid people who have an useless facebook account where they share pictures of them and their relatives and tell everything about their life. XD.

People are so stupid.

Maybe the globalists are right. It’s better to use and enslave these stupid people and make money and gain power thanks to them rather to try to help them or explain them basic stuff they don’t care about.


Once again, who defeat the globalists ?? China. China has forbidden Facebook. They do understand the purpose of this stupid organization.

Even Chamath Palihapitiya, former Facebook executive, said that he tries to use Facebook as little as possible, and that his children “aren’t allowed to use that shit.” XD.


Social media is ‘newspeak’ for social surveillance. Social media seemed great to us plebs in 2000’s – but in 2018 the reality is much clearer. As always it is about the control of the narrative. Serious venture capitalists did not just give random college kids millions to expand a very campus specific program – it is now apparent the exercise was picked and well funded by shell companies that are linked to the US state agncies.


Iran bans also fakebook. So, it’s logical.

All these social networks are spies for US agencies. it’s the same for Apple, Samsung, Google, Twitter, Android, Microsoft, …


Likewise China blocks major US web-media companies. In the west we are repeatedly told this is because these are oppressive states. Now, certainly China is a single party and authoritarian state, but its web-media policy is based on very logical self interests. Why would China let obvious, foriegn, US-state-corporate, nexus, organizations control, route and review all of its domestic digital data? All of it. Particularly when they have very divergent and competing strategic interests. Unlike us plebs, the foreign intelligence agencies figured out the actual definition of social media long ago.


China did understand well what was happening. That’s why they also manage to defeat USA in Vietnam, giving the first defeat to the globalists.

China did it to protect his people from brain hacking. In the same way, you don’t let your children take weeds because of so-called freedom. XD. Also, people smoke because of “freedom”. XD.

I don’t say that China will not use it for their own purposes but it’s better that China controls their medias rather than a foreign entity. I don’t think that the goal of China state is to make Chinese suffer and to destroy China.


I am sorry, but you got the wrong country. The country that defeated the US in Vietnam, was Vietnam.


Basically, you can’t trust anything coming from the US. Who remember about Stuxnet the american-israeli virus aimed at destroying iranian nuclear facilities. No american anti-virus has detected it because they are all under US state control. The only which detect it is Kasperky, the russian antivirus.

So, xhen I say that Americans are living in the most sophisticated dictatorship, they say they are free. XD.


I didn’t read the article, but why is it here on a site supposedly dedicated to foreign policy and subjects uncovered by MSM? Is it because Facebook shut down Russian troll farms a while back? Is it because SF wants to make the US look bad?

Wise Gandalf

You are stupid troll.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x