0 $
2,350 $
4,700 $
1,222 $

America’s Jews Are Driving America’s Wars


Shouldn’t they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?

America's Jews Are Driving America's Wars

Written by Philip Giraldi; Originally appeared at The Unz Review

I spoke recently at a conference on America’s war party where afterwards an elderly gentleman came up to me and asked, “Why doesn’t anyone ever speak honestly about the six-hundred-pound gorilla in the room? Nobody has mentioned Israel in this conference and we all know it’s American Jews with all their money and power who are supporting every war in the Middle East for Netanyahu? Shouldn’t we start calling them out and not letting them get away with it?”

It was a question combined with a comment that I have heard many times before and my answer is always the same: any organization that aspires to be heard on foreign policy knows that to touch the live wire of Israel and American Jews guarantees a quick trip to obscurity. Jewish groups and deep pocket individual donors not only control the politicians, they own and run the media and entertainment industries, meaning that no one will hear about or from the offending party ever again. They are particularly sensitive on the issue of so-called “dual loyalty,” particularly as the expression itself is a bit of a sham since it is pretty clear that some of them only have real loyalty to Israel.

Most recently, some pundits, including myself, have been warning of an impending war with Iran. To be sure, the urging to strike Iran comes from many quarters, to include generals in the Administration who always think first in terms of settling problems through force, from a Saudi government obsessed with fear over Iranian hegemony, and, of course, from Israel itself. But what makes the war engine run is provided by American Jews who have taken upon themselves the onerous task of starting a war with a country that does not conceivably threaten the United States. They have been very successful at faking the Iranian threat, so much so that nearly all Republican and most Democratic congressmen as well as much of the media seem to be convinced that Iran needs to be dealt with firmly, most definitely by using the U.S. military, and the sooner the better.

And while they are doing it, the issue that nearly all the Iran haters are Jewish has somehow fallen out of sight, as if it does not matter. But it should matter. A recent article in the New Yorker on stopping the impending war with Iran strangely suggests that the current generation “Iran hawks” might be a force of moderation regarding policy options given the lessons learned from Iraq. The article cites as hardliners on Iran David Frum, Max Boot, Bill Kristol and Bret Stephens.

Daniel Larison over at The American Conservative has a good review of the New Yorker piece entitled “Yes, Iran Hawks Want Conflict with Iran,” which identifies the four above cited hawks by name before describing them as “…a Who’s Who of consistently lousy foreign policy thinking. If they have been right about any major foreign policy issue in the last twenty years, it would be news to the entire world. Every single one of them hates the nuclear deal with Iran with a passion, and they have argued in favor of military action against Iran at one point or another. There is zero evidence that any of them would oppose attacking Iran.”

And I would add a few more names, Mark Dubowitz, Michael Ledeen and Reuel Marc Gerecht of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies; Daniel Pipes of the Middle East Forum; John Podhoretz of Commentary magazine; Elliot Abrams of the Council on Foreign Relations; Meyrav Wurmser of the Middle East Media Research Institute; Kimberly Kagan of the Institute for the Study of War; and Frederick Kagan, Danielle Pletka and David Wurmser of the American Enterprise Institute. And you can also throw into the hopper entire organizations like The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) and the Hudson Institute. And yep, they’re all Jewish, plus most of them would self-describe as neo-conservatives. And I might add that only one of the named individuals has ever served in any branch of the American military – David Wurmser was once in the Navy reserve. These individuals largely constitute a cabal of sanctimonious chairborne warriors who prefer to do the heavy thinking while they let others do the fighting and dying.

So it is safe to say that much of the agitation to do something about Iran comes from Israel and from American Jews. Indeed, I would opine that most of the fury from Congress re Iran comes from the same source, with AIPAC showering our Solons on the Potomac with “fact sheets” explaining how Iran is worthy of annihilation because it has pledged to “destroy Israel,” which is both a lie and an impossibility as Tehran does not have the resources to carry out such a task. The AIPAC lies are then picked up and replayed by an obliging media, where nearly every “expert” who speaks about the Middle East on television and radio or who is interviewed for newspaper stories is Jewish.

One might also add that neocons as a group were founded by Jews and are largely Jewish, hence their universal attachment to the state of Israel. They first rose into prominence when they obtained a number of national security positions during the Reagan Administration and their ascendancy was completed when they staffed senior positions in the Pentagon and White House under George W. Bush. Recall for a moment Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, and Scooter Libby. Yes, all Jewish and all conduits for the false information that led to a war that has spread and effectively destroyed much of the Middle East. Except for Israel, of course. Philip Zelikow, also Jewish, in a moment of candor, admitted that the Iraq War, in his opinion, was fought for Israel.

Add to the folly a Jewish U.S. Ambassador to Israel who identifies with the most right-wing Israeli settler elements, a White House appointed chief negotiator who is Jewish and a Jewish son-in-law who is also involved in formulating Middle East policy. Is anyone providing an alternative viewpoint to eternal and uncritical support for Benjamin Netanyahu and his kleptocratic regime of racist thugs? I think not.

There are a couple of simple fixes for the dominant involvement of American Jews in foreign policy issues where they have a personal interest due to their ethnicity or family ties. First of all, don’t put them into national security positions involving the Middle East, where they will potentially be conflicted. Let them worry instead about North Korea, which does not have a Jewish minority and which was not involved in the holocaust. This type of solution was, in fact, somewhat of a policy regarding the U.S. Ambassador position in Israel. No Jew was appointed to avoid any conflict of interest prior to 1995, an understanding that was violated by Bill Clinton (wouldn’t you know it!) who named Martin Indyk to the post. Indyk was not even an American citizen at the time and had to be naturalized quickly prior to being approved by congress.

Those American Jews who are strongly attached to Israel and somehow find themselves in senior policy making positions involving the Middle East and who actually possess any integrity on the issue should recuse themselves, just as any judge would do if he were presiding over a case in which he had a personal interest. Any American should be free to exercise first amendment rights to debate possible options regarding policy, up to and including embracing positions that damage the United States and benefit a foreign nation. But if he or she is in a position to actually create those policies, he or she should butt out and leave the policy generation to those who have no personal baggage.

For those American Jews who lack any shred of integrity, the media should be required to label them at the bottom of the television screen whenever they pop up, e.g. Bill Kristol is “Jewish and an outspoken supporter of the state of Israel.” That would be kind-of-like a warning label on a bottle of rat poison – translating roughly as “ingest even the tiniest little dosage of the nonsense spewed by Bill Kristol at your own peril.”

As none of the above is likely to happen, the only alternative is for American citizens who are tired of having their country’s national security interests hijacked by a group that is in thrall to a foreign government to become more assertive about what is happening. Shine a little light into the darkness and recognize who is being diddled and by whom. Call it like it is. And if someone’s feelings are hurt, too bad. We don’t need a war with Iran because Israel wants one and some rich and powerful American Jews are happy to deliver. Seriously, we don’t need it.

UPDATE: On the morning of September 21st Phil Giraldi was fired over the phone by The American Conservative, where he had been a regular contributor for fourteen years. He was told that “America’s Jews Are Driving America’s Wars” was unacceptable. The TACmanagement and board appear to have forgotten that the magazine was launched with an article by founder Pat Buchanan entitled“Whose War?” which largely made the same claims that Giraldi made about the Jewish push for another war, in that case with Iraq. Buchanan was vilified and denounced as an anti-Semite by many of the same people who are now similarly attacking Giraldi.



Do you like this content? Consider helping us!

  • Michael Qiao

    It’s not just American Jews, it’s Jews globally. Hitler fought against them

    • Daniel Castro

      He fought the wrong way, you can’t start a pretense war for justice claiming your race is superior and should be above all others.

      If you want to fight the jews you shouldn’t act as them.

      • Michael Qiao
        • Solomon Krupacek

          you are also forwarded to europol

          • Axis of Resistance

            You are forwarded into an oven

          • Garga

            Are you serious about ratting him out?

          • Serious Dude

            You can see all these comments full of anti-Jewish hatred. Then tell me that anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism version 2.0.

          • AlexanderAmproz

            These Zionists enlightened the dynamite wick !

            When the all times great Scientist Antoine Lavoisier
            was death sentenced, the Court said “The Revolution didn’t need Scientists !

            While he was doing research in chemistry, Lavoisier was also working at the government. During this time, the French Revolution began in 1789. Antoine kept his position in the government. But, two years later, a new government arrived in power. This new government was suspicious of Lavoisier’s great success as a scientific researcher and as a public administrator. He was accused of selling modified tobacco. He was arrested for conspiracy against the people. Even though there was no proof that showed that Antoine de Lavoisier broke the law, he was sentenced to death on May 8th 1794.[6] He was executed using the guillotine.

          • Serious Dude

            This is totally irrelevant!

          • DJ Double D

            This is a discussion forum.

          • Serious Dude

            Yeah but no one cares about 18th century France.

