0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
100 $

Angela Merkel’s Pragmatism Bridged The Divide Between East And West

Support SouthFront

Angela Merkel’s Pragmatism Bridged The Divide Between East And West

Illustrative Image

Her ‘careful’ approach was criticised by many, but in the international arena it meant successful relations with China and Russia…

Written by Johanna Ross, journalist based in Edinburgh, Scotland.

Few, if any, world leaders will have a verb in their language named after them. Angela Merkel is an exception to this. ‘Merkeln’ in German youth vernacular, coined around a decade ago, means, according to the German dictionary publisher Langenscheidt,”to do nothing, make no decisions, issue no statements.”

Merkel’s reticence when it came to decision-making came to be a feature of her 16-year rule. For this she received criticism from many quarters, with journalists now assessing her legacy as one which although stable, was devoid of any really groundbreaking developments.

On a positive note, Merkel effectively steered Germany through various crises: the financial crash of 2008 and the economic problems which ensued; the exodus of refugees fleeing war-torn Syria in 2015 and the recent Covid pandemic. But the country is still lagging behind when it comes to technological innovation and digitalisation, with Merkel famously referring to the internet once as ‘uncharted territory’, for which she was ridiculed.

The reality is that Germany in the 21st century isn’t quite up to speed in the information age, with schools crying out for modern computers and health authorities still relying on fax machines instead of email. Unlike neighbouring European countries many council services are still not available online. In fact, an EU report this year ranked Germany 21st out of the bloc’s 27 member countries (plus the UK) for offering web online services to its citizens. The problem was highlighted during the Covid pandemic, as many schools were simply not set up for remote learning.

While Merkel’s careful approach may have generated criticism domestically, it proved to be a winning strategy in the field of geopolitics. The ultimate pragmatist, she was an expert at the art of diplomacy and had an irrefutable talent for maintaining productive working relationships with her global partners. This has been particularly evident in her ability to manage relations with both East and West; with the US but also with China and Russia. She visited China no less than 12 times during her tenure, more than any other European leader, and placed great importance on Sino-German relations, no doubt because of the interest German car manufacturers had in the Chinese market, which makes up around 38% of their global sales.

This pragmatism ensured that Germany was a country one could do business with; enabling Merkel to pursue her Nord Stream 2 project with Russia to bring gas straight to Germany (in fact to her home constituency).  Despite considerable pressure from the United States to drop the scheme right up until its completion last month, Merkel was resolute in her determination that the pipeline should be built. In fact, throughout the highs and lows of the West’s relationship with Russia, Germany, unlike many of her western allies, kept diplomatic channels open, ensuring that dialogue would continue to take place. She always had a good working relationship with Vladimir Putin, with the two having more in common than other world leaders, both speaking German and having lived in East Germany.

Merkel and Putin, despite their differences on some issues, have a similar approach to international relations in that they are realists, and are principally concerned with the national interest. As Niall Ferguson, a historian from Stanford University has commented ‘Angela Merkel more than most western leaders was impressed by Putin, and accepted the logic of Putin’s argument that he was a source of energy that Europe could not do without.’

This refusal to take a harder line on Russia was of course, condemned by the US, but Merkel was not one to be pushed around, particularly after the phone-tapping scandal of 2013 which greatly undermined her trust in the US leadership. When it turned out that the NSA, under Barack Obama’s watch, had been monitoring Merkel’s mobile phone, it was clear that the Chancellor was not amused, stating that spying on one’s friends was ‘unacceptable’. Although she kept emotions out of politics, she was undoubtedly perturbed by the incident, and pursued a UN general assembly resolution calling for the right to privacy on the internet together with the then Brazilian leader Dilma Rouseff, whose country had also been targeted by the NSA.

With all these leadership skills of crisis management and diplomacy at her disposal, Merkel leaves behind her a large void to be filled. Whatever awaits Germany will likely be a period less stable than before, and less certain, with the new coalition government. We are entering a period of deeper divisions between East and West; will ‘Merkel’s successor’ be able to bridge that divide as she did? Or will he join western allies in pursuing a harder line towards China and Russia.  One thing is for sure: Germany’s energy future is much more secure now with the Nord Stream 2 project, something that Germans only have Merkel to thank.

You can follow the author on Twitter.


Support SouthFront


Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I‘ve seen 16 years of Merkel and this article is utterly grotesque horse shit. The only thing Merkel bridged was the Atlantic to lick some US boots. I‘ve they hadn‘t rigged the election, her party wd be at 10%… . There is a reason why she didn‘t show up at rallies. At her „farewell“ she was boo‘ed and loudly called „bunch of liers“. If by „East“ you mean Russia… that‘s also nonsense. We could have much better relations. Ah, and she help sell out to China… great! What rubbish.


She does. It’s her kink. https://youtu.be/sO8zw9Nf89E

Germany’s been kept under the judeo-Allied heel of east-west divide for 76 years. Never has it been allowed to return to its own course of action.

The purpose of NATO was perfectly summed up by General Hastings Ismay who stated the organization’s goal was “to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down”.

Then again, Sino-Russian Eurasianism is no better than Atlanticism. Europe must chart its own course independent of outside interference.

The post-war order must be dismantled.

Last edited 1 year ago by Marco

Enough flattery, and false respect. merkel is a satanist idiot, enough fake respect and pride.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x