0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
1,460 $
13 DAYS LEFT UNTIL THE END OF OCTOBER

Concern About Iran Prompts Israel To Weigh Acknowledgement Of Its Own Nuclear Weapons

Support SouthFront

Concern About Iran Prompts Israel To Weigh Acknowledgement Of Its Own Nuclear Weapons

Illustrative Image

Written by Dr. James M. Dorsey

On their way from Tel Aviv airport to Jerusalem in 1977 then Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Yigael Yadin asked President Anwar Sadat, the first Arab leader to ever officially visit Israel, why the Egyptian military had not moved deeper into the Sinai during the 1973 Middle East war. “You have nuclear arms. Haven’t you heard?” Mr. Sadat replied.

Mr. Sadat’s strategic calculations in the war, the last all-out military confrontation between Israel and Arab states, takes on renewed significance coupled with a recent report that asserts that Iranian nuclear advances are irreversible and have reached a stage at which Iran needs only one month to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a single bomb.

The report has sparked public debate in Israel about whether the Jewish state, which is long believed to have multiple nuclear weapons but consistently stopped short of confirming or denying the assertion, should finally do so to lay down a marker for Iran.

Israeli acknowledgement of its nuclear capabilities would likely force it to join Iran as a signatory to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). It would also constitute a tectonic shift in the geopolitical environment that frames thinking about a future security architecture in the Middle East.

The debate theoretically creates an opportunity for the administration of US President Joe Biden to position the rejiggering of the United States’ commitment to the region’s security in a totally different light and make a significant contribution to a situation in which the Middle East’s numerous conflicts and disputes can be better managed in the absence of resolutions.

The administration has a first chance to explore the opportunity when Eyal Hulata, the head of Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett’s national security council, meets this week in Washington with Mr. Biden’s national security advisor, Jake Sullivan.

Mr. Sullivan has just returned from a visit to the Middle East during which he focused on the war in Yemen and Iran and became the administration’s highest official to meet with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, days before the third anniversary of the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

Mr. Bennett, despite warning in remarks last month to the United Nations General Assembly that Israel would not shy away from military action to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, reportedly disagrees with the conclusion of the report by the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security. The report’s conclusions are supported by the likes of former Israeli prime minister and chief of staff Ehud Barak and Aluf Benn, the editor of Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

A senior Israeli official said that Mr. Bennet had read Mr. Barak’s assertion in a recent oped that Iran had “probably crossed the point of no return” and that Israel should reconsider its policy of nuclear ambiguity.

“Bennett doesn’t think that it’s game over about Iran’s nuclear program. He thinks that Iran is indeed very close to that point, but that there is still time, and if Israel acts on its own and with its allies in a systematic way, it is still possible to stop them.,” the official said.

Mr. Bennett’s position appears to be backed by former prime minister Ehud Olmert who argued that Israeli acknowledgement of its nuclear capability would allow Iran to justify the development of a capability of its own. Mr. Olmert’s opposition is rooted in his belief that Israel is not able to permanently destroy Iranian nuclear facilities with a conventional military strike.

Even so, acknowledgement would facilitate an international negotiation that focuses not only on Iran but also on Israel and, in doing so, helps lay the groundwork for a more sustainable regional security architecture.

John Carlson, a nuclear expert, argued, in a report published earlier this year by the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDR), that negotiation of a Middle East zone free of nuclear weapons would “itself help build regional confidence and trust.”

In the absence of a tectonic shift in Israeli policy, Israeli Chief of Staff Avi Kohavi has suggested on various occasions this year that Israel was developing “operational plans” for a potential strike prompted by Iran’s nuclear progress. Mr. Kohavi said last month that Israel had “greatly accelerated” preparations.

The potential opportunity created by an Israeli acknowledgement would not only contribute to averting the threat of a new Middle East war but also help fend off possible Saudi and Turkish thinking about expanding the region’s nuclear club. That league is currently a club of one if one ignores Pakistan that sits on the Middle East’s periphery.

The moral of Mr. Sadat’s reply to Mr. Yadin’ question is that Israeli ambiguity about its nuclear capabilities may no longer serve a purpose and that acknowledgement of its long-standing open secret may help ensure greater regional stability.