          • goingbrokes

            Lavoisier was not executed because he was a scientist, but because he was one of the Fermee Generale, or a salt farmer, to put it in English. It was a particularly hated part of the Royal tax system, where ordinary people were by law forced to buy a fixed amount of salt every year at exorbitant rates. So the “salt farmers” were especially hated by the people. That’s why the “conspiracy against the people”. The Court statement was probably in response to his defence of performing valuable scientific work. It did not save him.
            For instance, would you save a Stasi spy who has helped to execute dozens of people, just because he performs some scientific work? It’s a tough one with no easy answer.

          • AlexanderAmproz

            Mostly, when its a “Revolution” none “details”
            would be prevalents, genius or not, guilty or not !
            Revolutions are Ogres needing blood.
            Don’t be at the wrong place at the wrong time
            It was the said the “Terror-Times”,
            at the origin of the today Terrorism word !

            Jews were awful contemptuous racist abusers
            in Germany, it enlightened rage against them !

            In the today Philippines, Chinese’s minority are
            US NeoColonialism “Collaborators” with similar
            racist behaviors the Jews had.
            The majority dream to kill all of them !

            Suni-Christian minority in Irak,
            Christian in Egypt, Chinese in Vietnam,
            Tamils in Sri-Lanka, Hutus in Rwanda, etc
            The Colonial Divide to rule are ending-up
            into Genocide.
            The Middle East Zionism is condemned
            to end-up with a great disaster

          • Garga

            It’s not.

          • Serious Dude

            Yes it is.

          • Garga

            You asked me to tell you if it is or not, I said it’s not. You don’t like my answer?
            For someone who considers Bibi a brave and strong man, anything is possible.

            It is called “Newspeak”.

          • Serious Dude

            Anti-Zionism is a code word for anti-Jewish hatred. Anti-Peshmerga is a code word for anti-Kurdish hatred. Look at the above comments to confirm it.

          • Garga

            It doesn’t matter how you twist the words, it is not.
            Tell that to the Jews who oppose the Zionist plans.

            Tell that to the Kurds who don’t support the actions of KRG.

            Now comes the response that they’re self-hating Jews and self-hating Kurds.

          • Serious Dude

            Zionist and KRG plans are nothing compared to Wahhabism and Khomeinism. Now you are going to say that Jews are behind Wahhabis.

          • Garga

            Define Khomeinism.

          • Serious Dude

            The ideology of Ayatollah Khomeini.

          • Garga

            Aren’t you clever?

            Define it.

          • Serious Dude

            The hundreds of thousands of prisoners in Iran will define it.

          • Garga

            In other words, you have no idea what you’re talking about.

            If the number of prisoners is any indication, the US must be centuries ahead of Iran. Because the number of US prisoners in terms of absolute number and their ratio to the country’s total population is mush much more than Iran.
            By the way, nice try to pretending all Iran’s prisoners (crimes, drugs, financial, terrorism) are the result of this “Khomeinism”.

            Now please stop playing around and tell me what is this “Khomeinism”.
            Or alternatively, kindly admit you don’t know because you made it up.

          • Serious Dude

            I mean the political prisoners, not the criminals. And I haven’t said that I support the system of the US. Since you support Khomeini, you cannot blame Zionism. It is an irony.

          • Garga

            So, there are “hundreds of thousands” of political prisoners in Iran, all related to and experts in this “Khomeinism”. Good to know.

            I didn’t talk about Ayatollah Khomeini. Yet again, you are resorting to the infamous “Strawman argument”.

            Stop playing around and define “Khomeinism”.

          • Serious Dude

            You are playing around and refuse to see the truth. Iranian regime and its atrocities are acknowledged by the whole globe. On the other hand, what about Zionism? Some houses? Hm!

          • Garga

            Don’t try to change the subject.

            Define “Khomeinism”.

          • Serious Dude

            The ideology of the brutal regime of Khomeini.

          • Garga

            You are clever, after all. You said the same thing before, using other words. That, is not a definition, it’s a weak attempt to escape defining it.

            What is Khomeinism?

          • Serious Dude

            The ideology of the brutal regime of Khomeini. Hatred of US, hatred of Israel, jailing of Shahist opponents, creating wars to bring the “Mahdi”, brutal death penalties… Happy now?

          • Garga

            That’s interesting. More empty words to prove another one. So if some entity doesn’t like the US, Israel or have death penalty, they are “Khomeinists”, huh? I’m not going to start a bigger debate trying to prove you wrong, just this one should be more than enough:

            Which wars did Ayatollah Khomeini (or “Khomeinists” as you put it) create to bring the Mahdi? Name ONE.

          • Serious Dude

            Don’t circle around the subject and say this has nothing to do with Iranian regime. What wars did Ayatollah created? Or maybe what wars would Khomeini create if he had much more power? (Syrian Civil war and the 10 year war with Iraq are just the minimum)

          • Garga

            You really don’t know the first thing about the matters you talk about. FYI:
            – Iran went to help Syria after (2013) the war broke out (2011), not before that, so Iran cannot possibly start a war the mercenary terrorists started.
            – Iraq attacked Iran, not the other way around. The UN recognized Iraq as the aggressor and even Iraqi government apologized to Iran because of that in 2005.
            Are you going to prosecute all people based on “what they can do” not “what they do” or you’re like that just for the ones you don’t like?

            So, again, you have no idea what you’re talking about. I suggest more reading. Much, much more reading.

          • Serious Dude

            Iran has been friends with Hamas which supported FSA and MB in Egypt. Al-Qaeda supported Hezbollah in the 2006 war. So this thing about mercenary terrorists is invalid. It is true that Iraq attacked Iran, and Iraq had the same ideology with Assad. The problem with many Iranian government supporters is that they always talk about how evil Israel, Saudi Arabia (I agree with them on that one), US and now Kurdistan are without seeing their mismanagements. Not to mention that Palestinian Arabs live like aristocrats compared to Ahwazi Arabs but if I show you proof you will tell me that you don’t watch cartoons.

          • Garga

            Have you EVER showed me proof? You post animations for crying outloud!

            You never take a peek at what I send you and most ironically, you even don’t watch the videos you post before sending them.

            I don’t like to use this kind of literature but you, are lying. Again and again and have no shame when you are showed your words are lies. You just claim something else, equally false. It doesn’t matter how many times, it’s repeating in almost every comment.
            You accused Iran of starting the 1980-88 war, you accuse Iran of starting the Syrian war, you say Iran has hundreds of thousands of political prisoners. All as proofs of brutality of “Khomeinism”, a made-up word. Now you claim Iranian Arabs live worse than Palestinians, with no proof. What a shocker!

            I am a supporter of my country, including it’s government which I elected. The mis-managements in my country is none of your business as a foreigner, as I don’t talk about your country’s “mismanagements”.

            I am tired of this behaviour, of your fallacies, of you strawman arguments. There’s no point in this. If you insist on continuing like that, I’ll ignore you.

          • Serious Dude

            Animations? Search on youtube about Ahwazi Arabs and their conditions of living. You still don’t watch cartoons? Those cartoon that I have sent you are from PragerU and they are informative. I haven’t accused Iran of starting a war with Iraq but I said that your government is not more peaceful than Zionists or Peshmerga. Iran didn’t start the Syrian war but it helped to crush the opposition and to put oil to the fire. The political prisoners have been many but you don’t seem to care. This is called relativism. Of course I don’t care about mismanagements but don’t blame others. I won’t continue like that, but relativism and double standards get on my nerves.

          • Garga

            The least you can do when claim something is to accompany it with something to back it, to prove you say the truth. Something which is not the OPINION of somebody else, which is not a cartoon, which is not an unrelated video, something which you watched or read it beforehand and know it’s content.
            So far I haven’t received anything like that from you. Many times you expect me to accept it because “you read it somewhere but can’t find it now” or plain refer me to search myself for something you claim. just like now.

            FYI, Iran’s government is among the most peaceful governments in the world. It never started a war, never attacked anybody, never sanctioned any other country and never downed anybody’s passenger craft. It doesn’t destroy people’s houses, doesn’t shoot teenagers and doesn’t spray residential areas by skunk water. It doesn’t steal anybody’s heritage, doesn’t ethnically cleanse any area and doesn’t land grab. Don’t ever compare it to a mad dog like Israel (Mad dog is not my analogy, it’s a prominent Zionist’s).

            Do you call ISIS, HTS, FSA, AQ as “the opposition” in Syria? Good to know.

            You don’t know if I care about the so called political prisoners in my country, as I never showed you because it’s not your business. You’re happy to talk about another country’s problem and forget about your own and the mess it’s in. You know nothing about Iran. You want to embarrass yourself, be my guest but do it somewhere else if you’re going to do it the usual way, by rumors and without any kind of document.

            From this point forward, if you are going to reply to me and say something, you better have it’s proof ready at hand.

