0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
1,660 $
JUNE 2021

How America Does Regime-Change Propaganda

Support SouthFront

How America Does Regime-Change Propaganda

Illustrative image

Written by Eric Zuesse.

In the case of Saddam Hussein, it was by lying about “WMD” and about Saddam’s being behind Al Qaeda.

In the case of Muammar Qaddafi, it was by lying about Qaddafi’s being hated (instead of supported) by most Libyans.

In the case of Bashar al-Assad, it was by lying about Assad’s being hated (instead of supported) by most Syrians.

In the case of Xi Jinping, it is by lying about Xi’s being a dictator.

In the case of Vladimir Putin, it is by lying about Putin’s being a dictator.

However, all such allegations, except the case against Saddam, were irrelevant under international law, and provided no legal basis for an invasion or sanctions by any foreign country. (Furthermore, all of those allegations were lies.) Regarding Iraq, the U.S. regime lied to allege the presence of a nuclear-bomb program there, and this allegation pertained to America’s own national security; so, that allegation concerning Iraq would have been a possible justification to invade, if it hadn’t been a lie. (Truthfulness is always a requirement under international law.) But in the other instances, no danger to America’s national security was even being alleged. The U.S. regime alleged that the foreign leaders it wanted to overthrow were ‘violating the human rights of the people’ there, but the U.S. Government routinely violates the human rights of its own population and imprisons a higher percentage of them than any other country — including all of the ones it criticizes — does; so, any such allegation by the U.S. regime is perhaps even worse than a pot calling the kettle black, because this particular “pot” is blacker than any of the others. What foreign countries say about ‘human rights’ in any other country provides no grounds in international law for the accusing country to invade that country. If a given national leader should be replaced, that regime-change shouldn’t be foreign-imposed (for example, America and its allies — the champions of foreign regime-change operations — should have nothing to do with it), but instead it should be done only by patriots within that given nation — and not assisted (much less instigated) by the CIA, MI6, or etc., since that would make it be imperialism. A basic principle of international law is that law within any nation doesn’t fall within the purview of international law: it’s simply not an international matter. International law is supposed to concern only international relations — no internal (domestic) matters (unless the U.N. General Assembly and Security Council specify there to be an exception — such as if they rule that a genocide is being perpetrated within a given nation). Other countries (such as the rulers of America) might not like the ruler of a given nation, but this doesn’t give those foreigners any right to perpetrate regime-change there, such as the U.S. and its allies routinely do (and have done ever since 1948).

Consequently: the way that America and its allies do sanctions, coups, invasions, and other regime-change operations, is by deceiving their own publics — it is always being done by means of propaganda, lying to their own people. To this extent, any imperialistic nation is actually a regime, not a democracy, because imperialism is always, and even intrinsically, based upon lies, which the given nation’s rulers use in order to fool their own citizenry, so that those ‘citizens’ are actually those rulers’ “subjects,” not authentically citizens, of that actual dictatorship. (And then they lie by referring to their subjects as ‘citizens’, instead of as “subjects,” so as to be able to continue fooling them throughout the future, to continue the myth of their own nation’s being a ‘democracy’.)

The foreign-imposed regime-change operations are always based upon lying. It’s the basic tool of any dictatorship. And the public never learns that they’ve been suckered by their rulers.

That’s why it happens again and again, and the public fall for it again and again. The public never learn from their own government’s lying; they just fall for it, again and again. They trust their Government, ‘their’ ‘democracy’, and its ‘news’-media (actually propaganda-media).

In the world today, what country doesn’t call itself a “democracy”? Do any democracies actually exist? A nation that engages in imperialism is certainly a dictatorship — its government lies routinely, to its own subjects. That cannot be a democracy. A ‘democracy’ that’s built upon lies is a dictatorship. Democracy can be built only upon the public’s being truthfully informed regarding every issue that’s of governmental importance. Does such a nation exist? Where does it exist?

The biggest lying is done about international matters. Unfortunately, most people don’t care about international matters, but only about domestic (or intranational) matters. So, it’s easy for dictators who rule an imperialistic regime to fool their public — i.e., to enslave them mentally. It’s what the public there are actually accustomed to.

How America Does Regime-Change Propaganda

Illustrative image

Let’s take, as an example, the case by the American regime against Russia’s leader, Putin. America and its allies allege that Alexei Navalny, who has long aspired to replace Putin as Russia’s leader, is in prison in Russia because Navalny is so popular there that in a fair-and-square election, Navalny would beat Putin.

The dominant public image of Navalny in the United States and in its allied countries is that of his being an anti-corruption campaigner in a very corrupt Russia, and his being Russia’s most-popular opponent against Russia’s President Vladimir Putin, and therefore blocked by Putin from running against Putin, and who has even been poisoned by Putin, but — amazingly — survived that poisoning by Putin, and is therefore now being imprisoned by Putin, so as to prevent Navalny from being able to run against Putin in a free and fair democratic election in Russia.

