Analysis: Chengdu J-20, The Chinese Raptor?

Donate

Nate “Buster” Jaros says China will have a fifth generation fighter, and its development of the J-20 (amongst other fifth gen platforms) is significant.

Analysis: Chengdu J-20, The Chinese Raptor?

Chengdu J-20

Originally appeared at Fightersweep

If you haven’t been paying much attention to the jet fighter news lately, you may have missed something big. In fact, it doesn’t get a lot of press and over the past couple of years this new emerging threat really hasn’t been on anyone’s, ahem…radar, much at all.

We’re talking about the Chinese Chengdu J-20. What some are calling “the Chinese F-22 Raptor.” Also known in some circles as the “Black Eagle.”

The J-20 is still shrouded in secrecy, and the political closed doors of modern China are not saying much either. I don’t blame them. They are catching up in technology, and in this case fighter technology, and are committed to not being left behind. China will have a fifth generation fighter, and its development of the J-20 (amongst other fifth gen platforms) is significant.

Let’s take a closer look at the J-20, based on what little information is out there today.

At first glance the J-20 looks kind of like an F-22 Raptor. Why wouldn’t it? The Chinese have beencopying Russian and American technology for decades. In some cases they have even improved on the designs. In the case of the J-20, you may have forgotten that a few years ago, terabytes of classified US documents were lost or stolen by the Chinese. These documents were essentially the “blueprints” for the F-35, and U.S. stealth technology. From that breach, it is surmised that China has been able to piece together the basic tenets of stealth technology and apply them to its modern aircraft designs.

Basics

What we currently know about the J-20 is that it is a single seat, twin engine, canard/delta design, stealthy fighter platform. There are just four copies being tested right now, with fully operational fighters predicted to be ready by 2018.

The Black Eagle has two Saturn AL-31 engines producing about 30,000 lbs of thrust each. With the possibility of more powerful Xian WS-15 engines currently in development, those are speculated to produce 44,000 lbs of thrust each. For reference, the F-22 has roughly 35,000 lbs of thrust per engine.

The Black Eagle is big. It weighs an estimated 43,000 lbs empty / 80,000 lbs MTOW (Max Takeoff Weight). The Raptor weighs in at 43,000 lbs empty / 83,000 lbs MTOW. Personally, I believe that the J-20 will be a bit heavier than this, just based on size alone. These internet procured weight estimates seem a bit light to my best guesses. Here’s why.

Here’s why.

Analysis: Chengdu J-20, The Chinese Raptor?

Another interesting fighter size comparison chart. Credit: img.gawkerassets.com

Recall that the Chinese Chengdu J-10, which looks very much like a Eurofighter Typhoon, is actually more comparable in all aspects to the F-16 Viper. The J-10 is within inches of the F-16’s dimensions, yet the J-10 weighs over 3,000 lbs more when empty. The old Russian SU-24 Fencer was almost identical to the F-111 ‘Vark, yet it weighed nearly double the average ‘Vark’s weight. Despite their best efforts, foreign airplane makers just don’t focus on weight savings as much as US manufacturers do.

The J-20 is 67 feet long and has a 44 wingspan. The Raptor, is 62 feet long and sports an identical 44 foot wingspan. Based on size alone, there is no way a J-20 weighs the same as an F-22. The weight estimates above must be light.

Consider that, plus historical facts and now add an additional five feet of airplane in the J-20 Black Eagle over a Raptor, and you’ve got one large turkey. Remember that for later.

Analysis: Chengdu J-20, The Chinese Raptor?

J-20 and F-22 length comparison. Credit: pprune.org

It is predicted that the J-20 will carry four to six long range missiles and possibly two short range heat-seeking missiles as well, all inside internal bays. Very ‘Raptor-like.’ The F-22 carries six long range missiles and two heat-seeking missiles, and air-to-ground options too. The Raptor also has a gun, the J-20 does not…we think.

Analysis: Chengdu J-20, The Chinese Raptor?

The J-20 shows off it’s weapons bay. Credit: Sinodefense.com

Additionally, the Raptor carries 18,000 lbs of fuel (internal). The J-20 is touted as being able to carry 25,000 lbs of fuel internally, and that’s a lot of dinosaurs. Remember the size differences we talked about? You’ve got to be able to put that fuel somewhere on board.