          • Serious Dude

            Some of it is opinion but some of it is a fact. Is Israel the most free country in the ME? Yes. Do Kurds have the right to create their own state? Yes. Do Arab countries score low on indexes about human freedoms? Yes. Are Muslim countries hated not only by Christians and Jews but by Hindus and Buddhists? Yes. Iranian government is much more moderate now that it was in the past and are making good moves to get along with others. That’s a good thing. The bad thing is that Israel, US, Saudi Arabia and Kurdistan is always blamed if Iran does something wrong. ISIS is not opposition. FSA is opposition and HTS is radical opposition. Most opposition that have been democratic has been crushed by ISIS and HTS and some of it joined SDF. I don’t know about Shiite ideology, maybe it is far better from Wahhabism, but Israel and Kurdistan have the right to exist. US is a democratic state that it is plundered by several lobbies and Saudi Arabia is a country that is brutal and barbaric and needs to end. Shammar tribe, a tribe that wants the end of Saudi rule, is aligned with SDF. Are they also US-Israel-Saudi proxies?

          • Garga

            As long as you don’t back it by something, it doesn’t worth anything.
            All you wrote are called “assumptions”.

            Is Israel really a free country? Go ask Israeli Arabs, Christians, Ethiopian Jews and Oriental Jews.
            Do Kurds have a right to their own country? Yes they do, on their OWN lands.

            “Are Muslim countries hated not only by Christians and Jews but by Hindus and Buddhists?” I’m going to hold you for the proof for that one.

            “Israel, US, Saudi Arabia and Kurdistan is always blamed if Iran does something wrong” This one too, requires proof from you. Show me ONE example for each country or region.

            There’s something seriously wrong with you. A few comments ago you accused Iran for crushing the opposition, now you say “Most opposition that have been democratic has been crushed by ISIS and HTS and some of it joined SDF”. Make up your mind.

            “I don’t know about Shiite ideology”. Then you better stop talking about it if you know nothing about it. IS IT THAT HARD?

            Youngling, you proved to be unable to learn even the simplest of things. For almost a month, I tried to teach you to back your words to no avail. That’s the only thing I wanted you to learn, but I can’t be more Catholic than the Pope, if you don’t want to learn, why should I care? I’ve been patient more than I should.

            I say it ONE MORE TIME and will be done with you. You need to be able to back your words, otherwise enjoy your life the way you see fit and please leave me alone.
            If you want to start, start with the ones I asked a few lines above. But if I receive ONE more reply from you like the way you did so far, writing assumptions and accusations without backing, I’ll stop caring and will ignore you. Feel free to do the same.

          • Serious Dude

            They are not assumptions, except if every index about freedom and human rights is wrong. If you think so then fine.
            Israeli Arabs are doing fine, Christians also, I don’t know about Ethiopian Jews or Oriental Jews.
            Islamic countries score the lowest on freedom and human rights. I don’t know if it is Islam or just some people that are fanatics but I say what I see. Western Christian countries have problems with Islamic refugees. Israel has problem with Arab fanatics. Russia has problems in Caucasus. India has problems with Pakistan. Myanmar has problem with Rohingyas. China has problem with Uyghurs.
            If you think that Iranian government is all good then I cannot do something to prove you wrong. However, I answered you on this subject in order for you to see all these commenters and see the anti-Jewish hatred that they are exerting. This is the proof!
            I have also said that Shiite ideology is far better than Wahhabism but you didn’t see that.
            What do I need to learn?

          • Garga

            You still do not post anything to prove you say the truth.
            I’d say you need more research to find out if Israeli Arabs “are doing fine”.
            European countries have a great deal of problems because of their refugee imports without screening. We were reminding them from the beginning that it’ll hurt them. It is known that the most crimes of refugees were done by KNOWN Wahhabi assets, as in almost every case the security forces or police points out.
            You conveniently blame what Wahhabis do on all Muslims, you accept they creat problems for Russia, but at the same time accuse Iran’s government for Wahhabi terror attacks in Baluchistan.
            Myanmar and Rohingya have both problems with Wahhabi terror in that region, nice trying to put the blame on Muslims.

            You said you don’t know Shi’a “ideology” but have the nerve to declare them better than this or worse than that. I see what you do.

            Still, I haven’t receive anything remotely like a document, you just repeat what you already repeated before.

            It doesn’t matter if some commenters hate the Jews, it doesn’t matter if they hate the Iranian government. Anti-Zionism is not equal to Anti-Jew and Anti-IRI is not equal to anti-Shi’a.
            If someone says I hate the Jews’ guts that’s anti-Jew and a bigot, if the same person says I am opposed to Zionism, he is Anti-Zionism, just like many Jews who oppose Zionism. Equating Anti-Zionism and Anti-Semitism is just a pathetic method to silence people against Zionism.

            Tell these people that Anti-Zionism is equal to Anti-Semitism:

            I believe you need to learn to speak using sources, documents, verified videos who PROVE you are telling the truth.

            For the last time, either your next reply contains the real proof or I’m done.

          • Serious Dude

            I have done research. Many years ago, I was pro-Assad and pro-Iran but they are not any better from the opposition. You are against Wahhabism but we will see if Iran will be better or not. I haven’t accused Iranian government on attacks on Baluchistan. I have said that Baluchis are oppressed by the regime. Because Wahhabis are Muslims, Muslims are blamed because of collective responsibility. It does matter because there are many evil people that are making death threats to people on the internet. I have received online threats by atheists because of my Christian beliefs, I have received online threats by leftists because of my right-wing beliefs and now I am getting threats by anti-Zionist fanatics. These anti-Zionist Jews are a minority.

          • Garga

            Still nothing remotely like a proof, just repeating more of the repeated same things.

            I wasted time more than I should. I thank you for your help on the Greek phrases and bid you farewell.

          • Serious Dude

            What kind of proof do you want actually?

          • Gary Sellars

            STFU… snivelling toady

          • RichardD

            Jews lie just like you. If you have such a problem with his posts, then disprove what he’s written and linked to.

        • Daniel Castro

          Well, it is a fact he believed slavs to be largely inferior people, I myself never said anything about master race, and even claiming aryans, which is a failed concept, should alone rule over europe, is absurd.

          • Michael Qiao

            He never considered that the Slavs were inferior, if he did then the SS would never have gotten so much volunteers from countries like Ukraine, Russia, Latvia, Estonia, Hungary, and so on.

          • Daniel Castro

            There are a lot of eastern europeans who consider themselves as germanic.

            Drang nach Osten

          • Michael Qiao

            this doesn’t prove anything

          • Daniel Castro

            It proofs there were people in eastern europe who were not considered slavs, but aryans, and the SS would gladly take them as volunteers.

          • Michael Qiao

            so by that logic, Jews, Blacks, Arabs, Indians are also Germanic because they also gladly took them as volunteers… There are plenty of Slavs in Slavic SS divisions. This still is no evidence of Hitler considering the Slavs inferior

          • Daniel Castro

            In the case of non aryans I would say they just took them as volunteers, not gladly… Anyway, those willing themselves to swear submission to the nazi would be taken as volunteers.

          • Michael Qiao

            Oh no, they were pretty happy and very willing to join expecially in Ukraine. All Slavic nations considered them as liberators. Here’s a fact, in the first months of Hitler’s pre emptive strike known as operation Barbarossa, about 3 million Russian soldiers freely surrendered themselves to the Germans.

          • Daniel Castro

            It probably had something to do with that other crazy psycopath in Moscow…

          • Michael Qiao

            That is mostly the reason, another reason is that he reopened all the churches and cathedrals and removing freemasonry in the East

          • Michael Qiao

            I suggest you watch this https://thegreateststorynevertold.tv

          • Daniel Castro

            I will watch that video you posted, just bear in mind I’m not eager to believe in something just because it is on screen.

          • Michael Qiao

            I recommend you watching this https://thegreateststorynevertold.tv

          • goingbrokes

            All slavic languages belong to the Indo-Aryan language group, so there is no dispute about the slavs, they are aryan. It was known in the 40s already, so it is not logical for Hitler, or anyone else, to consider them as non-aryan.

          • Daniel Castro

            “Around the city, to a depth of thirty to forty kilometres, we shall have a belt of handsome villages connected by the best roads. What exists beyond that will be another world, in which we mean to let the Russians live as they like. It is merely necessary that we should rule them. In the event of a revolution, we shall only have to drop a few bombs on their cities, and the affair will be liquidated. Once a year we shall lead a troop of Kirghizes through the capital of the Reich, in order to strike their imaginations with the size of our monuments. What India was for England, the territories of Russia will be for us. If only I could make the German people understand what this space means for our future! Colonies are a precarious possession, but this ground is safely ours. Europe is not a geographic entity, it’s a racial entity.”

            Stop this nonsense please, Hitler was not Europe’s salvation, he was Europe’s doom.

          • Michael Qiao

            You must be talking about Generaleplan OST here right?

          • Daniel Castro

            A Hitler quote is a Hitler quote.

          • goingbrokes

            Yes, and he is not taking into account the fact that Russia had by that time been under jewish communist rule for twenty years, so at that point the Russians did appear inferior. Even Churchill knew that the Russian revolution was a jewish affair.