However, the dominant public image of the Russian Alexei Navalny inside Russia is that of his being a CIA-MI6 asset who is a racist-fascist traitor who would sell-out his country for anything so long as he could become its leader, just like Benedict Arnold was in early U.S. history, when the then U.S. Vice President Arnold worked with the intelligence services of Britain’s King George III in order to become America’s leader so as to restore the United States to British control. (That ploy, by Arnold, failed, of course.)

Typical of the view regarding Navalny that’s popular in the U.S. and in its allied countries is a news-report from Reuters on May 6th, titled “Defiant but cornered: Jailed Kremlin critic Navalny’s movement is on the ropes”. It opens:

He has been poisoned, jailed and his close aides are either being prosecuted or have fled abroad. His anti-Kremlin opposition movement is now also likely to soon be outlawed as extremist.

Yet Alexei Navalny and his supporters continue to work on ways to remain a thorn in President Vladimir Putin’s side, even as one of his most important financial backers says the movement in its current form is finished and will take time to rebound.

In the eyes of the Kremlin, the only half-meaningful political weapon the Navalny camp has left is its campaign for tactical, or what it calls “smart” voting against the ruling United Russia party in a parliamentary election in September, according to three people close to the Russian authorities.

Navalny’s supporters are set to be barred from that election via a court case, due to unfold later this month, and planned legislation unveiled on the parliamentary website on Tuesday that would ban “extremists” from running for office.

A court, meeting in secret, is considering a request from Moscow prosecutors to have Navalny’s network designated “extremist” for allegedly plotting a revolution, state media have reported. Russia’s financial monitoring agency has already added the network to a list on its website of groups involved in “terrorism and extremism”.

In response, Navalny’s movement has redoubled its call for sympathisers to vote for other opposition parties in September, however unpalatable they may consider them.

Typical of the view of Navalny that is popular inside Russia itself are the following:

An RT news-report on 1 February 2021 headlined “Top Navalny aide asked alleged British spy for millions in funding, intelligence video released by Russia’s FSB claims to reveal”. Back in 2012, Russia’s equivalent of America’s FBI had a hidden camera in position filming, and recording, Navalny’s top aide trying to persuade a person he thought to be an MI6 (UK’s CIA) agent that MI6 should annually donate tens of millions of dollars to Navalny’s organization because doing this would provide billions of dollars of benefit to UK corporations if Navalny would then succeed and become Russia’s leader.

Navalny is also known in Russia as a far-right ethnic supremacist. Here is a video that he posted to youtube on 19 September 2007, under the title of “НАРОД за легализацию оружия” meaning “PEOPLE for the legalization of weapons.”

He was saying there that all Russians should get guns in order to kill Muslims who are infesting Russia, which would be like swatting big flies or stamping on big cockroaches. Later, he decided that demagoguing against Russia’s “corruption” was far likelier to win him the backing of the U.S and its allies than demagoguing against Russia’s Muslims would. This was when U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media began presenting him as the ‘democratic’ alternative to Vladimir Putin, who has always been vastly more favorably viewed by Russians than Navalny has been. On 5 September 2020, right before the latest Russian Presidential election, the internationally respected Levada polling organization in Russia reported that the top choice of Russians to lead the country was Putin at 56%, the second-from-top choice was Zhirinovsky at 5%, and Alexey Navalny (shown there as Алексей Навальный), was the third-from-top choice, at 2%. In the 2018 Presidential election, Zhirinovsky polled at 13.7%, Grudinin polled at 12.0%, and Putin polled at 72.6%. The actual election-outcome was Putin 76.69%, Grudinin 11.7%, and Zhirinovsky 5.65%. There were many polls and Navalny was never any serious contender for Russia’s Presidency. The U.S. regime lies as it usually does (at least about international matters).

That’s what Russians know about Navalny. And, of course, it’s very different from what the publics in U.S.-and-allied countries know (or, at least, believe) about him.

Here is some recent propaganda that’s published by U.S.-and-allied regimes about Navalny:

On May 22nd, Japan Times ran a Reuters report, “How Russia’s new gulag tries to break convicts like Alexei Navalny”.

On May 23rd, the Wall Street Journal headlined “Russia’s Navalny Fights to Stay in Public Eye in Putin Standoff”.

On May 4th, the Washington Post columnist Vladimir Kara-Murza headlined “Russia just took a big step back toward the Soviet Union”, and said: “Last week, for the first time since the Soviet era, the Kremlin officially classified opposition to its rule as a criminal offense. … Moscow prosecutors suspended the activities of the nationwide organization of Alexei Navalny, Vladimir Putin’s most prominent opponent. Navalny is currently incarcerated in a prison camp after surviving a state-sponsored assassination attempt last year.”

