False Flag Admission: Euromaidan Snipers Were Hired By Ukrainian Opposition

Donate

False Flag Admission: Euromaidan Snipers Were Hired By Ukrainian Opposition

A screenshot from the video

Italia’s Channel 5 has released a documentary, which reveals the truth about the Euromaidan “snipers” incident in 2014.

The slaughter of people by snipers was the event which turned world opinion against Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych and resulted in a large-scale escalation of the situation during the so-called Euromaidan protests. The mainstream media accused the Yanukovych government of conducting this crime.

However, in the documentary “Ukraine, the hidden truths”, serveral of the snipers admitted that the pro-US/EU Ukrainain opposition was behind these deaths.

According to the documentary, Georgian Alexander Revazishvilli and his two companions were hired in in Tbilisi by Mamuka Mamulashvili to support the Euromaidan coup alongisde with other Georgian and Lithuanian volunteers.

Mamulashvili and other leaders of the Ukrainian opposition distributed weapons among the hired “volunteer groups” and tasked them shoot at the protestors and policy and sow the chaos.

Undercover operations with civilian casualties are a common sign of various coups staged by the global cartel around the world.

The Italian newspaper Il Giornale reported on the issue (Google translation) :

Everyone started shooting two or three shots at a time. It went on for fifteen, twenty minutes. We had no choice. We were ordered to shoot both on the police and the demonstrators, without any difference. I was totally outraged.”

So Georgian Alexander Revazishvilli remembers the tragic shootout of 20 February 2014 in Kiev when a group of mysterious snipers opened fire on crowds and cops massacring over 80 people. That massacre has horrified the world and changed the destiny of Ukraine by forcing President Viktor Yanukovich accused of organizing the shootout. But the massacre also changed the fates of Europe and our country, triggering the crisis that will lead to sanctions against Putin’s Russia. Sanctions revealed a boomerang for the Italian economy ( Watch the video ).

Revazishvilli’s confessions and two other Georgians – gathered by writers in the documentary “Ukraine, the hidden truths” aired tonight at 23.30 on Matrix, Channel 5 – reveal a different truth and disconcerting. The truth of a massacre and the same opposition that accused Yanukovych and his Russian allies. Revazishvilli and his two companions – met and interviewed in the documentary – are a former member of the security services of former Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili and two former militants of his own party. Hired in Tbilisi by Mamuka Mamulashvili, Saakashvili’s military advisor, are tasked with supporting – along with other Georgian and Lithuanian volunteers – ongoing demonstrations in Kiev in return for a $ 5,000 final fee. Having fake passports arrive in Ukraine to coordinate demonstrations and lead the Ukrainian police, initially without using weapons. The weapons come on stage on February 18 and are distributed to the various Georgian and Lithuanian groups by Mamulashvili and other leaders of the Ukrainian opposition. “There were three or four weapons in each bag, there were Makarov guns, Akm guns, rifles, and then cartridges.” The following day Mamulashvili and the leaders of the protest explain to volunteers who will face a police assault at the Conservatory building and at the Ukraine hotel. In that case – he says – we must shoot at the square and sow the chaos. But one of the protagonists confesses to having received another explanation, much more comprehensive. “When Mamulashvili arrived, I also asked him. Things are getting complicated, we have to start shooting – he replied that we can not go to the pre-election presidential elections. But who should shoot? “I asked. He replied that who and where it did not matter, you had to shoot somewhere so much to sow chaos. ”

“It did not matter if we fired at a tree, a barricade, or the molotov. confirms another volunteer – what counts was sowing confusion. Listen to the screams confess Alexander – there were dead and injured. My first and only thought was to leave me in a hurry before they caught up with me. Otherwise they would break me. Someone was already shouting that there were snipers Four years later Alexander and his two companions reported that they had not yet received the slightest reward and had also decided to tell the truth about who used them and abandoned them. “At that time I did not realize, I was not ready, then I understood. We’ve been used. Used and stuck. “

The original documentary:

With English subs:

Donate

SouthFront

Do you like this content? Consider helping us!

  • Serious

    Even if Obama comes and tells that they have killed Ukrainians to step down the former ukrainian president, what will happen ???? Nothing.

    So, the essential is to prevent this to happen.