          • Daniel Castro

            If people is being opressed you should have mercy on them, not consider them animals.

          • Michael Qiao

            He never treated them like animals though

          • Brother Ma

            Of course They knew it.Either Hitler knew it and kept quiet or he was delusional. Neither hitler,goebbels nor a sizable geoup of german nation look nothing like nordic aryans hitler loved so much.why?
            Because nordic people are only albino subset of aryan people.
            Aryans range from persians to swedes.

          • Icarus Tanović

            Yes they are. That’s a fact.

          • Icarus Tanović

            Argh, shut the fucck up!
            Hungarians slavs?
            Go through elementary school once again.

          • Michael Qiao

            They’re not Germanic either, they’re Magyars

          • Icarus Tanović

            Then, don’t call them Slavs. And took a history lesson. Or two on how things were in Southeastern Europe.

  • Axis of Resistance

    It’s only a secret to the willfully ignorant goyim.

    • Michael Qiao

      these goys are good goys. They will serve great for us g*d chosen

    • TiredOfBsToo

      Not willful… the product of propaganda and censorship and what happens to any people anywhere on the planet when it’s government is gradually taken over by psychopaths. How does it happen? My theory is that it happens very very slowly, as a fast takeover would be extremely noticeable. For Example, corporation x buys corporation y, yet corporation x doesn’t want the consumers of corporation y’s products to realize this, and so continues to label the products with corporation y’s labels.

      • Tudor Miron

        You are right that it happens gradually – some say that it started in ancient Egipt.

  • goingbrokes

    The take-over of US is proceeding as well as the takeover of Russia did a hundred years ago, even when the method is a little different. Slow corporate infiltration takeover, instead of a violent revolution. Result is the same, the jews rule over the goyim, who in short order will become the oppressed.
    Think tanks like the Institute for the Study of War doesn’t study just war as a tool of external policy. Their most important function is to study war and how it can be used to control the domestic cattle.

  • RamboDave

    And here are photos of the Jews in the mainstream media that are driving America’s wars to make the Mid East safe for Israel. Each of these people in the photo below are probably war criminals and traitors to America.
    This is a high resolution photo. Click on it to open in a separate page, then you can zoom way in to actually read the names of these criminals. Right click to save the photo to your computer. Then pass it on to millions of people around the world.
    The next time you see these criminals on T.V., just keep in mind all of the future wars for Israel that they have planned and want Americans to die for.

    • Gary Sellars

      That… is just simply…. disgusting

      • Axis of Resistance

        Also be advised that the US Supreme Court has 3 Jews out of 9 justices in total. Ginsberg, Breyer, and Kagan. Obama attempted to appoint a 4th Jew but failed. Diversity for the goyim except when it’s a position of power. Those are reserved for the Chosen.

        • RichardD

          And they attempt to bribe and coerce goy to do their bidding.

    • RichardD

      Fantastic graphic. The way that it can be magnified is very helpful. You can also right click and open it in a new tab to copy the address.

      • Helen4Yemen


        Fantastic. I have created the images on top on one another instead of side by side, much easier to view. Thanks for these images.

        • RichardD

          Thank You

  • RamboDave

    Yes American Jews are driving America’s wars. Here is the story of how Zionists Jews got America into WWI.

    It will be the hundred year anniversary of the Balfour Declaration next week. Benjamin Freedman was part of the Jewish delegation that was at the table during the Paris peace conference in 1919. He made this audio recording in 1961.(see the link below)

    He explains how British and German Zionists Jews had made a deal with the British in late 1916, that if they could bring the US into WWI to save Britain and France from likely defeat at that time, they
    would later be rewarded with a declaration granting a Jewish homeland in Palestine. After the Zionists accomplished this feat, the British kept their promise. The Declaration came out on November 2nd 1917.

    How did they do it? It didn’t have much to do with the sinking of the Lusitania, which is the common belief. The Zionists used Supreme Court Justice Brandeis, President Wilson’s best friend, as well as a massive propaganda campaign from their Jewish controlled press, to get the US into the war.

    The Germans only found out about this Balfour Declaration at the 1919 Paris conference. This is what led them (especially Adolph Hitler) to turn on the Jews, who up until that time had the good life in Germany.

    Needless to say, WWI would have ended in 2016. The Holocaust would not have happened had this Balfour Declaration not occurred. Hitler never would have come to power. The 80 million people killed in WWII would not have happened. A peace deal with justice for everyone would have occurred in 2016 or 2017, with no need for another war. The Jews brought all of this down on themselves (and everyone else too).

    Here is an excerpt of the audio tape:

    “The Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists
    from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and — I am going
    to be brief because it’s a long story, but I have all the documents to
    prove any statement that I make — they said: “Look here. You can yet
    win this war. You don’t have to give up. You don’t have to accept the
    negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if
    the United States will come in as your ally.”

    The complete speech is also on several other YouTube channels. This is just an excerpt.Here is the link:


    • AlexanderAmproz

      Thanks for your brief summary

      Maybe you will also like these other less fashionable Zionist

      Mass Murders Devils,

      The Dönmeh (Turkish: Dönme) were a group of crypto-Jews in the Ottoman Empire who converted publicly to Islam, but were said to have retained their beliefs. The movement was centred in Salonica.[1] The group originated during and soon after the era of Sabbatai Zevi, a 17th-century Jewish kabbalist who claimed to be the Messiah and eventually converted to Islam in order to escape punishment by the Sultan Mehmed IV. After Zevi’s conversion, a number of Jews followed him into Islam and became the Dönmeh.[2] Since the 20th century, assimilated Dönmeh might have intermarried with other groups and most have assimilated into Turkish society.



      The Dönmeh funded the “Young Turks” on purpose to destroy

      the Ottoman Empire to liberate the Palestine to found “Israel”

      Ataturk was a “Young” Turk leaders who promoted the Armenian Genocide,

      a Taboo subject in Turkey and Israel…


      Basil Zaharoff, the WW1 Devil,

      an other Turk Jews wasn’t a too bad mass murder for money,

      what is interesting, it’s fit perfectly to the today US model

      to run the Militaro-Industrial complex while promoting Wars

      thanks Medias and Corruption in all Countries WW1 involved

      Today France has it also with Marcel Ferdinand Bloch Son,

      said Serge Dassault(Mirage/Rafale builder)

      and “Le Figaro” newspaper owner with B.H.L (Bernard Henri Levy),

      the French No1 Warmonger journalist to sell Rafales to Bomb Civilians…


      The Merchant of Death: Basil Zaharoff

      TAGS BiographiesWar and Foreign PolicyWorld History

      08/24/2007John T. Flynn

      If the Lord God Jehovah had not created Basil Zaharoff, some novelist sooner or later would certainly have got around to the job. Indeed, it is by no means certain that Zaharoff, as we have him, is not the joint product of God and the fiction writers.

      Lieutenant Colonel Walter Guinness, member for Bury St.Edmonds, committed the blunder against history of referring to Zaharoff in the House of Commons in 1921 as the “Mystery Man of Europe.” Having fixed upon him that fascinating label, the figure of Zaharoff became thereafter a costumer’s dummy upon which the news caricaturists of Europe draped whatever garments would vindicate his reputation.

      Mysterious indeed he is and still more mysterious he became at the hands of the sensational news portrait painters. The mystery begins with his birth. A French biographer, Roger Menevee? records that he was born in Moughliou, or Mugla, on the Anatolian coast. But a German, Robert Neumann, asserts that Zaharoff, testifying in a London court as a young man, said he was born in the Tatavla or poor section of Constantinople, and he notes that the Mugla nativity is attested by an affidavit of a Greek priest made forty-two years after the event and was based upon memory.

      It was never known with complete certainty to what country he owed allegiance. He was a Greek, born in Turkey, who lived in Paris. His right to the ribbon of the Grand Cross of the Legion of Honor was questioned in the Chamber of Deputies and M. Clemenceau had to assure the Chamber that “M. Zaharoff is a Frenchman.” But also he was throughout his life the guiding genius of a great British armament concern, acted as a British agent, was a Knight of the Bath, known in England as Sir Basil Zaharoff.

      Journalists said he spoke fluently fourteen languages — which is probably an extravagant exaggeration. They reported how he had confided to a written record the story of his life, filling fifty-eight volumes which he ordered to be burned at his death, while others told how he had himself destroyed the record, two days being consumed in reducing it to ashes in the furnace of his Paris home. Extravagant tales were told of his habits, his amours, his dinners, and the exotic dishes brought fresh by plane from immense distances for his table. But, in fact, the reporters and the historians have produced but little about the personal life and affairs of the man. Searching the extensive but empty records, one fails to discover any documents or letters or speeches or records or meetings or conferences or instances in which the man is actually present. Always one hears that he is somewhere in the background, off in the shadows, pulling the strings, supplying the stratagems and the money.