Navalny, though he actually is favorably viewed by only around 2% of Russians (as indicated in polls there), is widely publicized in U.S.-and-allied media as having instead the highest support by the Russian people of anyone who might challenge Vladimir Putin for Russia’s leadership. It’s a lie, and always has been. Other politicians have far higher polled support in Russia. For example, a Russian poll conducted in the days following Alexey Navalny’s alleged novichok poisoning showed the following level of support for him then, if a Russian election for President would be held at that time: Vladimir Putin 56%, Vladimir Zhirinkovsky 5%. Alexei Navalny 2%. In the 2018 Presidential election, Zhirinovsky polled at 13.7%, Grudinin polled at 12.0%, and Putin polled at 72.6%. The actual election-outcome was Putin 76.69%, Grudinin 11.7%, and Zhirinovsky 5.65%. There were many polls and Navalny was never any serious contender for Russia’s Presidency. The U.S. regime lies as it usually does (at least about international matters).

To say that Navalny has enough public supporters for him to have become elected as Russia’s President is like alleging that the former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke had enough public supporters for him to have become elected as America’s President.

But some people in America still think that Saddam Hussein was hiding WMD in 2002.

This is how America does regime-change propaganda, every time: lies.

These lies come from the regime that spends around half of all of the entire world’s military spending, and the regime that imprisons the world’s highest percentage of its subjects (or ‘citizens’). It’s the ‘land of the free’, and exports its ‘freedom and democracy’ everywhere.

And that’s how America does regime-change operations: by sheer lies.

Like all imperialism throughout history, it’s based on lies — propaganda. And, like in all imperialistic regimes throughout history, their public believe these lies, every time, time after time. They don’t learn the truth, because they’re never taught the truth. (Dissenters are suppressed, not hired. In any dictatorship, the financial incentives support the liars, not the truth-tellers.)

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.


Support SouthFront


Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

amerikans are fake—“the cult of sincerity: amerikans are not sincere –it is a performance”. David Riesman

Marco Polo

Depends on the American in question. Israelis used pornography as a psychological weapon, as jews still do.

Porn should be banned:

worldtruthvideos. org/watch/should-porn-be-banned-aaron-kasparov_W4q1a5AWu3rRFbt. html

Last edited 24 days ago by Marco Polo
Marco Polo

Leon Trotsky (real name Lev Bronstein) lived much of his life in New York.

History of the “Russian Revolution”:


Marco Polo

Leon Trotsky (real name Lev Bronstein) lived much of his life in New York.

History of the “Russian Revolution”:

imgur. com/DPHvXZg
imgur. com/a/2xWKjAr




Socialist fraternal kiss: imgur. com/rii7Tzg
^ Bolshevism compares Slavic nationalism to “racism”.


My whole point is that Trotsky inverted the meaning of the term ‘racist’, changing it from a positive context (pride in one’s race or ethnic group, i.e. blood and soil like the “Native” Amerindians) to a negative one. His so-called “antiracism” was hatred of Slavs, and thus opposition to Slavophiles (i.e. Slavic nationalism and ethnic or cultural pride).

nationalvanguard. org/2015/06/on-the-origin-of-the-word-racist/

Last edited 23 days ago by Sean
Marco Polo

Page 7: “Slavophilism, the messianism of backwardness, has based its philosophy upon the assumption that the Russian people and their church are democratic through and through, whereas official Russia is a German bureaucracy imposed upon them by Peter the Great.

Marx remarked upon this theme: ‘In the same way the Teutonic jackasses blamed the despotism of Frederick the Second upon the French, as though backward slaves were not always in need of civilized slaves to train them.’ This brief comment completely finishes off not only the old philosophy of Slavophiles, but also the latest revelations of the ‘Racists.”


false—as Berdayeav and Belinsky observed Russian thinking, society had little in common w German, nearer to French


Varangians or Varyags (Vikings) settling in Novgorod and the Kievan Rus: duckduckgo. com/?t=ffab&q=varangians&ia=web

“Kievan Rus’ or Kyivan Rus’ was a loose federation of East Slavic and Uralic peoples in Europe from the late 9th to the mid-13th century, under the reign of the Rurik dynasty, founded by the Varangian prince Rurik.”