    • as

      By doing what ?

  • Daniel Castro

    That’s why Yanukovich should have told ukrainian army to open machinegun fire over the thugs in maidan, even if civil war started he as president could have called the russian army into ukraine like Assad did in Syria.

    • alejoeisabel

      That is so true. Should have called the Russian Army. Also Israelis helped overthrow the Ukrainian government by arming and training the foreign backed “opposition”.

  • Real Anti-Racist Action

    Mi6 was masterful in this coordinated and thought out inside job. Just as the London buss bombing were carried out by SAS agents for Mi6 to package and sell a war to fight people for Jewish power expansion.
    Mi6 is the heaviest hand in Ukraine, Mossad in the second. The CIA are only assisting their allies in their personal goals and aims. Make Ukraine yet another hotbed for Zionist!
    https://holodomorinfo.com/
    http://ihr.org/

    • Daniel Castro

      5eyes are globalist zionists, there is no difference from CIA MI6, Mossad or the others.

  • Garga

    The same thing happened in the unrest after the Iran’s 2009 presidential elections. There were people shot and dead, both from protestors and the anti-riot forces. One of the people killed was a young girl whose death was used to immortalize the green “revolution”. Back then there was no talk other than her death on various TV channels and the experts and “patriots” who shed crocodile tears and condemned whoever they hated the most.
    Of course government, IRGC, Basij and police were blamed for these deaths. Police conducted an investigation and reached to the conclusion that there were gunmen who shot the both sides but it seems human rights groups aren’t interested in any kind of investigation.

    The simplest question in situations like this is Cui bono. Do ruling government, good or bad, benefit from creating martyrs for the rioters or do anti-government forces benefit by showing the ruling governments as butchers and murderers of their own people?

    Luckily their colour revolution didn’t succeed otherwise Iran would be like those unfortunate countries who received their CIA version of “freedom”.

    • as

      Their Iranian color revolution are headed by Shah era sellouts. For their public consumption it works but to destabilize Iran they’re not really as popular as MSM advertised. Just like recent Kurds independence proclamation.

    • Tudor Miron

      Absolutely! Qui bono is the simplest way to find who’s behind an event. Like when white helmets (read Al Queda, read UK/US/Israel) where trying to blame Assad for using zorin. Assad had nothing to gain and only to loose from gas attack.

      • Eddy

        Then why not apply the same to Sept 11 ??? Who benefited the most from that event ?

        • Tudor Miron

          Could it be those who used that false flag (imho) event to restruct freedon of their population and to start “war against terrorism” that turned out to be a string of “regime change”, “color revolutions” and blatant invasions? Wesly Clark interview was very showing… https://youtu.be/LAFHOHIiFZA

          May I ask what is your opinion regarding 9/11? Who benefited other than those that I mentioned (those obviosly ised it as a pretext)

          • Eddy

            What is my opinion regarding 9/11 ????
            Firstly, it was a criminal act. When such an act occurs, the crime scene is usually roped off and investigators comb thru the debris to ascertain what happened and to gather evidence to sustain the claim a crime has been committed.
            In the case of 9/11, strangely, paper evidence survived whereas steel girders melted, ‘allegedly’. Of course why anyone who is going to committ suicide would take their passports with them, has never been examined, or explained.
            Secondly, It has never been explained, as to why the U.S.A.F. were ordered to return and land their planes, nor has it been explained, who gave those orders and under what reasons. Similarly, it has never been explained as to how an alleged terrorist sitting in a cave in Afghanistan could circumvent the whole U.S. defensive system, over riding all their fail safe technology and basicly grounding the U.S.A.F. That event alone, should have set off the alarm bells loudly.
            Is or Was O.B.L. a superman or some such, that was able to do all the above ?
            If so, does that not make a mockery of the U.S. Defensive systems, and contrary to what we are told, their military is NOT as mighty as they claim ???
            Thirdly, Building 7. Amazing, very few Americans even know this building existed once upon a time. The Govt and M.S.M. rarely, if ever mention this building. I wonder why not ? Could it have something to do with the FACT, that no aircraft hit this building, yet strangely enough, this building caught fire, (it has never been adequately explained, how it caught fire ) then in the afternoon, the owner states on World T.V. LIVE, that he has decided to “PULL THE BUILDING”.
            Not one authority figure ever, explained how this building could be loaded with explosives in a matter of hours, whilst it is allegedly burning, (think about that for a sec ) to allow it’s destruction.
            The FACTS, are it takes weeks to design the locations to place explosives for the safe demolition of a building, then the explosives need to be place in the designed locations and the wiring installed, in the case of building 7, we are expected to believe and accept all this was done in a matter of minutes whilst the building was aflame ????????
            Not once, have I ever heard an investigator or authority of any kind, explain to us, how this could be done in a matter of minutes.
            Fourth, It would seem the ANTHRAX event in the same week, seems to have disappeared down the rabbit hole, never mind the FACT that people DIED from this event, and the whole ANTHRAX affair was to target Congress, to make sure all Congress were on side with the program, or they just might receive such a letter in their mail. Like the cowards ALL members of Congress are, they all toed the line and got on board with the program.
            Fifth, The draconioan N.S.A. act was immediately introduce without prior warning, making it clear, it was written well before the event to allow it to be immediately introduced.
            Sixth, the dancing Israelis who were caught filing the event, clearly, to be able to plave yourself in a position to capture the event on camera, means PRIOR KNOWLEDGE of the coming event. Incidently, all these Israelis were allowed to depart U.S. shores free as a bird, without ever explaining how they knew the event was going to occur.
            Seventh, given all the above, it becomes abundantly clear, there was PRIOR warning of this event coming, and various people’s in authority KNEW of it, and arranged events to their benefit.
            The owner of ALL the buildings destroyed profited hugely from the event.
            In any crime, the first thing the investigators ask themselves is, ” Who stood to gain from this event “? You may well ask yourself, that same question, BUT one thing’s crystal clear, O.B.L. did not gain anything.

          • Tudor Miron

            I agree with all that you said and there’s many more “strange” things to add to your list but it would make it too long to list.
            But one thing bothers me the most – how come US is actively supporting HTS (Al Nusra Syrian branch of Al Queda) and US people are seemingly OK with this?

          • Eddy

            That’s a very valid question. It’s clear as day, the U.S. Government supports these groups, as does the M.S.M. not just in the U.S. either, many European nations stand side by side with the U.S. in that support. We don’t see any condemnation within the U.S. by U.S. citizens, therefore I must conclude, U.S. citizens are quiet happy with their Government’s support of these terrorists.
            The trick here, IMHO is I believe, rather than introduce a DRAFT and have U.S. citizens fighting and dying for the N.W.O. and then needing to confront a huge back lash from the people, when their relatives fail to come home, it’s easier all round, to USE these terrorists, who throw away their lives freely, and willingly, on behalf of the U.S. and it’s supporters. The citizens of the U.S. quietly acceed to this arrangement and the Government is well aware of it, using it to it’s advantage. I could be wrong, but I doubt it.

    • goingbrokes

      Can’t help thinking that the events at Tiananmen Square in Beijing 1989 too were a pre-run for these colour revolutions. But China was a too hard target. That some of them have been successful encourages the organisers to stage them again and again. Using snipers is vile, totally immoral and the organisers should face serious punishments. Unfortunately it helps things spiral out of control. In Syria too they used snipers to kill police right from the start.

  • RichardD

    These types of regime change operations are usually run by government intel agencies. It sounds like the people in the article were disposable and weren’t told to much in case they got caught, or they’re not being entirely truthful, or both.

  • BL

    They attempted to do the same thing in Iran during the 2009 protests. By randomly murdering civilians on the streets they attempted to fan the flames of the unrest and create the perception that Iran’s government was randomly killing civilians for no reason. This is clearly a modus operandi of the CIA for creating color revolutions.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1hkQtuwV38

  • Constantine

    Daraa, March 2011. Kiev, February 2014. What can one say about the human trash in Mordor-on the-Potomac? And these were the false-flags that initiated the destruction of these countries. More would follow in order to intensify the assault on the intended victims. MH17, Ghouta chemical attack, Khan Sheikhoun attack, the shootings that preceded the Odessa massacre etc.

    And since this seems to work with western audiences, this practice that serves the criminal policies of America’s CMIC will obviously continue.