      Yet it is certain that he remains the most considerable figure in that feverish world of the munitions makers that has had so much advertisement since the Great War. Only a few names take first rank among this dubious company — old Alfred Krupp, the cannon king of Essen, the Schneiders of Creusot, Thomas Vickers, the English gun maker of Sheffield, Skoda, du Pont de Nemours, the American powder king, Colt and Winchester and Remington and Maxim. They were all, as Messrs. Englebrecht and Hanighen have called them, “Merchants of Death.” But the mightiest “merchant” among them, the man who played the largest role in the “merchandising” of munitions, the greatest market maker, was Basil Zaharoff.

      It was his melancholy good fortune to come upon the scene when the world went in for arms on an unprecedented scale and it was he who, more than any other man, developed the international market for arms. He did not invent it, to be sure. Old Alfred Krupp had played off Turkish orders against his native Prussia when Zaharoff was a mere fireman in Tatavla. And long before either of them — centuries before — old Andries Bicker, Burgomaster of Amsterdam, had built and supplied and provisioned and even financed a complete navy for Spain when the Spanish king was waging war upon Holland. He then explained to the outraged Dutch that if Holland had not armed the Spanish enemy, the Danes would have done it and reaped the profit.

      But Zaharoff played a leading, if not the leading, role in that strange world comedy of the arms makers leading the double life of chauvinists and internationalists. They gave us the spectacle of Boers mowing down English regiments with Vickers’ pom-poms, Prussian surgeons picking out of Prussian wounded Austrian shrapnel fired by Krupp’s cannon, French poilus massacred by shot poured out of guns made in Le Creusot, English Tommies killed by weapons produced by Armstrong and Vickers, and American ships sent to the bottom by U-boats built on models supplied by American submarine builders. Zaharoff was the master of what one biographer has called the “principle of incitement,”under which war scares were managed, enemies created for nations,airplanes sold to one nation and antiaircraft guns to her neighbors, submarines to one and destroyers to another. He did what the cigarette people did, what the liquor industry, the beauty industry did — created a demand for his merchandise. The armament industry became a game of international politics, the arms salesman a diplomatic provocateur, the munitions magnates of all nations partners in cartels, combines, consolidations; exchanging plans, secrets, patents. He was the greatest of all the salesmen of death, and, as one commentator has observed, if you would see his monument, look about you at the military graveyards of Europe.



      • AlexanderAmproz

        The Simulacra Democracy



        … a nation in which 87 percent of eighteen- to twenty-four year olds (according to a 2002 National Geographic Society/Roper Poll survey) cannot locate Iran or Iraq on a world map and 11 percent cannot locate the United States (!) is not merely “intellectually sluggish.” It would be more accurate to call it moronic, capable of being fooled into believing anything …”

        — Morris Berman

        I cannot remember U.S. culture ever being quite so compromised by ruling class control. Hollywood turns out one jingoistic and militaristic and racist film and TV show after another. Corporate news is completely controlled by the same forces that run Hollywood. It is the complete capitulation of the liberal class to the interests of the increasingly fascistic U.S. elite. And this didn’t start with Donald Trump. Certainly in its current incarnation it goes back at least to Bill Clinton, and really it goes back to the end of World War Two. The ideological trajectory was formed under the Dulles brothers and military industrial complex — representing U.S. business interests and exhibiting a demand for global hegemony. But once the Soviet Union collapsed, the project was accelerated and intensified.

        Another starting point might well be the 1960 Bay of Pigs fiasco, or the 1961 CIA (and MI6) assassination of Patrice Lumumba. Or Kennedy’s 1962 speech at American University calling for the end of Pax Americana. We know what happened to Kennedy soon after that. Pick any of these incidents. But it was the fall of the U.S.S.R. that signaled to the governing class, the proprietor class, that the last real obstacle to global domination had been removed. In the interim, one finds the Iran/Contra affair, and the invasion of Iraq. The real and the symbolic meaning of the Soviet Union is forgotten today, I think. Its meaning for the developing world, especially.

        The next conscious trial balloon was Clinton’s attack on the former Yugoslavia. A test run for expanding NATO. And it worked. The propaganda machine has never been as successful as it was when it demonized the Serbs and Milosevic. Then came 9/11. And the well honed PR machine spewed an endless barrage of hyper-patriotic rhetoric and disinformation. American exceptionalism was given full credibility. And remember Colin Powell and his cartoon visual teaching aids at the UN? Nobody was going to argue. Certainly not the white liberal class. And Hollywood upped its game in churning out military fantasies. And in just churning out fantasies. A genre that lent itself to obvious neo-colonial messages. By 2007, when Barack Obama announces he will run for President, the master narrative for America was firmly entrenched. The biggest hit from Hollywood in this period is Avatar (2009), a neo-colonial fable that fit seamlessly with Obama’s reconquest of Africa.

        Dan Glazebrook recently wrote:

        The year 2009, two years before Gaddafi’s murder, was a pivotal one for US-African relations. First, because China surpassed the US as the continent’s largest trading partner; and second, because Gaddafi was elected President of the African Union. The significance of both for the decline of US influence on the continent could not be clearer. Whilst Gaddafi was spearheading attempts to unite Africa politically, committing serious amounts of Libyan oil wealth to make this dream a reality, China was quietly smashing the West’s monopoly over export markets and investment finance. Africa no longer had to go cap-in-hand to the IMF for loans, agreeing to whatever self-defeating terms were on offer, but could turn to China – or indeed Libya – for investment. And if the US threatened to cut them off from their markets, China would happily buy up whatever was on offer. Western economic domination of Africa was under threat as never before.

        The US response was to increase base building, upgrade AFRICOM, and then murder Gadaffi. Hollywood hits from this period include The Hurt Locker and The Dark Knight. Meanwhile domestically Obama was giving the OK for militarizing of police departments across the country. On another front….Danny Haiphong wrote…

        What isn’t discussed often enough is how Obama has worked tirelessly to protect and fulfill the interests of the corporate healthcare system. In 2009, he collaborated with the monopoly health insurance industry and its pharmaceutical counterparts to repress the demand for single payer healthcare. The conditions at the time appeared ripe for a single payer system. Popular discontent with Republican Party rule was at its highest point. A relatively organized movement for single payer care was represented by organizations such as Healthcare Now. The Democratic Party possessed a majority in both the House and Senate.

        Obama came to power as Wall Street went into meltdown, 2008. But instead of hope and change we got almost 5 trillion dollars moving to the top 1% of the financial elite. Poverty increased every year under Obama, as did inequality. Social Network came out in 2010 and Wolf of Wall Street in 2013. Both were big hits. The message from Hollywood never changed. And part of that message is that wealth is its own justification and a symbol of virtue. Hollywood, and U.S. liberals just naturally gravitate toward the rich.

        Obama attacked Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, and Yemen. And it is perhaps that last venture that will prove to be his most significant. Arming, training, and coordinating the Saudi aggression (and now that has escalated to boots on the ground) against the helpless Yemen has resulted in the largest humanitarian catastrophe in five decades.

        The U.S. now has all but formally criminalized dissent, especially if that dissent is aimed at Israel.

        None of this is to create exact corollaries between political action and studio product. But rather that the overriding message of Hollywood in both film and TV is to validate U.S. exceptionalism. And to hedge criticism with faint token protest. But its not just Hollywood, its theatre and fiction and all the rest of the arts. The erasure of the working class is the most pronounced truth in American culture today. There are no Clifford Odets (a high school drop out) anymore; they have been replaced by a steady stream of well groomed compliant MFA grads. Mostly from elite and expensive schools. Hemingway and James Baldwin were not college grads, nor was Tennessee Williams, the son of a traveling shoe salesman. Even more recent authors such as Thomas Pynchon were college drop outs (to join the Navy), but the point is that today mass culture is carefully controlled. Dreiser was a college drop out, and Twain was a typesetters apprentice. Others like Faulkner, went to University, but also worked. In Faulkner’s case as a postman. Same profession as Henry Miller and Charles Bukowski. Stephen Crane and Hemingway worked as journalists, when that was an honorable profession.

        The decision makers in mass culture are mostly firmly entrenched in the Democratic Party ethos (witness stuff like House of Cards, Madame Secretary, or Veep). If one only gets one’s news from MSNBC or FOX or CNN then one will take away mostly pure propaganda. Rachel Maddow has a career based on craven parroting of DNC approved talking points and conclusions. Bill Maher, whose show is on HBO, is of late pimping for war. Sunday news talk shows do not invite radical voices, not ever. Michael Parenti isn’t on those shows, nor are Ajamu Baraka or Glen Ford Mike Whitney or Ed Curtin or Dan Glazebrook or Stephen Gowans. No, but there are plenty of retired generals and politicians. This is a media that exerts absolute control of message.