Marco Polo

twitter. com/BigRiverSalmon/status/1260142902895734784

Marco Polo

bit. ly/3wAG0ro

Marco Polo

Is Academia “Right Wing”? youtu. be/B_4UAQ6eD5M


“the least reproach offends amerikans—the slightest sharp sting of truth turns them fierce”. Tocqueville
“amerikans have been liars and braggarts for 3 centuries”. Daniel Boorstin
“amerikans, especialy males are troubled by a fundamental insecurity that causes them to over-compensate…only in amerika is the father vestigial: the amerikan mind and conscience is feminine”. Geoffrey Gorer
“the cult of friendliness: amerikans are only friendly when they want something…in amerika the citizen has been transformed into a client, the worker into a consumer”. Christopher Lasch

Marco Polo

I feel you are missing the point here; you are conflating a handful of Americans with the average American throughout history, a history you do not seem familiar with.

Last edited 24 days ago by Marco Polo

u miss everything—I have lived in USA…when last there 1.5 years ago I met w 2 friends, all of us born in different European nations—Matias remarked, “I left France 18 years ago and I continue to be puzzled at why amerikans are so different from Europeans”….I suspect that you have never lived in a civilized nation


There are those from Russia who lived there longer with the opposite view about the white middle class; there is really multiple different Americas within the states, since it is a melting pot, which in itself is the cause of its problems. You can make accurate judgements about the character of people living there based on their racial identity, background, et cetera as you can anywhere else.

Urban America is not rural America, nor are the suburban areas the same as the inner city. There is lots of subversion afoot in America and it isn’t exclusively an American tendency, nor does it originate there. It is predominately the jewish mindset acting through proxy, their subversive effect on society in general.

There are certainly hard working people in America and they aren’t difficult to come by; this does not mean they all think and act in the same way.

A century of Cultural Marxism (i.e. Critical Theory, Western Marxism) has done plenty of damage worldwide.

Is Academia “Right Wing”? youtu. be/B_4UAQ6eD5M

“When you hear “Marxism” or “Marxist” think “destabilization of society and consolidation of power” not “social/economic justice”.


“I have lived in USA”

Where exactly? It doesn’t sound like you have. Your understanding seems more based on stereotypes from television and other news or entertainment media; even so, the term ‘American’ seems more like an insult than whether or not someone’s actually an American.

Seriously that country has better kept infrastructure than Russia, you must be referring to the modern culture or lack thereof in America that’s exported to Russia, China and everywhere else.

It remains more advanced than all 3rd world countries, despite its ongoing degradation and importation of 3rd world populations that have a profoundly negative impact on public safety and national health. Ask yourself why there’s never been any successful black ruled society; or why the only examples of some civilization as in the case of Nubia were always forced upon them by outsiders from Asia (ancient Egypt, Arabia), then Europe.

Why on earth are Zimbabwe (formerly Rhodesia) and South Africa worse off than under Apartheid? Despite the end of laws governing racial segregation (a perennial natural phenomenon) and handing power over to the black Communists has transformed once peaceful, prosperous 1st world nations into rapidly disintegrating shit holes mired in corruption?

Last edited 23 days ago by Sean

As for your quote about American standardization of relatively lower quality “goods”, China took that to another level. Asia has historically been more materialist and mercantile, the Graeco-Roman world contracted venereal disease from Asia in a metaphorical and somewhat physical sense, a “syphilis” of morals so to speak. Something which began to infect them long before Christianity, likely beginning with Plato and several other Greek philosophers.

“Christianity gave Eros poison to drink; he did not die of it, certainly, but degenerated to Vice.”― Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil

I think the following video does a good job of postulating as to why that is the case:

The “WHY” of Cuties and Pedo-Promotion: youtu. be/A5wqSxpqk4g

Judeo-Mysticism behind modern politics: youtu. be/yWSLDVa7iaU


amerikans always primitive backward
“white trash: the 400 year old untold history of class in amerika”. Nancy Isenberg
“Countours of amerikan history”. William Appleman Williams
See Daniel Boorstin’s trilogy—or Morris Berman, ”
“Dark Ages amerika,” “Why amerika failed”
Richard Hofstadter: “the paranoid Style in amerikan politics”. “Anti-intellectualism in amerikan Life”
etc…..I doubt you know your own history or peculiar national character


Anymore I pay attention to the ethnosocial commitments of the authors, such as those you cite. Nearly all these are Jewish “intellectuals” – like Trotsky in his time – that have been aggressive in destroying American colonial culture. My own 300 year tradition of New England Yankees has been eradicated by modernism and fake progressivism. Champions and ked by the news orgs owned by the super-few overlords.