Stealth

The J-20 is a LO (Low Observable) design. Using outside assessments and making a few of my own predictions from what little is out there on the J-20, most agree that the J-20 is “medium” stealthy in the mid to higher frequencies (acquisition and fire control radars mostly) and from front aspects only.

Most of an object’s “stealthy-ness” comes from shaping alone. No amount of RAM (Radar Absorbent Material) can undo a poorly shaped object, it must be designed and built from the ground up with stealth in mind. RAM comes later when designers want to clean up hot spots around various nacelles, apertures, and openings on the aircraft.

Analysis: Chengdu J-20, The Chinese Raptor?

Chinese J-20. Note the Raptor like appearance and intake designs. Credit: thaimilitaryandasianregion.com

From what I can see (and read) the J-20 is shaped about as well as can be expected for a fighter aircraft (go figure, it looks like a Raptor, which was heavily tested and tweaked for LO considerations). Front hemisphere designs appear to be in accordance with standard radar laws, with parallel lines, and minimum rough or flat edges. The J-20 uses angled chines along the sides of the aircraft (like the F-22), and a hidden engine intake design both to help lower side-section and front aspect RCS (Radar Cross Section).

Of course, a close-up examination of the J-20 will decide if the Chinese LO craftsmanship is up to par with Western standards. However, no one has been permitted to get up close to one yet. Simple things like blemishes, roughly fit skin panels, screw heads, and the like will destroy the stealth capabilities of any well-shaped stealthy design.

Visually, the J-20 does have some stealth faux pas. The tail section and engine nozzles appear to have little to no LO treatments or shaping. From a tail aspect, it almost appears that the Chinese have just given up on stealth altogether. Keep that in mind for later in our analysis too.

Analysis: Chengdu J-20, The Chinese Raptor?

The J-20. Note the tail section and engine nozzles. Credit: Chinesemilitaryreview.blogspot.com

Mission

The Chinese are rapidly working toward a future A2/AD (Anti Access / Aerial Denial) concept of force. A2/AD is the future of defensive systems and includes fourth and fifth generation fixed-wing, as well as a Cyber network, and a robust IADS (Integrated Air Defense System). The Chinese currently have all but one part of their A2/AD protective net built…that missing puzzle piece is (you guessed it) a stealthy frontline fighter.

That’s about to change.

Some researchers speculate that the J-20 will have similar performance and agility as a Raptor, some think it will be a fighter/bomber only. I believe it will be more of a “night one” strike asset, with the ability to quickly penetrate enemy defenses, deliver weapons, and safely retreat. It’s not going to be an overly capable dogfighter.

Why do I think this?

From the J-20’s size to wing area alone, one can see that it simply will not be a highly maneuverable fighter. Especially with the weaker Saturn engines. Now add in the weight she will have. Sure, it will be fast, and stealthy by some measure, but looking at the design and numbers we have on the J-20, I just don’t see it performing like a Raptor on most fronts.

Remember those figures from above that I asked you to remember? The J-20 is a large and heavy bird, with primarily front hemisphere LO, can possibly carry a lot of fuel, and it has smallish wings and lower thrust as compared to similar “fighters.”

Based on that, what would you have it do?

Analysis: Chengdu J-20, The Chinese Raptor?

Chinese J-20 in full burner. Note lack of LO treatments and designs around engine and tail. Credit: Chinesemilitaryreview.blogspot.com

The Black Eagle will certainly be the sharpest and most agile sword in the Chinese inventory, and it will be able to sneak in and deliver some crippling blows to any nearby adversary. Something to keep you up at night if you’re parking C2ISR (Command/Control Intelligence Surveillance Reconnaissance) or Carrier Groups somewhere offshore. Armed with capable air-to-air missiles, and pilots trained in LO tactics, it’s enough the outclass any US fourth generation fighter while BVR (Beyond Visual Range) or provide highly capable strike and standoff to China’s leaders.

We don’t know much about the J-20 Black Eagle yet, but as more are built and tested details will emerge. We have yet to see if the larger WS-15 engines will be fitted, and personally, I’m interested in seeing what kind of LO capabilities the Chinese will be able to incorporate into this large beast. Don’t forget those canards! Traditional canard-carrying aircraft are quite ‘dirty’ and easily spotted on radar.