        The loss of the working class, of class diversity, has been a far bigger blow to the health of the culture than anything else. One might argue that culture has always been, in the modern era, a province of the bourgeoisie, and that’s true. But there is still a rather pronounced change that has taken place. But Americans are discouraged from thinking in terms of class. They see individualism and identity. Get me more women directors they cry….which would give us more versions of Zero Dark Thirty, I guess. Gender equality matters, something every single socialist country in history has emphasized. Something Chavez saw fit to write into the Bolivarian constitution on day one. Chavez, who liberal avatar Bernie Sanders dismissed as a “dead communist dictator”. Chavez, who feminist avatar Hillary Clinton worked overtime to oust from power.

        People are shocked…shocked I say…that US soldiers are killed in Niger. Darn that Donald Trump. When it is pointed out that it was Obama who sent troops there in his pivot to Africa, one is met with blank stares. The concern over U.S. soldiers dying is simply mind numbing in its hypocrisy and blinkered exceptionalism. I mean just count the numbers of dead civilians due to U.S. drone strikes from just one year. Pick any year you like.

        Under Obama, the US African Command (AFRICOM) has penetrated every African country but Zimbabwe and Eritrea. AFRICOM has locked African nations into military subservience. In 2014, the US conducted 674 military operations in Africa . According to a recent Freedom of Information Act request by Intercept, the US currently has Special Forces deployed in more than twenty African nations.

        Danny Haiphong

        People are terrified today lest they be called conspiracy theorists. No single pejorative term has exercised such disproportionate power. There is a subterranean subject position associated with this, too. A masculine identity that connects with the presentation of those accepting of the official version of things. It is ‘no nonsense, mature, and sort of tough guy’ pose. Only weak and muddled (feminine you see!) would bother to question official narratives of…well, anything. It is staggering, really, why so few ask why is it OK to assassinate people without due process? Why is it whistleblowers, truth tellers, are being locked away and shunned? Why are there 900 plus US military bases around the world. Why, given the growing poverty in the U.S. do we need an updated nuclear arsenal that will cost trillions? In fact why is the defense budget over 4 billion a day? The liberal educated class seem not to ask such questions. Let alone ask is the U.S. arming takfiri jihadists in Syria? Most of what people call conspiracy is just perfectly reasonable skepticism. Given a history that includes COINTELPRO, Operation Northwoods, Gladio, MKUltra, and Operation AJAX. This is also relevant in terms of the coming war on *fake news*. An idea put forward by Obama and now in enthusiastic Orwellian operation by Facebook, YouTube, and Google. In the U.K. Theresa May proudly announces the government SHOULD control what one can see on the internet. Censorship is pitched as protection.

        And then we come to NATO and Europe. Why does NATO even exist one might ask? I mean the USSR doesn’t exist anymore. Well, the answer has been under construction for a few years now, and that answer is the extraordinary anti Putin propaganda of the U.S. The “Russian Threat” is now an accepted trope in public discourse. Or the anti Iranian disinformation. In fact Iran is far more democratic and less a global threat (actually its NO global threat) than U.S. boon allies Israel and Saudi Arabia. Which brings us back to Yemen. The utter destruction of Yemen, poorest Arab country in the world, and now one with the largest Cholera outbreak in history, posed no threat to ANYONE. Certainly not to the United States. Are we to believe the House of Saud is worth supporting? They behead homosexuals and witches in Saudi Arabia. The leader of KSA is a 32 year old psychopath named Mohammed Bin Salman. Someone please explain the U.S. support for this country?

        Or Venezuela. The U.S. has waged various campaigns against this sovereign nation for over a decade now. A democracy. But a disobedient one. Where is the outcry? When people are going on about Harvey Weinstein, a troglodyte movie producer that literally everyone knew was a serial abuser, I wonder that the women of Venezuela seem not to count. Or of Libya, or Haiti, or Puerto Rico, or hell, the women of Houston right now. Poor women. Ah, but that is class again. Now perhaps the Weinstein affair will yield good results and some form of collective protection and maybe even unionizing will take place to limit the power of rich white men. I doubt it, but maybe. Still, given that the liberal class today applaud the idea of making it OK for women to bomb defenseless villages in Afghanistan or Iraq or Yemen, just like men, and given that most of these horrified by Weinstein were and are solidly behind Hillary Clinton and the DNC, and laud adulation on figures like Maddie Albright, it seems hard to imagine.

        David Rosen:

        Sexual abuse and violence in the U.S. is as old as the country. America’s patriarchal culture long legitimized sexual abuse and violence toward women — and children — whether conducted at the workplace, at home, a nightclub or on a deserted street. During the nation’s earliest days, the custom of sexual abuse and violence was legitimized through the notion of “chastisement.” This was a feature of Anglo-American common law that recognized the husband as master of “his” household and, thus, permitted him to subject “his” wife to corporal punishment, including rape, so long as he did not inflict permanent injury upon her. Sexual abuse was institutionalized in the rape of African and later African-American female slaves. As the legal scholar Adrienne Davis notes, “U.S. slavery compelled enslaved black women to labor in three markets – productive, reproductive, and slavery – crucial to the political economy.”

        One need only note the sexual violence that takes place in the U.S. military (See Kirby Dick’s The Invisible War). But that is not the military you see in this season’s TV shows such as SEAL Team or Valor or The Brave. The current Tom Cruise film American Made is a sort of comedy about Barry Seal who worked as a pilot for the CIA, and with various cartels in South America. Yeah, nothing funnier than squashing a socialist government like in Nicaragua. There is not a single Spanish speaking character who is not either a drunk, a sadist, or just incompetent. This stunningly racist revisionism was called “jaunty and bouncy” by the Hollywood Reporter.

        The liberal class will always side with the status quo. Always. They do not care if the status quo is fascist. And its suits them much more to lay out bromides about male abuse of women, as long as this doesn’t mean having to untangle the complexity of women in unfamiliar non tourist visited nations like Yemen or Libya or Honduras. Just like the fact that U.S. domestic police departments murdered over a thousand black men in 2015. And continue to do so, along with increasing numbers of black women. That’s just not a jaunty bouncy story, I guess. Obama has never been comfortable talking about or to black people. He did manage to scold Colin Kaepernick recently though, about the pain he, Kaepernick, might be causing. The pain of white billionaire sports team owners I guess. The Uncle Tomism of what Glen Ford called black misleadership has never been greater. And that’s another crime we can lay, largely, at the feet of Barack Obama.

        The U.S. House voted unanimously to sanction Iran and North Korea, an absurdity and a crime, and yet one that barely registered on the media Richter scale. What has Iran or North Korea ever done to hurt anyone in the United States? It is Saudi Arabia and Israel that fear a democratic nation like Iran and the influence they wield in the region. Iran is accused of fomenting instability but evidence is never given. Russia is said to control U.S. public opinion, but evidence is never given. The U.S. doesn’t even bother to really try and make claims about Venzeuela, because its just part of inherited wisdom that they are *bad*. Like Castro was bad, like Gadaffi, like Aristide, like anyone exhibiting independence. The world according to media entertainment is made up of bad guys and good guys. Mike Pompeo, head of the CIA, recently stated that his agency would become a “much more vicious agency” in fighting its enemies. Its actually hard to imagine what that might look like given CIA history. More vicious than rendition, drone killing and black site torture? Remember it was the U.S. and its School of the Americas that trained those death squads in Central America. Hollywood makes comedies about this.

        In any event nobody in Hollywood complains. Just as none of the actresses assaulted by Weinstein (and countless others) said anything lest they lose career opportunities. Just as nobody complains about the racism and demonizing of Muslims or Serbs or North Koreans or Russians lest they not get the job. Coercion is silent and a given. It is also absolute. Most actors and directors simply don’t think about it, and most know little beyond what they hear on corporate news or read in the NYTimes. But I understand. People have to eat, have to feed their families. The real problem is that power is ever more consolidated. Distribution of films is monopolized. And for most Americans, foreign policy remains a giant black hole about which they know very little. Tell someone Milosovic was actually a good guy and they will laugh at you (this still happens on the left, too, rather depressingly). Tell them Russia is not threatening the U.S. or Europe, and they will laugh at you. Try to explain what Imperialism is and means, and you get that bored look of irritation. A good rule of thumb is if the U.S. targets a country or leader, then its worth questioning the western generated propagated propaganda in mainstream media about said country or leader (think Syria, Gadaffi, Aristide, Milosovic, Iran, North Korea). The U.S. does not go after countries who welcome western capital.