“colonial culture”

thuletide. wordpress. com/2021/01/06/imperialism-and-colonialism-white-guilt-and-historic-non-white-conquests-of-european-territories/


How Whites Took Over America: youtu. be/faNge-o0V-k?t=282

Last edited 23 days ago by Sean

Solutreans (First Americans) The Ice-Age Discovery of the Americas – Constructing an Iberian Solution:

youtu be/pY01NjND1jc

The Importance of the Kennewick Man (Part 1 of 2)
– AVOF program with Ernst Zundel:

bit. ly/3ig90B5

White “Indians” of Nirvia: whiteindians. com/

3 Basic Human Skulls: youtu. be/x3qcpbvCCvs

9,400 year old Spirit Cave Mummy (Nevada):

youtu. be/ekQlzmhJ4YM?t=433

7,000-Year-Old Europeans in Florida, North America:

youtu. be/vPWHduWKuZw

DNA Results of Ancient Native American Mummies:

youtu. be/IfOZg3X_GmA

Ancient “Giants” of the New World:

atlanteangardens. blogspot. com/2014/05/ancient-giants-of-new-world. html

More Info: odysee. com/@NordLuxBellator:f/Rant-Ethernal-with-Brother-Doom_Guard:9


“Nancy Isenberg”

You quoted a modern feminist author, she’s clearly a racial alien of a “semitic” (((variety))).

Most authors today pale in comparison to those of the past, even mainstream journalism a century ago puts modern journalism to shame.


You’re quite right. Also, America originated as a physical, spiritual, linguistic and cultural extension of Europe and therefore Aryan man.

Last edited 23 days ago by Sean
Marco Polo

Those quotes are more applicable to America over past 60s years after the jews took full control, and a little before when the jewish or jewish influenced elements are taken into consideration.


your pathetic inferiority complex and racism is tiresome


Last edited 24 days ago by Sean

Your response to the link I sent to a screenshot of Trotsky’s book is an indication you are ignorant of the fact that Russia was formed by Varangians.

Your prejudicial Eurasianist claims are usually nothing but childish projection of your profoundly misinformed worldview derived from jewish psychopaths that killed hundreds of millions, whether Capitalist or Marxist.

People are demonstratively different for better or for worse, the proto-Darwinist arguments put forth by Graeco-Roman authors and various others worldwide is surely verifiable. Judging by your statements I can tell you are a liar, and/or not so smart.

You choose not to understand this as a result of your confirmation bias and unwillingness to unlearn the nonsense you were brainwashed to believe by psychopathic jews that want you dead. Hence the myth they propagate about “everyone being the same” to encourage miscegenation, even when the claim everyone is inherently the same or equal is easy to disprove.

Everything I’m stating right now is diametrically opposed to what is promoted in “western” countries, I will post more links in support of my argument; links you and no other shill on here have disproven.

Which is why you resort to ad hominem attacks in the absence of evidence, whilst you ignorantly assume everything you were told by your rulers is almost completely true and ignore anything proving them wrong.

You also fall for the globalist’s bait and switch techniques that just because Russia and China seem opposed to the “West”, they must therefore not be globalists themselves in spite of their globalist indoctrination and promotion of globalist organizations such as the UN.

In your own worldview, the CIA controls everything and the big bad boogie man you call the “west” is somehow not a golem for international jewry, but since you choose to ignore all of the connections you can’t even begin to fathom that your reality is but a carefully crafted illusion.

youtube. com/watch?v=ATe_OOdh374

renegadetribune. com/cant-fix-stupid/

“So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand.”
— Thucydides

thuletide. wordpress. com/debunking-race-denialism/

thuletide. wordpress. com/2020/12/07/race-ethnicity-and-racism-in-greco-roman-society/

[The insane theory that “racism” is a modern invention can be debunked by studying almost any pre-modern civilization. There is copious written and archaeological evidence that humans have always racially and ethnically categorized one another in some shape or form, just as we have always categorized plants, animals, landscapes, and so on. Although, it may not always have been conducted in the precise, systemic manner that it is today, the fact that humans are natural-born categorizers cannot be denied.

Ancient civilizations from Rome to China have produced numerous detailed ethnographies and histories, comparing and contrasting the behaviors and appearances of the various peoples they encountered throughout the world.

See, for example:
Chinese ‘Records of the Grand Historian’ by Sima Qian (94 BC)
Roman ‘Natural History’ by Pliny (77 AD), ‘Germania’ by Tacitus (98 AD)
Greek ‘Histories’ by Herodotus (430 BC)
Egyptian ‘Book of Gates’ (1500 BC)]


Looking at how Russia and China are becoming like America, your criticism seems more like jealousy akin to slave “morality”.

Friedrich Engels died a wealthy man, worth at least $4 million adjusted to inflation. Marx and Engels did not believe in “equality.”

They did believe in German racial superiority and imperialism, going as far as endorsing a “revolutionary holocaust” to be waged against Basques, Scots, Slavs, among others. Karl Marx also held the view that slavery was necessary in the creation of civilization, as did a number of German philosophers who held a similar view despite their disagreement with slavery.

