0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
580 $
JUNE 2023

Can Western Air Defense Systems Protect Ukraine Properly?

Support SouthFront

Can Western Air Defense Systems Protect Ukraine Properly?

Click to see the full-size image

Written by Uriel Araujo, researcher with a focus on international and ethnic conflicts.

On May 16, Ukraine claimed its air defenses intercepted six Russian Kinzhal hypersonic missiles and shot them down amid “exceptionally dense” barrage fired – supposedly thanks to the arrival of Patriots, among other Western combat systems. Kinzhals are supposed to be able to overcome all existing air defense systems, and Moscow denies its Kinzhals were intercepted.

Kiev also claims to have shot down 29 of 30 Russian rockets on May 18, an obviously inflated number. However, a Ukrainian infrastructure facility in Khmelnytskyi has been hit by a missile, with no casualties reported. The barrage came as a response to Kiev’s advancements in Bakhmut. Ukrainian forces are reportedly preparing to launch a counteroffensive. Ukraine’s defense systems, however, should not be overestimated.

While Western powers are finally coming to realize that Kiev simply does not possess the necessary means to win the ongoing conflict, much is being written about Western air defenses supposedly being key for Western victory in its proxy war in Eastern Europe against Moscow. Despite Ukrainian denials, American officials have confirmed US-made Patriot was indeed damaged by Russian strikes. According to the Russian defense ministry, on 16 May Kinzhal destroyed a Patriot missile defense system (five launchers and a multifunctional radar). This is one of the most advanced US air defense systems. Albeit trying to minimize the damage, US authorities speaking to Reuters on the condition of anonymity said that they would have a better understanding of the situation “in the coming days” and that “information could change”.

In the past days, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been busy touring different European countries and so far he has been promised billions of dollars in military equipment by allies such as the United Kingdom (UK) and France. How much different can those make?

The hard truth is that Kiev remains unable to create a single control system or an interface for the various Western air defense systems and their different components, as these possess a large range of functional features and thus are poorly integrated into the already existing systems. This means that they would operate ineffectively if included in a single circuit. NATO’s anti-aircraft systems can fully control one defined sector of airspace at a time, but cannot intercept operational-tactical missiles that move along an aeroballistic trajectory, such as the Russian hypersonic Kinzhais. For Ukraine, it would therefore be necessary to construct a whole new system, which is no simple task during a confrontation – not to mention doing so quickly enough.

Moreover, according to defense and IR journalist S. Tiwari of the EurAsian Times, the Patriot, IRIS-T and NASAMS systems cannot protect Ukrainian troops from guided bombs, such as the ones massively used by Russian forces. Ukrainian Lieutenant Colonel Denis Smazhny, an aerial defense specialist, in turn has confirmed the low effectiveness of the US-sent NASAMS and IRIS-T complexes (supplied by Germany) to face Russian ballistic missiles such as the Iskanders and Kinzhals. The Russian weapons, unlike cruise missiles, are capable of rising to very high altitudes to fall almost vertically onto the target at great speeds. Thus, targeting them in flight is very difficult. How can one make them fall when they are in fact “already falling”?

Thus, in Colonel Smazhny’s words, “Western air defense systems will not be able to protect us.”

Even with the Western systems, quickly creating an integrated and effective system for airspace defense is a challenge for Ukraine, to say the least. This is why Kiev has been eyeing an Israeli system called Iron Dome, which could suit its needs better. However, military and technical issues are often entangled with political and diplomatic matters.

During a US Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces session (about missile-defense matters), last week, American Senator Angus King asked why Iron Dome had not been deployed in the Eastern European nation. The answer is quite simple: the main producer of such systems is Israel and thus it would have to grant Washington permission to send it to any other country, such as Ukraine. Despite several requests, this has not happened. Tel Aviv sees Russia as a regional great power with which it must engage in a number of issues in the Middle East. For one thing, Moscow and Tel Aviv currently have a working relationship in the Levant, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu himself has stated he has no reason to damage bilateral relations. Moreover, even if Israeli approval were to happen, which remains unlikely, this would still not necessarily make a great difference other than a symbolic one: Russian weapons are indeed more sophisticated than the Palestinian rockets the Iron Dome routinely shoots down. To have a huge impact, Ukraine would need dozens of Iron Domes, which do not currently exist.