        One of the things I’ve noticed about Hollywood film is the extraordinary amount of self pity from most characters. Self pity, entitlement, and sarcasm. The people who produce and make film and TV today, by and large, tacitly censor themselves. Some don’t have to, of course. But there is a general group think at work. And it extends to the way characters are written. The problems of affluent white people is the template here. Few examine the wider world, and mostly when they do it is seen as a world of threat and menace. An uncivilized place in need of guidance from the civilized white West (The Lost City of Z comes to mind, which made all the approved anti colonial notes while still creating a colonial narrative anyway.). But it is even more narrow than that. Everything resembles a studio; political discussions, even if they take place in outer space, resemble studio executives discussing opening weekend profits, or Neilson ratings. And since Hollywood itself ever more resembles Wall Street, or some corporate headquarters, that is increasingly what the world looks like. It is a profound loss of imagination. Westerns look and sound the same as melodramas set in Santa Monica or New York. Fantasy worlds resemble corporate headquarters or corporate motivational weekends. It is a world created by writers under thirty, largely, and certainly under forty. These are worlds created by people who themselves know very little of the world. They know even less about having to work for a living. The entire universe of film is absent any class awareness. History is simplified the better to appeal to a wider audience. Everything feels and sounds the same. And it is stultifying. There are films and TV from Europe, even from the U.K. that have merit, have heterogeneous sensibilities, but not from Hollywood. Like White House press conferences, the idea is to stay on message. Black characters sound white (or are given caricature *black* dialect and dialogue), brown characters sound white (or are given caricature barrio dialects), and Muslims sound dangerous and devious. Asians seem lifted from Fu Manchu serials or Charlie Chan. Strange when I hear people make fun of ethnic cliches from the 1940s, because it is really no different today (and check the recent TV incarnation of the venerable Star Trek franchise where the Klingon villains are very dark, live in dark spaceships and utter a guttural invented language all of which suggests something oddly racist and like nothing so much as colonial portraits of savages from darkest Africa).

        Fixation on Trump’s crimes distracts from a system in which crime is a built-in factor. Clinton, Bush, Obama, and Trump. They are only the figureheads that carry water for the system. And the system is the property of the ruling class. People vote as if it crucially matters, and they vote for who they like. Not for policy because mostly they have no idea of policy. Trump is an obvious target, but that’s the problem in a sense. America didn’t become racist and violent overnight. The forces of social unrest have been building for decades. Trump was inevitable. His lack of basic literacy mirrors the nation he nominally heads, and his vulgarity mirrors the vulgarity of America, as does his misogyny and racism. The same advisors are in place and if Hillary had won, those openly fascist thugs applauding Trump would still be committing hate crimes. Has Trump empowered them? To a degree, yes. But an HRC win would likely have provided motivation of a different sort and the same violence would be taking place. You cannot sustain, as a country, this level of inequality. And as more super hurricanes descend on us, as the bio-sphere collapses, none of this may end up mattering. There is something disturbing, actually, about the relentless attacks on Trump. Its like beating up a special needs kid. Where was this hatred and outrage before? I mean Trump’s America, a term I hear a lot, is just America. We have over 2 million people in prison in the U.S. Far and away leaders in the world. Infant mortality however puts the U.S. between 26th and 51st, depending on who is counting. There is no Universal Heath Care, no union protection for workers, no maternity leave, no free education. What is there to feel so special about, exactly? Trump was very popular on his moronic reality TV show. I’m guessing more than few now outraged by this buffoonish reactionary watched that show. I mean it did last fifteen years I believe. Who did they think he was? There is nothing wrong with identifying the crimes of Trump’s administration. But there is something deeply wrong in not recognizing it as a continuation of prevailing policy. Yes, it is worse in many areas. The environment for one. But then again, 47% of the world’s pollution is caused by the military. And the U.S. has a military bigger than the next ten largest militaries in the world. And every president since the first Bush has increased the military budget. The nightmare did not begin with the swearing in of Donald Trump. But nobody likes him. They liked Obama. And that is why he was able to do so much harm. Trump is dangerous not because of what he thinks (he mostly doesn’t) but because of his ignorance and weakness (and fear). And that weakness generated his welcoming hand to the Pentagon. Foreign policy is really in the hands of a man nicknamed ‘Mad Dog’. One cannot blame this catastrophic situation on one man. This is the creation of American history.

        More articles by:JOHN STEPPLING

        John Steppling is an original founding member of the Padua Hills Playwrights Festival, a two-time NEA recipient, Rockefeller Fellow in theatre, and PEN-West winner for playwriting. Plays produced in LA, NYC, SF, Louisville, and at universities across the US, as well in Warsaw, Lodz, Paris, London and Krakow. Taught screenwriting and curated the cinematheque for five years at the Polish National Film School in Lodz, Poland. A collection of plays, Sea of Cortez & Other Plays was published in 1999, and his book on aesthetics, Aesthetic Resistance and Dis-Interest was published this year by Mimesis International.

  • RichardD

    These are the locations of the Jew pedophile rape centers that should be closed and confiscated in the US by the federal government as part of the dejudification of America:

    List of synagogues in the United States

    The Department of Homeland Security should make preparations for the apprehension and incarceration of Mossad, IDF and Jew domestic terrorists planning and preparing conventional and WMD attacks against the US, including tactical and city buster nuclear munitions, as part of their opposition to outlawing their evil cult.

  • Gabriel Hollows

    The holocaust didn’t happen, but it should have.

  • Lazy Gamer

    Jews driving America’s wars is a bit stretched. If America does go to war, it does because it thinks it is in its interests. To ascribe this to one lobby, is just underestimating the rest of the different kinds of lobbies there are. Sure, they’ve got wealthy people, but as long as the Westphalian order still stands, then whatever control they have is flimsy. I am not going to underestimate the self interest of an American president or general. Israel is America’s unsinkable carrier in the ME.

    • Gabriel Hollows

      You do realize that the entire american economy and media apparatus are owned and run by Jews right? Even Shillary said in her emails that the entire Syria shitshow was just to benefit Israel. Look up the Yinon plan. Read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. The US has been Israel’s attack dog since 1913.

    • RichardD

      Look at the media pictures that Rambo Dave has posted on this thread. If that doesn’t explain Jew cult media and other monopolies to you. Then there’s something wrong with your comprehension abilities.

    • Helen4Yemen

      Here is from Ari Shavit – Haaretz – March 4, 2003

      “In the course of the past year, a new belief has
      emerged in the town: the belief in war against
      Iraq. That ardent faith was disseminated by a
      small group of 25 or 30 neoconservatives, almost
      all of them JEWISH, almost all of them intellectuals
      people who are mutual friends and cultivate one
      another and are convinced that political ideas are
      a major driving force of history.”

      Here is a partial list of the neocons:

      Alan Dershowtiz………… Dov Zakheim………… Mark Dubowitz
      Bill Kristol …………………. Eliot Cohen…………… Max Boot
      Charles Krauthammer…. Elliot Abrams………… Meyrav Wurmser
      Bret Stephens……………. Frederick Kagan……. Michael Ledeen
      Daniel Pipes ……………… Henry Kissenger……. Norman Podhoretz
      Danielle Pletka………….. Irving Kristol…………. Paul Wolfowitz
      David Frum……………….. James Schlesinger…. Richard Perle
      David Wurmser…………. John Podhoretz…….. Robert Kagan
      Donald Kagan……………. Joshua Bolten……….. Scooter Libby
      Douglas Feith…………….. Kimberly Kagan…….. Stephen Bryen
      Marc Grossman………….. William Kristol

  • hhabana

    I have to say as an American that the Jews control the media and they are the Goebbels of the US Government. Pat Buchanan, years ago on regular TV when ruining for President, commented that he never realized how powerful the Jewish lobby is. I saw this as a young man and my jaw dropped. I find it disturbing that Trump has his Jewish son-in-law in a advisory position.

  • RichardD

    Anti American Israel first Mossad assets:

    List of Jewish members of the United States Congress – Wikipedia

    These Jew pedophile rape cult members need to be gotten out of government, media, finance and academia, and kept out, as part of the dejudification of America to create a better future for the American people and humanity.

    • AlexanderAmproz

      Don’t worry,
      what happened in Germany,
      will happened in America for the same reasons…

      Small innocent Potatoes paid the hefty price,
      the wealthy went to GB and the US !

      How to avoid it and jail the guilty ?

      NB: Anglo-American Money Owners Organized World War II

      • RichardD

        Americans need to get it right and outlaw and eradicate this evil cult that has done and continues to do so much harm to humanity.

  • RichardD

    Is this the future that the evil Jew cult will bring to American goy, like they’ve done in so many other places, as part of their lust for power, control, domination and the enslavement of humanity:



    • RichardD

      “This site was created to make the European and the wider White population aware of the mass slaughter of their people that took place under the Jewish Bolshevik regime (Soviet Union). This often centres on the second Jewish Bolshevik mass slaughter that occurred during the years 1932 to 1933. Indeed this was a !932-33 Holodomor death charthorrific event and loss of life has been listed as anywhere between 7 million to 7.5 million, although, figures have been as high as 10 Million deaths. Less well publicised is the torture and butchery of 1921-3 implemented by the Jewish protagonist Lenin. It was under Lenin that the most horrific torture took place. Eyes were poked out, tongues cut off, and victims were buried alive. Maxim Gorky “They would open a prisoner’s belly,%22There were Jewish Communist Cheka (Police) who cut open their victim’s stomach, pulled out a length of small intestine, nailed it to a telegraph pole, and with blows or a whip forced the victim in circles around the pole until the whole intestine became unravelled. Later to become known as the Holodomor holocausts due to the mass terror and state torture perpetrated, 16.5 Million Europeans murdered in all 3 Holodomorsaltogether the death toll took upwards of 16.5 million. Jewish Bolshevik grain seizure has been established as the focus of the genocidal famines and ethnic cleansing in Europe of 1921-3, 1932-3 and 1946-7. Also vital to note is that the 1946-7 genocide was contemporary with the Jewish invention of ‘War Crimes’ (the Nuremburg trials). These horrific events are but a microcosm in a Jewish Bolshevik regime that brutally tortured, starved and worked to death anywhere up to 60 million Europeans.”