Marxism is a potpurri of ideas revolving around the death of God, “liberation,” nihilism, and resentment. “Worker’s rights” was a small part of it that was blown completely out of proportion. Academic institutions throughout western countries have been going through various stages of culturally Marxism for around 50-100 years now. By now they are at the advanced stage of what Yuri Bezmenov referred to as “demoralization”.

Yuri Bezmenov on Demoralization in America:

youtu. be/AhAzGLb1j40

Yuri Bezmenov: Psychological Warfare Subversion & Control of Western Society:

youtu. be/5gnpCqsXE8g

What Yuri Bezmenov Didn’t Tell You:

youtu. be/niiF8hCSrYQ

Fake Breakup Of The Soviet Union (Anatoliy Golitsyn New Lies For Old):

youtu. be/2oAJqz89mXw

^ First published in the 1980’s, 1984 to be exact.

Last edited 24 days ago by Sean

As for what you recently stated about America, much of that is true about China and very poor parts of Asia further west.

“For it would be absurd if someone should think that spiritedness does not occur in our cities from private citizens, who indeed have this reputation, such as those who live throughout Thrace and Scythia and nearly all the northern areas, or love of learning, which indeed someone would say is especially prevalent in the area around us, or as someone would say that the love of money is not least among the Phoenicians or Egyptians.”
— Plato’s Republic, 435e3-436a3.

“And concerning the listlessness and cowardice of peoples, the seasons are especially the cause why Asians are less martial than the Europeans and more tame in their character, for making no dramatic shift either to the hot nor to the cold their seasons are temperate. For there are no mental disturbances nor strong change of the body, from which it is more likely that the passion is roused and indulges the senseless and high-spirited rather than when it is in a steady state. For it is change of everything which wake the disposition of men and do not allow it to rest. For these aforesaid reasons it seems to me that that the Asian race is weak and yet further so because of their customs. For much of Asia is ruled by a king. And where men do not rule themselves nor are autonomous, but are ruled by a despot, there is no reason for them to concern themselves over this. So that they do not practice the military disciplines, but they work to seem pacifistic.”
— Hippocrates (Airs, Waters, Places; XVI)

Last edited 24 days ago by Sean

“There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance – that principle is contempt prior to investigation.”
— Herbert Spencer

The Origins of Races by Carleton S. Coon: archive. org/details/B-001-001-289

ostarapublications. com/product-category/racial-science/

archive. org/details/my-awakening-a-path-to-racial-understanding-2008-by-david-duke-improved-audiobook/0+-+Introduction+1. mp3

^ Contains over 1,000 footnotes!


There should be a law where refusal to

1. Engage in constructive debate and
2. Actually step out of one’s comfort zone to analyze evidence from the other side

Results in a fine.

Once proven wrong, the loser of the debate is subject to a court gag order, until they can prove themselves correct in a constructive debate.

You have this persistent tendency to childishly insist anyone you disagree with is lying, or “stupid”. And any source you disagree with is surely spreading lies, under the foolish assumption you cannot be wrong because your feelings tell you so. You can’t fathom that you have been lied to all your life, as everyone everywhere in the world today is certainly lied to throughout their entire lives as well by the powers that be.

In Search of a High IQ African Population (virtually non-existent):

archive. org/details/youtube-RxAhwYoZQKU

Racial Crime Statistics – Documentation of globally consistent trends [+PDF version]:

thuletide. wordpress. com/2020/08/01/racial-crime-statistics-lots-of-infographics/

Last edited 24 days ago by Sean
Marco Polo

As for deeming the American consciousness as something which is feminine, it is a result of imposing the jewish character upon them; as they have done to many others around the world.

Last edited 24 days ago by Marco Polo
Marco Polo

Cultured Thug’s made good videos about jews: odysee. com/@Cultured-Thug:c

odysee. com/@Cultured-Thug:c/Evola–amp–The-JQ:8

His Karakalpak admixture likely influences his appeal to Evola’s thinking, who rejected biological facts about race in favour of a supposedly “spiritual” race not dissimilar to the rather jewish/near-eastern view. Evola is a prick, those he criticized as “incoherent” or “vague” was a projection of his own convoluted worldview that is not too dissimilar to the ideas of his Oriental ancestors.

Last edited 24 days ago by Marco Polo

“amerikans are the living refutation of the cartesian cogito ergo sum. amerikans are yet they do not think. the amerikan mind puerile, primitive lacks characteristic form and is therefore open to any standardization”. Julius Evola

Marco Polo

research. calvin. edu/german-propaganda-archive/goeb5. htm

[Goebbels began a weekly newspaper called Das Reich in 1940. He generally wrote the lead article each week, in which he took special pride. This essay is dated 9 August 1942. It presents the standard Nazi view of the U.S. as a land with no culture.]