Besides these military issues, Ukraine is struggling with a domestic political crisis amid several corruption scandals. This week, for instance, the chair of its Supreme Court, chief justice Vsevolod Knyazev was removed from his post over bribery accusations amounting to $2.7 million. In addition, former US President Donald Trump stated last week he will not commit to backing Kiev, should he win the Republican presidential nomination and the upcoming elections. Despite the legal controversies, Trump remains a clear Republican favorite, while Republican senators are increasingly opposing advancing aid for Ukraine and some, like Senator JD Vance, are calling for investigating a possible Democrat money laundering scheme in Ukraine.


Support SouthFront


Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

pravda nakoniec vyjde na svetlo sveta. svet sa dozvie ako to s tými patriotmi naozaj je. bude to zaujímavé sledovať. už sa na to teraz teším. zase to bude blamáž, ako z tými ich sračkami na covid 19!!! viac ľuďom ublížili, ako pomohli. tak isto sa dozvedáme pravdu.

Ole C G

the article is an israelian sales brochure … nothing else …. stop such shit !


no actually russian wants to check iron dome scrape… now


the article describes ukraine would need “dozens of iron domes which do not exist”. and israelis mostly shoot down palestinenser rockets , which is not quite an equivalent to kinzhals. this is no good promotion for israeli weapons. i think you exaggerate.


oh yes, after 11 days they were criyng for sease fire because the plastic dome was out of counter missils. palestinian resistanse use fire crackers till the missils are gone and then sends there big missils on the zionist parasites. even yemen resistanse could mislead the patriots in sa. hahahahaha

AM Hants

russia has control of the ukraine airspace and the iron dome, over in israel, is as bad as the patriot system.

in the meantime over in hiroshima. what did the us do to hiroshima, back in 1945, when japan was ready to surrender?

g7 so called leaders’, little people on the world stage, telling iran that she cannot be friends with russia. seriously? didn’t, the us send cws to sadam, instruction use on the people of iran?

AM Hants

part 2 well, just look at the images of the leaders.

rishi sumak – billionaire oligarch of the uk, courtesy of his wife.

meloni, – italy with a double forked tongue.

scholz, – germany, fully supported destruction ns1 and ns2.

maccron, – france, protesting longer than war in syria.

trudea, – canada, ‘black up’ or just remove truckers bank accounts.

dementia joe – us .

unelected ursula, sea witch of the eu.

kishida – japan.

Captain Hohol

western reports that aren’t propaganda say no, in fact the alternative media is seeing reports slip out that ukraine is unable to provide any manpower that won’t inevitably be ground up in a fruitless effort.


mathematically speaking the patriot battery missiles cost the taxpayer 3 million each. the system can be overwhelmed with cheap rockets then destroyed.it cost over 100 million just to shoot at the kinzhal.this could turn this into an economic war of attrition that would work against the globalists.


32 patriots were not able to shoot down kinzhal. 32 x 3 millions = 96 miliions just for nothing.

WT Baker

no one in the anglo-dutch-american cabal ever believed this proxy war could be won. it’s the perception that that these wars are justified due to the “brutal dictator” narrative or the “violation of human rights” accusation. it’s the drip, drip,drip, of these lies that wear down the populations ability to discern truth from fiction.

Just me

warlords who have been fighting each other since the dawn of mankind. there are always new senseless wars and quarrels between these madmen. i will not believe the cheap propaganda and cheer for one side. yes, it’s good that people in donbass are now being liberated, but without politicians none of this would have happened, so….

Madam Defarge

the us can’t even defend itself right now. ask most us citizens if the red rubber nose, giant shoe wearing biden regime is protecting them and they will tell you no, unless your skin is a certain color, you have pink hair, and you enjoy abusing children.


no, western air defenses can´t to protect ukraine.


western powers *always* knew that kiev has nothing to do against russia. ukraine was used to try to (unsuccessfully) weaken russia

Buford T Justice

going to be very bad for us arms sales.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x