0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
1,600 $

How the Deep State ‘Justifies’ Itself in America

Support SouthFront

Written by Eric Zuesse; Originally appeared on strategic-culture.org

On October 30th, there was a panel discussion broadcast live on C-Span from the National Press Club and the Michael V. Hayden Center. The discussants were John Brennan, Michael McCabe, John McGlaughlin, and Michael Morrell. They all agreed with the statement by McLaughlin (former Deputy CIA Director) “Thank God for the ‘Deep State’”, and the large audience there also applauded it — nobody booed it. John Brennan amplified upon the thought, and there was yet more applause. However, that thought hadn’t been invented by McLaughlin; it instead had evolved recently in the pages of the New York Times. Perhaps the discussants had read it there. Instead of America’s ‘news’-media uncritically trumpeting what government officials assert to be facts (as they traditionally do), we now have former spooks uncritically trumpeting what a mainstream ‘news’-medium has recently concocted to be the case — about themselves. They’ve come out of the closet, about being the Deep State. However, even in that, they are lying, because they aren’t it; they are only agents for it.

How the Deep State ‘Justifies’ Itself in America

US Capitol. (John Sonderman/Flickr cc 2.0)

In America, the Deep State ‘justifies’ itself in the ‘news’-media that it owns, and does so by falsely ‘defining’ what the “Deep State” is (which is actually the nation’s 607 billionaires, whose hired agents number in the millions). They mis-‘define’ it, as being, instead, the taxpayer-salaried career Government employees, known professionally as “the Civil Service.” (Although some Civil Servants — especially at the upper levels — are agents for America’s billionaires and retire to cushy board seats, most of them actually are not and do not. And the “revolving door” between “the public sector” and “the private sector” is where the Deep State operations become concentrated. That’s the core of the networking, by which the billionaires get served. And, of course, those former spooks at the National Press Club said nothing about it. Are they authentically so stupid that they don’t know about it, or is that just pretense from them?)

How the Deep State’s operatives perpetrate this deception about the meaning of “Deep State” was well exemplified in the nine links that were supplied on October 28th by the extraordinarily honest anonymous German intelligence analyst who blogs as “Moon of Alabama” and who condemned there (and linked to) 9 recent articles in the New York Times, as posing a threat against democracy in America. As I intend to argue here, the 9 articles are, indeed, aimed at deceiving the American public, about what the true meaning of the phrase “the Deep State” is. He headlined “Endorsing The Deep State Endangers Democracy”. (And that’s what the October 30th panel discussion was actually doing — endorsing the Deep State.) However, he didn’t explain the tactic the NYT’s editors (and those former spooks) use to deceive the public about the Deep State, and this is what I aim to do here, by showing the transformation, over time, in the way that that propaganda-organization, the New York Times, has been employing the phrase “Deep State” — a remarkable transformation, which started, on 16 February 2017, by the newspaper’s denying that any Deep State exists in America but that it exists only in corrupt nations; and which gradually transitioned into an upside-down, by asserting that a Deep State does exist in the United States, and that it fights against corruption in this country. As always, only fools (such as that applauding audience on October 30th) would believe it, but propagandists depend upon fools and cannot thrive without them. In this case, the Times, in those 9 articles, was evolving quickly from a blanket denial, to an American-exceptionalist proud affirmation, that a Deep State rules this country and ought to rule it. I agree with the statement that “Endorsing The Deep State Endangers Democracy”, but I am more concerned here to explain how that endorsement — that deceit — is being done.

The first of these NYT articles was published on 16 February 2017, and it denied that the US has any “Deep State” whatsoever. The second, published on 6 March 2017, blamed President Trump (since the NYT represents mainly Democratic Party billionaires) for mainstreaming the phrase “the Deep State” into American political discourse, and it alleged that that phrase actually refers only to “countries like Egypt, Turkey and Pakistan, where authoritarian elements band together to undercut democratically elected leaders.” The third, published on 10 March 2017, repeated this allegation, that this phrase applies only to “the powerful deep states of countries like Egypt or Pakistan, experts say.” The fourth, published on 5 September 2018, was an anonymous op-ed from a Government employee who condemned Trump and “vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.” “This isn’t the work of the so-called deep state. It’s the work of the steady state.” So: still the NYT’s editors were hewing to their propaganda-line, that no “Deep State” exists in America — there are just whistleblowers, here. The fifth, on 18 December 2018, said, for example, that “Adam Lovinger, a Pentagon analyst, was one of the first to wrap himself in the deep state defense” — namely, that they consist of “people who have been targeted for political reasons.” So, the NYT’s editors were now reinforcing their new false ‘definition’ of “Deep State,” as consisting just of Government whistleblowers. The sixth, on 6 October 2019, said, “President Trump and some of his allies have asserted without evidence that a cabal of American officials — the so-called deep state — embarked on a broad operation to thwart Mr. Trump’s campaign. The conspiracy theory remains unsubstantiated.” So: the NYT’s editors were back, again, to denying that there is any “Deep State” in America. This was a signal, from them, that they were starting to recognize that they’d need to jiggle their ‘definition’ of “Deep State,” at least a bit. The seventh, on 20 October 2019, was by a member of the Editorial Board, and it boldly proclaimed, about “the deep state,” “Let us now praise these not-silent heroes.” The propagandists now had settled firmly upon their new (and previously merely exploratory) ‘definition’ of “Deep State,” as consisting of whistleblowers in the US Government’s Civil Services, “individuals willing to step up and protest the administration’s war on science, expertise and facts.” The eighth, on 23 October 2019, equated “the deep state” even more boldly with the impeachment of President Trump: “Over the last three weeks, the deep state has emerged from the shadows in the form of real live government officials, past and present, who have defied a White House attempt to block cooperation with House impeachment investigators and provided evidence that largely backs up the still-anonymous whistle-blower.” The ninth, on 26 October 2019, which came from “a contributing opinion writer and professor of history,” alleged that the origins of “the deep state” are to be found with Teddy Roosevelt in the 1880s, when “A healthy dose of elitism drove Roosevelt’s crusade, as the spoils system had been the path to power for immigrant-driven political machines in big cities like New York. Yet the Civil Service laws he and others created marked the beginning of a shift toward a fairer, less corrupt public realm.”