“I don’t see much future for the Americans … it’s a decayed country. And they have their racial problem, and the problem of social inequalities … my feelings against Americanism are feelings of hatred and deep repugnance … everything about the behaviour of American society reveals that it’s half Judaised, and the other half negrified. How can one expect a State like that to hold together?”

— Adolf Hitler

Marco Polo

Evola also criticized the negrification of America and was critical of jazz music.

Last edited 24 days ago by Marco Polo
Marco Polo

You are right in that Americanism produces a lot of fake things, often due to its Liberal origins.

odysee. com/@Zolt:b/trim.16A988F3-DFA4-4140-AAC6-79454BE1EA92:2

China Is Right

Renegade Tribune is CIA/Jew propaganda, like all American “alternative” media.

The American was replaced by negroes.

As a Jew’s country is.

The American is the negro ruled by the Jew.

Lone Ranger

CIA is the worst terror organization on the planet.
They even do it at home.
Sooner they are stopped the better for everyone.

Marco Polo

renegadetribune. com/diversity-gone-mad-at-cia/

no death cults

The Abrahamic death cults that have infected Middle East, Europe, Americas is the real culprit. All secular nations are targeted by these Abrahamic terrorist cults which genocides the traditions, religions and philosophies of all people. Where the sinners are accused and we must all be part of their death or else we will become the sinner accused. Where is the peace except in death for these terrorist rulers. The real Resistance is Humanity not a Abrahamic death cult by any other name.

Marco Polo

Even secular society is run by atheistic Abrahamic death cults, especially judaism.

Marco Polo

How to recognize a jew: bit. ly/3c4umNP

Torture of the author at Nuremberg who was subsequently executed in a not so dissimilar fashion to Alfred Rosenberg who was also murdered for merely writing “antisemtic” material:

bit. ly/3p8P9Fi

[We have been down this road before, although most Americans don’t know it.

“Breaking chemical lights and pouring the phosphoric liquid on detainees; pouring cold water on naked detainees; beating detainees with a broom handle and a chair; threatening male detainees with rape; allowing a military police guard to stitch the wound of a detainee who was injured after being slammed against the wall in his cell; sodomizing a detainee with a chemical light and perhaps a broom stick, and using military working dogs to frighten and intimidate detainees with threats of attack, and in one instance actually biting a detainee.”
— From General Antonio Taguba’s official report on events at Abu Ghraib, (quoted by Seymour Hersh in The New Yorker).

“Confessions” Under Torture

Altogether more disturbing, however, were the methods employed to extract statements and “confessions” at Nuremberg, particularly those from S.S. officers which were used to support the extermination charge. The American Senator, Joseph McCarthy, in a statement given to the American press on May 20th, 1949, drew attention to the following cases of torture to secure such confessions.

In the prison of the Swabisch Hall, he stated, officers of the S.S. Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler were flogged until they were soaked in blood, after which their sexual organs were trampled on as they lay prostrate on the ground. As in the notorious Malmedy Trials of private soldiers, the prisoners were hoisted in the air and beaten until they signed the confessions demanded of them. On the basis of such “confessions” extorted from S.S. Generals Sepp Dietrich and Joachim Paiper, the Leibstandarte was convicted as a “guilty organisation.” SS General Oswald Pohl, the economic administrator of the concentration camp system, had his face smeared with faeces and was subsequently beaten until he supplied his confession.

In dealing with these cases, Senator McCarthy told the press: “I have heard evidence and read documentary proofs to the effect that the accused persons were beaten up, maltreated and physically tortured by methods which could only be conceived in sick brains. They were subjected to mock trials and pretended executions, they were told their families would be deprived of their ration cards. All these things were carried out with the approval of the Public Prosecutor in order to secure the psychological atmosphere necessary for the extortion of the required confessions. If the United States lets such acts committed by a few people go unpunished, then the whole world can rightly criticise us severely and forever doubt the correctness of our motives and our moral integrity.”

The methods of intimidation described were repeated during trials at Frankfurt-am-Mein and at Dachau, and large numbers of Germans were convicted for atrocities on the basis of their admissions. The American Judge Edward L. van Roden, one of the three members of the Simpson Army Commission which was subsequently appointed to investigate the methods of justice at the Dachau trials, revealed the methods by which these admissions were secured in the Washington Daily News, January 9th, 1949. His account also appeared in the British newspaper, the Sunday Pictorial, January 23rd, 1949.

The methods he described were: “Posturing as priests to hear confessions and give absolution; torture with burning matches driven under the prisoners’ finger-nails; knocking out of teeth and breaking jaws; solitary confinement and near starvation rations.”