Modern effective LO is much more than just shaping and angular panels. Time will tell if the Chinese can figure that out as well. I’m also watching for some flight test numbers. Speed, altitudes, and maneuverability (don’t forget those canards here too) might be abysmal, but it could also be off the charts.

Either way you look at it, the Chinese are not far behind us in 5th generation fighter technology. The technology gap continues to narrow.

Top Photo credit: chinesemilitaryreview.blogspot.com

Donate

SouthFront

Do you like this content? Consider helping us!

  • chris chuba

    I am making a guess that the Chinese developed this to be a naval fighter, optimized for deep penetration over the ocean to fire long range air to air or air to ship missiles. They probably have different long term plans for battles over land.

    On a different subject, I don’t understand why the F35 opted for the one big engine when everyone else uses two smaller engines. It is not more efficient, it does not increase the range and it increases the F35’s heat signature and gives the pilot less redundancy.

    • Brad Isherwood

      J 20 is to big for carrier/future carrier….( folding wings? )
      As a A2/AD it may be large to house fuel vs external for operations.
      If having air to air refuel….could also operate like Mig 3I E as an area AWACs
      with other combat aircraft.

      J 20 is reasonably learning curve for China. ..
      Their gesture is A2/AD to US…Japan and South Korea.
      If J 20 fails this…they probably limit production.

    • John Whitehot

      don’t forget that strike fighters today are always two engined, for survivability reasons. the F-35 manufacturers bet everything on lo-obs, which is a kind of presumptuous gamble. The absymal internal load of the F-35 is basically asking to employ double the number of F-18s to perform the same mission (or thriple if the F-15E is considered). That translates in the need of buying more and more planes which are admittedly an economical nightmare that could eat up the budget of entire countries (Italy for example has had a skyrocketing in its national debt since the F-35 order – they say it’s not related, but I doubt it).

  • Gary Sellars

    The J-20 looks to be a specialist naval strike platform, designed to penetrate enemy defenses with frontal aspect LO/VLO stealth and launching stand-off AShMs to kill carriers and their AEGIS escorts. It looks to be a part of Chinas planned A2/AD capability to ‘encourage” the USN to keep away and not challenge Chinese primacy in their own backyard.

    • chris chuba

      That is what I meant by ‘naval fighter’ in my previous post. I was thinking an aircraft designed to strike targets deep in the South China Sea from land bases, not aircraft carriers. It has the potential to be very effective. It probably has a very extended range with its larger size.

      It approaches its target stealthily, fires its missiles and then bugs out. It has the potential to be very effective, especially as Chinese missile technology improves.

      • Brad Isherwood

        A2/AD requires several interfaces.
        Real-time with C4I and AWACs director.
        Mig 31 E shows Russia has gamed this to maintain numeric vs attrition loss
        In Theatre Combat.
        China must move beyond just sending out taskers.
        She must be real time flexible as South Korea and Japan have numeric
        Which cannot be allowed to deep strike and tanker home.

        If I were China….Put in the monster search radar and C4I like Mig 31 E
        China has excellent super computing….they could build a smaller radar package to be
        Housed in J 20.
        If an airframe can be adaptive. …it can do numerous Tasker
        Like the old Su 24m with SVP 24 Targeting and standoff Anti ship missiles.

        USN will be going to the bottom…+ Japan. ..+ South Korea.

  • Melissa N Anthony Lloyd

    Reminds me of the one from the film firefox with clint eastwood

  • JPH

    The length comparison of the J20 and F22 is still even somewhat misleading. Compare the difference in length between intake and exhaust. The exhaust of the F22 ends well short of the tail end and that of the J20 actually extends well beyond the tail end. So the fuselage length of the J20 from intake till exhaust is some 50% longer than that of the F22.

  • Top secret clearence

    I think the J-20 and other weapons of war are for sale.(Pakistan,Iran,Saudi Arabia,North Korea) 128 PLZ-45 (155mm self propelled artillery vehicles) were sold to Saudi Arabia and Kuwait over the objection of the US for 7.4 million dollars each.125 J-10B was sold to Iran.On September 18,2015 a stealth airplane flew at mach 6,speed and landed.