      • Brother Ma

        I do not doubt that jews were involved in savage barbaric acts yet i do think most of these deaths were due to starvation brought on by war,poor administration and being forced out of trade networks of the west.

        • AlexanderAmproz

          In his last book Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
          put the Gulags “Butchers” and Managers names,
          most of them were “Jews”…

          Solzhenitsyn was immediately banned from the World Wide Medias.

          Two lines at his death in 2008.

          Before his last book he was considered the modern “Fyodor Dostoyevsky”,
          the century Greatest Writer !

          • Brother Ma

            Yes. I do agree he was loved by usa for his anti commie stance until he mentioned the jews role in gulags.

        • RichardD

          The starvation was a deliberate Jew genocide against Europeans. I haven’t seen anything credible to prove otherwise. Do you have proof that it wasn’t deliberate?

          “The Holodomor (Ukrainian: Голодомо́р)[a];[2] derived from морити голодом, “to kill by starvation”),[3][4][5] also known as the Terror-Famine and Famine-Genocide in Ukraine”


  • RichardD
    • gustavo

      There is not way that you can demonstrate that these persons are jews. Yes, this is a good propaganda……

      • RichardD


        “most of the leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews. Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the Bolshevik party’s executive secretary and — as chairman of the Central Executive Committee — head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev (Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), foreign affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Moisei Uritsky.6

        Lenin himself was of mostly Russian and Kalmuck ancestry, but he was also one-quarter Jewish. His maternal grandfather, Israel (Alexander) Blank, was a Ukrainian Jew”


  • RichardD
    • PZIVJ

      You love eradication of all peoples for sure.
      U R A fricking idiot ! ;DDD

      • RichardD

        The Jew pedophile cultists rape 1,000 cult babies every week. Your evil cult should be outlawed.

        “As a result, several groups have been made into recognized criminal organizations. This is not a common designation, but it has occurred on occasion, typically after a cult group has been involved with a criminal enterprise. These cults have generally been involved with activities like murder, abduction, statutory rape, or other serious crimes. Often, they hold an illegal activity to be a primary focus of their religious teachings, making adherence to the group’s beliefs a virtual guarantee of grossly illegal activity directly harming others. ”


      • RichardD
  • Veritas Vincit

    Many do not know that various Jewish organisations/individuals declared war against Germany long before WW2. For example:

    – “The millions of Jews …. are determined to bring the war of annihilation against Germany to its final end.” (Central Blad Voor Israeliten, September 13, 1939)

    – “our Jewish interests demand the complete destruction of Germany.” (Vladimir Jabotinsky, founder of Irgun Zvai Leumi, January, 1934)

    – “Judea Declares War on Germany” (Headline, Daily Express headline, March 24, 1933)

    – “The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. And we are the Trojan horses in the enemy’s fortress. Thousands of Jews living in Europe constitute the principal factor in the destruction of our enemy.” (Chaim Weizmann, President of the World Jewish Congress, Head of the Jewish Agency and later President of Israel, in a Speech on December 3, 1942, in New York).

    – “This declaration called the war against Germany, which was now determined on, a ‘holy war’. This war was to be carried out against Germany to its conclusion, to her destruction”

    – “The World Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years.” – (Rabbi M. Perlzweig, head of the British Section of the World Jewish Congress, Toronto Evening Telegram, February 26, 1940).

    – “Germany Must Perish”, (by Theodore N. Kaufman, Newark, N.J., Argyle press, 1941)

    – “Kaufman’s fervent proposal [Germany Must Perish!, by Theodore N. Kaufman] for the systematic sterilization of the entire German population was given respectful attention in the American press, including reviews in a number of newspapers. A review in the weekly Time magazine, March 24, 1941, called Kaufman’s plan a “sensational idea.” Germany’s propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels, seized with delight on the book. “This Jew [Kaufman] has done a disservice to the enemy,” Goebbels privately commented. “If he had composed the book at my behest he couldn’t have done a better job.” At his direction the German press played up Kaufman’s call for genocide. A front page article about the book in the Berlin daily Der Angriff, July 23, 1941, appeared under headlines that called it a “Diabolical Plan for the Extermination of the German People” and a work of “Old Testament Hatred.” Extracts also appeared, for example, in the nationally-circulated weekly paper Das Reich, August 3, 1941.”, etc………

    Several years after these declarations of war (including total war/ war of annihilation/ extermination of Germans) against Germany were made, atrocities against Jewish populations occurred. Western efforts to conceal this historical context/reality merely means that people will not learn from history. (To clarify, I do not support the atrocities of Nazi Germany).

    But those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it and history is largely repeating:

    – “American neocons remain the dominant foreign policy force in Official Washington, demanding more “regime change” in the Middle East and a new Cold War that could heat up and end all life on the planet” (Are Neocons an Existential Threat?, By Robert Parry, September 15, 2015)

    – “The neoconservatives now have control of Obama’s Russian policy and I think they are pushing us towards World War III,” (NATO War Games Near Russia ‘Pushing Humanity Towards World War III’, SputnikNews, 08/06/2016)
    – “the propaganda machine of the AngloZionist Empire is telling us that ‘Islam is the enemy’ or that ‘Islam is not compatible with western values’…. What the AngloZionists are trying to organize right now is an anti-Muslim lynchmob, their famous ‘clash of civilizations’… make no mistake, things are about to get much, much worse…. there is now a real possibility of a continental war in the Ukraine and even a total intercontinental nuclear war between the USA and Russia is not impossible any more…. ” [Saker] (Open Letter to the Saker Community and all our friends, January 9, 2015)

    As the Israel lobby continues to engineer successive wars against strategic opponents, there is little recognition by this lobby of what is unfolding and likely outcomes. Indeed, in time it is likely the many successive/expanding wars (with preparations for war against the DPRK, Hezbollah, Iran, etc., developing forms of warfare against the Russian Federation and the assessment of various strategic analysts that war against China is in time “almost inevitable”), will in time be recognised as one.

    Note: Recognising atomic warfare was a feature of the previous world war, the logical conclusion (likely to result from escalation rather than calculation) should be self evident. If this outcome in time occurs, it does not translate to human extinction. It would however eclipse all previous wars. Subsequent horrors would follow as would retribution against those deemed responsible (many such as Western bloc political, media, military, intelligence, academic assets/figures, etc., for their role and responsibility in directing events, if they were to survive the initial horror, would only do so to envy the dead). Those who survive in Israel would also likely only do so to envy the dead as the survivors in neighbouring nations would seek retribution. (Muslims take the teachings of the Quran very seriously. In this context it is interesting that Islamic prophecy refers to such an event. As the Israelis seek to increasingly ‘Judaise’ regional Islamic sites, a process that includes an intention to Judaise the al-Aqsa Mosque, the Israelis should pray Islamic prophecy is not fulfilled). But they have been warned:

    – Hassan Nasrallah calls on Jews to flee Israel: Zionism is our common enemy, Saker/Almanar, October 04, 2017

    In the meantime, the Israel lobby will foolishly agitate for other wars believing themselves to be protected by their allies. But the logical conclusion of unfolding developments will likely show such beliefs were erroneous and leave them vulnerable to the neighbouring nations they have acted with hostility towards.

    Time will reveal what will occur.

    • RichardD

      The Jews who rape 1,000 babies every week, infect them with venereal disease, brain damage and murder them, should be the last ones to talk about antisemitism.

  • gustavo

    WOW and WOW what astonishing discovery. It is like waking up during 70 years, and in your 71 birth day you wake up and realized we have a Sun lighting up the days.

  • RamboDave

    Even the Jews themselves admit that they control the media. They use this position of trust to start wars to take out Israel’s enemy’s. Remember the 4,500 American soldiers that died during the Iraq war !
    Read this article written by a Jew.
    “Jews DO control the media” ….. By Elad Nehorai


  • RichardD

    “For the second time this year, Russian authorities have ordered out of the country a foreign Chabad rabbi …

    In its ruling against Ari Edelkopf, the Krasnodar Court of Appeals accepted the determination of a Sochi tribunal that Edelkopf, who had been working as Chabad’s emissary to the city, was a threat to national security.”


  • RichardD

    These are the locations of the Jew pedophile cult rape centers that should be closed and confiscated in the US by the federal government as part of the dejudification of America:

    List of synagogues in the United States

    This is what needs to be done in the US to outlaw the evil Jew baby raping cult. Police raiding a cult compound to shut it down: