By Way of Deception Thou Shalt Lose Your Empire

Donate

By Way of Deception Thou Shalt Lose Your Empire

Written by TheSaker; Originally appeared at TheUnzReview

For nothing is hidden that will not be made manifest, nor is anything secret that will not be known and come to light
Holy Gospel according to Saint Luke (8:17)

There’s an old saying in Tennessee — I know it’s in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can’t get fooled again.
George W Bush

In April of 2014 I wrote an article entitled “How the Ukrainian crisis will eventually bring down the AngloZionist Empire” in which I made a list of the similarities between the Soviet Union of the 1980s and Obama’s USA and wrote the following:

What the AngloZionist are openly and publicly defending in the Ukraine is the polar opposite of what they are supposed to stand for. That is an extremely dangerous thing to do for any regime and the AngloZionist Empire is no exception to that rule. Empire often crumble when their own people become disillusioned and disgusted with massive discrepancy between what the ruling elites say and what they do. And as a result, it is not so much that the Empire is faced with formidable enemies as it is the fact that nobody is willing to stand up – nevermind die – in defense of it.

Over two years later, watching the Presidential race between Trump and Hillary I am amazed to see how deep and “in your face” the habit of lying, denying the obvious, deceiving and otherwise misrepresenting has permeated the US political discourse.

First and foremost, there is the absolutely unabashed way the corporate Ziomedia is bashing Trump without even so much as a pretense of objectivity or truthfulness. Of course, I always new that the US propaganda machine was lying and that the media was owned by the US deep state, but at least there was this thin veneer or pseudo-objectivity, of having “both sides” heard. Now this is over. When dealing with Trump, we have Orwell’s “Two Minutes of Hate” but spread over 24/7. Not that Trump does not deserve some of it, he sure does, but compared to how real scumbags like the Clintons are treated, the lynching of Trump is, I believe, unprecedented and unique. Why does it matter? Because now the masks have been taken off, the pretenses removed, and what you see is the true face of the corporate media as it always was: hateful, hypocritical and totally corrupted. And since a truly free and independent media is central to a functioning democracy, then the total corruption of the media in the USA is also the proof that this country does not have a functioning democracy.

Second, there are the completely surreal events happening in Syria: the US betrayal of the agreement signed with Russia, the US threats to attack Syria (in total illegality), the crocodile tears about the humanitarian situation in Aleppo (and the blind eye to Yemen), the mind-blowing hypocrisy of the USA wanting to take the Syrians and the Russians to an international criminal court for war crimes, the now absolutely open support for al-Qaeda (aka al-Nusra, aka Jabhat Fateh al-Sham aka Daesh) and the threats to arm them, the open threats by Admiral Kirby to have Russian aircraft shot down, Russian cities bombed and Russians soldiers come back in body bags – we now see an Administration which has gone completely “mental” over Syria and which does not even know what it is doing. To say that the 1000-4000 US servicemen and contractors currently deployed in Syria are “serving their country” or “defending democracy” or “our way of life” is simply laughable and everybody knows that. But nobody says a word about it. In fact, their presence in Syria is hardly ever mentioned.

This Kafkaesque slouching towards war with Russia is simply never discussed by any pundit or media outlet. It’s like it’s not happening, but of course it is happening, right before our eyes. The Russian officials speak about this every day, so does the Russian media, it is one of the most discussed topics on TV, and yet in the “land of the brave home of the free” this is a kind of Orwellian “untopic” which, by consensus, has no existence, no reality and no relevance: The Neocons’ crazy policies risk turning the USA into a gigantic pile of radioactive ashes, but the topic which preoccupies everybody is Trump’s potty-mouth about women.

I don’t know about you, but I see more nobility in the Titanic’s chamber orchestra playing the waltz “Songe d’Automne” as long as the ship could still float then in the pathetic spectacle which the (equally sinking) AngloZionist Empire offers to us today.

On the external front, the Empire is also doubling down on its lies. Here are a few headlines which were recently seen in 5th columnist newspapers in Russia and their colleagues abroad:

HeadlineReality
“Patriarch Kirill bans abortions in Russia”Patriarch Kirill, along with other religious leaders, signed a statement saying that abortions should not be paid for by the state.
“Russian women will be forced to give birth”
“Employees will be fired for using Whatsapp or similar messaging services”State employee are banned from using messaging services to transmit work-related or classified information.
“Tolstoi and Dostoevsky are now banned from Russian schools”Various officials are discussing in what grade Russian classical authors should be studied.

These are just a few recent examples. Such garbage is published by the pro-western “yellow” press in Russia and by the western corporate media on an almost daily basis.

Of course, the Neocons have always ruled “by way of deception”, as did the Anglo rulers of the British Empire, but in modern Russia they are now hitting a number of obstacles which greatly complicates their work:

  1. Putin has done an excellent job slowly but surely booting out the worst russophobes from the main Russian TV and radio channels. Of course, some are left, very deliberately (I explain the reason for that in detail here) but they surely don’t control the media like they did in the 1990s.
  2. In the age of the Internet, it takes just days to debunk the lies of Uncle Sam, the Neocons or the Russian 5th columnists (for the latest example see here).
  3. Russians remember the 1990s and they follow very closely what is happening across the border in the Nazi occupied Ukraine and they realize that what the Ukraine is undergoing today is what Russia had to suffer in the 1990s and would have to live through again if the pro-western forces ever came back to power. In a way, you could say that the Russians have been “vaccinated” against the AngloZionist propaganda.

I think that while the situation is still much worse in the USA, there are also some very encouraging signs that the lies are beginning to wear off. While there are still millions who believe the Idiot-Box or simply don’t have the energy to think any more, there are also millions who are thoroughly disillusioned, cynical, disgusted and angry at the parasitic elites which rule over them. By and large, the corporate media is deeply distrusted. As for journalists, they are about as respected as lawyers and medical doctors (amazing how these two noble professions got completely discredited by their practitioners in just a few decades!). We can speculate for hours over whether Trump still has a chance to win the next election or not, but I submit that, judging by their panicked actions, the Neocons clearly believe that he might. And that terrifies them. The are clearly afraid that those whom they consider as their dumb serfs might revolt against their rule (as has happened so many times in history).

I know that there are many out there who do not trust Trump. And I agree with them. I don’t trust him either. However, while I do not “trust” Trump, I admit that it is possible that he really might be a President who would put the interests of the American people first, and the interests of the AngloZionist Empire a distant second. The history of empires is full of situations were one part of the ruling class turned against the other one (SA vs SS, Trotskists vs Stalinists, etc.). There is no reason to dismiss a priori the possibility that there is a schism inside the US deep state, that one part wants to save the Empire as the expense of the USA (the Neocons) and another wants to save the USA at the expense of the Empire (the Trump supporters). Again, I did not say that this is likely, only that I admit that this is possible. And if that is really a possibility, could it not also be possible that the American people would deliberately vote against their own mass media and political elites, just like the British people chose the Brexit in total defiance of the official doxa? That all the Trump-bashing actually could help him get elected?

Could it be that after losing Russia to their lies, the Neocons will now lose the United States to their apparently incurable propensity to rule by deception?

For years I used to dismiss the US Presidential elections like a joke, a fraud and an exercise in collective brainwashing. This time around, and for the first time, I think that there is a possibility, however slim, that something of importance might be decided on November 8. The fact that such a possibility even appeared is, by itself, quite remarkable and it is yet another sign of how deep the systemic crisis of the Empire has become. As for the parasites who form the 1% who run this Empire, they are clearly in a panic mode, probably because they are much better informed than most of us of how truly catastrophic the situation really is.

A Hillary victory will not change any of it. It will only make it much, much more dangerous. With Trump, there is at least a possibility of a gradual, more or less organized withdrawal, a drawdown of sorts, a transition of the USA from being a wannabe World Hegemon into a USA as a major, but “normal”, country. Very much like Russia today, I hope.

With Hillary we can be sure the Empire will double down, continue to lie to itself and the rest of the planet, and deny it all, making the end inevitably very violent, possibly catastrophic. I would not put it past the “crazies in the basement” to prefer a nuclear holocaust (their favorite topic!) to a liberation of the USA, and the rest of the planet, from their demonic power. It is therefore our duty to prevent them from succeeding from destroying our planet.

Donate

SouthFront

Do you like this content? Consider helping us!

  • watcher12

    A thoughtful gaze at current political unconsciousness and possibilities.

  • Gue Bjuen

    because they are bullying trump too much it will cause a lot of sympahy votes for trump. yep trump’s wants to make US strong by making decisions benefiting the US and it’s people. but this will hurt the jews. it will delay, pause or even reverse their progress. if trump wants to make the US strong, he has to fight corruption which will be very hard. but whatever he does, at least he will be able to pause or delay the jewtsh madness. even that will be very helpful for hummanity.

    • John Whitehot

      but the problem is that right now it seems unlikely at best that he gets elected.. Of course we still aren’t there and lots of things may happen in the meanwhile.

  • Governor Jesse Ventura was right when he said that American politics are like professional wrestling – the “opponents” are all great friends and the results of the events are all determined ahead of time. All of the drama is just entertainment for the people.
    The US is one of the very few major powers that hasn’t ever had a female head-of-state. We’ve had our token black and now it’s time for our token female. Hillary has paid her dues and shall be the next President.
    The Clintons and the Trumps have been good friends for decades and if Trump can’t stick his foot in his mouth far enough to lose, good old electronic voting shall ensure the correct results without the hassle and potential embarrassment of a recount.

  • Hanna Reitsch

    Goood analysis!

  • Joseph Scott

    The Saker picked on something. In 17th Century Britain, the political elite were divided between two major factions of Freemasons. One based their power around the King, the Royal Court, the higher nobility, the Church of England and royally appointed officials. They controlled the Grand Lodge. They tended towards a public persona that we might call ‘conservative.’ Their use of traditionalism also won them a certain popularity with the very lowest classes, whom, to the everlasting frustration of Socialists and Communists and revolutionaries of every sort, have generally favoured such ideologies. The other side tended towards more ‘modernism.’ They were the greater power in Parliament, more of the gentry than the nobility (though not lacking in royal bloodlines), they more openly pursued business enterprises such as the East India Trading Company, made alliance with bankers and also entered or made use of extremist religious ideologies like Puritanism, and found greater support amongst the middle class. They based themselves around the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, an outgrowth of Knights Templar exiles in Scotland. They have often been most ironically appelled ‘Liberals’ because of their less class-based, less traditionalist, but also more extreme methods

    The conservatives/Royalists had been in control of the nation, but the liberals/Parliamentarians had been growing in power, and at last, they stage their revolution, which we call the English Civil War. Scottish Rite took over the Grand Lodge, Cromwell was made Lord Protector and England’s finances were given over to the control of the Rothschilds under the new Bank of England. The Royalists fled abroad, many to various British colonies, because in most cases, the Royal Governors were in sympathy with them. North America was a particularly popular destination, with plenty of available land on which to set up the agricultural estates the old nobility were familiar with. The victors In London balked at the cost and potential for disaster that engaging in a military pursuit of the opponents into the colonies would entail, and so a de facto truce prevailed. So long as the Governors took an oath of allegiance to the new government, their Royalist sympathies and any Royalist refugees they’d welcomed would be ignored. Instead, Scottish Rite preferred to use espionage through it’s business arms and religious sects to infiltrate the opposition, and maintain a loose control.

    The Socialist/Liberal half of the Masonic elite have always been a dour, boring bunch, and Cromwell’s brand of religious Communism rubbed the common people entirely the wrong way, to the point that the country was on the edge of revolution. In any case, Cromwell’s son didn’t care for his father’s Scottish Rite ideals, his courting of ‘Jewish’ bankers, or the idea of ruling over it all, so he abdicated and invited the Royalists back. However, through the strengthening of the Commons, and the creation of the Bank of England under their ‘Jewish’ masonic allies, Scottish Rite retained a vast degree of control, which they have retained to this day.

    Meanwhile, many of the Royalists didn’t trust this reunion, and remained in the colonies, many nurturing dreams of revenge. Being wealthier, usually better educated, and far better connected than the local elites, they easily took over the political structures, and in America, many began slowly working toward creating an independent power base with which they could break free of London, which in spite of the Glorious Revolution many regarded as still being in the grip of their foe. In time, they managed to create the conditions which led to the American Revolution. However, they have never been as good at espionage as their Scottish Rite rivals, and even their revolution had been thoroughly infiltrated. In fact, Scottish Rite has always had a certain fondness for having revolutions. The letters of Thomas Jefferson, for example, reveal a correspondence
    with London that indicated that he was there as their agent, to make
    sure the revolution went according to their plan. And so, the United States of America was founded as a Masonic nation by these two competing Masonic factions.

    The conservatives have always been more prone to identify with the nation they lived in, as befits their stronger roots in the old nobility, more closely tied to the land and the common people. They have never hesitated to exploit their people (it is their Divine Right, after all!), yet they retain a possessiveness, an aristocratic fondness for them that their more corporate, middle class, cosmopolitan rivals have never had.

    And here you see the division between the factions that the Saker identifies. Both want Empire, to be sure. But the one would not sacrifice their home, their base of power, their demense, in order to retain it. In their view of things, it is through this base that they attain Empire, and thus through it they will regain Empire if, for the time being, they lose grip of it. To the Scottish Rite Neo-Liberal, on the other hand, all of it is just liquid assets, playing pieces, to be traded away or spent or exchanged as the game demands. Empire is the prize. They can always buy or infiltrate another country.