In other words: the Deep State, in America, are not perpetrators of corrupt government (such as in “countries like Egypt, Turkey and Pakistan, where authoritarian elements band together to undercut democratically elected leaders”), but are instead courageous enemies of corrupt government; and they are instituted by the aristocracy here (today’s American billionaires), in order to reduce, if not eliminate, corruption in government (which, the Times now alleges, originates amongst, or serves, the lower classes).

The lessons about Big Brother, which were taught by George Orwell in his merely metaphorical masterpiece 1984, were apparently never learned, because even now — as his “Newspeak” is being further refined so that black is white, and good is bad, and truth is falsehood — there still are people who subscribe to the propagandists and cannot get enough of their ridiculous con-games. Though in some poor countries, a corrupt Deep State rules; a Deep State rules in America so as to reduce if not prevent corruption, the New York Times now concludes.

You can see how it’s done, in those nine NYT articles. Isn’t it simply amazing there?!

Support SouthFront


Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The America People are not the deep state
Please do not hate us.

Hasbara Hunter

No perhaps the American peoples ain’t the Deep State…but the Deep State is definitely America…

Jacob Wohl's Nose

ur forgetting Rocket Nose Nation

Hasbara Hunter

Well Murica & this ZioNazi Rothschild-Balfour Declaration, Illegal Occupation of Palestine, Beachhead into the Middle East & Criminal Freehaven definitely have one thing in common: they love stealing land…resources & the Genocide of Indigenous folks….

Tommy Jensen

We know.
But as long you are fooling around in pink Nike shoes eating soft ice living a superficial careless life expecting “somebody else” to take care of it, you are in the way in a vey dangerous manner.

Jacob Wohl's Nose

deep state are bankers, military industrial complex… who are all ZIONIST. key word zionist
follow the giant noses


Hehe, yeah, after all this years, even the uber scums are crawling out of the woodwork, nice one dont you think and of course this isnt pimped on the MSM, but then again, the MSM is just more and more irrelevant, they are loosing it, and is slowly suforcating them self in their own barrel of manure, thanks.

I just read an uh… report from one of their eh…. tanked think tanks, some whom had initials whom was remarkable alike ISIS, or was it IISS os something like that, about Iran, yup, for years this Moronikans have whines and drooled about about Russian Booooots, and how eh…. they have wrecked the propaganda, and now,, they whine and drool something about Iranian eh…… boooooooots, whom is aparently everywhere with their pesky perseptions witch of course is hurting the Moronikans push for oi….. sory freedom and demoncrasy, of course, and they are crashing the fac…. sorry, their poliTicks, in the Internet.
They are like children, spoled snotty little f….. whom starts to so when things or people dont bite into their stupiditys and idiot propaganda, witch is basically meant for domestic abuse, and the moment they start to go outside the banana republic, nobody belives them anymore, of course apart from those that are payed to yapp the shit they creates, witch is pimped by most of the Moronikans sites incl so called Alt -ehhh- sites etc, and now they blame it all on Irans eh…. booots.
What this tanked think tanks forget, is that they are the problem, they do things we all know are iligale, despite the idiot propaganda they pimp on the Tube, we all know that, but they whine about why dont we suck the shit out of the feeding tube, huh, because we stil have an functional brain, not an much soaked in prozack, etc.

Hurmf, like talking to idiots, and on top of it, thinks everybody else are equally stupid as they are.
The Imperial banana republic Moronika, the biggest mafia org moooney can buy, we all know that, and its even glearingly obvious with the Trumpstein day to day, stupidtys and flat out lies.

Yup, they are terminaly detached from this reality, and it shows and we see it, and even an goat herder in Africa knows this, and every day that passes confirms it.
Nice, even us old time uh…. conspiracy nuts can start to plan an fishing trip, yeah, why not, let this people burn down their bed side by them selfs, nothing warms me more than that.
So, the next issue is, what kind of angles am I going to use, or use bait, what to do, since I dont like pop corn any more.
Have an nice day.


Would love your thoughts, please comment.x