Mr. Sadat was telling Mr. Yadin that both he and Syrian President Hafez al-Assad were fully aware of Israel’s nuclear capability as they planned the war and were determined to ensure that the attack would not push the Jewish state to the point where it would use nuclear weapons to ensure its survival. In other words, it was the knowledge of Israeli capabilities, not whether Israel acknowledged them, that shaped their strategy.

Disagreement in Israel’s national security community is not limited to whether the Jewish state should radically shift gears but also includes the question of how close Iran may be to being able to produce a nuclear weapon.

Countering alarmist assessments, Maj.-Gen. Tamir Hayman, the head of Israel’s military intelligence, argued this weekend that “there is an enriched amount [of uranium] in volumes that we have not seen before, and it is disturbing. At the same time, in all other aspects of the Iranian nuclear project, we see no progress. Not in the weapons project, in the financial area, not in any other sector… They are not heading toward a bomb right now: It may be in the distant future.”

A podcast version of this story is available on  Soundcloud, Itunes, Spotify, Stitcher, TuneIn, Spreaker, Pocket Casts, Tumblr, Podbean, Audecibel, Patreon and Castbox.

Dr. James M. Dorsey is an award-winning journalist and scholar and a Senior Fellow at the National University of Singapore’s Middle East Institute.

MORE ON THE TOPIC:

Support SouthFront

SouthFront

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
A.H.

What is the UN gona do about that parasite convicted war criminal and proven genocide on the Palestinian people ? Nothing as usual? Stop the zionist experiment in Palestine !!!

jens holm

I dont care half a banana for a Turkish tourist camel about it anymore.

UN has done almost anything since 1949 also feeding the Palestians. Israel is a fact even it was made as a mistake by WW2 and the Germans.

Dicksonrp

Iran has ALL Rights, if they do decide, to produce some nukes for their DEFENCE!!! They are constantly being attacked by the blood thirsty children of lucifer in occupied Palestine.

Last edited 14 days ago by Dicksonrp
jens holm

You should wonder why. You are not even allowed and raised to do that.

block

Typical zionist hysteria and inbred paranoia. Let me guess “6 million, never again” for the tenth decade. Tired idiotic propaganda from warmongering degenerates.

Michel LeBlanc

“Mr. Kohavi said last month that Israel had “greatly accelerated” preparations.”

IDF, you have been saying for decades that Iran is within weeks of having a bomb and you have a plan.

That plan still aint ready, or there is no plan and your just plain lying?

You may have some nukes now, but you cant enrich anymore as your reactor is toast. So unless you steal some nuclear material fron somewhere, you will be nukeless soon enough, and once that happens, your toast.

Who am i kidding your toast already anyways.

Good riddance you arrogant pricks!

jens holm

Arrh the belowed propagandist Dorsey again.

Noah landed at Mount Ararat in 1973 having the Ark with secret passangers named as Mr and Mrs Assad.

Its a secret. Dont tell anybody else.

Daniel

According to the writer Israel is going? to sign NPT treaty and keep its 200+ nuclear weapons !!, The only rational solution for ME is a NuclearWeapon-free ME,

jens holm

I wrote old news from Mr Dorsey.

This newspaper site is from 1986 !

block

You are an imbecile that eats uk gov a$$.

Lrcaptain

now before Zion say the IDF would use nuclear weapons to destroy Iran let me make it clear
the nukes are to be used by Israel to defend the 1960’s borders there are clauses in treaties with both Russia and US that if IDF use nukes to say out right attack Iran or Syria there is no treaties to binding them to defend Israel against any relation. whether is nuclear or biological

Now the USA don’t care for treaties so won’t join in a war even they were bound. while Russia and china bound mutual defense backs. so if china nukes Israel Russia won’t stop it.

For the IDF nukes are a no win situation. to destroy land and people so no one can use territory.

Ramses

This type of behavior by the Israeli’s and the US prompts the Chinese to do the same policies to Australians since the Aussies support Israel whole heartedly. So now the Chinese can bomb Australians? This is a Pandora’s box situation.

15
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x