Van Roden explained: “The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months. . . . The investigators would put a black hood over the accused’s head and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses . . . All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators.”

The “American” investigators responsible (and who later functioned as the prosecution in the trials) were: Lt.-Col. Burton F. Ellis (chief of the War Crimes Committee) and his assistants, Capt. Raphael Shumacker, Lt. Robert E. Byrne, Lt. William R. Perl, Mr. Morris Ellowitz, Mr. Harry Thon, and Mr. Kirschbaum. The legal adviser of the court was Col. A. H. Rosenfeld. The reader will immediately appreciate from their names that the majority of these people were “biased on racial grounds” in the words of Justice Wenersturm — that is, were Jewish, and therefore should never have been involved in any such investigation. Despite the fact that “confessions” pertaining to the extermination of the Jews were extracted under these conditions, Nuremberg statements are still regarded as conclusive evidence for the Six Million by writers like Reitlinger and others, and the illusion is maintained that the Trials were both impartial and impeccably fair.

When General Taylor, the Chief Public Prosecutor, was asked where he had obtained the figure of the Six Million, he replied that it was based on the confession of S.S. General Otto Ohlendorf. He, too, was tortured and his case is examined below. But as far as such “confessions” in general are concerned, we can do no better than quote the British Sunday Pictorial when reviewing the report of Judge van Roden: “Strong men were reduced to broken wrecks ready to mumble any admission demanded by their prosecutors.”

The names of seven U.S. personnel shown in the scandalous photographs from Abu Ghraib have been published. In order of rank they are: Staff Sergeant Ivan L. “Chip” Frederick II (a White man who is married to a Negress); Sergeant Javal Davis (Negro); Specialist Charles A. Graner; Specialist Megan Ambuhl; Specialist Sabrina Harman; Private Jeremy Sivits; Private Lynndie England.

Several of the accused have indicated that abuse of prisoners was encouraged by Military Intelligence as an aid to interrogation, and this claim is corroborated by witnesses who are not among the defendants. Hersh summarizes General Taguba’s report thus:

“The picture he draws of Abu Ghraib is one in which Army regulations and the Geneva conventions were routinely violated, and in which much of the day-to-day management of the prisoners was abdicated to Army military-intelligence units and civilian contract employees.”

In other words, those being prosecuted so far are only the smallest players in this scandal. The names of the important culprits should come out eventually, and I eagerly wait to see what their ethnic background will be. We have the name of Frederick’s superior, the commander of the 320th Military Police Battallion, Lieutenant Colonel Jerry Phillabaum, who Frederick says knew what was being done to the Iraqis and condoned it. Some of the higher-ups blamed in Taguba’s report are Colonel Thomas Pappas, the commander of one of the M.I. brigades, Lieutenant Colonel Steven Jordan, the former director of the Joint Interrogation and Debriefing Center, a civilian contractor named Steven Stephanowicz of CACI International, who was empowered to give instructions to Army personnel that according to Taguba “equated to physical abuse,” and another CACI employee, John Israel.

We see a strange abundance of Jews involved in the torture of Iraqis, just as in the torture of German prisoners six decades ago, and that is certainly an important key to understanding why this has been going on.]

Last edited 24 days ago by Marco Polo
Raptar Driver

The American government is the largest criminal enterprise in all of history.
It will continue on it’s course until the people of the world realize this and act appropriately.

Marco Polo

More like the globalist deep state of international jewry.

China Is Right

Coup, not “change”.

Stop speaking the Jewish newspeak.

Much of the Jewish scheme is the language.

If it is Russia it’s “meddling”, if it is the JewSA is “change” of “regime” (they don’t say even government).

If you feed the beast you can’t complain

Marco Polo

Regime is literally French for governance:

etymonline. com/search?q=regime

“regime (noun)

“system of government or rule,” 1792, from French régime, from Old French regimen (14th century), from Latin regimen “rule, guidance, government, means of guidance, rudder,” from regere “to direct, to guide” (from PIE root *reg- “move in a straight line,” with derivatives meaning “to direct in a straight line,” thus “to lead, rule”). Earlier “course of diet, exercise,” late 15th century. In French, l’ancien régime refers to the system of government before the revolution of 1789.”

Last edited 24 days ago by Marco Polo

No one use it today in its original meaning, today it has a negative conation by default.


Exactly. It’s all done by design and therefore illegitimate, many words are misunderstood today, as they are divorced their broader meaning. Propaganda for instance is one such word.

Propaganda (1928): archive. org/details/EdwardBernaysPropaganda1928Liveright/page/n15/mode/2up

“Propaganda’ in its proper meaning is a perfectly wholesome word, of honest parentage, and with an honorable history. The fact that it should to-day be carrying a sinister meaning merely shows how much of the child remains in the average adult.”

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x